How to know that given a simple graph $G$ that a vertex $v$ if connected, then $G - v$ is also connected.
$begingroup$
I'm trying to understand the answer to this question:
If $G$ is simple with diameter two and maximum degree $|V(G)| - 2$, then $|E(G)| geq 2|V(G)| - 4$
The person that answered claimed that if $deg(v)=n-2$ then $G-v$ is connected, but I just don't understand that part (highlighted below):
"It is easy to see that $G−v$ is a connected graph. (There is a vertex $u$ of $G−v$ which is not adjacent to $v$; every other vertex of $G−v$ is connected to $u$ by a path in $G$ of length at most $2$; since there is no edge $uv$, that path must be contained in $G−v$.)..."
graph-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to understand the answer to this question:
If $G$ is simple with diameter two and maximum degree $|V(G)| - 2$, then $|E(G)| geq 2|V(G)| - 4$
The person that answered claimed that if $deg(v)=n-2$ then $G-v$ is connected, but I just don't understand that part (highlighted below):
"It is easy to see that $G−v$ is a connected graph. (There is a vertex $u$ of $G−v$ which is not adjacent to $v$; every other vertex of $G−v$ is connected to $u$ by a path in $G$ of length at most $2$; since there is no edge $uv$, that path must be contained in $G−v$.)..."
graph-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
the diameter characteristic is on G. If I eliminate v on G, does the new graph G still have the same characteristic? that is what I trying to understand. How did he know that "every other vertex of G−v is connected to u by a path in G of length at most 2"? because the diam is the max distance.
$endgroup$
– John Hernandez
Jan 17 at 13:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to understand the answer to this question:
If $G$ is simple with diameter two and maximum degree $|V(G)| - 2$, then $|E(G)| geq 2|V(G)| - 4$
The person that answered claimed that if $deg(v)=n-2$ then $G-v$ is connected, but I just don't understand that part (highlighted below):
"It is easy to see that $G−v$ is a connected graph. (There is a vertex $u$ of $G−v$ which is not adjacent to $v$; every other vertex of $G−v$ is connected to $u$ by a path in $G$ of length at most $2$; since there is no edge $uv$, that path must be contained in $G−v$.)..."
graph-theory
$endgroup$
I'm trying to understand the answer to this question:
If $G$ is simple with diameter two and maximum degree $|V(G)| - 2$, then $|E(G)| geq 2|V(G)| - 4$
The person that answered claimed that if $deg(v)=n-2$ then $G-v$ is connected, but I just don't understand that part (highlighted below):
"It is easy to see that $G−v$ is a connected graph. (There is a vertex $u$ of $G−v$ which is not adjacent to $v$; every other vertex of $G−v$ is connected to $u$ by a path in $G$ of length at most $2$; since there is no edge $uv$, that path must be contained in $G−v$.)..."
graph-theory
graph-theory
edited Jan 17 at 13:30
idriskameni
749321
749321
asked Jan 17 at 13:20
John HernandezJohn Hernandez
205
205
$begingroup$
the diameter characteristic is on G. If I eliminate v on G, does the new graph G still have the same characteristic? that is what I trying to understand. How did he know that "every other vertex of G−v is connected to u by a path in G of length at most 2"? because the diam is the max distance.
$endgroup$
– John Hernandez
Jan 17 at 13:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
the diameter characteristic is on G. If I eliminate v on G, does the new graph G still have the same characteristic? that is what I trying to understand. How did he know that "every other vertex of G−v is connected to u by a path in G of length at most 2"? because the diam is the max distance.
$endgroup$
– John Hernandez
Jan 17 at 13:25
$begingroup$
the diameter characteristic is on G. If I eliminate v on G, does the new graph G still have the same characteristic? that is what I trying to understand. How did he know that "every other vertex of G−v is connected to u by a path in G of length at most 2"? because the diam is the max distance.
$endgroup$
– John Hernandez
Jan 17 at 13:25
$begingroup$
the diameter characteristic is on G. If I eliminate v on G, does the new graph G still have the same characteristic? that is what I trying to understand. How did he know that "every other vertex of G−v is connected to u by a path in G of length at most 2"? because the diam is the max distance.
$endgroup$
– John Hernandez
Jan 17 at 13:25
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $G$ with $diam(G)=2$ and max degree $Delta(G)=n-2$. Then let $v$ a vertex such that $d(v)=n-2$.
There exist a unique $u$ such that $v$ and $u$ are not connected, $v nsim u$.
Now, for all $win V(G-{v})$, we know that in $G$, the distance between $w$ and $u$ is at most 2. But as $u$ is not connected to $v$, the 2-edges-path from $w$ and $u$ cannot pass through $v$. Therefore the path from $u$ to $w$ exists also in $G-v$. This is true for any $wneq v$, therefore $G-v$ is connected.
Edit
Even more : you don't need $d(v)=n-2$, you only need $d(v)leq n-2$ to get at least one vertice $u$ satisfying the condition. Therefore as long as the maximum degree $Delta(G)$ is at most $n-2$ (which is the case here), then for any $v$ , $G-v$ is connected, and therefore $G$ is 2-connected.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076963%2fhow-to-know-that-given-a-simple-graph-g-that-a-vertex-v-if-connected-then%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $G$ with $diam(G)=2$ and max degree $Delta(G)=n-2$. Then let $v$ a vertex such that $d(v)=n-2$.
There exist a unique $u$ such that $v$ and $u$ are not connected, $v nsim u$.
Now, for all $win V(G-{v})$, we know that in $G$, the distance between $w$ and $u$ is at most 2. But as $u$ is not connected to $v$, the 2-edges-path from $w$ and $u$ cannot pass through $v$. Therefore the path from $u$ to $w$ exists also in $G-v$. This is true for any $wneq v$, therefore $G-v$ is connected.
Edit
Even more : you don't need $d(v)=n-2$, you only need $d(v)leq n-2$ to get at least one vertice $u$ satisfying the condition. Therefore as long as the maximum degree $Delta(G)$ is at most $n-2$ (which is the case here), then for any $v$ , $G-v$ is connected, and therefore $G$ is 2-connected.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ with $diam(G)=2$ and max degree $Delta(G)=n-2$. Then let $v$ a vertex such that $d(v)=n-2$.
There exist a unique $u$ such that $v$ and $u$ are not connected, $v nsim u$.
Now, for all $win V(G-{v})$, we know that in $G$, the distance between $w$ and $u$ is at most 2. But as $u$ is not connected to $v$, the 2-edges-path from $w$ and $u$ cannot pass through $v$. Therefore the path from $u$ to $w$ exists also in $G-v$. This is true for any $wneq v$, therefore $G-v$ is connected.
Edit
Even more : you don't need $d(v)=n-2$, you only need $d(v)leq n-2$ to get at least one vertice $u$ satisfying the condition. Therefore as long as the maximum degree $Delta(G)$ is at most $n-2$ (which is the case here), then for any $v$ , $G-v$ is connected, and therefore $G$ is 2-connected.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ with $diam(G)=2$ and max degree $Delta(G)=n-2$. Then let $v$ a vertex such that $d(v)=n-2$.
There exist a unique $u$ such that $v$ and $u$ are not connected, $v nsim u$.
Now, for all $win V(G-{v})$, we know that in $G$, the distance between $w$ and $u$ is at most 2. But as $u$ is not connected to $v$, the 2-edges-path from $w$ and $u$ cannot pass through $v$. Therefore the path from $u$ to $w$ exists also in $G-v$. This is true for any $wneq v$, therefore $G-v$ is connected.
Edit
Even more : you don't need $d(v)=n-2$, you only need $d(v)leq n-2$ to get at least one vertice $u$ satisfying the condition. Therefore as long as the maximum degree $Delta(G)$ is at most $n-2$ (which is the case here), then for any $v$ , $G-v$ is connected, and therefore $G$ is 2-connected.
$endgroup$
Let $G$ with $diam(G)=2$ and max degree $Delta(G)=n-2$. Then let $v$ a vertex such that $d(v)=n-2$.
There exist a unique $u$ such that $v$ and $u$ are not connected, $v nsim u$.
Now, for all $win V(G-{v})$, we know that in $G$, the distance between $w$ and $u$ is at most 2. But as $u$ is not connected to $v$, the 2-edges-path from $w$ and $u$ cannot pass through $v$. Therefore the path from $u$ to $w$ exists also in $G-v$. This is true for any $wneq v$, therefore $G-v$ is connected.
Edit
Even more : you don't need $d(v)=n-2$, you only need $d(v)leq n-2$ to get at least one vertice $u$ satisfying the condition. Therefore as long as the maximum degree $Delta(G)$ is at most $n-2$ (which is the case here), then for any $v$ , $G-v$ is connected, and therefore $G$ is 2-connected.
edited Jan 17 at 13:55
answered Jan 17 at 13:29
Thomas LesgourguesThomas Lesgourgues
1,401220
1,401220
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076963%2fhow-to-know-that-given-a-simple-graph-g-that-a-vertex-v-if-connected-then%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
the diameter characteristic is on G. If I eliminate v on G, does the new graph G still have the same characteristic? that is what I trying to understand. How did he know that "every other vertex of G−v is connected to u by a path in G of length at most 2"? because the diam is the max distance.
$endgroup$
– John Hernandez
Jan 17 at 13:25