Area enclosed by polar curve
I can't get the text answer using standard method of integration of a polar equation. Yet when I use a symmetry method I do get their answer. Can you assist in clarification?
Find the area of the region enclosed by $r=4cos(3 theta)$.
I use $ frac 12 int_0^{2pi} (16cos^2(3theta) dtheta$. For $cos^2(3theta)$ I use the identity $frac12[1+cos(6theta)]$
This gives me $frac{16}{4} int_0^{2pi} 1+cos(6theta) dtheta$.
This gives me $4[int_0^{2pi}1 dtheta +frac16int_0^{12pi} cos (u) du]$.
The integral of the cosine term is $0$, so I get $theta $ evaluated from $0$ to $2pi$. This gives me $4(2pi)=8pi$.
When I use a symmetrical method A=$6int_0^{pi/6}frac12(16 cos^2(3theta)dtheta$ I get $4pi$. This is the text answer.
Don't understand why my 2 answers don't match.
calculus
add a comment |
I can't get the text answer using standard method of integration of a polar equation. Yet when I use a symmetry method I do get their answer. Can you assist in clarification?
Find the area of the region enclosed by $r=4cos(3 theta)$.
I use $ frac 12 int_0^{2pi} (16cos^2(3theta) dtheta$. For $cos^2(3theta)$ I use the identity $frac12[1+cos(6theta)]$
This gives me $frac{16}{4} int_0^{2pi} 1+cos(6theta) dtheta$.
This gives me $4[int_0^{2pi}1 dtheta +frac16int_0^{12pi} cos (u) du]$.
The integral of the cosine term is $0$, so I get $theta $ evaluated from $0$ to $2pi$. This gives me $4(2pi)=8pi$.
When I use a symmetrical method A=$6int_0^{pi/6}frac12(16 cos^2(3theta)dtheta$ I get $4pi$. This is the text answer.
Don't understand why my 2 answers don't match.
calculus
add a comment |
I can't get the text answer using standard method of integration of a polar equation. Yet when I use a symmetry method I do get their answer. Can you assist in clarification?
Find the area of the region enclosed by $r=4cos(3 theta)$.
I use $ frac 12 int_0^{2pi} (16cos^2(3theta) dtheta$. For $cos^2(3theta)$ I use the identity $frac12[1+cos(6theta)]$
This gives me $frac{16}{4} int_0^{2pi} 1+cos(6theta) dtheta$.
This gives me $4[int_0^{2pi}1 dtheta +frac16int_0^{12pi} cos (u) du]$.
The integral of the cosine term is $0$, so I get $theta $ evaluated from $0$ to $2pi$. This gives me $4(2pi)=8pi$.
When I use a symmetrical method A=$6int_0^{pi/6}frac12(16 cos^2(3theta)dtheta$ I get $4pi$. This is the text answer.
Don't understand why my 2 answers don't match.
calculus
I can't get the text answer using standard method of integration of a polar equation. Yet when I use a symmetry method I do get their answer. Can you assist in clarification?
Find the area of the region enclosed by $r=4cos(3 theta)$.
I use $ frac 12 int_0^{2pi} (16cos^2(3theta) dtheta$. For $cos^2(3theta)$ I use the identity $frac12[1+cos(6theta)]$
This gives me $frac{16}{4} int_0^{2pi} 1+cos(6theta) dtheta$.
This gives me $4[int_0^{2pi}1 dtheta +frac16int_0^{12pi} cos (u) du]$.
The integral of the cosine term is $0$, so I get $theta $ evaluated from $0$ to $2pi$. This gives me $4(2pi)=8pi$.
When I use a symmetrical method A=$6int_0^{pi/6}frac12(16 cos^2(3theta)dtheta$ I get $4pi$. This is the text answer.
Don't understand why my 2 answers don't match.
calculus
calculus
asked Dec 26 '18 at 18:30
user163862
84821016
84821016
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Your first answer is twice the correct answer for the following reason: if you let $theta$ range from $theta=0$ to $theta=2pi$, the curve $r=4cos(3theta)$ — which is a flower with three petals — is traced twice, and therefore you find twice the area. If you trace it carefully starting from $theta=0$, which is $(4,0)$ in cartesian coordinates, you will see that the curve is completed and comes back to the initial point at $theta=pi$; and then, from $theta=pi$ to $theta=2pi$ you retrace it once more.
In the second method, you find the area of a half of one petal, which you correctly determined to range from $theta=0$ to $theta=dfrac{pi}{6}$. Since there are six such half-petals, multiplying by $6$ clearly yields the correct answer. Note, however, that taking six half-petals of the same "angular width" (so to speak) as the one going from $theta=0$ to $theta=dfrac{pi}{6}$ will produce the angle six times as wide, i.e. from $theta=0$ to $theta=pi$, consistent with my explanation above.
Ah, I immediately see this now. How can you tell when you have a polar equation that traces out completely in $0$ to $pi$ instead of $0$ to $2pi$?
– user163862
Dec 26 '18 at 20:05
add a comment |
$$intlimits_{theta = 0}^{2 pi} 4 |cos (3 theta)| dtheta = 16$$
add a comment |
To provide yet another approach, you can use Green's theorem on the differential form $x ,dy$ to transform the area integral over one petal into a line integral along the petal:
$$frac13 A = text{area of petal} = intlimits_{text{petal}},1,dA = intlimits_{text{boundary of petal}} x,dy $$
Since $r = 4cos(3theta)$, the petal can be parameterized by
$$(x(theta), y(theta)) = (r(theta)costheta, r(theta)sin(theta)) = (4costhetacos(3theta), 4sinthetacos(3theta))$$
for $theta in left[-frac{pi}6, frac{pi}6right]$.
Differentiating gives $dy = (4costhetacos(3theta) - 12sinthetasin(3theta)),dtheta$ so
$$frac13 A = int_{-frac{pi}6}^{frac{pi}6}4costhetacos(3theta) (4costhetacos(3theta) - 12sinthetasin(3theta)),dtheta = frac{4pi}3$$
so $A = 4pi$.
The integral is a bit cumbersome but it can be solved using the product-to-sum formulas for sine and cosine.
... and which is the wrong answer of the two.
– zipirovich
Dec 26 '18 at 18:51
@zipirovich You are right of course, thanks. I have added a completely different approach to obtain the right result.
– mechanodroid
Dec 26 '18 at 19:36
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053190%2farea-enclosed-by-polar-curve%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your first answer is twice the correct answer for the following reason: if you let $theta$ range from $theta=0$ to $theta=2pi$, the curve $r=4cos(3theta)$ — which is a flower with three petals — is traced twice, and therefore you find twice the area. If you trace it carefully starting from $theta=0$, which is $(4,0)$ in cartesian coordinates, you will see that the curve is completed and comes back to the initial point at $theta=pi$; and then, from $theta=pi$ to $theta=2pi$ you retrace it once more.
In the second method, you find the area of a half of one petal, which you correctly determined to range from $theta=0$ to $theta=dfrac{pi}{6}$. Since there are six such half-petals, multiplying by $6$ clearly yields the correct answer. Note, however, that taking six half-petals of the same "angular width" (so to speak) as the one going from $theta=0$ to $theta=dfrac{pi}{6}$ will produce the angle six times as wide, i.e. from $theta=0$ to $theta=pi$, consistent with my explanation above.
Ah, I immediately see this now. How can you tell when you have a polar equation that traces out completely in $0$ to $pi$ instead of $0$ to $2pi$?
– user163862
Dec 26 '18 at 20:05
add a comment |
Your first answer is twice the correct answer for the following reason: if you let $theta$ range from $theta=0$ to $theta=2pi$, the curve $r=4cos(3theta)$ — which is a flower with three petals — is traced twice, and therefore you find twice the area. If you trace it carefully starting from $theta=0$, which is $(4,0)$ in cartesian coordinates, you will see that the curve is completed and comes back to the initial point at $theta=pi$; and then, from $theta=pi$ to $theta=2pi$ you retrace it once more.
In the second method, you find the area of a half of one petal, which you correctly determined to range from $theta=0$ to $theta=dfrac{pi}{6}$. Since there are six such half-petals, multiplying by $6$ clearly yields the correct answer. Note, however, that taking six half-petals of the same "angular width" (so to speak) as the one going from $theta=0$ to $theta=dfrac{pi}{6}$ will produce the angle six times as wide, i.e. from $theta=0$ to $theta=pi$, consistent with my explanation above.
Ah, I immediately see this now. How can you tell when you have a polar equation that traces out completely in $0$ to $pi$ instead of $0$ to $2pi$?
– user163862
Dec 26 '18 at 20:05
add a comment |
Your first answer is twice the correct answer for the following reason: if you let $theta$ range from $theta=0$ to $theta=2pi$, the curve $r=4cos(3theta)$ — which is a flower with three petals — is traced twice, and therefore you find twice the area. If you trace it carefully starting from $theta=0$, which is $(4,0)$ in cartesian coordinates, you will see that the curve is completed and comes back to the initial point at $theta=pi$; and then, from $theta=pi$ to $theta=2pi$ you retrace it once more.
In the second method, you find the area of a half of one petal, which you correctly determined to range from $theta=0$ to $theta=dfrac{pi}{6}$. Since there are six such half-petals, multiplying by $6$ clearly yields the correct answer. Note, however, that taking six half-petals of the same "angular width" (so to speak) as the one going from $theta=0$ to $theta=dfrac{pi}{6}$ will produce the angle six times as wide, i.e. from $theta=0$ to $theta=pi$, consistent with my explanation above.
Your first answer is twice the correct answer for the following reason: if you let $theta$ range from $theta=0$ to $theta=2pi$, the curve $r=4cos(3theta)$ — which is a flower with three petals — is traced twice, and therefore you find twice the area. If you trace it carefully starting from $theta=0$, which is $(4,0)$ in cartesian coordinates, you will see that the curve is completed and comes back to the initial point at $theta=pi$; and then, from $theta=pi$ to $theta=2pi$ you retrace it once more.
In the second method, you find the area of a half of one petal, which you correctly determined to range from $theta=0$ to $theta=dfrac{pi}{6}$. Since there are six such half-petals, multiplying by $6$ clearly yields the correct answer. Note, however, that taking six half-petals of the same "angular width" (so to speak) as the one going from $theta=0$ to $theta=dfrac{pi}{6}$ will produce the angle six times as wide, i.e. from $theta=0$ to $theta=pi$, consistent with my explanation above.
edited Dec 26 '18 at 19:46
answered Dec 26 '18 at 18:49
zipirovich
10.9k11631
10.9k11631
Ah, I immediately see this now. How can you tell when you have a polar equation that traces out completely in $0$ to $pi$ instead of $0$ to $2pi$?
– user163862
Dec 26 '18 at 20:05
add a comment |
Ah, I immediately see this now. How can you tell when you have a polar equation that traces out completely in $0$ to $pi$ instead of $0$ to $2pi$?
– user163862
Dec 26 '18 at 20:05
Ah, I immediately see this now. How can you tell when you have a polar equation that traces out completely in $0$ to $pi$ instead of $0$ to $2pi$?
– user163862
Dec 26 '18 at 20:05
Ah, I immediately see this now. How can you tell when you have a polar equation that traces out completely in $0$ to $pi$ instead of $0$ to $2pi$?
– user163862
Dec 26 '18 at 20:05
add a comment |
$$intlimits_{theta = 0}^{2 pi} 4 |cos (3 theta)| dtheta = 16$$
add a comment |
$$intlimits_{theta = 0}^{2 pi} 4 |cos (3 theta)| dtheta = 16$$
add a comment |
$$intlimits_{theta = 0}^{2 pi} 4 |cos (3 theta)| dtheta = 16$$
$$intlimits_{theta = 0}^{2 pi} 4 |cos (3 theta)| dtheta = 16$$
answered Dec 26 '18 at 18:58
David G. Stork
9,82021232
9,82021232
add a comment |
add a comment |
To provide yet another approach, you can use Green's theorem on the differential form $x ,dy$ to transform the area integral over one petal into a line integral along the petal:
$$frac13 A = text{area of petal} = intlimits_{text{petal}},1,dA = intlimits_{text{boundary of petal}} x,dy $$
Since $r = 4cos(3theta)$, the petal can be parameterized by
$$(x(theta), y(theta)) = (r(theta)costheta, r(theta)sin(theta)) = (4costhetacos(3theta), 4sinthetacos(3theta))$$
for $theta in left[-frac{pi}6, frac{pi}6right]$.
Differentiating gives $dy = (4costhetacos(3theta) - 12sinthetasin(3theta)),dtheta$ so
$$frac13 A = int_{-frac{pi}6}^{frac{pi}6}4costhetacos(3theta) (4costhetacos(3theta) - 12sinthetasin(3theta)),dtheta = frac{4pi}3$$
so $A = 4pi$.
The integral is a bit cumbersome but it can be solved using the product-to-sum formulas for sine and cosine.
... and which is the wrong answer of the two.
– zipirovich
Dec 26 '18 at 18:51
@zipirovich You are right of course, thanks. I have added a completely different approach to obtain the right result.
– mechanodroid
Dec 26 '18 at 19:36
add a comment |
To provide yet another approach, you can use Green's theorem on the differential form $x ,dy$ to transform the area integral over one petal into a line integral along the petal:
$$frac13 A = text{area of petal} = intlimits_{text{petal}},1,dA = intlimits_{text{boundary of petal}} x,dy $$
Since $r = 4cos(3theta)$, the petal can be parameterized by
$$(x(theta), y(theta)) = (r(theta)costheta, r(theta)sin(theta)) = (4costhetacos(3theta), 4sinthetacos(3theta))$$
for $theta in left[-frac{pi}6, frac{pi}6right]$.
Differentiating gives $dy = (4costhetacos(3theta) - 12sinthetasin(3theta)),dtheta$ so
$$frac13 A = int_{-frac{pi}6}^{frac{pi}6}4costhetacos(3theta) (4costhetacos(3theta) - 12sinthetasin(3theta)),dtheta = frac{4pi}3$$
so $A = 4pi$.
The integral is a bit cumbersome but it can be solved using the product-to-sum formulas for sine and cosine.
... and which is the wrong answer of the two.
– zipirovich
Dec 26 '18 at 18:51
@zipirovich You are right of course, thanks. I have added a completely different approach to obtain the right result.
– mechanodroid
Dec 26 '18 at 19:36
add a comment |
To provide yet another approach, you can use Green's theorem on the differential form $x ,dy$ to transform the area integral over one petal into a line integral along the petal:
$$frac13 A = text{area of petal} = intlimits_{text{petal}},1,dA = intlimits_{text{boundary of petal}} x,dy $$
Since $r = 4cos(3theta)$, the petal can be parameterized by
$$(x(theta), y(theta)) = (r(theta)costheta, r(theta)sin(theta)) = (4costhetacos(3theta), 4sinthetacos(3theta))$$
for $theta in left[-frac{pi}6, frac{pi}6right]$.
Differentiating gives $dy = (4costhetacos(3theta) - 12sinthetasin(3theta)),dtheta$ so
$$frac13 A = int_{-frac{pi}6}^{frac{pi}6}4costhetacos(3theta) (4costhetacos(3theta) - 12sinthetasin(3theta)),dtheta = frac{4pi}3$$
so $A = 4pi$.
The integral is a bit cumbersome but it can be solved using the product-to-sum formulas for sine and cosine.
To provide yet another approach, you can use Green's theorem on the differential form $x ,dy$ to transform the area integral over one petal into a line integral along the petal:
$$frac13 A = text{area of petal} = intlimits_{text{petal}},1,dA = intlimits_{text{boundary of petal}} x,dy $$
Since $r = 4cos(3theta)$, the petal can be parameterized by
$$(x(theta), y(theta)) = (r(theta)costheta, r(theta)sin(theta)) = (4costhetacos(3theta), 4sinthetacos(3theta))$$
for $theta in left[-frac{pi}6, frac{pi}6right]$.
Differentiating gives $dy = (4costhetacos(3theta) - 12sinthetasin(3theta)),dtheta$ so
$$frac13 A = int_{-frac{pi}6}^{frac{pi}6}4costhetacos(3theta) (4costhetacos(3theta) - 12sinthetasin(3theta)),dtheta = frac{4pi}3$$
so $A = 4pi$.
The integral is a bit cumbersome but it can be solved using the product-to-sum formulas for sine and cosine.
edited Dec 26 '18 at 19:35
answered Dec 26 '18 at 18:40
mechanodroid
26.1k62245
26.1k62245
... and which is the wrong answer of the two.
– zipirovich
Dec 26 '18 at 18:51
@zipirovich You are right of course, thanks. I have added a completely different approach to obtain the right result.
– mechanodroid
Dec 26 '18 at 19:36
add a comment |
... and which is the wrong answer of the two.
– zipirovich
Dec 26 '18 at 18:51
@zipirovich You are right of course, thanks. I have added a completely different approach to obtain the right result.
– mechanodroid
Dec 26 '18 at 19:36
... and which is the wrong answer of the two.
– zipirovich
Dec 26 '18 at 18:51
... and which is the wrong answer of the two.
– zipirovich
Dec 26 '18 at 18:51
@zipirovich You are right of course, thanks. I have added a completely different approach to obtain the right result.
– mechanodroid
Dec 26 '18 at 19:36
@zipirovich You are right of course, thanks. I have added a completely different approach to obtain the right result.
– mechanodroid
Dec 26 '18 at 19:36
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053190%2farea-enclosed-by-polar-curve%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown