Question about vector equations of lines and planes












0












$begingroup$


Find the equation of the line going through the point $(2,-3,4)$ ,and which is perpendicular to the plane $ x+2y + 2z = 13$



So I tried this: the normal of the plane is $(1,2,2)$, random point on the line is $(x,y,z)$, so direction vector is $(x-2,y+3,z-4)$. We'll require $(x-2,y+3,z-4)cdot (1,2,2) = 0$. This yields $x-2y+2z -4 =0$



let us take $z=y=1$. that makes $x=0$ and so $(0,1,1)$ is a random point on the plane; and so we get direction vector $(-2,4,-3)$. This gives a line equation of: $(2,-3,4) + t(-2,4,-3)$ ;



general point on such a line is: $(2-2t,4t-3,-3t+4)$.
We also need to find it's point of intersection with the plane $ x+2y + 2z = 13$, so we substitute values of the
general point to the plane $ x+2y + 2z = 13$. this however yields $0=9$ which is a little unsatisfying.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Find the equation of the line going through the point $(2,-3,4)$ ,and which is perpendicular to the plane $ x+2y + 2z = 13$



    So I tried this: the normal of the plane is $(1,2,2)$, random point on the line is $(x,y,z)$, so direction vector is $(x-2,y+3,z-4)$. We'll require $(x-2,y+3,z-4)cdot (1,2,2) = 0$. This yields $x-2y+2z -4 =0$



    let us take $z=y=1$. that makes $x=0$ and so $(0,1,1)$ is a random point on the plane; and so we get direction vector $(-2,4,-3)$. This gives a line equation of: $(2,-3,4) + t(-2,4,-3)$ ;



    general point on such a line is: $(2-2t,4t-3,-3t+4)$.
    We also need to find it's point of intersection with the plane $ x+2y + 2z = 13$, so we substitute values of the
    general point to the plane $ x+2y + 2z = 13$. this however yields $0=9$ which is a little unsatisfying.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Find the equation of the line going through the point $(2,-3,4)$ ,and which is perpendicular to the plane $ x+2y + 2z = 13$



      So I tried this: the normal of the plane is $(1,2,2)$, random point on the line is $(x,y,z)$, so direction vector is $(x-2,y+3,z-4)$. We'll require $(x-2,y+3,z-4)cdot (1,2,2) = 0$. This yields $x-2y+2z -4 =0$



      let us take $z=y=1$. that makes $x=0$ and so $(0,1,1)$ is a random point on the plane; and so we get direction vector $(-2,4,-3)$. This gives a line equation of: $(2,-3,4) + t(-2,4,-3)$ ;



      general point on such a line is: $(2-2t,4t-3,-3t+4)$.
      We also need to find it's point of intersection with the plane $ x+2y + 2z = 13$, so we substitute values of the
      general point to the plane $ x+2y + 2z = 13$. this however yields $0=9$ which is a little unsatisfying.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Find the equation of the line going through the point $(2,-3,4)$ ,and which is perpendicular to the plane $ x+2y + 2z = 13$



      So I tried this: the normal of the plane is $(1,2,2)$, random point on the line is $(x,y,z)$, so direction vector is $(x-2,y+3,z-4)$. We'll require $(x-2,y+3,z-4)cdot (1,2,2) = 0$. This yields $x-2y+2z -4 =0$



      let us take $z=y=1$. that makes $x=0$ and so $(0,1,1)$ is a random point on the plane; and so we get direction vector $(-2,4,-3)$. This gives a line equation of: $(2,-3,4) + t(-2,4,-3)$ ;



      general point on such a line is: $(2-2t,4t-3,-3t+4)$.
      We also need to find it's point of intersection with the plane $ x+2y + 2z = 13$, so we substitute values of the
      general point to the plane $ x+2y + 2z = 13$. this however yields $0=9$ which is a little unsatisfying.







      vector-spaces vector-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 14 '14 at 19:32







      Bak1139

















      asked Apr 14 '14 at 19:18









      Bak1139Bak1139

      1,39121232




      1,39121232






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          The reason why you get $0=9$ is that there is no intersection; the intersection is empty. Notice that the plane $P: x+2y+2z=13$ is parallel to the original plane, and so is the line. This means that either the line lies on the plane $P$ , or the line is parallel to it--and the second choice here is the case. If you start with a wrong assumption you may not get a good result (i.e., you are not guaranteed to, which you would be if you started with a true premise and argued correctly) , even if you argue correctly .



          EDIT: Since the point lies on a line perpendicular to the plane thru $(2, -3,4)$, the line must be of the type : $L: (2,-3,4)+ t(1,2,2)=(2+t, -3+2t, 4+2t)=(x,y,z)$ . We then substitute this form into $x+2y+2z=13$, and find that $t=1$ is the solution ( makes sense, since both must intersect at a single point by a (co)dimension argument ). From $t=1$, we get that the intersection point is $(2+1, -3+2, 4+2)=(3,-1,6)$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Well, according to the answers such an intersection exists; it is $(3,-1,6)$
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:26










          • $begingroup$
            @Bak1139 If you find a line parallel to a plane, then the plane and line will never intersect (unless the line is part of the plane). Since they point in the same direction.
            $endgroup$
            – George1811
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:29












          • $begingroup$
            you all are absolutely right, there is a typo...I'll fix
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:31










          • $begingroup$
            But the line is parallel to the original plane, and the second plane you're given; $x+2y+2z=13$ is parallel to the original plane, since both have the same ( up to scaling) normal vector $(1,2,2)$ . So the line and the two planes are either parallel, or the line lies on the plane. The answer is that the line is parallel to the second plane. I think the answer $(3,-1,6)$ is a mistake; notice that $(3,-1,6)$ is not on the line.
            $endgroup$
            – guero
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:34










          • $begingroup$
            perpendicularity is indeed the correct given data, at the problem beginning
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:36











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f753784%2fquestion-about-vector-equations-of-lines-and-planes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          The reason why you get $0=9$ is that there is no intersection; the intersection is empty. Notice that the plane $P: x+2y+2z=13$ is parallel to the original plane, and so is the line. This means that either the line lies on the plane $P$ , or the line is parallel to it--and the second choice here is the case. If you start with a wrong assumption you may not get a good result (i.e., you are not guaranteed to, which you would be if you started with a true premise and argued correctly) , even if you argue correctly .



          EDIT: Since the point lies on a line perpendicular to the plane thru $(2, -3,4)$, the line must be of the type : $L: (2,-3,4)+ t(1,2,2)=(2+t, -3+2t, 4+2t)=(x,y,z)$ . We then substitute this form into $x+2y+2z=13$, and find that $t=1$ is the solution ( makes sense, since both must intersect at a single point by a (co)dimension argument ). From $t=1$, we get that the intersection point is $(2+1, -3+2, 4+2)=(3,-1,6)$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Well, according to the answers such an intersection exists; it is $(3,-1,6)$
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:26










          • $begingroup$
            @Bak1139 If you find a line parallel to a plane, then the plane and line will never intersect (unless the line is part of the plane). Since they point in the same direction.
            $endgroup$
            – George1811
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:29












          • $begingroup$
            you all are absolutely right, there is a typo...I'll fix
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:31










          • $begingroup$
            But the line is parallel to the original plane, and the second plane you're given; $x+2y+2z=13$ is parallel to the original plane, since both have the same ( up to scaling) normal vector $(1,2,2)$ . So the line and the two planes are either parallel, or the line lies on the plane. The answer is that the line is parallel to the second plane. I think the answer $(3,-1,6)$ is a mistake; notice that $(3,-1,6)$ is not on the line.
            $endgroup$
            – guero
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:34










          • $begingroup$
            perpendicularity is indeed the correct given data, at the problem beginning
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:36
















          0












          $begingroup$

          The reason why you get $0=9$ is that there is no intersection; the intersection is empty. Notice that the plane $P: x+2y+2z=13$ is parallel to the original plane, and so is the line. This means that either the line lies on the plane $P$ , or the line is parallel to it--and the second choice here is the case. If you start with a wrong assumption you may not get a good result (i.e., you are not guaranteed to, which you would be if you started with a true premise and argued correctly) , even if you argue correctly .



          EDIT: Since the point lies on a line perpendicular to the plane thru $(2, -3,4)$, the line must be of the type : $L: (2,-3,4)+ t(1,2,2)=(2+t, -3+2t, 4+2t)=(x,y,z)$ . We then substitute this form into $x+2y+2z=13$, and find that $t=1$ is the solution ( makes sense, since both must intersect at a single point by a (co)dimension argument ). From $t=1$, we get that the intersection point is $(2+1, -3+2, 4+2)=(3,-1,6)$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Well, according to the answers such an intersection exists; it is $(3,-1,6)$
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:26










          • $begingroup$
            @Bak1139 If you find a line parallel to a plane, then the plane and line will never intersect (unless the line is part of the plane). Since they point in the same direction.
            $endgroup$
            – George1811
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:29












          • $begingroup$
            you all are absolutely right, there is a typo...I'll fix
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:31










          • $begingroup$
            But the line is parallel to the original plane, and the second plane you're given; $x+2y+2z=13$ is parallel to the original plane, since both have the same ( up to scaling) normal vector $(1,2,2)$ . So the line and the two planes are either parallel, or the line lies on the plane. The answer is that the line is parallel to the second plane. I think the answer $(3,-1,6)$ is a mistake; notice that $(3,-1,6)$ is not on the line.
            $endgroup$
            – guero
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:34










          • $begingroup$
            perpendicularity is indeed the correct given data, at the problem beginning
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:36














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          The reason why you get $0=9$ is that there is no intersection; the intersection is empty. Notice that the plane $P: x+2y+2z=13$ is parallel to the original plane, and so is the line. This means that either the line lies on the plane $P$ , or the line is parallel to it--and the second choice here is the case. If you start with a wrong assumption you may not get a good result (i.e., you are not guaranteed to, which you would be if you started with a true premise and argued correctly) , even if you argue correctly .



          EDIT: Since the point lies on a line perpendicular to the plane thru $(2, -3,4)$, the line must be of the type : $L: (2,-3,4)+ t(1,2,2)=(2+t, -3+2t, 4+2t)=(x,y,z)$ . We then substitute this form into $x+2y+2z=13$, and find that $t=1$ is the solution ( makes sense, since both must intersect at a single point by a (co)dimension argument ). From $t=1$, we get that the intersection point is $(2+1, -3+2, 4+2)=(3,-1,6)$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The reason why you get $0=9$ is that there is no intersection; the intersection is empty. Notice that the plane $P: x+2y+2z=13$ is parallel to the original plane, and so is the line. This means that either the line lies on the plane $P$ , or the line is parallel to it--and the second choice here is the case. If you start with a wrong assumption you may not get a good result (i.e., you are not guaranteed to, which you would be if you started with a true premise and argued correctly) , even if you argue correctly .



          EDIT: Since the point lies on a line perpendicular to the plane thru $(2, -3,4)$, the line must be of the type : $L: (2,-3,4)+ t(1,2,2)=(2+t, -3+2t, 4+2t)=(x,y,z)$ . We then substitute this form into $x+2y+2z=13$, and find that $t=1$ is the solution ( makes sense, since both must intersect at a single point by a (co)dimension argument ). From $t=1$, we get that the intersection point is $(2+1, -3+2, 4+2)=(3,-1,6)$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Apr 14 '14 at 20:21

























          answered Apr 14 '14 at 19:24









          gueroguero

          362




          362












          • $begingroup$
            Well, according to the answers such an intersection exists; it is $(3,-1,6)$
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:26










          • $begingroup$
            @Bak1139 If you find a line parallel to a plane, then the plane and line will never intersect (unless the line is part of the plane). Since they point in the same direction.
            $endgroup$
            – George1811
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:29












          • $begingroup$
            you all are absolutely right, there is a typo...I'll fix
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:31










          • $begingroup$
            But the line is parallel to the original plane, and the second plane you're given; $x+2y+2z=13$ is parallel to the original plane, since both have the same ( up to scaling) normal vector $(1,2,2)$ . So the line and the two planes are either parallel, or the line lies on the plane. The answer is that the line is parallel to the second plane. I think the answer $(3,-1,6)$ is a mistake; notice that $(3,-1,6)$ is not on the line.
            $endgroup$
            – guero
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:34










          • $begingroup$
            perpendicularity is indeed the correct given data, at the problem beginning
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:36


















          • $begingroup$
            Well, according to the answers such an intersection exists; it is $(3,-1,6)$
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:26










          • $begingroup$
            @Bak1139 If you find a line parallel to a plane, then the plane and line will never intersect (unless the line is part of the plane). Since they point in the same direction.
            $endgroup$
            – George1811
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:29












          • $begingroup$
            you all are absolutely right, there is a typo...I'll fix
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:31










          • $begingroup$
            But the line is parallel to the original plane, and the second plane you're given; $x+2y+2z=13$ is parallel to the original plane, since both have the same ( up to scaling) normal vector $(1,2,2)$ . So the line and the two planes are either parallel, or the line lies on the plane. The answer is that the line is parallel to the second plane. I think the answer $(3,-1,6)$ is a mistake; notice that $(3,-1,6)$ is not on the line.
            $endgroup$
            – guero
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:34










          • $begingroup$
            perpendicularity is indeed the correct given data, at the problem beginning
            $endgroup$
            – Bak1139
            Apr 14 '14 at 19:36
















          $begingroup$
          Well, according to the answers such an intersection exists; it is $(3,-1,6)$
          $endgroup$
          – Bak1139
          Apr 14 '14 at 19:26




          $begingroup$
          Well, according to the answers such an intersection exists; it is $(3,-1,6)$
          $endgroup$
          – Bak1139
          Apr 14 '14 at 19:26












          $begingroup$
          @Bak1139 If you find a line parallel to a plane, then the plane and line will never intersect (unless the line is part of the plane). Since they point in the same direction.
          $endgroup$
          – George1811
          Apr 14 '14 at 19:29






          $begingroup$
          @Bak1139 If you find a line parallel to a plane, then the plane and line will never intersect (unless the line is part of the plane). Since they point in the same direction.
          $endgroup$
          – George1811
          Apr 14 '14 at 19:29














          $begingroup$
          you all are absolutely right, there is a typo...I'll fix
          $endgroup$
          – Bak1139
          Apr 14 '14 at 19:31




          $begingroup$
          you all are absolutely right, there is a typo...I'll fix
          $endgroup$
          – Bak1139
          Apr 14 '14 at 19:31












          $begingroup$
          But the line is parallel to the original plane, and the second plane you're given; $x+2y+2z=13$ is parallel to the original plane, since both have the same ( up to scaling) normal vector $(1,2,2)$ . So the line and the two planes are either parallel, or the line lies on the plane. The answer is that the line is parallel to the second plane. I think the answer $(3,-1,6)$ is a mistake; notice that $(3,-1,6)$ is not on the line.
          $endgroup$
          – guero
          Apr 14 '14 at 19:34




          $begingroup$
          But the line is parallel to the original plane, and the second plane you're given; $x+2y+2z=13$ is parallel to the original plane, since both have the same ( up to scaling) normal vector $(1,2,2)$ . So the line and the two planes are either parallel, or the line lies on the plane. The answer is that the line is parallel to the second plane. I think the answer $(3,-1,6)$ is a mistake; notice that $(3,-1,6)$ is not on the line.
          $endgroup$
          – guero
          Apr 14 '14 at 19:34












          $begingroup$
          perpendicularity is indeed the correct given data, at the problem beginning
          $endgroup$
          – Bak1139
          Apr 14 '14 at 19:36




          $begingroup$
          perpendicularity is indeed the correct given data, at the problem beginning
          $endgroup$
          – Bak1139
          Apr 14 '14 at 19:36


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f753784%2fquestion-about-vector-equations-of-lines-and-planes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Human spaceflight

          Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

          File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg