How to know that given a simple graph $G$ that a vertex $v$ if connected, then $G - v$ is also connected.












0












$begingroup$


I'm trying to understand the answer to this question:



If $G$ is simple with diameter two and maximum degree $|V(G)| - 2$, then $|E(G)| geq 2|V(G)| - 4$



The person that answered claimed that if $deg(v)=n-2$ then $G-v$ is connected, but I just don't understand that part (highlighted below):



"It is easy to see that $G−v$ is a connected graph. (There is a vertex $u$ of $G−v$ which is not adjacent to $v$; every other vertex of $G−v$ is connected to $u$ by a path in $G$ of length at most $2$; since there is no edge $uv$, that path must be contained in $G−v$.)..."










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    the diameter characteristic is on G. If I eliminate v on G, does the new graph G still have the same characteristic? that is what I trying to understand. How did he know that "every other vertex of G−v is connected to u by a path in G of length at most 2"? because the diam is the max distance.
    $endgroup$
    – John Hernandez
    Jan 17 at 13:25
















0












$begingroup$


I'm trying to understand the answer to this question:



If $G$ is simple with diameter two and maximum degree $|V(G)| - 2$, then $|E(G)| geq 2|V(G)| - 4$



The person that answered claimed that if $deg(v)=n-2$ then $G-v$ is connected, but I just don't understand that part (highlighted below):



"It is easy to see that $G−v$ is a connected graph. (There is a vertex $u$ of $G−v$ which is not adjacent to $v$; every other vertex of $G−v$ is connected to $u$ by a path in $G$ of length at most $2$; since there is no edge $uv$, that path must be contained in $G−v$.)..."










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    the diameter characteristic is on G. If I eliminate v on G, does the new graph G still have the same characteristic? that is what I trying to understand. How did he know that "every other vertex of G−v is connected to u by a path in G of length at most 2"? because the diam is the max distance.
    $endgroup$
    – John Hernandez
    Jan 17 at 13:25














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm trying to understand the answer to this question:



If $G$ is simple with diameter two and maximum degree $|V(G)| - 2$, then $|E(G)| geq 2|V(G)| - 4$



The person that answered claimed that if $deg(v)=n-2$ then $G-v$ is connected, but I just don't understand that part (highlighted below):



"It is easy to see that $G−v$ is a connected graph. (There is a vertex $u$ of $G−v$ which is not adjacent to $v$; every other vertex of $G−v$ is connected to $u$ by a path in $G$ of length at most $2$; since there is no edge $uv$, that path must be contained in $G−v$.)..."










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm trying to understand the answer to this question:



If $G$ is simple with diameter two and maximum degree $|V(G)| - 2$, then $|E(G)| geq 2|V(G)| - 4$



The person that answered claimed that if $deg(v)=n-2$ then $G-v$ is connected, but I just don't understand that part (highlighted below):



"It is easy to see that $G−v$ is a connected graph. (There is a vertex $u$ of $G−v$ which is not adjacent to $v$; every other vertex of $G−v$ is connected to $u$ by a path in $G$ of length at most $2$; since there is no edge $uv$, that path must be contained in $G−v$.)..."







graph-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 17 at 13:30









idriskameni

749321




749321










asked Jan 17 at 13:20









John HernandezJohn Hernandez

205




205












  • $begingroup$
    the diameter characteristic is on G. If I eliminate v on G, does the new graph G still have the same characteristic? that is what I trying to understand. How did he know that "every other vertex of G−v is connected to u by a path in G of length at most 2"? because the diam is the max distance.
    $endgroup$
    – John Hernandez
    Jan 17 at 13:25


















  • $begingroup$
    the diameter characteristic is on G. If I eliminate v on G, does the new graph G still have the same characteristic? that is what I trying to understand. How did he know that "every other vertex of G−v is connected to u by a path in G of length at most 2"? because the diam is the max distance.
    $endgroup$
    – John Hernandez
    Jan 17 at 13:25
















$begingroup$
the diameter characteristic is on G. If I eliminate v on G, does the new graph G still have the same characteristic? that is what I trying to understand. How did he know that "every other vertex of G−v is connected to u by a path in G of length at most 2"? because the diam is the max distance.
$endgroup$
– John Hernandez
Jan 17 at 13:25




$begingroup$
the diameter characteristic is on G. If I eliminate v on G, does the new graph G still have the same characteristic? that is what I trying to understand. How did he know that "every other vertex of G−v is connected to u by a path in G of length at most 2"? because the diam is the max distance.
$endgroup$
– John Hernandez
Jan 17 at 13:25










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Let $G$ with $diam(G)=2$ and max degree $Delta(G)=n-2$. Then let $v$ a vertex such that $d(v)=n-2$.



There exist a unique $u$ such that $v$ and $u$ are not connected, $v nsim u$.



Now, for all $win V(G-{v})$, we know that in $G$, the distance between $w$ and $u$ is at most 2. But as $u$ is not connected to $v$, the 2-edges-path from $w$ and $u$ cannot pass through $v$. Therefore the path from $u$ to $w$ exists also in $G-v$. This is true for any $wneq v$, therefore $G-v$ is connected.



Edit
Even more : you don't need $d(v)=n-2$, you only need $d(v)leq n-2$ to get at least one vertice $u$ satisfying the condition. Therefore as long as the maximum degree $Delta(G)$ is at most $n-2$ (which is the case here), then for any $v$ , $G-v$ is connected, and therefore $G$ is 2-connected.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076963%2fhow-to-know-that-given-a-simple-graph-g-that-a-vertex-v-if-connected-then%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Let $G$ with $diam(G)=2$ and max degree $Delta(G)=n-2$. Then let $v$ a vertex such that $d(v)=n-2$.



    There exist a unique $u$ such that $v$ and $u$ are not connected, $v nsim u$.



    Now, for all $win V(G-{v})$, we know that in $G$, the distance between $w$ and $u$ is at most 2. But as $u$ is not connected to $v$, the 2-edges-path from $w$ and $u$ cannot pass through $v$. Therefore the path from $u$ to $w$ exists also in $G-v$. This is true for any $wneq v$, therefore $G-v$ is connected.



    Edit
    Even more : you don't need $d(v)=n-2$, you only need $d(v)leq n-2$ to get at least one vertice $u$ satisfying the condition. Therefore as long as the maximum degree $Delta(G)$ is at most $n-2$ (which is the case here), then for any $v$ , $G-v$ is connected, and therefore $G$ is 2-connected.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Let $G$ with $diam(G)=2$ and max degree $Delta(G)=n-2$. Then let $v$ a vertex such that $d(v)=n-2$.



      There exist a unique $u$ such that $v$ and $u$ are not connected, $v nsim u$.



      Now, for all $win V(G-{v})$, we know that in $G$, the distance between $w$ and $u$ is at most 2. But as $u$ is not connected to $v$, the 2-edges-path from $w$ and $u$ cannot pass through $v$. Therefore the path from $u$ to $w$ exists also in $G-v$. This is true for any $wneq v$, therefore $G-v$ is connected.



      Edit
      Even more : you don't need $d(v)=n-2$, you only need $d(v)leq n-2$ to get at least one vertice $u$ satisfying the condition. Therefore as long as the maximum degree $Delta(G)$ is at most $n-2$ (which is the case here), then for any $v$ , $G-v$ is connected, and therefore $G$ is 2-connected.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Let $G$ with $diam(G)=2$ and max degree $Delta(G)=n-2$. Then let $v$ a vertex such that $d(v)=n-2$.



        There exist a unique $u$ such that $v$ and $u$ are not connected, $v nsim u$.



        Now, for all $win V(G-{v})$, we know that in $G$, the distance between $w$ and $u$ is at most 2. But as $u$ is not connected to $v$, the 2-edges-path from $w$ and $u$ cannot pass through $v$. Therefore the path from $u$ to $w$ exists also in $G-v$. This is true for any $wneq v$, therefore $G-v$ is connected.



        Edit
        Even more : you don't need $d(v)=n-2$, you only need $d(v)leq n-2$ to get at least one vertice $u$ satisfying the condition. Therefore as long as the maximum degree $Delta(G)$ is at most $n-2$ (which is the case here), then for any $v$ , $G-v$ is connected, and therefore $G$ is 2-connected.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Let $G$ with $diam(G)=2$ and max degree $Delta(G)=n-2$. Then let $v$ a vertex such that $d(v)=n-2$.



        There exist a unique $u$ such that $v$ and $u$ are not connected, $v nsim u$.



        Now, for all $win V(G-{v})$, we know that in $G$, the distance between $w$ and $u$ is at most 2. But as $u$ is not connected to $v$, the 2-edges-path from $w$ and $u$ cannot pass through $v$. Therefore the path from $u$ to $w$ exists also in $G-v$. This is true for any $wneq v$, therefore $G-v$ is connected.



        Edit
        Even more : you don't need $d(v)=n-2$, you only need $d(v)leq n-2$ to get at least one vertice $u$ satisfying the condition. Therefore as long as the maximum degree $Delta(G)$ is at most $n-2$ (which is the case here), then for any $v$ , $G-v$ is connected, and therefore $G$ is 2-connected.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 17 at 13:55

























        answered Jan 17 at 13:29









        Thomas LesgourguesThomas Lesgourgues

        1,401220




        1,401220






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076963%2fhow-to-know-that-given-a-simple-graph-g-that-a-vertex-v-if-connected-then%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg