Geometric distribution of independent t random variables and their limit












2












$begingroup$


let there be $X_1,X_2,...,X_t$ independent random variables that are distributed $X_itext{~}Geo(frac{1}{2})$ for every $1le i le t$. Show that there is a constant $c gt 0 $ so that for every $a gt 3$ and every $t ge 1$:



$$ P(X_1 + X_2 + ... + X_t ge a cdot t) le 2^{-c cdot a cdot t}$$



Mention specifically the constant and prove its correctness.



So far I tried using Chernoff bounds but I am not able to complete the calculation due to the $delta$, the expected value can be found due to the geometry of the the random variable, moreover is that they are independent so we can also find variance but I don't see a use for it at the moment.
I have also tried maybe getting the expression to the central limit theorem but that was a dead end as well, any help would be much appreciated.






probability







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure you don't mean $2^{-cat}$? $2^{cat}$ is bigger than $1$, so the probability is trivially less than $2^{cat}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    Jan 5 at 18:28










  • $begingroup$
    Yes you are right, i edited.
    $endgroup$
    – LonelyStudent
    Jan 5 at 18:29
















2












$begingroup$


let there be $X_1,X_2,...,X_t$ independent random variables that are distributed $X_itext{~}Geo(frac{1}{2})$ for every $1le i le t$. Show that there is a constant $c gt 0 $ so that for every $a gt 3$ and every $t ge 1$:



$$ P(X_1 + X_2 + ... + X_t ge a cdot t) le 2^{-c cdot a cdot t}$$



Mention specifically the constant and prove its correctness.



So far I tried using Chernoff bounds but I am not able to complete the calculation due to the $delta$, the expected value can be found due to the geometry of the the random variable, moreover is that they are independent so we can also find variance but I don't see a use for it at the moment.
I have also tried maybe getting the expression to the central limit theorem but that was a dead end as well, any help would be much appreciated.






probability







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure you don't mean $2^{-cat}$? $2^{cat}$ is bigger than $1$, so the probability is trivially less than $2^{cat}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    Jan 5 at 18:28










  • $begingroup$
    Yes you are right, i edited.
    $endgroup$
    – LonelyStudent
    Jan 5 at 18:29














2












2








2





$begingroup$


let there be $X_1,X_2,...,X_t$ independent random variables that are distributed $X_itext{~}Geo(frac{1}{2})$ for every $1le i le t$. Show that there is a constant $c gt 0 $ so that for every $a gt 3$ and every $t ge 1$:



$$ P(X_1 + X_2 + ... + X_t ge a cdot t) le 2^{-c cdot a cdot t}$$



Mention specifically the constant and prove its correctness.



So far I tried using Chernoff bounds but I am not able to complete the calculation due to the $delta$, the expected value can be found due to the geometry of the the random variable, moreover is that they are independent so we can also find variance but I don't see a use for it at the moment.
I have also tried maybe getting the expression to the central limit theorem but that was a dead end as well, any help would be much appreciated.






probability







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




let there be $X_1,X_2,...,X_t$ independent random variables that are distributed $X_itext{~}Geo(frac{1}{2})$ for every $1le i le t$. Show that there is a constant $c gt 0 $ so that for every $a gt 3$ and every $t ge 1$:



$$ P(X_1 + X_2 + ... + X_t ge a cdot t) le 2^{-c cdot a cdot t}$$



Mention specifically the constant and prove its correctness.



So far I tried using Chernoff bounds but I am not able to complete the calculation due to the $delta$, the expected value can be found due to the geometry of the the random variable, moreover is that they are independent so we can also find variance but I don't see a use for it at the moment.
I have also tried maybe getting the expression to the central limit theorem but that was a dead end as well, any help would be much appreciated.






probability




probability






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 5 at 18:30







LonelyStudent

















asked Jan 5 at 17:33









LonelyStudentLonelyStudent

523




523












  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure you don't mean $2^{-cat}$? $2^{cat}$ is bigger than $1$, so the probability is trivially less than $2^{cat}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    Jan 5 at 18:28










  • $begingroup$
    Yes you are right, i edited.
    $endgroup$
    – LonelyStudent
    Jan 5 at 18:29


















  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure you don't mean $2^{-cat}$? $2^{cat}$ is bigger than $1$, so the probability is trivially less than $2^{cat}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    Jan 5 at 18:28










  • $begingroup$
    Yes you are right, i edited.
    $endgroup$
    – LonelyStudent
    Jan 5 at 18:29
















$begingroup$
Are you sure you don't mean $2^{-cat}$? $2^{cat}$ is bigger than $1$, so the probability is trivially less than $2^{cat}$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 18:28




$begingroup$
Are you sure you don't mean $2^{-cat}$? $2^{cat}$ is bigger than $1$, so the probability is trivially less than $2^{cat}$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 18:28












$begingroup$
Yes you are right, i edited.
$endgroup$
– LonelyStudent
Jan 5 at 18:29




$begingroup$
Yes you are right, i edited.
$endgroup$
– LonelyStudent
Jan 5 at 18:29










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

$E[e^{sX_1}]=sum_k (1/2)^{k+1}e^{sk}=1/(2-e^s). $ Therefore, the mgf for $X_1+dots+X_t$ is $(2-e^{s})^{-t}$, valid for all $s<ln 2$.



For any $0<s<ln 2$,
$$
P(X_1+dots+X_tge at)=P(e^{s(X_1+dots+X_t)}ge e^{sat})lefrac{E[e^{s(X_1+dots+X_t)}]}{e^{sat}}= e^{-sat}(2-e^s)^{-t}.
$$
Now choose $s$ so that $2-e^s=e^{-1/2}$, namely $s=log(2-e^{-1/2})approx 0.33$. Then since $sa ge 0.33cdot 3ge 3/4$, we have $frac23 sage frac12$, so
$$
P(X_1+dots+X_tge at)le e^{-sat}cdot e^{t/2}=e^{-(sa-frac12)t}ge e^{-(sa-frac23sa)t}=2^{-(log_2 e)sat/3}.$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062957%2fgeometric-distribution-of-independent-t-random-variables-and-their-limit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    $E[e^{sX_1}]=sum_k (1/2)^{k+1}e^{sk}=1/(2-e^s). $ Therefore, the mgf for $X_1+dots+X_t$ is $(2-e^{s})^{-t}$, valid for all $s<ln 2$.



    For any $0<s<ln 2$,
    $$
    P(X_1+dots+X_tge at)=P(e^{s(X_1+dots+X_t)}ge e^{sat})lefrac{E[e^{s(X_1+dots+X_t)}]}{e^{sat}}= e^{-sat}(2-e^s)^{-t}.
    $$
    Now choose $s$ so that $2-e^s=e^{-1/2}$, namely $s=log(2-e^{-1/2})approx 0.33$. Then since $sa ge 0.33cdot 3ge 3/4$, we have $frac23 sage frac12$, so
    $$
    P(X_1+dots+X_tge at)le e^{-sat}cdot e^{t/2}=e^{-(sa-frac12)t}ge e^{-(sa-frac23sa)t}=2^{-(log_2 e)sat/3}.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      $E[e^{sX_1}]=sum_k (1/2)^{k+1}e^{sk}=1/(2-e^s). $ Therefore, the mgf for $X_1+dots+X_t$ is $(2-e^{s})^{-t}$, valid for all $s<ln 2$.



      For any $0<s<ln 2$,
      $$
      P(X_1+dots+X_tge at)=P(e^{s(X_1+dots+X_t)}ge e^{sat})lefrac{E[e^{s(X_1+dots+X_t)}]}{e^{sat}}= e^{-sat}(2-e^s)^{-t}.
      $$
      Now choose $s$ so that $2-e^s=e^{-1/2}$, namely $s=log(2-e^{-1/2})approx 0.33$. Then since $sa ge 0.33cdot 3ge 3/4$, we have $frac23 sage frac12$, so
      $$
      P(X_1+dots+X_tge at)le e^{-sat}cdot e^{t/2}=e^{-(sa-frac12)t}ge e^{-(sa-frac23sa)t}=2^{-(log_2 e)sat/3}.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        $E[e^{sX_1}]=sum_k (1/2)^{k+1}e^{sk}=1/(2-e^s). $ Therefore, the mgf for $X_1+dots+X_t$ is $(2-e^{s})^{-t}$, valid for all $s<ln 2$.



        For any $0<s<ln 2$,
        $$
        P(X_1+dots+X_tge at)=P(e^{s(X_1+dots+X_t)}ge e^{sat})lefrac{E[e^{s(X_1+dots+X_t)}]}{e^{sat}}= e^{-sat}(2-e^s)^{-t}.
        $$
        Now choose $s$ so that $2-e^s=e^{-1/2}$, namely $s=log(2-e^{-1/2})approx 0.33$. Then since $sa ge 0.33cdot 3ge 3/4$, we have $frac23 sage frac12$, so
        $$
        P(X_1+dots+X_tge at)le e^{-sat}cdot e^{t/2}=e^{-(sa-frac12)t}ge e^{-(sa-frac23sa)t}=2^{-(log_2 e)sat/3}.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        $E[e^{sX_1}]=sum_k (1/2)^{k+1}e^{sk}=1/(2-e^s). $ Therefore, the mgf for $X_1+dots+X_t$ is $(2-e^{s})^{-t}$, valid for all $s<ln 2$.



        For any $0<s<ln 2$,
        $$
        P(X_1+dots+X_tge at)=P(e^{s(X_1+dots+X_t)}ge e^{sat})lefrac{E[e^{s(X_1+dots+X_t)}]}{e^{sat}}= e^{-sat}(2-e^s)^{-t}.
        $$
        Now choose $s$ so that $2-e^s=e^{-1/2}$, namely $s=log(2-e^{-1/2})approx 0.33$. Then since $sa ge 0.33cdot 3ge 3/4$, we have $frac23 sage frac12$, so
        $$
        P(X_1+dots+X_tge at)le e^{-sat}cdot e^{t/2}=e^{-(sa-frac12)t}ge e^{-(sa-frac23sa)t}=2^{-(log_2 e)sat/3}.$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 7 at 16:50

























        answered Jan 5 at 18:35









        Mike EarnestMike Earnest

        22.5k12051




        22.5k12051






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062957%2fgeometric-distribution-of-independent-t-random-variables-and-their-limit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Image
            Human spaceflight From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search "Space traveler" redirects here. For other uses, see Space traveler (disambiguation). @media all and (max-width:720px){.mw-parser-output .tmulti>.thumbinner{width:100%!important;max-width:none!important}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .tsingle{float:none!important;max-width:none!important;width:100%!important;text-align:center}} Apollo 11 crewmember Buzz Aldrin on the Moon, 1969 International Space Station crewmember Tracy Caldwell Dyson views the Earth, 2010 Space Shuttle Discovery heads into space with a crew aboard, STS-121 in 2006 Inside a space suit on the Canadarm, 1993 Human spaceflight (also referred to as crewed spaceflight or manned spaceflight ) is space travel with a crew or passengers aboard the spacecraft. Spacecraft carrying people may be operated directly, by human crew, or it may be e
            Read more

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            Image
            0 1 What exactly does the error message beginning with E: mean? I assume it has to do with the file structure on Ubuntu-on-Windows, but what exactly? The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required: os-prober Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove it. The following extra packages will be installed: libxslt1.1 The following NEW packages will be installed: libxslt1.1 xmlstarlet 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 435 kB of archives. After this operation, 1023 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main libxslt1.1 amd64 1.1.28-2build1 [145 kB] Get:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/universe xmlstarlet amd64 1.5.0-1 [290 kB]
            Read more

            File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg

            Image
            File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search File File history File usage No higher resolution available. DeusFollowingSea.jpg ‎ (238 × 211 pixels, file size: 12 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg ) Summary [ edit ] Media data and Non-free use rationale Description Cover art of the Deus CD Following Sea Author or copyright owner Deus Source (WP:NFCC#4) rocksucker.co.uk Date of publication 2012 Use in article (WP:NFCC#7) Following Sea Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8) to serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question. Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1) n.a. Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3) Low res image used in infobox of the article on the album Respect for commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2) n.a. Fair use Fair use of co
            Read more