Proof of identity using polynomial operator and commutators












2














Suppose x is a real number, and $hat{A}$ and $hat{B}$ are two non-commuting operators.



A polynomial operator is defined by



$$g(hat{B}) = sum_{n=0}^infty a_n hat{B}^n,$$
where $a_n$ are real numbers.



If [$hat{A}$ , $hat{B}$] = c, where c is a complex number, prove that



$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = g(hat{B} + cx).$$



A previous proof yielded the taylor expansion of a similar expression, which led me to believe it could be the key, thus i started at



$$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n frac{x^n}{n!}.$$



Here, $[hat{A} , hat{B}]_n$ := $[hat{A},[hat{A},hat{B}]]_{n-1}$, describes the nested commutator, with $[hat{A},hat{B}]_0 := hat{B}.$



Sadly, I could not make it work as of now. Am I missing an obvious or simple solution? Any help is greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question



























    2














    Suppose x is a real number, and $hat{A}$ and $hat{B}$ are two non-commuting operators.



    A polynomial operator is defined by



    $$g(hat{B}) = sum_{n=0}^infty a_n hat{B}^n,$$
    where $a_n$ are real numbers.



    If [$hat{A}$ , $hat{B}$] = c, where c is a complex number, prove that



    $$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = g(hat{B} + cx).$$



    A previous proof yielded the taylor expansion of a similar expression, which led me to believe it could be the key, thus i started at



    $$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n frac{x^n}{n!}.$$



    Here, $[hat{A} , hat{B}]_n$ := $[hat{A},[hat{A},hat{B}]]_{n-1}$, describes the nested commutator, with $[hat{A},hat{B}]_0 := hat{B}.$



    Sadly, I could not make it work as of now. Am I missing an obvious or simple solution? Any help is greatly appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2


      1





      Suppose x is a real number, and $hat{A}$ and $hat{B}$ are two non-commuting operators.



      A polynomial operator is defined by



      $$g(hat{B}) = sum_{n=0}^infty a_n hat{B}^n,$$
      where $a_n$ are real numbers.



      If [$hat{A}$ , $hat{B}$] = c, where c is a complex number, prove that



      $$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = g(hat{B} + cx).$$



      A previous proof yielded the taylor expansion of a similar expression, which led me to believe it could be the key, thus i started at



      $$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n frac{x^n}{n!}.$$



      Here, $[hat{A} , hat{B}]_n$ := $[hat{A},[hat{A},hat{B}]]_{n-1}$, describes the nested commutator, with $[hat{A},hat{B}]_0 := hat{B}.$



      Sadly, I could not make it work as of now. Am I missing an obvious or simple solution? Any help is greatly appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Suppose x is a real number, and $hat{A}$ and $hat{B}$ are two non-commuting operators.



      A polynomial operator is defined by



      $$g(hat{B}) = sum_{n=0}^infty a_n hat{B}^n,$$
      where $a_n$ are real numbers.



      If [$hat{A}$ , $hat{B}$] = c, where c is a complex number, prove that



      $$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = g(hat{B} + cx).$$



      A previous proof yielded the taylor expansion of a similar expression, which led me to believe it could be the key, thus i started at



      $$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n frac{x^n}{n!}.$$



      Here, $[hat{A} , hat{B}]_n$ := $[hat{A},[hat{A},hat{B}]]_{n-1}$, describes the nested commutator, with $[hat{A},hat{B}]_0 := hat{B}.$



      Sadly, I could not make it work as of now. Am I missing an obvious or simple solution? Any help is greatly appreciated.







      polynomials operator-theory quantum-mechanics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 17 '18 at 0:14









      Fred Frog

      111




      111






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          You are essentially there!



          Observe $hat A/c$ acts like a derivative operator on powers of $hat B$, and so $g(hat B)$ as well,
          $$
          [hat A, g(hat B)]= c g^{(1)}(hat B), qquad Longrightarrow \
          [hat A, g(hat B)]_n= c^n g^{(n)} (hat B),
          $$

          where the superscript in parenthesis denotes number of derivatives;
          so that, substituting in your final (Duhamel) expression readily yields the Taylor expansion at $hat B$,
          $$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n ~ frac{x^n}{n!}\
          = sum_{n=0}^infty g^{(n)} (hat B) ~frac{c^n x^n}{n!} = g(hat B + cx)
          ~ .$$



          (Historically, this was Baker's minority contribution to the CBH expansion algorithm.)






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2694447%2fproof-of-identity-using-polynomial-operator-and-commutators%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            You are essentially there!



            Observe $hat A/c$ acts like a derivative operator on powers of $hat B$, and so $g(hat B)$ as well,
            $$
            [hat A, g(hat B)]= c g^{(1)}(hat B), qquad Longrightarrow \
            [hat A, g(hat B)]_n= c^n g^{(n)} (hat B),
            $$

            where the superscript in parenthesis denotes number of derivatives;
            so that, substituting in your final (Duhamel) expression readily yields the Taylor expansion at $hat B$,
            $$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n ~ frac{x^n}{n!}\
            = sum_{n=0}^infty g^{(n)} (hat B) ~frac{c^n x^n}{n!} = g(hat B + cx)
            ~ .$$



            (Historically, this was Baker's minority contribution to the CBH expansion algorithm.)






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              0














              You are essentially there!



              Observe $hat A/c$ acts like a derivative operator on powers of $hat B$, and so $g(hat B)$ as well,
              $$
              [hat A, g(hat B)]= c g^{(1)}(hat B), qquad Longrightarrow \
              [hat A, g(hat B)]_n= c^n g^{(n)} (hat B),
              $$

              where the superscript in parenthesis denotes number of derivatives;
              so that, substituting in your final (Duhamel) expression readily yields the Taylor expansion at $hat B$,
              $$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n ~ frac{x^n}{n!}\
              = sum_{n=0}^infty g^{(n)} (hat B) ~frac{c^n x^n}{n!} = g(hat B + cx)
              ~ .$$



              (Historically, this was Baker's minority contribution to the CBH expansion algorithm.)






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0






                You are essentially there!



                Observe $hat A/c$ acts like a derivative operator on powers of $hat B$, and so $g(hat B)$ as well,
                $$
                [hat A, g(hat B)]= c g^{(1)}(hat B), qquad Longrightarrow \
                [hat A, g(hat B)]_n= c^n g^{(n)} (hat B),
                $$

                where the superscript in parenthesis denotes number of derivatives;
                so that, substituting in your final (Duhamel) expression readily yields the Taylor expansion at $hat B$,
                $$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n ~ frac{x^n}{n!}\
                = sum_{n=0}^infty g^{(n)} (hat B) ~frac{c^n x^n}{n!} = g(hat B + cx)
                ~ .$$



                (Historically, this was Baker's minority contribution to the CBH expansion algorithm.)






                share|cite|improve this answer














                You are essentially there!



                Observe $hat A/c$ acts like a derivative operator on powers of $hat B$, and so $g(hat B)$ as well,
                $$
                [hat A, g(hat B)]= c g^{(1)}(hat B), qquad Longrightarrow \
                [hat A, g(hat B)]_n= c^n g^{(n)} (hat B),
                $$

                where the superscript in parenthesis denotes number of derivatives;
                so that, substituting in your final (Duhamel) expression readily yields the Taylor expansion at $hat B$,
                $$exp(xhat{A})g(hat{B})exp(-xhat{A}) = sum_{n=0}^infty [hat{A},g(hat{B})]_n ~ frac{x^n}{n!}\
                = sum_{n=0}^infty g^{(n)} (hat B) ~frac{c^n x^n}{n!} = g(hat B + cx)
                ~ .$$



                (Historically, this was Baker's minority contribution to the CBH expansion algorithm.)







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 26 '18 at 20:49

























                answered Dec 26 '18 at 17:08









                Cosmas Zachos

                1,543520




                1,543520






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2694447%2fproof-of-identity-using-polynomial-operator-and-commutators%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Human spaceflight

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                    張江高科駅