How to calculate compounding frequency for an loan (Using Lambert-W Function)












4












$begingroup$



A bond will become worth 500 dollars when it becomes due in 5 years. If the bond was purchased today for 450 dollars at 2.13% per year, determine how frequently the interest was compounded.




I tried to solve the question with trial and error, but is there a better way to solve it?



The function looks like this:
$$500 = 450(1 +{0.0213over x})^{5x}$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$



    A bond will become worth 500 dollars when it becomes due in 5 years. If the bond was purchased today for 450 dollars at 2.13% per year, determine how frequently the interest was compounded.




    I tried to solve the question with trial and error, but is there a better way to solve it?



    The function looks like this:
    $$500 = 450(1 +{0.0213over x})^{5x}$$










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$



      A bond will become worth 500 dollars when it becomes due in 5 years. If the bond was purchased today for 450 dollars at 2.13% per year, determine how frequently the interest was compounded.




      I tried to solve the question with trial and error, but is there a better way to solve it?



      The function looks like this:
      $$500 = 450(1 +{0.0213over x})^{5x}$$










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      A bond will become worth 500 dollars when it becomes due in 5 years. If the bond was purchased today for 450 dollars at 2.13% per year, determine how frequently the interest was compounded.




      I tried to solve the question with trial and error, but is there a better way to solve it?



      The function looks like this:
      $$500 = 450(1 +{0.0213over x})^{5x}$$







      exponential-function lambert-w






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 15 at 11:58







      Kevin

















      asked Jan 14 at 1:59









      KevinKevin

      496




      496






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Consider the more general case of the equation
          $$a=left(1+frac{b}{x}right)^{c x}$$ The solution of it is given in terms of Lambert function. I shall skip all intermediate steps and just provide the result; it write
          $$x=-frac{b log (a)}{log (a)+b, c, W_{-1}(-t)}qquad text{where} qquad t=frac{ a^{-frac{1}{b, c}}}{b ,c}log (a)$$
          Just remember than any equation which can write or rewrite as
          $$A+B x+C log(D+Ex)=0$$ has solution(s) i terms of Lambert function.



          For your specific problem, since graphing, you see that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could have done the following : take logarithms of both sides and use Taylor expansion around $x=1$. Working with whole numbers you would get
          $$left(5 log left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-log
          left(frac{10}{9}right)right)+(x-1) left(5 log
          left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-frac{1065}{10213}right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$
          and ignoring the higher order terms, this would give, as an approximation,
          $$x=1-frac{10213 left(5 log left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-log
          left(frac{10}{9}right)right)}{5 left(10213 log
          left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-213right)}approx 0.98086$$
          while the exact solution is $0.98121$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The explanation is really good, wish I could give you an upvote if I am reputation 15
            $endgroup$
            – Kevin
            Jan 14 at 20:29










          • $begingroup$
            @KevinXu. You are very welcome ! I upvoted you question because it reveals an intelligent attitude (curiosity). Cheers :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Jan 15 at 3:36











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072767%2fhow-to-calculate-compounding-frequency-for-an-loan-using-lambert-w-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Consider the more general case of the equation
          $$a=left(1+frac{b}{x}right)^{c x}$$ The solution of it is given in terms of Lambert function. I shall skip all intermediate steps and just provide the result; it write
          $$x=-frac{b log (a)}{log (a)+b, c, W_{-1}(-t)}qquad text{where} qquad t=frac{ a^{-frac{1}{b, c}}}{b ,c}log (a)$$
          Just remember than any equation which can write or rewrite as
          $$A+B x+C log(D+Ex)=0$$ has solution(s) i terms of Lambert function.



          For your specific problem, since graphing, you see that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could have done the following : take logarithms of both sides and use Taylor expansion around $x=1$. Working with whole numbers you would get
          $$left(5 log left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-log
          left(frac{10}{9}right)right)+(x-1) left(5 log
          left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-frac{1065}{10213}right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$
          and ignoring the higher order terms, this would give, as an approximation,
          $$x=1-frac{10213 left(5 log left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-log
          left(frac{10}{9}right)right)}{5 left(10213 log
          left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-213right)}approx 0.98086$$
          while the exact solution is $0.98121$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The explanation is really good, wish I could give you an upvote if I am reputation 15
            $endgroup$
            – Kevin
            Jan 14 at 20:29










          • $begingroup$
            @KevinXu. You are very welcome ! I upvoted you question because it reveals an intelligent attitude (curiosity). Cheers :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Jan 15 at 3:36
















          1












          $begingroup$

          Consider the more general case of the equation
          $$a=left(1+frac{b}{x}right)^{c x}$$ The solution of it is given in terms of Lambert function. I shall skip all intermediate steps and just provide the result; it write
          $$x=-frac{b log (a)}{log (a)+b, c, W_{-1}(-t)}qquad text{where} qquad t=frac{ a^{-frac{1}{b, c}}}{b ,c}log (a)$$
          Just remember than any equation which can write or rewrite as
          $$A+B x+C log(D+Ex)=0$$ has solution(s) i terms of Lambert function.



          For your specific problem, since graphing, you see that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could have done the following : take logarithms of both sides and use Taylor expansion around $x=1$. Working with whole numbers you would get
          $$left(5 log left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-log
          left(frac{10}{9}right)right)+(x-1) left(5 log
          left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-frac{1065}{10213}right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$
          and ignoring the higher order terms, this would give, as an approximation,
          $$x=1-frac{10213 left(5 log left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-log
          left(frac{10}{9}right)right)}{5 left(10213 log
          left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-213right)}approx 0.98086$$
          while the exact solution is $0.98121$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The explanation is really good, wish I could give you an upvote if I am reputation 15
            $endgroup$
            – Kevin
            Jan 14 at 20:29










          • $begingroup$
            @KevinXu. You are very welcome ! I upvoted you question because it reveals an intelligent attitude (curiosity). Cheers :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Jan 15 at 3:36














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Consider the more general case of the equation
          $$a=left(1+frac{b}{x}right)^{c x}$$ The solution of it is given in terms of Lambert function. I shall skip all intermediate steps and just provide the result; it write
          $$x=-frac{b log (a)}{log (a)+b, c, W_{-1}(-t)}qquad text{where} qquad t=frac{ a^{-frac{1}{b, c}}}{b ,c}log (a)$$
          Just remember than any equation which can write or rewrite as
          $$A+B x+C log(D+Ex)=0$$ has solution(s) i terms of Lambert function.



          For your specific problem, since graphing, you see that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could have done the following : take logarithms of both sides and use Taylor expansion around $x=1$. Working with whole numbers you would get
          $$left(5 log left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-log
          left(frac{10}{9}right)right)+(x-1) left(5 log
          left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-frac{1065}{10213}right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$
          and ignoring the higher order terms, this would give, as an approximation,
          $$x=1-frac{10213 left(5 log left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-log
          left(frac{10}{9}right)right)}{5 left(10213 log
          left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-213right)}approx 0.98086$$
          while the exact solution is $0.98121$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Consider the more general case of the equation
          $$a=left(1+frac{b}{x}right)^{c x}$$ The solution of it is given in terms of Lambert function. I shall skip all intermediate steps and just provide the result; it write
          $$x=-frac{b log (a)}{log (a)+b, c, W_{-1}(-t)}qquad text{where} qquad t=frac{ a^{-frac{1}{b, c}}}{b ,c}log (a)$$
          Just remember than any equation which can write or rewrite as
          $$A+B x+C log(D+Ex)=0$$ has solution(s) i terms of Lambert function.



          For your specific problem, since graphing, you see that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could have done the following : take logarithms of both sides and use Taylor expansion around $x=1$. Working with whole numbers you would get
          $$left(5 log left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-log
          left(frac{10}{9}right)right)+(x-1) left(5 log
          left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-frac{1065}{10213}right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$
          and ignoring the higher order terms, this would give, as an approximation,
          $$x=1-frac{10213 left(5 log left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-log
          left(frac{10}{9}right)right)}{5 left(10213 log
          left(frac{10213}{10000}right)-213right)}approx 0.98086$$
          while the exact solution is $0.98121$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 14 at 6:32

























          answered Jan 14 at 6:19









          Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici

          124k1158135




          124k1158135












          • $begingroup$
            The explanation is really good, wish I could give you an upvote if I am reputation 15
            $endgroup$
            – Kevin
            Jan 14 at 20:29










          • $begingroup$
            @KevinXu. You are very welcome ! I upvoted you question because it reveals an intelligent attitude (curiosity). Cheers :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Jan 15 at 3:36


















          • $begingroup$
            The explanation is really good, wish I could give you an upvote if I am reputation 15
            $endgroup$
            – Kevin
            Jan 14 at 20:29










          • $begingroup$
            @KevinXu. You are very welcome ! I upvoted you question because it reveals an intelligent attitude (curiosity). Cheers :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Jan 15 at 3:36
















          $begingroup$
          The explanation is really good, wish I could give you an upvote if I am reputation 15
          $endgroup$
          – Kevin
          Jan 14 at 20:29




          $begingroup$
          The explanation is really good, wish I could give you an upvote if I am reputation 15
          $endgroup$
          – Kevin
          Jan 14 at 20:29












          $begingroup$
          @KevinXu. You are very welcome ! I upvoted you question because it reveals an intelligent attitude (curiosity). Cheers :-)
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Jan 15 at 3:36




          $begingroup$
          @KevinXu. You are very welcome ! I upvoted you question because it reveals an intelligent attitude (curiosity). Cheers :-)
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Jan 15 at 3:36


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072767%2fhow-to-calculate-compounding-frequency-for-an-loan-using-lambert-w-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Human spaceflight

          Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

          張江高科駅