Continuity of a map: proving manifold structure of Grassmanian
$begingroup$
This post should be self contained - it is from a concern of page 13 of this notes.
Let $q ge n$, $V_n(Bbb R^q)$ be the subspace of $n$ -linearly independent vectors in $(Bbb R^q)^n$.
We define $G_n(Bbb R^q)$ to be the set of $n$ planes in $Bbb R^q$.
It is given the quotient topology of the map
$$ q:V_n(Bbb R^q) rightarrow G_n(Bbb R^q)$$
sending $n$ vectors to the space spanend by it.
Now fix $X in G_n(Bbb R^q)$, and let $U subseteq G_n(Bbb R^q)$, be the open set such that for $Y in U$, the projection map $pi:Bbb R^q rightarrow X$, induces an isomoprhism $pi|_Y:Y rightarrow X$.
I want to prove the following map is continuous:
Fix a basis ${x_i }$ of $X$
$$D:q^{-1}(U) rightarrow q^{-1}(U)$$
such that $(y_1, ldots, y_n)$ is mapped to $(y'_1 ,ldots, y'_n)$ where $pi(y'_i) = x_i$ and $q(y'_1,ldots, y'_n) = q(y_1,ldots, y_n)$.
It is claimed that (from the notes) this is continuous. But I do not see an easy expression of this map.
differential-geometry algebraic-topology differential-topology vector-bundles
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This post should be self contained - it is from a concern of page 13 of this notes.
Let $q ge n$, $V_n(Bbb R^q)$ be the subspace of $n$ -linearly independent vectors in $(Bbb R^q)^n$.
We define $G_n(Bbb R^q)$ to be the set of $n$ planes in $Bbb R^q$.
It is given the quotient topology of the map
$$ q:V_n(Bbb R^q) rightarrow G_n(Bbb R^q)$$
sending $n$ vectors to the space spanend by it.
Now fix $X in G_n(Bbb R^q)$, and let $U subseteq G_n(Bbb R^q)$, be the open set such that for $Y in U$, the projection map $pi:Bbb R^q rightarrow X$, induces an isomoprhism $pi|_Y:Y rightarrow X$.
I want to prove the following map is continuous:
Fix a basis ${x_i }$ of $X$
$$D:q^{-1}(U) rightarrow q^{-1}(U)$$
such that $(y_1, ldots, y_n)$ is mapped to $(y'_1 ,ldots, y'_n)$ where $pi(y'_i) = x_i$ and $q(y'_1,ldots, y'_n) = q(y_1,ldots, y_n)$.
It is claimed that (from the notes) this is continuous. But I do not see an easy expression of this map.
differential-geometry algebraic-topology differential-topology vector-bundles
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This post should be self contained - it is from a concern of page 13 of this notes.
Let $q ge n$, $V_n(Bbb R^q)$ be the subspace of $n$ -linearly independent vectors in $(Bbb R^q)^n$.
We define $G_n(Bbb R^q)$ to be the set of $n$ planes in $Bbb R^q$.
It is given the quotient topology of the map
$$ q:V_n(Bbb R^q) rightarrow G_n(Bbb R^q)$$
sending $n$ vectors to the space spanend by it.
Now fix $X in G_n(Bbb R^q)$, and let $U subseteq G_n(Bbb R^q)$, be the open set such that for $Y in U$, the projection map $pi:Bbb R^q rightarrow X$, induces an isomoprhism $pi|_Y:Y rightarrow X$.
I want to prove the following map is continuous:
Fix a basis ${x_i }$ of $X$
$$D:q^{-1}(U) rightarrow q^{-1}(U)$$
such that $(y_1, ldots, y_n)$ is mapped to $(y'_1 ,ldots, y'_n)$ where $pi(y'_i) = x_i$ and $q(y'_1,ldots, y'_n) = q(y_1,ldots, y_n)$.
It is claimed that (from the notes) this is continuous. But I do not see an easy expression of this map.
differential-geometry algebraic-topology differential-topology vector-bundles
$endgroup$
This post should be self contained - it is from a concern of page 13 of this notes.
Let $q ge n$, $V_n(Bbb R^q)$ be the subspace of $n$ -linearly independent vectors in $(Bbb R^q)^n$.
We define $G_n(Bbb R^q)$ to be the set of $n$ planes in $Bbb R^q$.
It is given the quotient topology of the map
$$ q:V_n(Bbb R^q) rightarrow G_n(Bbb R^q)$$
sending $n$ vectors to the space spanend by it.
Now fix $X in G_n(Bbb R^q)$, and let $U subseteq G_n(Bbb R^q)$, be the open set such that for $Y in U$, the projection map $pi:Bbb R^q rightarrow X$, induces an isomoprhism $pi|_Y:Y rightarrow X$.
I want to prove the following map is continuous:
Fix a basis ${x_i }$ of $X$
$$D:q^{-1}(U) rightarrow q^{-1}(U)$$
such that $(y_1, ldots, y_n)$ is mapped to $(y'_1 ,ldots, y'_n)$ where $pi(y'_i) = x_i$ and $q(y'_1,ldots, y'_n) = q(y_1,ldots, y_n)$.
It is claimed that (from the notes) this is continuous. But I do not see an easy expression of this map.
differential-geometry algebraic-topology differential-topology vector-bundles
differential-geometry algebraic-topology differential-topology vector-bundles
edited Jan 12 at 13:54
CL.
asked Jan 10 at 9:06
CL.CL.
2,2592925
2,2592925
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think the author was not well-advised to omit the proof.
We begin by recalling some facts from linear algebra:
Let $V$ be a vector space over a field $K$. Each matrix $A = (a_{ij}) in M_n(K)$ induces a linear map $A : V^n to V^n, A(v_1,dots,v_n) = (sum_{j=1}^n a_{1j}v_j,dots,sum_{j=1}^n a_{nj}v_j)$. Note that in this definition $dim(V)$ is arbitrary. If $mathbf{v} = (v_1,dots,v_n) in V^n$ forms a basis of $V$ (which requires $dim(V) = n$), then each $mathbf{w} = (w_1,dots,w_n) in V^n$ admits a unique $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w}) in M_n(K)$ such that $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w})(mathbf{v}) = mathbf{w}$. We have $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w}) in GL_n(K)$ if and only if $(w_1,dots,w_n)$ forms a basis of $V$. In that case $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w})$ realizes the change of basis from $mathbf{v}$ to $mathbf{w}$.
Each linear map $f : V to W$ induces a linear map
$$f^n : V^n to W^n, f^n(v_1,dots,v_n) = (f(v_1),dots,f(v_n)) .$$
It is readily verified that
$$f^n(A(mathbf{v})) = A(f^n(mathbf{v})) .$$
We now come to the proof of continuity. Given a fixed basis $mathbf{x} = (x_1,dots,x_n)$ of $X$, the orthogonal projection $pi : mathbb{R}^q to X$ can be written as $pi(y) = sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y) x_j$ with linear maps $xi_j :mathbb{R}^q to mathbb{R}$. This gives us a linear map
$$phi : (mathbb{R}^q)^n to M_n(mathbb{R}), phi(y_1,dots,y_n)_{ij} = xi_j(y_i) .$$
For each $mathbf{y} = (y_1,dots,y_n) in q^{-1}(U)$ the span $q(mathbf{y})$ is mapped by $pi$ isomorphically onto $X$. Hence $pi^n(mathbf{y}) = (pi(y_1),dots,pi(y_n)) = (sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y_1) x_j,dots,sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y_n) x_j)$ is a basis of $X$. Thus the matrix $phi(mathbf{y})$ realizes the change of basis from $mathbf{x}$ to $pi^n(mathbf{y})$, i.e. we have $phi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{x}) = pi^n(mathbf{y})$. We conclude
$$phi(q^{-1}(U)) subset GL_n(mathbb{R}) .$$
Since linear maps between finite-dimensional vector spaces (endowed with any norm) are continuous and inverting matrices in $ GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is continuous, we see that
$$psi : q^{-1}(U) to GL_n(mathbb{R}), psi(mathbf{y}) = phi(mathbf{y})^{-1}$$
is continuous. The matrix $psi(mathbf{y})$ realizes the change of basis from $pi^n(mathbf{y})$ to $mathbf{x}$, i.e. we have $psi(mathbf{y})(pi^n(mathbf{y})) = mathbf{x}$.
For $mathbf{y} in q^{-1}(U)$ define
$$D(mathbf{y}) = psi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{y})$$
where we regard $psi(mathbf{y})$ as a linear map $q(mathbf{y})^n to q(mathbf{y})^n$. Since $mathbf{y}$ is a basis of $q(mathbf{y})$, also $D(mathbf{y})$ is a basis of $q(mathbf{y}) in U$. Hence $D(mathbf{y}) in q^{-1}(U)$, i.e. we have defined a function
$$D : q^{-1}(U) to q^{-1}(U) .$$
We have
$$pi^n(D(mathbf{y})) = pi^n(psi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{y})) = psi(mathbf{y})(pi^n(mathbf{y})) = mathbf{x}$$
which shows that our $D$ is the same as the author's.
To see that $D$ is continuous note that the coordinate functions $D_i : q^{-1}(U) to mathbb{R}^q$ are given by $D_i(mathbf{y}) = sum_{j=1}^n psi(mathbf{y})_{ij}y_j = sum_{j=1}^n psi(mathbf{y})_{ij}p_j(mathbf{y})$ with (continuous!) coordinate projections $p_j : (mathbb{R}^q)^n to mathbb{R}^q$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068413%2fcontinuity-of-a-map-proving-manifold-structure-of-grassmanian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think the author was not well-advised to omit the proof.
We begin by recalling some facts from linear algebra:
Let $V$ be a vector space over a field $K$. Each matrix $A = (a_{ij}) in M_n(K)$ induces a linear map $A : V^n to V^n, A(v_1,dots,v_n) = (sum_{j=1}^n a_{1j}v_j,dots,sum_{j=1}^n a_{nj}v_j)$. Note that in this definition $dim(V)$ is arbitrary. If $mathbf{v} = (v_1,dots,v_n) in V^n$ forms a basis of $V$ (which requires $dim(V) = n$), then each $mathbf{w} = (w_1,dots,w_n) in V^n$ admits a unique $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w}) in M_n(K)$ such that $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w})(mathbf{v}) = mathbf{w}$. We have $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w}) in GL_n(K)$ if and only if $(w_1,dots,w_n)$ forms a basis of $V$. In that case $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w})$ realizes the change of basis from $mathbf{v}$ to $mathbf{w}$.
Each linear map $f : V to W$ induces a linear map
$$f^n : V^n to W^n, f^n(v_1,dots,v_n) = (f(v_1),dots,f(v_n)) .$$
It is readily verified that
$$f^n(A(mathbf{v})) = A(f^n(mathbf{v})) .$$
We now come to the proof of continuity. Given a fixed basis $mathbf{x} = (x_1,dots,x_n)$ of $X$, the orthogonal projection $pi : mathbb{R}^q to X$ can be written as $pi(y) = sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y) x_j$ with linear maps $xi_j :mathbb{R}^q to mathbb{R}$. This gives us a linear map
$$phi : (mathbb{R}^q)^n to M_n(mathbb{R}), phi(y_1,dots,y_n)_{ij} = xi_j(y_i) .$$
For each $mathbf{y} = (y_1,dots,y_n) in q^{-1}(U)$ the span $q(mathbf{y})$ is mapped by $pi$ isomorphically onto $X$. Hence $pi^n(mathbf{y}) = (pi(y_1),dots,pi(y_n)) = (sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y_1) x_j,dots,sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y_n) x_j)$ is a basis of $X$. Thus the matrix $phi(mathbf{y})$ realizes the change of basis from $mathbf{x}$ to $pi^n(mathbf{y})$, i.e. we have $phi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{x}) = pi^n(mathbf{y})$. We conclude
$$phi(q^{-1}(U)) subset GL_n(mathbb{R}) .$$
Since linear maps between finite-dimensional vector spaces (endowed with any norm) are continuous and inverting matrices in $ GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is continuous, we see that
$$psi : q^{-1}(U) to GL_n(mathbb{R}), psi(mathbf{y}) = phi(mathbf{y})^{-1}$$
is continuous. The matrix $psi(mathbf{y})$ realizes the change of basis from $pi^n(mathbf{y})$ to $mathbf{x}$, i.e. we have $psi(mathbf{y})(pi^n(mathbf{y})) = mathbf{x}$.
For $mathbf{y} in q^{-1}(U)$ define
$$D(mathbf{y}) = psi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{y})$$
where we regard $psi(mathbf{y})$ as a linear map $q(mathbf{y})^n to q(mathbf{y})^n$. Since $mathbf{y}$ is a basis of $q(mathbf{y})$, also $D(mathbf{y})$ is a basis of $q(mathbf{y}) in U$. Hence $D(mathbf{y}) in q^{-1}(U)$, i.e. we have defined a function
$$D : q^{-1}(U) to q^{-1}(U) .$$
We have
$$pi^n(D(mathbf{y})) = pi^n(psi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{y})) = psi(mathbf{y})(pi^n(mathbf{y})) = mathbf{x}$$
which shows that our $D$ is the same as the author's.
To see that $D$ is continuous note that the coordinate functions $D_i : q^{-1}(U) to mathbb{R}^q$ are given by $D_i(mathbf{y}) = sum_{j=1}^n psi(mathbf{y})_{ij}y_j = sum_{j=1}^n psi(mathbf{y})_{ij}p_j(mathbf{y})$ with (continuous!) coordinate projections $p_j : (mathbb{R}^q)^n to mathbb{R}^q$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the author was not well-advised to omit the proof.
We begin by recalling some facts from linear algebra:
Let $V$ be a vector space over a field $K$. Each matrix $A = (a_{ij}) in M_n(K)$ induces a linear map $A : V^n to V^n, A(v_1,dots,v_n) = (sum_{j=1}^n a_{1j}v_j,dots,sum_{j=1}^n a_{nj}v_j)$. Note that in this definition $dim(V)$ is arbitrary. If $mathbf{v} = (v_1,dots,v_n) in V^n$ forms a basis of $V$ (which requires $dim(V) = n$), then each $mathbf{w} = (w_1,dots,w_n) in V^n$ admits a unique $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w}) in M_n(K)$ such that $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w})(mathbf{v}) = mathbf{w}$. We have $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w}) in GL_n(K)$ if and only if $(w_1,dots,w_n)$ forms a basis of $V$. In that case $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w})$ realizes the change of basis from $mathbf{v}$ to $mathbf{w}$.
Each linear map $f : V to W$ induces a linear map
$$f^n : V^n to W^n, f^n(v_1,dots,v_n) = (f(v_1),dots,f(v_n)) .$$
It is readily verified that
$$f^n(A(mathbf{v})) = A(f^n(mathbf{v})) .$$
We now come to the proof of continuity. Given a fixed basis $mathbf{x} = (x_1,dots,x_n)$ of $X$, the orthogonal projection $pi : mathbb{R}^q to X$ can be written as $pi(y) = sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y) x_j$ with linear maps $xi_j :mathbb{R}^q to mathbb{R}$. This gives us a linear map
$$phi : (mathbb{R}^q)^n to M_n(mathbb{R}), phi(y_1,dots,y_n)_{ij} = xi_j(y_i) .$$
For each $mathbf{y} = (y_1,dots,y_n) in q^{-1}(U)$ the span $q(mathbf{y})$ is mapped by $pi$ isomorphically onto $X$. Hence $pi^n(mathbf{y}) = (pi(y_1),dots,pi(y_n)) = (sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y_1) x_j,dots,sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y_n) x_j)$ is a basis of $X$. Thus the matrix $phi(mathbf{y})$ realizes the change of basis from $mathbf{x}$ to $pi^n(mathbf{y})$, i.e. we have $phi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{x}) = pi^n(mathbf{y})$. We conclude
$$phi(q^{-1}(U)) subset GL_n(mathbb{R}) .$$
Since linear maps between finite-dimensional vector spaces (endowed with any norm) are continuous and inverting matrices in $ GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is continuous, we see that
$$psi : q^{-1}(U) to GL_n(mathbb{R}), psi(mathbf{y}) = phi(mathbf{y})^{-1}$$
is continuous. The matrix $psi(mathbf{y})$ realizes the change of basis from $pi^n(mathbf{y})$ to $mathbf{x}$, i.e. we have $psi(mathbf{y})(pi^n(mathbf{y})) = mathbf{x}$.
For $mathbf{y} in q^{-1}(U)$ define
$$D(mathbf{y}) = psi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{y})$$
where we regard $psi(mathbf{y})$ as a linear map $q(mathbf{y})^n to q(mathbf{y})^n$. Since $mathbf{y}$ is a basis of $q(mathbf{y})$, also $D(mathbf{y})$ is a basis of $q(mathbf{y}) in U$. Hence $D(mathbf{y}) in q^{-1}(U)$, i.e. we have defined a function
$$D : q^{-1}(U) to q^{-1}(U) .$$
We have
$$pi^n(D(mathbf{y})) = pi^n(psi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{y})) = psi(mathbf{y})(pi^n(mathbf{y})) = mathbf{x}$$
which shows that our $D$ is the same as the author's.
To see that $D$ is continuous note that the coordinate functions $D_i : q^{-1}(U) to mathbb{R}^q$ are given by $D_i(mathbf{y}) = sum_{j=1}^n psi(mathbf{y})_{ij}y_j = sum_{j=1}^n psi(mathbf{y})_{ij}p_j(mathbf{y})$ with (continuous!) coordinate projections $p_j : (mathbb{R}^q)^n to mathbb{R}^q$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the author was not well-advised to omit the proof.
We begin by recalling some facts from linear algebra:
Let $V$ be a vector space over a field $K$. Each matrix $A = (a_{ij}) in M_n(K)$ induces a linear map $A : V^n to V^n, A(v_1,dots,v_n) = (sum_{j=1}^n a_{1j}v_j,dots,sum_{j=1}^n a_{nj}v_j)$. Note that in this definition $dim(V)$ is arbitrary. If $mathbf{v} = (v_1,dots,v_n) in V^n$ forms a basis of $V$ (which requires $dim(V) = n$), then each $mathbf{w} = (w_1,dots,w_n) in V^n$ admits a unique $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w}) in M_n(K)$ such that $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w})(mathbf{v}) = mathbf{w}$. We have $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w}) in GL_n(K)$ if and only if $(w_1,dots,w_n)$ forms a basis of $V$. In that case $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w})$ realizes the change of basis from $mathbf{v}$ to $mathbf{w}$.
Each linear map $f : V to W$ induces a linear map
$$f^n : V^n to W^n, f^n(v_1,dots,v_n) = (f(v_1),dots,f(v_n)) .$$
It is readily verified that
$$f^n(A(mathbf{v})) = A(f^n(mathbf{v})) .$$
We now come to the proof of continuity. Given a fixed basis $mathbf{x} = (x_1,dots,x_n)$ of $X$, the orthogonal projection $pi : mathbb{R}^q to X$ can be written as $pi(y) = sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y) x_j$ with linear maps $xi_j :mathbb{R}^q to mathbb{R}$. This gives us a linear map
$$phi : (mathbb{R}^q)^n to M_n(mathbb{R}), phi(y_1,dots,y_n)_{ij} = xi_j(y_i) .$$
For each $mathbf{y} = (y_1,dots,y_n) in q^{-1}(U)$ the span $q(mathbf{y})$ is mapped by $pi$ isomorphically onto $X$. Hence $pi^n(mathbf{y}) = (pi(y_1),dots,pi(y_n)) = (sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y_1) x_j,dots,sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y_n) x_j)$ is a basis of $X$. Thus the matrix $phi(mathbf{y})$ realizes the change of basis from $mathbf{x}$ to $pi^n(mathbf{y})$, i.e. we have $phi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{x}) = pi^n(mathbf{y})$. We conclude
$$phi(q^{-1}(U)) subset GL_n(mathbb{R}) .$$
Since linear maps between finite-dimensional vector spaces (endowed with any norm) are continuous and inverting matrices in $ GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is continuous, we see that
$$psi : q^{-1}(U) to GL_n(mathbb{R}), psi(mathbf{y}) = phi(mathbf{y})^{-1}$$
is continuous. The matrix $psi(mathbf{y})$ realizes the change of basis from $pi^n(mathbf{y})$ to $mathbf{x}$, i.e. we have $psi(mathbf{y})(pi^n(mathbf{y})) = mathbf{x}$.
For $mathbf{y} in q^{-1}(U)$ define
$$D(mathbf{y}) = psi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{y})$$
where we regard $psi(mathbf{y})$ as a linear map $q(mathbf{y})^n to q(mathbf{y})^n$. Since $mathbf{y}$ is a basis of $q(mathbf{y})$, also $D(mathbf{y})$ is a basis of $q(mathbf{y}) in U$. Hence $D(mathbf{y}) in q^{-1}(U)$, i.e. we have defined a function
$$D : q^{-1}(U) to q^{-1}(U) .$$
We have
$$pi^n(D(mathbf{y})) = pi^n(psi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{y})) = psi(mathbf{y})(pi^n(mathbf{y})) = mathbf{x}$$
which shows that our $D$ is the same as the author's.
To see that $D$ is continuous note that the coordinate functions $D_i : q^{-1}(U) to mathbb{R}^q$ are given by $D_i(mathbf{y}) = sum_{j=1}^n psi(mathbf{y})_{ij}y_j = sum_{j=1}^n psi(mathbf{y})_{ij}p_j(mathbf{y})$ with (continuous!) coordinate projections $p_j : (mathbb{R}^q)^n to mathbb{R}^q$.
$endgroup$
I think the author was not well-advised to omit the proof.
We begin by recalling some facts from linear algebra:
Let $V$ be a vector space over a field $K$. Each matrix $A = (a_{ij}) in M_n(K)$ induces a linear map $A : V^n to V^n, A(v_1,dots,v_n) = (sum_{j=1}^n a_{1j}v_j,dots,sum_{j=1}^n a_{nj}v_j)$. Note that in this definition $dim(V)$ is arbitrary. If $mathbf{v} = (v_1,dots,v_n) in V^n$ forms a basis of $V$ (which requires $dim(V) = n$), then each $mathbf{w} = (w_1,dots,w_n) in V^n$ admits a unique $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w}) in M_n(K)$ such that $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w})(mathbf{v}) = mathbf{w}$. We have $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w}) in GL_n(K)$ if and only if $(w_1,dots,w_n)$ forms a basis of $V$. In that case $A(mathbf{v},mathbf{w})$ realizes the change of basis from $mathbf{v}$ to $mathbf{w}$.
Each linear map $f : V to W$ induces a linear map
$$f^n : V^n to W^n, f^n(v_1,dots,v_n) = (f(v_1),dots,f(v_n)) .$$
It is readily verified that
$$f^n(A(mathbf{v})) = A(f^n(mathbf{v})) .$$
We now come to the proof of continuity. Given a fixed basis $mathbf{x} = (x_1,dots,x_n)$ of $X$, the orthogonal projection $pi : mathbb{R}^q to X$ can be written as $pi(y) = sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y) x_j$ with linear maps $xi_j :mathbb{R}^q to mathbb{R}$. This gives us a linear map
$$phi : (mathbb{R}^q)^n to M_n(mathbb{R}), phi(y_1,dots,y_n)_{ij} = xi_j(y_i) .$$
For each $mathbf{y} = (y_1,dots,y_n) in q^{-1}(U)$ the span $q(mathbf{y})$ is mapped by $pi$ isomorphically onto $X$. Hence $pi^n(mathbf{y}) = (pi(y_1),dots,pi(y_n)) = (sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y_1) x_j,dots,sum_{j=1}^n xi_j(y_n) x_j)$ is a basis of $X$. Thus the matrix $phi(mathbf{y})$ realizes the change of basis from $mathbf{x}$ to $pi^n(mathbf{y})$, i.e. we have $phi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{x}) = pi^n(mathbf{y})$. We conclude
$$phi(q^{-1}(U)) subset GL_n(mathbb{R}) .$$
Since linear maps between finite-dimensional vector spaces (endowed with any norm) are continuous and inverting matrices in $ GL_n(mathbb{R})$ is continuous, we see that
$$psi : q^{-1}(U) to GL_n(mathbb{R}), psi(mathbf{y}) = phi(mathbf{y})^{-1}$$
is continuous. The matrix $psi(mathbf{y})$ realizes the change of basis from $pi^n(mathbf{y})$ to $mathbf{x}$, i.e. we have $psi(mathbf{y})(pi^n(mathbf{y})) = mathbf{x}$.
For $mathbf{y} in q^{-1}(U)$ define
$$D(mathbf{y}) = psi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{y})$$
where we regard $psi(mathbf{y})$ as a linear map $q(mathbf{y})^n to q(mathbf{y})^n$. Since $mathbf{y}$ is a basis of $q(mathbf{y})$, also $D(mathbf{y})$ is a basis of $q(mathbf{y}) in U$. Hence $D(mathbf{y}) in q^{-1}(U)$, i.e. we have defined a function
$$D : q^{-1}(U) to q^{-1}(U) .$$
We have
$$pi^n(D(mathbf{y})) = pi^n(psi(mathbf{y})(mathbf{y})) = psi(mathbf{y})(pi^n(mathbf{y})) = mathbf{x}$$
which shows that our $D$ is the same as the author's.
To see that $D$ is continuous note that the coordinate functions $D_i : q^{-1}(U) to mathbb{R}^q$ are given by $D_i(mathbf{y}) = sum_{j=1}^n psi(mathbf{y})_{ij}y_j = sum_{j=1}^n psi(mathbf{y})_{ij}p_j(mathbf{y})$ with (continuous!) coordinate projections $p_j : (mathbb{R}^q)^n to mathbb{R}^q$.
edited Jan 26 at 14:27
answered Jan 25 at 14:41
Paul FrostPaul Frost
11.3k3934
11.3k3934
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068413%2fcontinuity-of-a-map-proving-manifold-structure-of-grassmanian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown