Why do we start from the bottom note when counting intervals?












4















Say if I play G to C descending, my intuition tells me to start from the note that came first. But I've been told that's not correct. You start from the bass note and count up no matter what.










share|improve this question





























    4















    Say if I play G to C descending, my intuition tells me to start from the note that came first. But I've been told that's not correct. You start from the bass note and count up no matter what.










    share|improve this question



























      4












      4








      4








      Say if I play G to C descending, my intuition tells me to start from the note that came first. But I've been told that's not correct. You start from the bass note and count up no matter what.










      share|improve this question
















      Say if I play G to C descending, my intuition tells me to start from the note that came first. But I've been told that's not correct. You start from the bass note and count up no matter what.







      theory notation intervals






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 23 at 3:35









      Dom

      36.2k19105222




      36.2k19105222










      asked Jan 23 at 3:18









      BrandonBrandon

      1396




      1396






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          You can describe intervals as ascending (lower note to higher note) or descending (higher note to lower note), although almost all music theory concepts strictly talk about ascending like your teacher says.



          The reason for this is simple and it's to do with the physics behind music. Notes generate what are known as harmonics. So not only do you get the fundamental pitch, but you also get multiples of it depending on the exact tone. This is also why inversions, even though they contain the same set of notes, can have different functions and roles in harmony due to the interaction between them. It's also why we make distinctions between inverse intervals. For example, the perfect 5th interval's inversion, a perfect 4th, is dissonant in some contexts even though the perfect 5th has been consistently considered consonant.





          For more reading about the importance of bass in harmony see this question.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks! I remember seeing a video about the importance of bass in harmonic function actually. I thought it had something to do with that but I'm always the type to get a second opinion. (^_^)m/

            – Brandon
            Jan 23 at 5:04





















          1














          It could have been counted either way - resulting in two different answers to the same question - what's the interval between G and C?



          It's easier to count upwards, and most of what we do goes left to right, so this has become convention. G>C we count as P4, whereas C>G is P5. G>C descending puts C underneath, therefore it's P5. There's a 'rule of nine' for inverts, so P5 inverted becomes P4. Majors become minors when inverted, and diminished become augmented (and vice versa). Agreement on the method used to identify intervals saves a lot of arguments and confusion!






          share|improve this answer































            0














            Although, as @Dom says, the convention is to describe the ascending interval, it doesn't really matter in terms of distance if you describe it ascending or descending. It becomes clear if you use a specific pitch label like Helmholtz or scientific notation. G4 to C4 is the same as C4 to G4. Either way it's still a perfect fifth. But the convention is to refer to a G4 above a C4, or a perfect fifth above C4.



            Just to add a bit to the detail about bass and harmony: when describing chord root movements (not actual bass movement) the convention is describe descending intervals from a step to a fifth and then ascending intervals for anything larger than a descending fifth. For example, root progression by descending fifth or descending third, but rather than root progression by descending minor seventh it would be root progression by ascending major second. Not root progression by descending sixth, but root progression by ascending third.






            share|improve this answer































              -1














              For harmonic intervals, saying "a perfect fourth" covers both directions: a perfect fourth above C is F, and a perfect fourth down from F is C.



              For melodic intervals, you would start from the first note, not the bottom: I go up a perfect fourth from C to get to F, and I go down a perfect fourth from F to get to C. It's about the direction you're going, not which one is higher or lower.






              share|improve this answer























                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "240"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79156%2fwhy-do-we-start-from-the-bottom-note-when-counting-intervals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                5














                You can describe intervals as ascending (lower note to higher note) or descending (higher note to lower note), although almost all music theory concepts strictly talk about ascending like your teacher says.



                The reason for this is simple and it's to do with the physics behind music. Notes generate what are known as harmonics. So not only do you get the fundamental pitch, but you also get multiples of it depending on the exact tone. This is also why inversions, even though they contain the same set of notes, can have different functions and roles in harmony due to the interaction between them. It's also why we make distinctions between inverse intervals. For example, the perfect 5th interval's inversion, a perfect 4th, is dissonant in some contexts even though the perfect 5th has been consistently considered consonant.





                For more reading about the importance of bass in harmony see this question.






                share|improve this answer


























                • Thanks! I remember seeing a video about the importance of bass in harmonic function actually. I thought it had something to do with that but I'm always the type to get a second opinion. (^_^)m/

                  – Brandon
                  Jan 23 at 5:04


















                5














                You can describe intervals as ascending (lower note to higher note) or descending (higher note to lower note), although almost all music theory concepts strictly talk about ascending like your teacher says.



                The reason for this is simple and it's to do with the physics behind music. Notes generate what are known as harmonics. So not only do you get the fundamental pitch, but you also get multiples of it depending on the exact tone. This is also why inversions, even though they contain the same set of notes, can have different functions and roles in harmony due to the interaction between them. It's also why we make distinctions between inverse intervals. For example, the perfect 5th interval's inversion, a perfect 4th, is dissonant in some contexts even though the perfect 5th has been consistently considered consonant.





                For more reading about the importance of bass in harmony see this question.






                share|improve this answer


























                • Thanks! I remember seeing a video about the importance of bass in harmonic function actually. I thought it had something to do with that but I'm always the type to get a second opinion. (^_^)m/

                  – Brandon
                  Jan 23 at 5:04
















                5












                5








                5







                You can describe intervals as ascending (lower note to higher note) or descending (higher note to lower note), although almost all music theory concepts strictly talk about ascending like your teacher says.



                The reason for this is simple and it's to do with the physics behind music. Notes generate what are known as harmonics. So not only do you get the fundamental pitch, but you also get multiples of it depending on the exact tone. This is also why inversions, even though they contain the same set of notes, can have different functions and roles in harmony due to the interaction between them. It's also why we make distinctions between inverse intervals. For example, the perfect 5th interval's inversion, a perfect 4th, is dissonant in some contexts even though the perfect 5th has been consistently considered consonant.





                For more reading about the importance of bass in harmony see this question.






                share|improve this answer















                You can describe intervals as ascending (lower note to higher note) or descending (higher note to lower note), although almost all music theory concepts strictly talk about ascending like your teacher says.



                The reason for this is simple and it's to do with the physics behind music. Notes generate what are known as harmonics. So not only do you get the fundamental pitch, but you also get multiples of it depending on the exact tone. This is also why inversions, even though they contain the same set of notes, can have different functions and roles in harmony due to the interaction between them. It's also why we make distinctions between inverse intervals. For example, the perfect 5th interval's inversion, a perfect 4th, is dissonant in some contexts even though the perfect 5th has been consistently considered consonant.





                For more reading about the importance of bass in harmony see this question.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Jan 23 at 14:19









                trw

                2,4531127




                2,4531127










                answered Jan 23 at 3:34









                DomDom

                36.2k19105222




                36.2k19105222













                • Thanks! I remember seeing a video about the importance of bass in harmonic function actually. I thought it had something to do with that but I'm always the type to get a second opinion. (^_^)m/

                  – Brandon
                  Jan 23 at 5:04





















                • Thanks! I remember seeing a video about the importance of bass in harmonic function actually. I thought it had something to do with that but I'm always the type to get a second opinion. (^_^)m/

                  – Brandon
                  Jan 23 at 5:04



















                Thanks! I remember seeing a video about the importance of bass in harmonic function actually. I thought it had something to do with that but I'm always the type to get a second opinion. (^_^)m/

                – Brandon
                Jan 23 at 5:04







                Thanks! I remember seeing a video about the importance of bass in harmonic function actually. I thought it had something to do with that but I'm always the type to get a second opinion. (^_^)m/

                – Brandon
                Jan 23 at 5:04













                1














                It could have been counted either way - resulting in two different answers to the same question - what's the interval between G and C?



                It's easier to count upwards, and most of what we do goes left to right, so this has become convention. G>C we count as P4, whereas C>G is P5. G>C descending puts C underneath, therefore it's P5. There's a 'rule of nine' for inverts, so P5 inverted becomes P4. Majors become minors when inverted, and diminished become augmented (and vice versa). Agreement on the method used to identify intervals saves a lot of arguments and confusion!






                share|improve this answer




























                  1














                  It could have been counted either way - resulting in two different answers to the same question - what's the interval between G and C?



                  It's easier to count upwards, and most of what we do goes left to right, so this has become convention. G>C we count as P4, whereas C>G is P5. G>C descending puts C underneath, therefore it's P5. There's a 'rule of nine' for inverts, so P5 inverted becomes P4. Majors become minors when inverted, and diminished become augmented (and vice versa). Agreement on the method used to identify intervals saves a lot of arguments and confusion!






                  share|improve this answer


























                    1












                    1








                    1







                    It could have been counted either way - resulting in two different answers to the same question - what's the interval between G and C?



                    It's easier to count upwards, and most of what we do goes left to right, so this has become convention. G>C we count as P4, whereas C>G is P5. G>C descending puts C underneath, therefore it's P5. There's a 'rule of nine' for inverts, so P5 inverted becomes P4. Majors become minors when inverted, and diminished become augmented (and vice versa). Agreement on the method used to identify intervals saves a lot of arguments and confusion!






                    share|improve this answer













                    It could have been counted either way - resulting in two different answers to the same question - what's the interval between G and C?



                    It's easier to count upwards, and most of what we do goes left to right, so this has become convention. G>C we count as P4, whereas C>G is P5. G>C descending puts C underneath, therefore it's P5. There's a 'rule of nine' for inverts, so P5 inverted becomes P4. Majors become minors when inverted, and diminished become augmented (and vice versa). Agreement on the method used to identify intervals saves a lot of arguments and confusion!







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 23 at 8:41









                    TimTim

                    101k10104256




                    101k10104256























                        0














                        Although, as @Dom says, the convention is to describe the ascending interval, it doesn't really matter in terms of distance if you describe it ascending or descending. It becomes clear if you use a specific pitch label like Helmholtz or scientific notation. G4 to C4 is the same as C4 to G4. Either way it's still a perfect fifth. But the convention is to refer to a G4 above a C4, or a perfect fifth above C4.



                        Just to add a bit to the detail about bass and harmony: when describing chord root movements (not actual bass movement) the convention is describe descending intervals from a step to a fifth and then ascending intervals for anything larger than a descending fifth. For example, root progression by descending fifth or descending third, but rather than root progression by descending minor seventh it would be root progression by ascending major second. Not root progression by descending sixth, but root progression by ascending third.






                        share|improve this answer




























                          0














                          Although, as @Dom says, the convention is to describe the ascending interval, it doesn't really matter in terms of distance if you describe it ascending or descending. It becomes clear if you use a specific pitch label like Helmholtz or scientific notation. G4 to C4 is the same as C4 to G4. Either way it's still a perfect fifth. But the convention is to refer to a G4 above a C4, or a perfect fifth above C4.



                          Just to add a bit to the detail about bass and harmony: when describing chord root movements (not actual bass movement) the convention is describe descending intervals from a step to a fifth and then ascending intervals for anything larger than a descending fifth. For example, root progression by descending fifth or descending third, but rather than root progression by descending minor seventh it would be root progression by ascending major second. Not root progression by descending sixth, but root progression by ascending third.






                          share|improve this answer


























                            0












                            0








                            0







                            Although, as @Dom says, the convention is to describe the ascending interval, it doesn't really matter in terms of distance if you describe it ascending or descending. It becomes clear if you use a specific pitch label like Helmholtz or scientific notation. G4 to C4 is the same as C4 to G4. Either way it's still a perfect fifth. But the convention is to refer to a G4 above a C4, or a perfect fifth above C4.



                            Just to add a bit to the detail about bass and harmony: when describing chord root movements (not actual bass movement) the convention is describe descending intervals from a step to a fifth and then ascending intervals for anything larger than a descending fifth. For example, root progression by descending fifth or descending third, but rather than root progression by descending minor seventh it would be root progression by ascending major second. Not root progression by descending sixth, but root progression by ascending third.






                            share|improve this answer













                            Although, as @Dom says, the convention is to describe the ascending interval, it doesn't really matter in terms of distance if you describe it ascending or descending. It becomes clear if you use a specific pitch label like Helmholtz or scientific notation. G4 to C4 is the same as C4 to G4. Either way it's still a perfect fifth. But the convention is to refer to a G4 above a C4, or a perfect fifth above C4.



                            Just to add a bit to the detail about bass and harmony: when describing chord root movements (not actual bass movement) the convention is describe descending intervals from a step to a fifth and then ascending intervals for anything larger than a descending fifth. For example, root progression by descending fifth or descending third, but rather than root progression by descending minor seventh it would be root progression by ascending major second. Not root progression by descending sixth, but root progression by ascending third.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 23 at 14:11









                            Michael CurtisMichael Curtis

                            8,164531




                            8,164531























                                -1














                                For harmonic intervals, saying "a perfect fourth" covers both directions: a perfect fourth above C is F, and a perfect fourth down from F is C.



                                For melodic intervals, you would start from the first note, not the bottom: I go up a perfect fourth from C to get to F, and I go down a perfect fourth from F to get to C. It's about the direction you're going, not which one is higher or lower.






                                share|improve this answer




























                                  -1














                                  For harmonic intervals, saying "a perfect fourth" covers both directions: a perfect fourth above C is F, and a perfect fourth down from F is C.



                                  For melodic intervals, you would start from the first note, not the bottom: I go up a perfect fourth from C to get to F, and I go down a perfect fourth from F to get to C. It's about the direction you're going, not which one is higher or lower.






                                  share|improve this answer


























                                    -1












                                    -1








                                    -1







                                    For harmonic intervals, saying "a perfect fourth" covers both directions: a perfect fourth above C is F, and a perfect fourth down from F is C.



                                    For melodic intervals, you would start from the first note, not the bottom: I go up a perfect fourth from C to get to F, and I go down a perfect fourth from F to get to C. It's about the direction you're going, not which one is higher or lower.






                                    share|improve this answer













                                    For harmonic intervals, saying "a perfect fourth" covers both directions: a perfect fourth above C is F, and a perfect fourth down from F is C.



                                    For melodic intervals, you would start from the first note, not the bottom: I go up a perfect fourth from C to get to F, and I go down a perfect fourth from F to get to C. It's about the direction you're going, not which one is higher or lower.







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered Jan 24 at 0:29









                                    John DoeJohn Doe

                                    50416




                                    50416






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79156%2fwhy-do-we-start-from-the-bottom-note-when-counting-intervals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Human spaceflight

                                        Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                                        File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg