Nonzero $f in C([0, 1])$ for which $int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n$
$begingroup$
As the title says, I'm wondering if there is a continuous function such that $f$ is nonzero on $[0, 1]$, and for which $int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n geq 1$. I am trying to solve a problem proving that if (on $C([0, 1])$) $int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n geq 0$, then $f$ must be identically zero. I presume then we do require the $n=0$ case to hold too, otherwise it wouldn't be part of the statement. Is there ay function which is not identically zero which satisfies $int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n geq 1$?
The statement I am attempting to prove is homework, but this is just idle curiosity (though I will tag it as homework anyway since it is related). Thank you!
real-analysis analysis integration
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
As the title says, I'm wondering if there is a continuous function such that $f$ is nonzero on $[0, 1]$, and for which $int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n geq 1$. I am trying to solve a problem proving that if (on $C([0, 1])$) $int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n geq 0$, then $f$ must be identically zero. I presume then we do require the $n=0$ case to hold too, otherwise it wouldn't be part of the statement. Is there ay function which is not identically zero which satisfies $int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n geq 1$?
The statement I am attempting to prove is homework, but this is just idle curiosity (though I will tag it as homework anyway since it is related). Thank you!
real-analysis analysis integration
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
There are many counterexamples to both your claims. For example, the function $f$ with $f(0)=1$ and $f(x)=0$ for $x neq 0$. You'll need some additional assumption on $f$ to make them true.
$endgroup$
– Chris Eagle
Jan 8 '11 at 22:04
1
$begingroup$
@Chris: I think this is an exercise in Rudin or similar, and I think f is supposed to be continuous.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 8 '11 at 22:08
7
$begingroup$
Just apply your homework problem to $xf(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Zarrax
Jan 8 '11 at 22:13
1
$begingroup$
This maybe related.
$endgroup$
– timur
Jan 9 '11 at 4:14
2
$begingroup$
As an aside, the answer is yes if the interval is $(0,infty)$ instead of $(0,1)$. For example the "Stieltjes ghost function" $f(x) = exp(-x^{1/4}) sin x^{1/4}$ satisfies $int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 0$ for all integers $n ge 0$.
$endgroup$
– Hans Lundmark
Jan 9 '11 at 10:18
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
As the title says, I'm wondering if there is a continuous function such that $f$ is nonzero on $[0, 1]$, and for which $int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n geq 1$. I am trying to solve a problem proving that if (on $C([0, 1])$) $int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n geq 0$, then $f$ must be identically zero. I presume then we do require the $n=0$ case to hold too, otherwise it wouldn't be part of the statement. Is there ay function which is not identically zero which satisfies $int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n geq 1$?
The statement I am attempting to prove is homework, but this is just idle curiosity (though I will tag it as homework anyway since it is related). Thank you!
real-analysis analysis integration
$endgroup$
As the title says, I'm wondering if there is a continuous function such that $f$ is nonzero on $[0, 1]$, and for which $int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n geq 1$. I am trying to solve a problem proving that if (on $C([0, 1])$) $int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n geq 0$, then $f$ must be identically zero. I presume then we do require the $n=0$ case to hold too, otherwise it wouldn't be part of the statement. Is there ay function which is not identically zero which satisfies $int_0^1 f(x)x^n dx = 0$ for all $n geq 1$?
The statement I am attempting to prove is homework, but this is just idle curiosity (though I will tag it as homework anyway since it is related). Thank you!
real-analysis analysis integration
real-analysis analysis integration
edited Dec 20 '11 at 14:00
Srivatsan
21k371126
21k371126
asked Jan 8 '11 at 21:56
SpyamSpyam
1,63221426
1,63221426
1
$begingroup$
There are many counterexamples to both your claims. For example, the function $f$ with $f(0)=1$ and $f(x)=0$ for $x neq 0$. You'll need some additional assumption on $f$ to make them true.
$endgroup$
– Chris Eagle
Jan 8 '11 at 22:04
1
$begingroup$
@Chris: I think this is an exercise in Rudin or similar, and I think f is supposed to be continuous.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 8 '11 at 22:08
7
$begingroup$
Just apply your homework problem to $xf(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Zarrax
Jan 8 '11 at 22:13
1
$begingroup$
This maybe related.
$endgroup$
– timur
Jan 9 '11 at 4:14
2
$begingroup$
As an aside, the answer is yes if the interval is $(0,infty)$ instead of $(0,1)$. For example the "Stieltjes ghost function" $f(x) = exp(-x^{1/4}) sin x^{1/4}$ satisfies $int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 0$ for all integers $n ge 0$.
$endgroup$
– Hans Lundmark
Jan 9 '11 at 10:18
|
show 4 more comments
1
$begingroup$
There are many counterexamples to both your claims. For example, the function $f$ with $f(0)=1$ and $f(x)=0$ for $x neq 0$. You'll need some additional assumption on $f$ to make them true.
$endgroup$
– Chris Eagle
Jan 8 '11 at 22:04
1
$begingroup$
@Chris: I think this is an exercise in Rudin or similar, and I think f is supposed to be continuous.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 8 '11 at 22:08
7
$begingroup$
Just apply your homework problem to $xf(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Zarrax
Jan 8 '11 at 22:13
1
$begingroup$
This maybe related.
$endgroup$
– timur
Jan 9 '11 at 4:14
2
$begingroup$
As an aside, the answer is yes if the interval is $(0,infty)$ instead of $(0,1)$. For example the "Stieltjes ghost function" $f(x) = exp(-x^{1/4}) sin x^{1/4}$ satisfies $int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 0$ for all integers $n ge 0$.
$endgroup$
– Hans Lundmark
Jan 9 '11 at 10:18
1
1
$begingroup$
There are many counterexamples to both your claims. For example, the function $f$ with $f(0)=1$ and $f(x)=0$ for $x neq 0$. You'll need some additional assumption on $f$ to make them true.
$endgroup$
– Chris Eagle
Jan 8 '11 at 22:04
$begingroup$
There are many counterexamples to both your claims. For example, the function $f$ with $f(0)=1$ and $f(x)=0$ for $x neq 0$. You'll need some additional assumption on $f$ to make them true.
$endgroup$
– Chris Eagle
Jan 8 '11 at 22:04
1
1
$begingroup$
@Chris: I think this is an exercise in Rudin or similar, and I think f is supposed to be continuous.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 8 '11 at 22:08
$begingroup$
@Chris: I think this is an exercise in Rudin or similar, and I think f is supposed to be continuous.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 8 '11 at 22:08
7
7
$begingroup$
Just apply your homework problem to $xf(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Zarrax
Jan 8 '11 at 22:13
$begingroup$
Just apply your homework problem to $xf(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Zarrax
Jan 8 '11 at 22:13
1
1
$begingroup$
This maybe related.
$endgroup$
– timur
Jan 9 '11 at 4:14
$begingroup$
This maybe related.
$endgroup$
– timur
Jan 9 '11 at 4:14
2
2
$begingroup$
As an aside, the answer is yes if the interval is $(0,infty)$ instead of $(0,1)$. For example the "Stieltjes ghost function" $f(x) = exp(-x^{1/4}) sin x^{1/4}$ satisfies $int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 0$ for all integers $n ge 0$.
$endgroup$
– Hans Lundmark
Jan 9 '11 at 10:18
$begingroup$
As an aside, the answer is yes if the interval is $(0,infty)$ instead of $(0,1)$. For example the "Stieltjes ghost function" $f(x) = exp(-x^{1/4}) sin x^{1/4}$ satisfies $int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 0$ for all integers $n ge 0$.
$endgroup$
– Hans Lundmark
Jan 9 '11 at 10:18
|
show 4 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
(I am turning this into Community wiki, since the original version made an obvious mistake).
The result follows, for example, from the Stone-Weierstrass theorem, once one justifies that the limit of some integrals is the integral of the limit, which can be done (overkill) using Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem or (more easily) using simple estimates from the fact that $f$ is bounded, since it is continuous.
Below I give full details, which you should probably not read until after your homework is due, since this also solves your homework.
Spoilers:
There is a sequence of polynomials $p_n(x)$ that converges uniformly to $xf(x)$ on ${}[0,1]$. We have $int_0^1xf(x)p_n(x)dx=0$ for all $n$, by assumption, since $xp_n(x)$ is a sum of monomials the integral of whose integral with $f$ is 0. Now take the limit as $ntoinfty$ to conclude that $int_0^1x(f(x))^2dx=0$.
This gives us that $f=0$ because if $f(x_0)ne 0$, continuity ensures a positive $epsilon>0$ and an interval $(a,b)$ with $a>0$ such that $|f(x)|geepsilon$ for all $xin(a,b)$. But then $int_0^1xf(x)^2dxge laepsilon^2>0$, where $l=b-a$ is the length of the interval.
To see that the limit of the integrals is 0 without using dominated convergence, let $Mge|f(x)|$ for all $xin[0,1]$. The, for any $delta>0$, if $n$ is large enough, we have $$int_0^1f(x)xp_n(x)dx=int_0^1ftimes(p-xf+xf)dx=int_0^1xf(x)^2dx+int_0^1ftimes(p-xf)dx,$$ and the second integral is bounded by $int_0^1|f||p-xf|dxle M(delta/M)=delta$.
In fact, even this is approach is an overkill. (For example, Müntz's theorem gives a more general fact, as already mentioned in another answer.)
(Apologies for the original mistake.)
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The Stone-Weierstrass theorem doesn't (directly) apply to the question the OP asked, since the subalgebra generated by {x^n | n > 0} doesn't contain a constant function. But Zarrax's comment takes care of this.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 8 '11 at 22:28
$begingroup$
I would say Muntz theorem is overkill! (and not your current answer).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 9 '11 at 0:57
$begingroup$
:-) I meant overkill in the sense that we are using hypothesis that are way too strong for the task at hand. (It would be nice to try to weaken them significantly.)
$endgroup$
– Andrés E. Caicedo
Jan 9 '11 at 2:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As an aside, the answer is yes if the interval is $(0,infty)$ instead of $(0,1)$.
For example the "Stieltjes ghost function"
$f(x) = exp(-x^{1/4}) sin x^{1/4}$ satisfies
$int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 0$
for all integers $n ge 0$.
Stieltjes gave this as an example of a case where the
moment problem
does not have a unique solution.
It appears in Section 55 of his famous paper "Recherches sur les fractions continues" from 1894;
see p. 506 in
Œuvres Complètes, Vol. II.
To compute the moments, use the substitution $x=u^4$ to write
$I_n = int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 4 int_0^{infty} e^{-u} sin(u) u^{4n+3} du$;
then integrate by parts four times (differentiating the power of $u$, and integrating the rest) to show that $I_n$ is proportional to $I_{n-1}$,
and finally check that $I_0=0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is no. Actually I believe the following is a theorem whose name totally escapes me at the moment: assume that $f$ is continuous and let $a_n$ be a sequence of increasing positive integers such that $int_0^1 f(x) x^{a_n} , dx = 0$ for $n ge 1$. If $sum frac{1}{a_n}$ diverges, then $f$ is identically zero! (Edit: this is a corollary of the Müntz–Szász theorem - thanks, Moron!)
In other words, the problem isn't phrased the way it is because stronger statements are false; the stronger versions are just harder to prove.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Corollary of Muntz theorem, I believe.
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:12
$begingroup$
+1, but that is actually not needed :-) (see Zarrax's comment).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:22
6
$begingroup$
+1, interesting theorem. As a side note, this is one of those posts where now that Moron has changed his name, the way it reads is rather funny.
$endgroup$
– Eric Naslund
Dec 20 '11 at 12:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a proof, using the Weierstrass approximation theorem, that if $f$ is continuous then $f$ is necessarily zero!
Classical Weierstrass's Theorem : If f is a continuous real valued function on $[a, b]$, then there exists a sequence of polynomials $p_n$ such that
$$ lim_{nrightarrow+infty}p_n(x)=f(x)$$ uniformly on $[a, b]$.
By the assumptions of the problem and the linearity of the integral
is easy to see that
$$
int_{0}^1f(x)p(x)dx=0
$$
for all polynomials $p(x)$ on $C([0,1])$. Now just apply Theorem!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just for fun, here's a proof in non-standard analysis (Nelson-style IST). I write $a approx b$ to mean that $a-b$ is infinitesimal.
It's enough to prove the result when $f$ is standard. The Weierstrass approximation theorem gives a polynomial $p$ such that $p(x) approx x f(x)$ for all $x in [0,1]$. Note $int _0 ^1 xfp = 0$, because the integral is linear.
Now estimate the absolute value of $int xfp - (xf)^2$. Factoring the integrand as $xf(x)cdot ( p(x) - xf(x) )$, we see that this integral is bounded above by $operatorname{sup}(xf) cdot operatorname{sup}(p-xf)$, where the sup is over all $x in [0,1]$. This is infinitesimal, since the sup of a standard continuous function on a standard compact interval is limited.
We therefore have $int (xf)^2 approx int xfp = 0$. Since $int (xf)^2$ is standard, it is equal to zero. Therefore $(xf)^2$ is identically zero, and so is $f$ (being continuous).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f16831%2fnonzero-f-in-c0-1-for-which-int-01-fxxn-dx-0-for-all-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
(I am turning this into Community wiki, since the original version made an obvious mistake).
The result follows, for example, from the Stone-Weierstrass theorem, once one justifies that the limit of some integrals is the integral of the limit, which can be done (overkill) using Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem or (more easily) using simple estimates from the fact that $f$ is bounded, since it is continuous.
Below I give full details, which you should probably not read until after your homework is due, since this also solves your homework.
Spoilers:
There is a sequence of polynomials $p_n(x)$ that converges uniformly to $xf(x)$ on ${}[0,1]$. We have $int_0^1xf(x)p_n(x)dx=0$ for all $n$, by assumption, since $xp_n(x)$ is a sum of monomials the integral of whose integral with $f$ is 0. Now take the limit as $ntoinfty$ to conclude that $int_0^1x(f(x))^2dx=0$.
This gives us that $f=0$ because if $f(x_0)ne 0$, continuity ensures a positive $epsilon>0$ and an interval $(a,b)$ with $a>0$ such that $|f(x)|geepsilon$ for all $xin(a,b)$. But then $int_0^1xf(x)^2dxge laepsilon^2>0$, where $l=b-a$ is the length of the interval.
To see that the limit of the integrals is 0 without using dominated convergence, let $Mge|f(x)|$ for all $xin[0,1]$. The, for any $delta>0$, if $n$ is large enough, we have $$int_0^1f(x)xp_n(x)dx=int_0^1ftimes(p-xf+xf)dx=int_0^1xf(x)^2dx+int_0^1ftimes(p-xf)dx,$$ and the second integral is bounded by $int_0^1|f||p-xf|dxle M(delta/M)=delta$.
In fact, even this is approach is an overkill. (For example, Müntz's theorem gives a more general fact, as already mentioned in another answer.)
(Apologies for the original mistake.)
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The Stone-Weierstrass theorem doesn't (directly) apply to the question the OP asked, since the subalgebra generated by {x^n | n > 0} doesn't contain a constant function. But Zarrax's comment takes care of this.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 8 '11 at 22:28
$begingroup$
I would say Muntz theorem is overkill! (and not your current answer).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 9 '11 at 0:57
$begingroup$
:-) I meant overkill in the sense that we are using hypothesis that are way too strong for the task at hand. (It would be nice to try to weaken them significantly.)
$endgroup$
– Andrés E. Caicedo
Jan 9 '11 at 2:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(I am turning this into Community wiki, since the original version made an obvious mistake).
The result follows, for example, from the Stone-Weierstrass theorem, once one justifies that the limit of some integrals is the integral of the limit, which can be done (overkill) using Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem or (more easily) using simple estimates from the fact that $f$ is bounded, since it is continuous.
Below I give full details, which you should probably not read until after your homework is due, since this also solves your homework.
Spoilers:
There is a sequence of polynomials $p_n(x)$ that converges uniformly to $xf(x)$ on ${}[0,1]$. We have $int_0^1xf(x)p_n(x)dx=0$ for all $n$, by assumption, since $xp_n(x)$ is a sum of monomials the integral of whose integral with $f$ is 0. Now take the limit as $ntoinfty$ to conclude that $int_0^1x(f(x))^2dx=0$.
This gives us that $f=0$ because if $f(x_0)ne 0$, continuity ensures a positive $epsilon>0$ and an interval $(a,b)$ with $a>0$ such that $|f(x)|geepsilon$ for all $xin(a,b)$. But then $int_0^1xf(x)^2dxge laepsilon^2>0$, where $l=b-a$ is the length of the interval.
To see that the limit of the integrals is 0 without using dominated convergence, let $Mge|f(x)|$ for all $xin[0,1]$. The, for any $delta>0$, if $n$ is large enough, we have $$int_0^1f(x)xp_n(x)dx=int_0^1ftimes(p-xf+xf)dx=int_0^1xf(x)^2dx+int_0^1ftimes(p-xf)dx,$$ and the second integral is bounded by $int_0^1|f||p-xf|dxle M(delta/M)=delta$.
In fact, even this is approach is an overkill. (For example, Müntz's theorem gives a more general fact, as already mentioned in another answer.)
(Apologies for the original mistake.)
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The Stone-Weierstrass theorem doesn't (directly) apply to the question the OP asked, since the subalgebra generated by {x^n | n > 0} doesn't contain a constant function. But Zarrax's comment takes care of this.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 8 '11 at 22:28
$begingroup$
I would say Muntz theorem is overkill! (and not your current answer).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 9 '11 at 0:57
$begingroup$
:-) I meant overkill in the sense that we are using hypothesis that are way too strong for the task at hand. (It would be nice to try to weaken them significantly.)
$endgroup$
– Andrés E. Caicedo
Jan 9 '11 at 2:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(I am turning this into Community wiki, since the original version made an obvious mistake).
The result follows, for example, from the Stone-Weierstrass theorem, once one justifies that the limit of some integrals is the integral of the limit, which can be done (overkill) using Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem or (more easily) using simple estimates from the fact that $f$ is bounded, since it is continuous.
Below I give full details, which you should probably not read until after your homework is due, since this also solves your homework.
Spoilers:
There is a sequence of polynomials $p_n(x)$ that converges uniformly to $xf(x)$ on ${}[0,1]$. We have $int_0^1xf(x)p_n(x)dx=0$ for all $n$, by assumption, since $xp_n(x)$ is a sum of monomials the integral of whose integral with $f$ is 0. Now take the limit as $ntoinfty$ to conclude that $int_0^1x(f(x))^2dx=0$.
This gives us that $f=0$ because if $f(x_0)ne 0$, continuity ensures a positive $epsilon>0$ and an interval $(a,b)$ with $a>0$ such that $|f(x)|geepsilon$ for all $xin(a,b)$. But then $int_0^1xf(x)^2dxge laepsilon^2>0$, where $l=b-a$ is the length of the interval.
To see that the limit of the integrals is 0 without using dominated convergence, let $Mge|f(x)|$ for all $xin[0,1]$. The, for any $delta>0$, if $n$ is large enough, we have $$int_0^1f(x)xp_n(x)dx=int_0^1ftimes(p-xf+xf)dx=int_0^1xf(x)^2dx+int_0^1ftimes(p-xf)dx,$$ and the second integral is bounded by $int_0^1|f||p-xf|dxle M(delta/M)=delta$.
In fact, even this is approach is an overkill. (For example, Müntz's theorem gives a more general fact, as already mentioned in another answer.)
(Apologies for the original mistake.)
$endgroup$
(I am turning this into Community wiki, since the original version made an obvious mistake).
The result follows, for example, from the Stone-Weierstrass theorem, once one justifies that the limit of some integrals is the integral of the limit, which can be done (overkill) using Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem or (more easily) using simple estimates from the fact that $f$ is bounded, since it is continuous.
Below I give full details, which you should probably not read until after your homework is due, since this also solves your homework.
Spoilers:
There is a sequence of polynomials $p_n(x)$ that converges uniformly to $xf(x)$ on ${}[0,1]$. We have $int_0^1xf(x)p_n(x)dx=0$ for all $n$, by assumption, since $xp_n(x)$ is a sum of monomials the integral of whose integral with $f$ is 0. Now take the limit as $ntoinfty$ to conclude that $int_0^1x(f(x))^2dx=0$.
This gives us that $f=0$ because if $f(x_0)ne 0$, continuity ensures a positive $epsilon>0$ and an interval $(a,b)$ with $a>0$ such that $|f(x)|geepsilon$ for all $xin(a,b)$. But then $int_0^1xf(x)^2dxge laepsilon^2>0$, where $l=b-a$ is the length of the interval.
To see that the limit of the integrals is 0 without using dominated convergence, let $Mge|f(x)|$ for all $xin[0,1]$. The, for any $delta>0$, if $n$ is large enough, we have $$int_0^1f(x)xp_n(x)dx=int_0^1ftimes(p-xf+xf)dx=int_0^1xf(x)^2dx+int_0^1ftimes(p-xf)dx,$$ and the second integral is bounded by $int_0^1|f||p-xf|dxle M(delta/M)=delta$.
In fact, even this is approach is an overkill. (For example, Müntz's theorem gives a more general fact, as already mentioned in another answer.)
(Apologies for the original mistake.)
edited Jan 8 '11 at 23:58
community wiki
4 revs
Andres Caicedo
1
$begingroup$
The Stone-Weierstrass theorem doesn't (directly) apply to the question the OP asked, since the subalgebra generated by {x^n | n > 0} doesn't contain a constant function. But Zarrax's comment takes care of this.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 8 '11 at 22:28
$begingroup$
I would say Muntz theorem is overkill! (and not your current answer).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 9 '11 at 0:57
$begingroup$
:-) I meant overkill in the sense that we are using hypothesis that are way too strong for the task at hand. (It would be nice to try to weaken them significantly.)
$endgroup$
– Andrés E. Caicedo
Jan 9 '11 at 2:39
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The Stone-Weierstrass theorem doesn't (directly) apply to the question the OP asked, since the subalgebra generated by {x^n | n > 0} doesn't contain a constant function. But Zarrax's comment takes care of this.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 8 '11 at 22:28
$begingroup$
I would say Muntz theorem is overkill! (and not your current answer).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 9 '11 at 0:57
$begingroup$
:-) I meant overkill in the sense that we are using hypothesis that are way too strong for the task at hand. (It would be nice to try to weaken them significantly.)
$endgroup$
– Andrés E. Caicedo
Jan 9 '11 at 2:39
1
1
$begingroup$
The Stone-Weierstrass theorem doesn't (directly) apply to the question the OP asked, since the subalgebra generated by {x^n | n > 0} doesn't contain a constant function. But Zarrax's comment takes care of this.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 8 '11 at 22:28
$begingroup$
The Stone-Weierstrass theorem doesn't (directly) apply to the question the OP asked, since the subalgebra generated by {x^n | n > 0} doesn't contain a constant function. But Zarrax's comment takes care of this.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 8 '11 at 22:28
$begingroup$
I would say Muntz theorem is overkill! (and not your current answer).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 9 '11 at 0:57
$begingroup$
I would say Muntz theorem is overkill! (and not your current answer).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 9 '11 at 0:57
$begingroup$
:-) I meant overkill in the sense that we are using hypothesis that are way too strong for the task at hand. (It would be nice to try to weaken them significantly.)
$endgroup$
– Andrés E. Caicedo
Jan 9 '11 at 2:39
$begingroup$
:-) I meant overkill in the sense that we are using hypothesis that are way too strong for the task at hand. (It would be nice to try to weaken them significantly.)
$endgroup$
– Andrés E. Caicedo
Jan 9 '11 at 2:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As an aside, the answer is yes if the interval is $(0,infty)$ instead of $(0,1)$.
For example the "Stieltjes ghost function"
$f(x) = exp(-x^{1/4}) sin x^{1/4}$ satisfies
$int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 0$
for all integers $n ge 0$.
Stieltjes gave this as an example of a case where the
moment problem
does not have a unique solution.
It appears in Section 55 of his famous paper "Recherches sur les fractions continues" from 1894;
see p. 506 in
Œuvres Complètes, Vol. II.
To compute the moments, use the substitution $x=u^4$ to write
$I_n = int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 4 int_0^{infty} e^{-u} sin(u) u^{4n+3} du$;
then integrate by parts four times (differentiating the power of $u$, and integrating the rest) to show that $I_n$ is proportional to $I_{n-1}$,
and finally check that $I_0=0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As an aside, the answer is yes if the interval is $(0,infty)$ instead of $(0,1)$.
For example the "Stieltjes ghost function"
$f(x) = exp(-x^{1/4}) sin x^{1/4}$ satisfies
$int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 0$
for all integers $n ge 0$.
Stieltjes gave this as an example of a case where the
moment problem
does not have a unique solution.
It appears in Section 55 of his famous paper "Recherches sur les fractions continues" from 1894;
see p. 506 in
Œuvres Complètes, Vol. II.
To compute the moments, use the substitution $x=u^4$ to write
$I_n = int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 4 int_0^{infty} e^{-u} sin(u) u^{4n+3} du$;
then integrate by parts four times (differentiating the power of $u$, and integrating the rest) to show that $I_n$ is proportional to $I_{n-1}$,
and finally check that $I_0=0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As an aside, the answer is yes if the interval is $(0,infty)$ instead of $(0,1)$.
For example the "Stieltjes ghost function"
$f(x) = exp(-x^{1/4}) sin x^{1/4}$ satisfies
$int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 0$
for all integers $n ge 0$.
Stieltjes gave this as an example of a case where the
moment problem
does not have a unique solution.
It appears in Section 55 of his famous paper "Recherches sur les fractions continues" from 1894;
see p. 506 in
Œuvres Complètes, Vol. II.
To compute the moments, use the substitution $x=u^4$ to write
$I_n = int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 4 int_0^{infty} e^{-u} sin(u) u^{4n+3} du$;
then integrate by parts four times (differentiating the power of $u$, and integrating the rest) to show that $I_n$ is proportional to $I_{n-1}$,
and finally check that $I_0=0$.
$endgroup$
As an aside, the answer is yes if the interval is $(0,infty)$ instead of $(0,1)$.
For example the "Stieltjes ghost function"
$f(x) = exp(-x^{1/4}) sin x^{1/4}$ satisfies
$int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 0$
for all integers $n ge 0$.
Stieltjes gave this as an example of a case where the
moment problem
does not have a unique solution.
It appears in Section 55 of his famous paper "Recherches sur les fractions continues" from 1894;
see p. 506 in
Œuvres Complètes, Vol. II.
To compute the moments, use the substitution $x=u^4$ to write
$I_n = int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 4 int_0^{infty} e^{-u} sin(u) u^{4n+3} du$;
then integrate by parts four times (differentiating the power of $u$, and integrating the rest) to show that $I_n$ is proportional to $I_{n-1}$,
and finally check that $I_0=0$.
answered Jan 10 '11 at 23:23
Hans LundmarkHans Lundmark
35.9k564115
35.9k564115
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is no. Actually I believe the following is a theorem whose name totally escapes me at the moment: assume that $f$ is continuous and let $a_n$ be a sequence of increasing positive integers such that $int_0^1 f(x) x^{a_n} , dx = 0$ for $n ge 1$. If $sum frac{1}{a_n}$ diverges, then $f$ is identically zero! (Edit: this is a corollary of the Müntz–Szász theorem - thanks, Moron!)
In other words, the problem isn't phrased the way it is because stronger statements are false; the stronger versions are just harder to prove.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Corollary of Muntz theorem, I believe.
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:12
$begingroup$
+1, but that is actually not needed :-) (see Zarrax's comment).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:22
6
$begingroup$
+1, interesting theorem. As a side note, this is one of those posts where now that Moron has changed his name, the way it reads is rather funny.
$endgroup$
– Eric Naslund
Dec 20 '11 at 12:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is no. Actually I believe the following is a theorem whose name totally escapes me at the moment: assume that $f$ is continuous and let $a_n$ be a sequence of increasing positive integers such that $int_0^1 f(x) x^{a_n} , dx = 0$ for $n ge 1$. If $sum frac{1}{a_n}$ diverges, then $f$ is identically zero! (Edit: this is a corollary of the Müntz–Szász theorem - thanks, Moron!)
In other words, the problem isn't phrased the way it is because stronger statements are false; the stronger versions are just harder to prove.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Corollary of Muntz theorem, I believe.
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:12
$begingroup$
+1, but that is actually not needed :-) (see Zarrax's comment).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:22
6
$begingroup$
+1, interesting theorem. As a side note, this is one of those posts where now that Moron has changed his name, the way it reads is rather funny.
$endgroup$
– Eric Naslund
Dec 20 '11 at 12:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is no. Actually I believe the following is a theorem whose name totally escapes me at the moment: assume that $f$ is continuous and let $a_n$ be a sequence of increasing positive integers such that $int_0^1 f(x) x^{a_n} , dx = 0$ for $n ge 1$. If $sum frac{1}{a_n}$ diverges, then $f$ is identically zero! (Edit: this is a corollary of the Müntz–Szász theorem - thanks, Moron!)
In other words, the problem isn't phrased the way it is because stronger statements are false; the stronger versions are just harder to prove.
$endgroup$
The answer is no. Actually I believe the following is a theorem whose name totally escapes me at the moment: assume that $f$ is continuous and let $a_n$ be a sequence of increasing positive integers such that $int_0^1 f(x) x^{a_n} , dx = 0$ for $n ge 1$. If $sum frac{1}{a_n}$ diverges, then $f$ is identically zero! (Edit: this is a corollary of the Müntz–Szász theorem - thanks, Moron!)
In other words, the problem isn't phrased the way it is because stronger statements are false; the stronger versions are just harder to prove.
edited Jan 8 '11 at 22:16
answered Jan 8 '11 at 22:11
Qiaochu YuanQiaochu Yuan
281k32593939
281k32593939
$begingroup$
Corollary of Muntz theorem, I believe.
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:12
$begingroup$
+1, but that is actually not needed :-) (see Zarrax's comment).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:22
6
$begingroup$
+1, interesting theorem. As a side note, this is one of those posts where now that Moron has changed his name, the way it reads is rather funny.
$endgroup$
– Eric Naslund
Dec 20 '11 at 12:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Corollary of Muntz theorem, I believe.
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:12
$begingroup$
+1, but that is actually not needed :-) (see Zarrax's comment).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:22
6
$begingroup$
+1, interesting theorem. As a side note, this is one of those posts where now that Moron has changed his name, the way it reads is rather funny.
$endgroup$
– Eric Naslund
Dec 20 '11 at 12:57
$begingroup$
Corollary of Muntz theorem, I believe.
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:12
$begingroup$
Corollary of Muntz theorem, I believe.
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:12
$begingroup$
+1, but that is actually not needed :-) (see Zarrax's comment).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:22
$begingroup$
+1, but that is actually not needed :-) (see Zarrax's comment).
$endgroup$
– Aryabhata
Jan 8 '11 at 22:22
6
6
$begingroup$
+1, interesting theorem. As a side note, this is one of those posts where now that Moron has changed his name, the way it reads is rather funny.
$endgroup$
– Eric Naslund
Dec 20 '11 at 12:57
$begingroup$
+1, interesting theorem. As a side note, this is one of those posts where now that Moron has changed his name, the way it reads is rather funny.
$endgroup$
– Eric Naslund
Dec 20 '11 at 12:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a proof, using the Weierstrass approximation theorem, that if $f$ is continuous then $f$ is necessarily zero!
Classical Weierstrass's Theorem : If f is a continuous real valued function on $[a, b]$, then there exists a sequence of polynomials $p_n$ such that
$$ lim_{nrightarrow+infty}p_n(x)=f(x)$$ uniformly on $[a, b]$.
By the assumptions of the problem and the linearity of the integral
is easy to see that
$$
int_{0}^1f(x)p(x)dx=0
$$
for all polynomials $p(x)$ on $C([0,1])$. Now just apply Theorem!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a proof, using the Weierstrass approximation theorem, that if $f$ is continuous then $f$ is necessarily zero!
Classical Weierstrass's Theorem : If f is a continuous real valued function on $[a, b]$, then there exists a sequence of polynomials $p_n$ such that
$$ lim_{nrightarrow+infty}p_n(x)=f(x)$$ uniformly on $[a, b]$.
By the assumptions of the problem and the linearity of the integral
is easy to see that
$$
int_{0}^1f(x)p(x)dx=0
$$
for all polynomials $p(x)$ on $C([0,1])$. Now just apply Theorem!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a proof, using the Weierstrass approximation theorem, that if $f$ is continuous then $f$ is necessarily zero!
Classical Weierstrass's Theorem : If f is a continuous real valued function on $[a, b]$, then there exists a sequence of polynomials $p_n$ such that
$$ lim_{nrightarrow+infty}p_n(x)=f(x)$$ uniformly on $[a, b]$.
By the assumptions of the problem and the linearity of the integral
is easy to see that
$$
int_{0}^1f(x)p(x)dx=0
$$
for all polynomials $p(x)$ on $C([0,1])$. Now just apply Theorem!
$endgroup$
There is a proof, using the Weierstrass approximation theorem, that if $f$ is continuous then $f$ is necessarily zero!
Classical Weierstrass's Theorem : If f is a continuous real valued function on $[a, b]$, then there exists a sequence of polynomials $p_n$ such that
$$ lim_{nrightarrow+infty}p_n(x)=f(x)$$ uniformly on $[a, b]$.
By the assumptions of the problem and the linearity of the integral
is easy to see that
$$
int_{0}^1f(x)p(x)dx=0
$$
for all polynomials $p(x)$ on $C([0,1])$. Now just apply Theorem!
edited Dec 20 '11 at 14:02
Srivatsan
21k371126
21k371126
answered Dec 20 '11 at 12:38
MathOverviewMathOverview
8,96043164
8,96043164
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just for fun, here's a proof in non-standard analysis (Nelson-style IST). I write $a approx b$ to mean that $a-b$ is infinitesimal.
It's enough to prove the result when $f$ is standard. The Weierstrass approximation theorem gives a polynomial $p$ such that $p(x) approx x f(x)$ for all $x in [0,1]$. Note $int _0 ^1 xfp = 0$, because the integral is linear.
Now estimate the absolute value of $int xfp - (xf)^2$. Factoring the integrand as $xf(x)cdot ( p(x) - xf(x) )$, we see that this integral is bounded above by $operatorname{sup}(xf) cdot operatorname{sup}(p-xf)$, where the sup is over all $x in [0,1]$. This is infinitesimal, since the sup of a standard continuous function on a standard compact interval is limited.
We therefore have $int (xf)^2 approx int xfp = 0$. Since $int (xf)^2$ is standard, it is equal to zero. Therefore $(xf)^2$ is identically zero, and so is $f$ (being continuous).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just for fun, here's a proof in non-standard analysis (Nelson-style IST). I write $a approx b$ to mean that $a-b$ is infinitesimal.
It's enough to prove the result when $f$ is standard. The Weierstrass approximation theorem gives a polynomial $p$ such that $p(x) approx x f(x)$ for all $x in [0,1]$. Note $int _0 ^1 xfp = 0$, because the integral is linear.
Now estimate the absolute value of $int xfp - (xf)^2$. Factoring the integrand as $xf(x)cdot ( p(x) - xf(x) )$, we see that this integral is bounded above by $operatorname{sup}(xf) cdot operatorname{sup}(p-xf)$, where the sup is over all $x in [0,1]$. This is infinitesimal, since the sup of a standard continuous function on a standard compact interval is limited.
We therefore have $int (xf)^2 approx int xfp = 0$. Since $int (xf)^2$ is standard, it is equal to zero. Therefore $(xf)^2$ is identically zero, and so is $f$ (being continuous).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just for fun, here's a proof in non-standard analysis (Nelson-style IST). I write $a approx b$ to mean that $a-b$ is infinitesimal.
It's enough to prove the result when $f$ is standard. The Weierstrass approximation theorem gives a polynomial $p$ such that $p(x) approx x f(x)$ for all $x in [0,1]$. Note $int _0 ^1 xfp = 0$, because the integral is linear.
Now estimate the absolute value of $int xfp - (xf)^2$. Factoring the integrand as $xf(x)cdot ( p(x) - xf(x) )$, we see that this integral is bounded above by $operatorname{sup}(xf) cdot operatorname{sup}(p-xf)$, where the sup is over all $x in [0,1]$. This is infinitesimal, since the sup of a standard continuous function on a standard compact interval is limited.
We therefore have $int (xf)^2 approx int xfp = 0$. Since $int (xf)^2$ is standard, it is equal to zero. Therefore $(xf)^2$ is identically zero, and so is $f$ (being continuous).
$endgroup$
Just for fun, here's a proof in non-standard analysis (Nelson-style IST). I write $a approx b$ to mean that $a-b$ is infinitesimal.
It's enough to prove the result when $f$ is standard. The Weierstrass approximation theorem gives a polynomial $p$ such that $p(x) approx x f(x)$ for all $x in [0,1]$. Note $int _0 ^1 xfp = 0$, because the integral is linear.
Now estimate the absolute value of $int xfp - (xf)^2$. Factoring the integrand as $xf(x)cdot ( p(x) - xf(x) )$, we see that this integral is bounded above by $operatorname{sup}(xf) cdot operatorname{sup}(p-xf)$, where the sup is over all $x in [0,1]$. This is infinitesimal, since the sup of a standard continuous function on a standard compact interval is limited.
We therefore have $int (xf)^2 approx int xfp = 0$. Since $int (xf)^2$ is standard, it is equal to zero. Therefore $(xf)^2$ is identically zero, and so is $f$ (being continuous).
edited Jan 9 '11 at 0:49
answered Jan 9 '11 at 0:26
Matthew TowersMatthew Towers
7,51722446
7,51722446
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f16831%2fnonzero-f-in-c0-1-for-which-int-01-fxxn-dx-0-for-all-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
There are many counterexamples to both your claims. For example, the function $f$ with $f(0)=1$ and $f(x)=0$ for $x neq 0$. You'll need some additional assumption on $f$ to make them true.
$endgroup$
– Chris Eagle
Jan 8 '11 at 22:04
1
$begingroup$
@Chris: I think this is an exercise in Rudin or similar, and I think f is supposed to be continuous.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 8 '11 at 22:08
7
$begingroup$
Just apply your homework problem to $xf(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Zarrax
Jan 8 '11 at 22:13
1
$begingroup$
This maybe related.
$endgroup$
– timur
Jan 9 '11 at 4:14
2
$begingroup$
As an aside, the answer is yes if the interval is $(0,infty)$ instead of $(0,1)$. For example the "Stieltjes ghost function" $f(x) = exp(-x^{1/4}) sin x^{1/4}$ satisfies $int_0^{infty} f(x) x^n dx = 0$ for all integers $n ge 0$.
$endgroup$
– Hans Lundmark
Jan 9 '11 at 10:18