Proof of identity using polynomial operator and commutators
Suppose x is a real number, and $hat{A}$ and $hat{B}$ are two non-commuting operators.
A polynomial operator is defined by
$$g(hat{B}) = sum_{n=0}^infty a_n hat{B}^n,$$
where $a_n$ are real numbers.
If [$hat{A}$ , $hat{B}$] = c, where c is a complex number, prove that
$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = g(hat{B} + cx).$$
A previous proof yielded the taylor expansion of a similar expression, which led me to believe it could be the key, thus i started at
$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n frac{x^n}{n!}.$$
Here, $[hat{A} , hat{B}]_n$ := $[hat{A},[hat{A},hat{B}]]_{n-1}$, describes the nested commutator, with $[hat{A},hat{B}]_0 := hat{B}.$
Sadly, I could not make it work as of now. Am I missing an obvious or simple solution? Any help is greatly appreciated.
polynomials operator-theory quantum-mechanics
add a comment |
Suppose x is a real number, and $hat{A}$ and $hat{B}$ are two non-commuting operators.
A polynomial operator is defined by
$$g(hat{B}) = sum_{n=0}^infty a_n hat{B}^n,$$
where $a_n$ are real numbers.
If [$hat{A}$ , $hat{B}$] = c, where c is a complex number, prove that
$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = g(hat{B} + cx).$$
A previous proof yielded the taylor expansion of a similar expression, which led me to believe it could be the key, thus i started at
$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n frac{x^n}{n!}.$$
Here, $[hat{A} , hat{B}]_n$ := $[hat{A},[hat{A},hat{B}]]_{n-1}$, describes the nested commutator, with $[hat{A},hat{B}]_0 := hat{B}.$
Sadly, I could not make it work as of now. Am I missing an obvious or simple solution? Any help is greatly appreciated.
polynomials operator-theory quantum-mechanics
add a comment |
Suppose x is a real number, and $hat{A}$ and $hat{B}$ are two non-commuting operators.
A polynomial operator is defined by
$$g(hat{B}) = sum_{n=0}^infty a_n hat{B}^n,$$
where $a_n$ are real numbers.
If [$hat{A}$ , $hat{B}$] = c, where c is a complex number, prove that
$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = g(hat{B} + cx).$$
A previous proof yielded the taylor expansion of a similar expression, which led me to believe it could be the key, thus i started at
$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n frac{x^n}{n!}.$$
Here, $[hat{A} , hat{B}]_n$ := $[hat{A},[hat{A},hat{B}]]_{n-1}$, describes the nested commutator, with $[hat{A},hat{B}]_0 := hat{B}.$
Sadly, I could not make it work as of now. Am I missing an obvious or simple solution? Any help is greatly appreciated.
polynomials operator-theory quantum-mechanics
Suppose x is a real number, and $hat{A}$ and $hat{B}$ are two non-commuting operators.
A polynomial operator is defined by
$$g(hat{B}) = sum_{n=0}^infty a_n hat{B}^n,$$
where $a_n$ are real numbers.
If [$hat{A}$ , $hat{B}$] = c, where c is a complex number, prove that
$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = g(hat{B} + cx).$$
A previous proof yielded the taylor expansion of a similar expression, which led me to believe it could be the key, thus i started at
$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n frac{x^n}{n!}.$$
Here, $[hat{A} , hat{B}]_n$ := $[hat{A},[hat{A},hat{B}]]_{n-1}$, describes the nested commutator, with $[hat{A},hat{B}]_0 := hat{B}.$
Sadly, I could not make it work as of now. Am I missing an obvious or simple solution? Any help is greatly appreciated.
polynomials operator-theory quantum-mechanics
polynomials operator-theory quantum-mechanics
asked Mar 17 '18 at 0:14
Fred Frog
111
111
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You are essentially there!
Observe $hat A/c$ acts like a derivative operator on powers of $hat B$, and so $g(hat B)$ as well,
$$
[hat A, g(hat B)]= c g^{(1)}(hat B), qquad Longrightarrow \
[hat A, g(hat B)]_n= c^n g^{(n)} (hat B),
$$
where the superscript in parenthesis denotes number of derivatives;
so that, substituting in your final (Duhamel) expression readily yields the Taylor expansion at $hat B$,
$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n ~ frac{x^n}{n!}\
= sum_{n=0}^infty g^{(n)} (hat B) ~frac{c^n x^n}{n!} = g(hat B + cx)
~ .$$
(Historically, this was Baker's minority contribution to the CBH expansion algorithm.)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2694447%2fproof-of-identity-using-polynomial-operator-and-commutators%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You are essentially there!
Observe $hat A/c$ acts like a derivative operator on powers of $hat B$, and so $g(hat B)$ as well,
$$
[hat A, g(hat B)]= c g^{(1)}(hat B), qquad Longrightarrow \
[hat A, g(hat B)]_n= c^n g^{(n)} (hat B),
$$
where the superscript in parenthesis denotes number of derivatives;
so that, substituting in your final (Duhamel) expression readily yields the Taylor expansion at $hat B$,
$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n ~ frac{x^n}{n!}\
= sum_{n=0}^infty g^{(n)} (hat B) ~frac{c^n x^n}{n!} = g(hat B + cx)
~ .$$
(Historically, this was Baker's minority contribution to the CBH expansion algorithm.)
add a comment |
You are essentially there!
Observe $hat A/c$ acts like a derivative operator on powers of $hat B$, and so $g(hat B)$ as well,
$$
[hat A, g(hat B)]= c g^{(1)}(hat B), qquad Longrightarrow \
[hat A, g(hat B)]_n= c^n g^{(n)} (hat B),
$$
where the superscript in parenthesis denotes number of derivatives;
so that, substituting in your final (Duhamel) expression readily yields the Taylor expansion at $hat B$,
$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n ~ frac{x^n}{n!}\
= sum_{n=0}^infty g^{(n)} (hat B) ~frac{c^n x^n}{n!} = g(hat B + cx)
~ .$$
(Historically, this was Baker's minority contribution to the CBH expansion algorithm.)
add a comment |
You are essentially there!
Observe $hat A/c$ acts like a derivative operator on powers of $hat B$, and so $g(hat B)$ as well,
$$
[hat A, g(hat B)]= c g^{(1)}(hat B), qquad Longrightarrow \
[hat A, g(hat B)]_n= c^n g^{(n)} (hat B),
$$
where the superscript in parenthesis denotes number of derivatives;
so that, substituting in your final (Duhamel) expression readily yields the Taylor expansion at $hat B$,
$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n ~ frac{x^n}{n!}\
= sum_{n=0}^infty g^{(n)} (hat B) ~frac{c^n x^n}{n!} = g(hat B + cx)
~ .$$
(Historically, this was Baker's minority contribution to the CBH expansion algorithm.)
You are essentially there!
Observe $hat A/c$ acts like a derivative operator on powers of $hat B$, and so $g(hat B)$ as well,
$$
[hat A, g(hat B)]= c g^{(1)}(hat B), qquad Longrightarrow \
[hat A, g(hat B)]_n= c^n g^{(n)} (hat B),
$$
where the superscript in parenthesis denotes number of derivatives;
so that, substituting in your final (Duhamel) expression readily yields the Taylor expansion at $hat B$,
$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n ~ frac{x^n}{n!}\
= sum_{n=0}^infty g^{(n)} (hat B) ~frac{c^n x^n}{n!} = g(hat B + cx)
~ .$$
(Historically, this was Baker's minority contribution to the CBH expansion algorithm.)
edited Dec 26 '18 at 20:49
answered Dec 26 '18 at 17:08
Cosmas Zachos
1,543520
1,543520
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2694447%2fproof-of-identity-using-polynomial-operator-and-commutators%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown