Solution for $46x + 10y=2$ for ${ x,y} in mathbb{Z}$ [closed]












-1














I've searched many youtube videos to help me solve them and although I have understood the concepts (using euclidean algorithm) I can't seem to get this right. I'd would prefer the answer to have all steps and explanations along the way, thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Lyon-Dalipsy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Eevee Trainer, KReiser, Lord_Farin Dec 27 '18 at 8:56


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Eevee Trainer, KReiser, Lord_Farin

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Lyon-Dalipsy, welcome to MSE. When you ask for a "solution" to the equation, what do you mean? Do you mean how to determine $y$ in terms of $x$, or something else?
    – John Omielan
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:26










  • @JohnOmielan The number theory tag and the mention of Euclidian algorithm imply that this needs to be solved as a diophantine equation, i.e. finding all integer solutions.
    – N. S.
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:27










  • @N.S. Thanks for mentioning this. I am still fairly new here so I forget that the tags are not just for searching or grouping on, but they also can implicitly specify what questions are being asked.
    – John Omielan
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:29
















-1














I've searched many youtube videos to help me solve them and although I have understood the concepts (using euclidean algorithm) I can't seem to get this right. I'd would prefer the answer to have all steps and explanations along the way, thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Lyon-Dalipsy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Eevee Trainer, KReiser, Lord_Farin Dec 27 '18 at 8:56


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Eevee Trainer, KReiser, Lord_Farin

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Lyon-Dalipsy, welcome to MSE. When you ask for a "solution" to the equation, what do you mean? Do you mean how to determine $y$ in terms of $x$, or something else?
    – John Omielan
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:26










  • @JohnOmielan The number theory tag and the mention of Euclidian algorithm imply that this needs to be solved as a diophantine equation, i.e. finding all integer solutions.
    – N. S.
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:27










  • @N.S. Thanks for mentioning this. I am still fairly new here so I forget that the tags are not just for searching or grouping on, but they also can implicitly specify what questions are being asked.
    – John Omielan
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:29














-1












-1








-1







I've searched many youtube videos to help me solve them and although I have understood the concepts (using euclidean algorithm) I can't seem to get this right. I'd would prefer the answer to have all steps and explanations along the way, thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Lyon-Dalipsy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I've searched many youtube videos to help me solve them and although I have understood the concepts (using euclidean algorithm) I can't seem to get this right. I'd would prefer the answer to have all steps and explanations along the way, thanks.







elementary-number-theory






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Lyon-Dalipsy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Lyon-Dalipsy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 26 '18 at 22:31









David G. Stork

9,79521232




9,79521232






New contributor




Lyon-Dalipsy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Dec 26 '18 at 22:20









Lyon-Dalipsy

11




11




New contributor




Lyon-Dalipsy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Lyon-Dalipsy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Lyon-Dalipsy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Eevee Trainer, KReiser, Lord_Farin Dec 27 '18 at 8:56


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Eevee Trainer, KReiser, Lord_Farin

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Eevee Trainer, KReiser, Lord_Farin Dec 27 '18 at 8:56


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Eevee Trainer, KReiser, Lord_Farin

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Lyon-Dalipsy, welcome to MSE. When you ask for a "solution" to the equation, what do you mean? Do you mean how to determine $y$ in terms of $x$, or something else?
    – John Omielan
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:26










  • @JohnOmielan The number theory tag and the mention of Euclidian algorithm imply that this needs to be solved as a diophantine equation, i.e. finding all integer solutions.
    – N. S.
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:27










  • @N.S. Thanks for mentioning this. I am still fairly new here so I forget that the tags are not just for searching or grouping on, but they also can implicitly specify what questions are being asked.
    – John Omielan
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:29


















  • Lyon-Dalipsy, welcome to MSE. When you ask for a "solution" to the equation, what do you mean? Do you mean how to determine $y$ in terms of $x$, or something else?
    – John Omielan
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:26










  • @JohnOmielan The number theory tag and the mention of Euclidian algorithm imply that this needs to be solved as a diophantine equation, i.e. finding all integer solutions.
    – N. S.
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:27










  • @N.S. Thanks for mentioning this. I am still fairly new here so I forget that the tags are not just for searching or grouping on, but they also can implicitly specify what questions are being asked.
    – John Omielan
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:29
















Lyon-Dalipsy, welcome to MSE. When you ask for a "solution" to the equation, what do you mean? Do you mean how to determine $y$ in terms of $x$, or something else?
– John Omielan
Dec 26 '18 at 22:26




Lyon-Dalipsy, welcome to MSE. When you ask for a "solution" to the equation, what do you mean? Do you mean how to determine $y$ in terms of $x$, or something else?
– John Omielan
Dec 26 '18 at 22:26












@JohnOmielan The number theory tag and the mention of Euclidian algorithm imply that this needs to be solved as a diophantine equation, i.e. finding all integer solutions.
– N. S.
Dec 26 '18 at 22:27




@JohnOmielan The number theory tag and the mention of Euclidian algorithm imply that this needs to be solved as a diophantine equation, i.e. finding all integer solutions.
– N. S.
Dec 26 '18 at 22:27












@N.S. Thanks for mentioning this. I am still fairly new here so I forget that the tags are not just for searching or grouping on, but they also can implicitly specify what questions are being asked.
– John Omielan
Dec 26 '18 at 22:29




@N.S. Thanks for mentioning this. I am still fairly new here so I forget that the tags are not just for searching or grouping on, but they also can implicitly specify what questions are being asked.
– John Omielan
Dec 26 '18 at 22:29










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















0














This is a actually a pretty straightforward application of the euclidean algorithm. First we want to find gcd(10,46). Since 10 = 2*5 and 46 is not divisible by 5, the gcd is 2. So we know that there are integers x,y such that 46x+10y=gcd(10,46).



So we do the euclidean algorithm:
$$ 46 = 4(10)+6$$
$$ 10 = 1(6) + 4$$
$$ 6 = 1(4)+2$$



Now we reverse the steps to get our equation.
$$ 6-1(4) = 2$$
$$ 6-1(10-1(6))=2$$ Note:We replace 4 = 10-1(6) and rewrite as
$$ 2(6)-10 =2$$
$$2(46-4(10)-10 = 2$$ Here we replace 6 = 46-4(10) and rewrite as
$$(2)46-(9)10 = 2$$
Thus x =2 and y = -9.$checkmark$






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    This give 1 solution... You need couple more steps to get ALL solutions ;)
    – N. S.
    Dec 26 '18 at 22:30



















1














The given equation is equivalent to $$23x+5y=1$$



We see that $$ 23(2)+5(-9)=1$$ so $x=2$ and $y=-9$ is one solution.



We notice that we may consider $$x=2+5k$$ and $$y=-9-23k$$ for $k=0, pm 1, pm 2,....$ to get all solutions to the equation.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • -1 Everything is pulled out of a hat - that's magic not mathematics! One should explain how "we see that..." and how "we notice that..." for it to be mathematics (vs. magic).
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 27 '18 at 1:05












  • @Bill Dubuque Which part of $46-45=1$ needs more explanation ? Or may be $5(23k)-23(5k)=0$ is magical?
    – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
    Dec 27 '18 at 1:35










  • But you should explain how you found that particular solution for $,x,y$ ("we see that" does not count as a mathematical explanation). You are simply stating the solution without giving any clue whatsoever how it was derived. That's not good pedagogy. Notice all the other answers do give such explanations.
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 27 '18 at 1:41












  • @BillDubuque Agreed, I should have explained my solution. Thanks for the comment.
    – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
    Dec 27 '18 at 1:57



















0














The fastest way consists in performing the extended Euclidean algorithm. The equation is equivalent to solving
$$23x+5y=1,$$
which is a Bézout's relation between $23$ and $5$:
begin{array}{rrrl}
r_i &x_i &y_i&q_i\
hline
23&1&0\
5&0&1&4 \
hline
3&1&-4&1 \
2 &-1&5&1\
1&color{red}2&color{red}{-9}\
hline
end{array}

so a basic solution is $;x=2,;y=-9$. Doing some arithmetic and using Gauß' lemma shows the general solution is given by
$$x=2+5k,quad y=-9-23kquad(kin bf Z).$$






share|cite|improve this answer





























    0














    Cancelling $,2,$ yields $ 23x+5y = 1iffbmodcolor{#c00} 5!:, 23xequiv 1iff x equiv dfrac{1}{23}equiv dfrac{6}3equivcolor{#c00} 2$



    So $ x = color{#c00}{2+5}n Rightarrow y = dfrac{1!-!23x}5 = dfrac{-45!-!23(5n)}5 = -9!-!23n$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Beware $ $ Modular fraction arithmetic is well-defined only for fractions with denominator coprime to the modulus. See here for further discussion.
      – Bill Dubuque
      Dec 27 '18 at 1:09



















    0














    This was the method I first learned for tackling diophantine equations in terms of $x$ and $y$. There's a nice little theorem that comes along with it.




    Theorem: Given an equation of the form$$ax+by=c$$where $a,b,cinmathbb{Z}$ and $alpha,beta$ are integral values of $x, y$ respectively, the general case takes the form$$begin{align*}x & =alpha-bt\y & =beta-atend{align*}$$where $t$ can be an arbitrary integer.




    The procedure, meanwhile, is repetitive. If $alpha,beta$ cannot be easily found by inspection, then divide by the smallest coefficient and split up the improper fractions if necessary. Equate the remaining fractions to an unknown variable and solve the remaining diophantine equation. If the solutions still cannot be found by inspection, repeat until you can.



    I'll walk you through with this example:$$23x+5y=1$$Since five is the smallest coefficient, divide to get that$$4x+frac 35x+y=frac 15$$The remaining fractions are $tfrac 35$ and $tfrac 15$. Setting them equal to another unknown, we'll call $z$, we get$$frac 35x=frac 15+zquadimpliesquad 3x=1+5z$$Here, it's easy to see that $z=1$ and $x=2$ are integral solutions. Now that we've found our value of $x$, it's time to substitute it into the original equation to find that $y=-9$. Hence, one value for $alpha$ and $beta$ are$$begin{align*}alpha & =2\beta & =-9end{align*}$$



    Therefore, by our theorem, the rest of the solutions will take the form$$begin{align*}x & color{blue}{,,=2-5t}\y & color{red}{,,=23t-9}end{align*}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0














      This is a actually a pretty straightforward application of the euclidean algorithm. First we want to find gcd(10,46). Since 10 = 2*5 and 46 is not divisible by 5, the gcd is 2. So we know that there are integers x,y such that 46x+10y=gcd(10,46).



      So we do the euclidean algorithm:
      $$ 46 = 4(10)+6$$
      $$ 10 = 1(6) + 4$$
      $$ 6 = 1(4)+2$$



      Now we reverse the steps to get our equation.
      $$ 6-1(4) = 2$$
      $$ 6-1(10-1(6))=2$$ Note:We replace 4 = 10-1(6) and rewrite as
      $$ 2(6)-10 =2$$
      $$2(46-4(10)-10 = 2$$ Here we replace 6 = 46-4(10) and rewrite as
      $$(2)46-(9)10 = 2$$
      Thus x =2 and y = -9.$checkmark$






      share|cite|improve this answer

















      • 1




        This give 1 solution... You need couple more steps to get ALL solutions ;)
        – N. S.
        Dec 26 '18 at 22:30
















      0














      This is a actually a pretty straightforward application of the euclidean algorithm. First we want to find gcd(10,46). Since 10 = 2*5 and 46 is not divisible by 5, the gcd is 2. So we know that there are integers x,y such that 46x+10y=gcd(10,46).



      So we do the euclidean algorithm:
      $$ 46 = 4(10)+6$$
      $$ 10 = 1(6) + 4$$
      $$ 6 = 1(4)+2$$



      Now we reverse the steps to get our equation.
      $$ 6-1(4) = 2$$
      $$ 6-1(10-1(6))=2$$ Note:We replace 4 = 10-1(6) and rewrite as
      $$ 2(6)-10 =2$$
      $$2(46-4(10)-10 = 2$$ Here we replace 6 = 46-4(10) and rewrite as
      $$(2)46-(9)10 = 2$$
      Thus x =2 and y = -9.$checkmark$






      share|cite|improve this answer

















      • 1




        This give 1 solution... You need couple more steps to get ALL solutions ;)
        – N. S.
        Dec 26 '18 at 22:30














      0












      0








      0






      This is a actually a pretty straightforward application of the euclidean algorithm. First we want to find gcd(10,46). Since 10 = 2*5 and 46 is not divisible by 5, the gcd is 2. So we know that there are integers x,y such that 46x+10y=gcd(10,46).



      So we do the euclidean algorithm:
      $$ 46 = 4(10)+6$$
      $$ 10 = 1(6) + 4$$
      $$ 6 = 1(4)+2$$



      Now we reverse the steps to get our equation.
      $$ 6-1(4) = 2$$
      $$ 6-1(10-1(6))=2$$ Note:We replace 4 = 10-1(6) and rewrite as
      $$ 2(6)-10 =2$$
      $$2(46-4(10)-10 = 2$$ Here we replace 6 = 46-4(10) and rewrite as
      $$(2)46-(9)10 = 2$$
      Thus x =2 and y = -9.$checkmark$






      share|cite|improve this answer












      This is a actually a pretty straightforward application of the euclidean algorithm. First we want to find gcd(10,46). Since 10 = 2*5 and 46 is not divisible by 5, the gcd is 2. So we know that there are integers x,y such that 46x+10y=gcd(10,46).



      So we do the euclidean algorithm:
      $$ 46 = 4(10)+6$$
      $$ 10 = 1(6) + 4$$
      $$ 6 = 1(4)+2$$



      Now we reverse the steps to get our equation.
      $$ 6-1(4) = 2$$
      $$ 6-1(10-1(6))=2$$ Note:We replace 4 = 10-1(6) and rewrite as
      $$ 2(6)-10 =2$$
      $$2(46-4(10)-10 = 2$$ Here we replace 6 = 46-4(10) and rewrite as
      $$(2)46-(9)10 = 2$$
      Thus x =2 and y = -9.$checkmark$







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Dec 26 '18 at 22:29









      Joel Pereira

      65119




      65119








      • 1




        This give 1 solution... You need couple more steps to get ALL solutions ;)
        – N. S.
        Dec 26 '18 at 22:30














      • 1




        This give 1 solution... You need couple more steps to get ALL solutions ;)
        – N. S.
        Dec 26 '18 at 22:30








      1




      1




      This give 1 solution... You need couple more steps to get ALL solutions ;)
      – N. S.
      Dec 26 '18 at 22:30




      This give 1 solution... You need couple more steps to get ALL solutions ;)
      – N. S.
      Dec 26 '18 at 22:30











      1














      The given equation is equivalent to $$23x+5y=1$$



      We see that $$ 23(2)+5(-9)=1$$ so $x=2$ and $y=-9$ is one solution.



      We notice that we may consider $$x=2+5k$$ and $$y=-9-23k$$ for $k=0, pm 1, pm 2,....$ to get all solutions to the equation.






      share|cite|improve this answer





















      • -1 Everything is pulled out of a hat - that's magic not mathematics! One should explain how "we see that..." and how "we notice that..." for it to be mathematics (vs. magic).
        – Bill Dubuque
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:05












      • @Bill Dubuque Which part of $46-45=1$ needs more explanation ? Or may be $5(23k)-23(5k)=0$ is magical?
        – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:35










      • But you should explain how you found that particular solution for $,x,y$ ("we see that" does not count as a mathematical explanation). You are simply stating the solution without giving any clue whatsoever how it was derived. That's not good pedagogy. Notice all the other answers do give such explanations.
        – Bill Dubuque
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:41












      • @BillDubuque Agreed, I should have explained my solution. Thanks for the comment.
        – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:57
















      1














      The given equation is equivalent to $$23x+5y=1$$



      We see that $$ 23(2)+5(-9)=1$$ so $x=2$ and $y=-9$ is one solution.



      We notice that we may consider $$x=2+5k$$ and $$y=-9-23k$$ for $k=0, pm 1, pm 2,....$ to get all solutions to the equation.






      share|cite|improve this answer





















      • -1 Everything is pulled out of a hat - that's magic not mathematics! One should explain how "we see that..." and how "we notice that..." for it to be mathematics (vs. magic).
        – Bill Dubuque
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:05












      • @Bill Dubuque Which part of $46-45=1$ needs more explanation ? Or may be $5(23k)-23(5k)=0$ is magical?
        – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:35










      • But you should explain how you found that particular solution for $,x,y$ ("we see that" does not count as a mathematical explanation). You are simply stating the solution without giving any clue whatsoever how it was derived. That's not good pedagogy. Notice all the other answers do give such explanations.
        – Bill Dubuque
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:41












      • @BillDubuque Agreed, I should have explained my solution. Thanks for the comment.
        – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:57














      1












      1








      1






      The given equation is equivalent to $$23x+5y=1$$



      We see that $$ 23(2)+5(-9)=1$$ so $x=2$ and $y=-9$ is one solution.



      We notice that we may consider $$x=2+5k$$ and $$y=-9-23k$$ for $k=0, pm 1, pm 2,....$ to get all solutions to the equation.






      share|cite|improve this answer












      The given equation is equivalent to $$23x+5y=1$$



      We see that $$ 23(2)+5(-9)=1$$ so $x=2$ and $y=-9$ is one solution.



      We notice that we may consider $$x=2+5k$$ and $$y=-9-23k$$ for $k=0, pm 1, pm 2,....$ to get all solutions to the equation.







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Dec 26 '18 at 22:43









      Mohammad Riazi-Kermani

      40.9k42059




      40.9k42059












      • -1 Everything is pulled out of a hat - that's magic not mathematics! One should explain how "we see that..." and how "we notice that..." for it to be mathematics (vs. magic).
        – Bill Dubuque
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:05












      • @Bill Dubuque Which part of $46-45=1$ needs more explanation ? Or may be $5(23k)-23(5k)=0$ is magical?
        – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:35










      • But you should explain how you found that particular solution for $,x,y$ ("we see that" does not count as a mathematical explanation). You are simply stating the solution without giving any clue whatsoever how it was derived. That's not good pedagogy. Notice all the other answers do give such explanations.
        – Bill Dubuque
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:41












      • @BillDubuque Agreed, I should have explained my solution. Thanks for the comment.
        – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:57


















      • -1 Everything is pulled out of a hat - that's magic not mathematics! One should explain how "we see that..." and how "we notice that..." for it to be mathematics (vs. magic).
        – Bill Dubuque
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:05












      • @Bill Dubuque Which part of $46-45=1$ needs more explanation ? Or may be $5(23k)-23(5k)=0$ is magical?
        – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:35










      • But you should explain how you found that particular solution for $,x,y$ ("we see that" does not count as a mathematical explanation). You are simply stating the solution without giving any clue whatsoever how it was derived. That's not good pedagogy. Notice all the other answers do give such explanations.
        – Bill Dubuque
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:41












      • @BillDubuque Agreed, I should have explained my solution. Thanks for the comment.
        – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
        Dec 27 '18 at 1:57
















      -1 Everything is pulled out of a hat - that's magic not mathematics! One should explain how "we see that..." and how "we notice that..." for it to be mathematics (vs. magic).
      – Bill Dubuque
      Dec 27 '18 at 1:05






      -1 Everything is pulled out of a hat - that's magic not mathematics! One should explain how "we see that..." and how "we notice that..." for it to be mathematics (vs. magic).
      – Bill Dubuque
      Dec 27 '18 at 1:05














      @Bill Dubuque Which part of $46-45=1$ needs more explanation ? Or may be $5(23k)-23(5k)=0$ is magical?
      – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
      Dec 27 '18 at 1:35




      @Bill Dubuque Which part of $46-45=1$ needs more explanation ? Or may be $5(23k)-23(5k)=0$ is magical?
      – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
      Dec 27 '18 at 1:35












      But you should explain how you found that particular solution for $,x,y$ ("we see that" does not count as a mathematical explanation). You are simply stating the solution without giving any clue whatsoever how it was derived. That's not good pedagogy. Notice all the other answers do give such explanations.
      – Bill Dubuque
      Dec 27 '18 at 1:41






      But you should explain how you found that particular solution for $,x,y$ ("we see that" does not count as a mathematical explanation). You are simply stating the solution without giving any clue whatsoever how it was derived. That's not good pedagogy. Notice all the other answers do give such explanations.
      – Bill Dubuque
      Dec 27 '18 at 1:41














      @BillDubuque Agreed, I should have explained my solution. Thanks for the comment.
      – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
      Dec 27 '18 at 1:57




      @BillDubuque Agreed, I should have explained my solution. Thanks for the comment.
      – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
      Dec 27 '18 at 1:57











      0














      The fastest way consists in performing the extended Euclidean algorithm. The equation is equivalent to solving
      $$23x+5y=1,$$
      which is a Bézout's relation between $23$ and $5$:
      begin{array}{rrrl}
      r_i &x_i &y_i&q_i\
      hline
      23&1&0\
      5&0&1&4 \
      hline
      3&1&-4&1 \
      2 &-1&5&1\
      1&color{red}2&color{red}{-9}\
      hline
      end{array}

      so a basic solution is $;x=2,;y=-9$. Doing some arithmetic and using Gauß' lemma shows the general solution is given by
      $$x=2+5k,quad y=-9-23kquad(kin bf Z).$$






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        0














        The fastest way consists in performing the extended Euclidean algorithm. The equation is equivalent to solving
        $$23x+5y=1,$$
        which is a Bézout's relation between $23$ and $5$:
        begin{array}{rrrl}
        r_i &x_i &y_i&q_i\
        hline
        23&1&0\
        5&0&1&4 \
        hline
        3&1&-4&1 \
        2 &-1&5&1\
        1&color{red}2&color{red}{-9}\
        hline
        end{array}

        so a basic solution is $;x=2,;y=-9$. Doing some arithmetic and using Gauß' lemma shows the general solution is given by
        $$x=2+5k,quad y=-9-23kquad(kin bf Z).$$






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          0












          0








          0






          The fastest way consists in performing the extended Euclidean algorithm. The equation is equivalent to solving
          $$23x+5y=1,$$
          which is a Bézout's relation between $23$ and $5$:
          begin{array}{rrrl}
          r_i &x_i &y_i&q_i\
          hline
          23&1&0\
          5&0&1&4 \
          hline
          3&1&-4&1 \
          2 &-1&5&1\
          1&color{red}2&color{red}{-9}\
          hline
          end{array}

          so a basic solution is $;x=2,;y=-9$. Doing some arithmetic and using Gauß' lemma shows the general solution is given by
          $$x=2+5k,quad y=-9-23kquad(kin bf Z).$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          The fastest way consists in performing the extended Euclidean algorithm. The equation is equivalent to solving
          $$23x+5y=1,$$
          which is a Bézout's relation between $23$ and $5$:
          begin{array}{rrrl}
          r_i &x_i &y_i&q_i\
          hline
          23&1&0\
          5&0&1&4 \
          hline
          3&1&-4&1 \
          2 &-1&5&1\
          1&color{red}2&color{red}{-9}\
          hline
          end{array}

          so a basic solution is $;x=2,;y=-9$. Doing some arithmetic and using Gauß' lemma shows the general solution is given by
          $$x=2+5k,quad y=-9-23kquad(kin bf Z).$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 26 '18 at 22:45









          Bernard

          118k639112




          118k639112























              0














              Cancelling $,2,$ yields $ 23x+5y = 1iffbmodcolor{#c00} 5!:, 23xequiv 1iff x equiv dfrac{1}{23}equiv dfrac{6}3equivcolor{#c00} 2$



              So $ x = color{#c00}{2+5}n Rightarrow y = dfrac{1!-!23x}5 = dfrac{-45!-!23(5n)}5 = -9!-!23n$






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • Beware $ $ Modular fraction arithmetic is well-defined only for fractions with denominator coprime to the modulus. See here for further discussion.
                – Bill Dubuque
                Dec 27 '18 at 1:09
















              0














              Cancelling $,2,$ yields $ 23x+5y = 1iffbmodcolor{#c00} 5!:, 23xequiv 1iff x equiv dfrac{1}{23}equiv dfrac{6}3equivcolor{#c00} 2$



              So $ x = color{#c00}{2+5}n Rightarrow y = dfrac{1!-!23x}5 = dfrac{-45!-!23(5n)}5 = -9!-!23n$






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • Beware $ $ Modular fraction arithmetic is well-defined only for fractions with denominator coprime to the modulus. See here for further discussion.
                – Bill Dubuque
                Dec 27 '18 at 1:09














              0












              0








              0






              Cancelling $,2,$ yields $ 23x+5y = 1iffbmodcolor{#c00} 5!:, 23xequiv 1iff x equiv dfrac{1}{23}equiv dfrac{6}3equivcolor{#c00} 2$



              So $ x = color{#c00}{2+5}n Rightarrow y = dfrac{1!-!23x}5 = dfrac{-45!-!23(5n)}5 = -9!-!23n$






              share|cite|improve this answer












              Cancelling $,2,$ yields $ 23x+5y = 1iffbmodcolor{#c00} 5!:, 23xequiv 1iff x equiv dfrac{1}{23}equiv dfrac{6}3equivcolor{#c00} 2$



              So $ x = color{#c00}{2+5}n Rightarrow y = dfrac{1!-!23x}5 = dfrac{-45!-!23(5n)}5 = -9!-!23n$







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Dec 27 '18 at 0:59









              Bill Dubuque

              208k29190628




              208k29190628












              • Beware $ $ Modular fraction arithmetic is well-defined only for fractions with denominator coprime to the modulus. See here for further discussion.
                – Bill Dubuque
                Dec 27 '18 at 1:09


















              • Beware $ $ Modular fraction arithmetic is well-defined only for fractions with denominator coprime to the modulus. See here for further discussion.
                – Bill Dubuque
                Dec 27 '18 at 1:09
















              Beware $ $ Modular fraction arithmetic is well-defined only for fractions with denominator coprime to the modulus. See here for further discussion.
              – Bill Dubuque
              Dec 27 '18 at 1:09




              Beware $ $ Modular fraction arithmetic is well-defined only for fractions with denominator coprime to the modulus. See here for further discussion.
              – Bill Dubuque
              Dec 27 '18 at 1:09











              0














              This was the method I first learned for tackling diophantine equations in terms of $x$ and $y$. There's a nice little theorem that comes along with it.




              Theorem: Given an equation of the form$$ax+by=c$$where $a,b,cinmathbb{Z}$ and $alpha,beta$ are integral values of $x, y$ respectively, the general case takes the form$$begin{align*}x & =alpha-bt\y & =beta-atend{align*}$$where $t$ can be an arbitrary integer.




              The procedure, meanwhile, is repetitive. If $alpha,beta$ cannot be easily found by inspection, then divide by the smallest coefficient and split up the improper fractions if necessary. Equate the remaining fractions to an unknown variable and solve the remaining diophantine equation. If the solutions still cannot be found by inspection, repeat until you can.



              I'll walk you through with this example:$$23x+5y=1$$Since five is the smallest coefficient, divide to get that$$4x+frac 35x+y=frac 15$$The remaining fractions are $tfrac 35$ and $tfrac 15$. Setting them equal to another unknown, we'll call $z$, we get$$frac 35x=frac 15+zquadimpliesquad 3x=1+5z$$Here, it's easy to see that $z=1$ and $x=2$ are integral solutions. Now that we've found our value of $x$, it's time to substitute it into the original equation to find that $y=-9$. Hence, one value for $alpha$ and $beta$ are$$begin{align*}alpha & =2\beta & =-9end{align*}$$



              Therefore, by our theorem, the rest of the solutions will take the form$$begin{align*}x & color{blue}{,,=2-5t}\y & color{red}{,,=23t-9}end{align*}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                0














                This was the method I first learned for tackling diophantine equations in terms of $x$ and $y$. There's a nice little theorem that comes along with it.




                Theorem: Given an equation of the form$$ax+by=c$$where $a,b,cinmathbb{Z}$ and $alpha,beta$ are integral values of $x, y$ respectively, the general case takes the form$$begin{align*}x & =alpha-bt\y & =beta-atend{align*}$$where $t$ can be an arbitrary integer.




                The procedure, meanwhile, is repetitive. If $alpha,beta$ cannot be easily found by inspection, then divide by the smallest coefficient and split up the improper fractions if necessary. Equate the remaining fractions to an unknown variable and solve the remaining diophantine equation. If the solutions still cannot be found by inspection, repeat until you can.



                I'll walk you through with this example:$$23x+5y=1$$Since five is the smallest coefficient, divide to get that$$4x+frac 35x+y=frac 15$$The remaining fractions are $tfrac 35$ and $tfrac 15$. Setting them equal to another unknown, we'll call $z$, we get$$frac 35x=frac 15+zquadimpliesquad 3x=1+5z$$Here, it's easy to see that $z=1$ and $x=2$ are integral solutions. Now that we've found our value of $x$, it's time to substitute it into the original equation to find that $y=-9$. Hence, one value for $alpha$ and $beta$ are$$begin{align*}alpha & =2\beta & =-9end{align*}$$



                Therefore, by our theorem, the rest of the solutions will take the form$$begin{align*}x & color{blue}{,,=2-5t}\y & color{red}{,,=23t-9}end{align*}$$






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  This was the method I first learned for tackling diophantine equations in terms of $x$ and $y$. There's a nice little theorem that comes along with it.




                  Theorem: Given an equation of the form$$ax+by=c$$where $a,b,cinmathbb{Z}$ and $alpha,beta$ are integral values of $x, y$ respectively, the general case takes the form$$begin{align*}x & =alpha-bt\y & =beta-atend{align*}$$where $t$ can be an arbitrary integer.




                  The procedure, meanwhile, is repetitive. If $alpha,beta$ cannot be easily found by inspection, then divide by the smallest coefficient and split up the improper fractions if necessary. Equate the remaining fractions to an unknown variable and solve the remaining diophantine equation. If the solutions still cannot be found by inspection, repeat until you can.



                  I'll walk you through with this example:$$23x+5y=1$$Since five is the smallest coefficient, divide to get that$$4x+frac 35x+y=frac 15$$The remaining fractions are $tfrac 35$ and $tfrac 15$. Setting them equal to another unknown, we'll call $z$, we get$$frac 35x=frac 15+zquadimpliesquad 3x=1+5z$$Here, it's easy to see that $z=1$ and $x=2$ are integral solutions. Now that we've found our value of $x$, it's time to substitute it into the original equation to find that $y=-9$. Hence, one value for $alpha$ and $beta$ are$$begin{align*}alpha & =2\beta & =-9end{align*}$$



                  Therefore, by our theorem, the rest of the solutions will take the form$$begin{align*}x & color{blue}{,,=2-5t}\y & color{red}{,,=23t-9}end{align*}$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  This was the method I first learned for tackling diophantine equations in terms of $x$ and $y$. There's a nice little theorem that comes along with it.




                  Theorem: Given an equation of the form$$ax+by=c$$where $a,b,cinmathbb{Z}$ and $alpha,beta$ are integral values of $x, y$ respectively, the general case takes the form$$begin{align*}x & =alpha-bt\y & =beta-atend{align*}$$where $t$ can be an arbitrary integer.




                  The procedure, meanwhile, is repetitive. If $alpha,beta$ cannot be easily found by inspection, then divide by the smallest coefficient and split up the improper fractions if necessary. Equate the remaining fractions to an unknown variable and solve the remaining diophantine equation. If the solutions still cannot be found by inspection, repeat until you can.



                  I'll walk you through with this example:$$23x+5y=1$$Since five is the smallest coefficient, divide to get that$$4x+frac 35x+y=frac 15$$The remaining fractions are $tfrac 35$ and $tfrac 15$. Setting them equal to another unknown, we'll call $z$, we get$$frac 35x=frac 15+zquadimpliesquad 3x=1+5z$$Here, it's easy to see that $z=1$ and $x=2$ are integral solutions. Now that we've found our value of $x$, it's time to substitute it into the original equation to find that $y=-9$. Hence, one value for $alpha$ and $beta$ are$$begin{align*}alpha & =2\beta & =-9end{align*}$$



                  Therefore, by our theorem, the rest of the solutions will take the form$$begin{align*}x & color{blue}{,,=2-5t}\y & color{red}{,,=23t-9}end{align*}$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 27 '18 at 4:02









                  Frank W.

                  3,0031317




                  3,0031317















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Human spaceflight

                      Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                      張江高科駅