Change of variables and the partial derivative












4












$begingroup$


From time to time, I suddenly get confused with a change of variables in a partial derivative.



Here, I am trying to perform a change of variables $(x,t) mapsto (xi, eta)$ where



$$xi = t qquad qquad text{and} qquad qquad eta = x+t$$



The question is, how to compute $$frac{partial u}{partial t}$$ in the new coordinate system?



Intuitively, since $xi = t$ (or rather $t=xi$), we should have



$$frac{partial u}{partial t} = frac{partial u}{partial xi}$$



However, applying the chain rule for partial derivatives, we instead get



$$frac{partial u}{partial t} = frac{partial u}{partial xi}frac{partial xi}{partial t} + frac{partial u}{partial eta}frac{partial eta}{partial t} = frac{partial u}{partial xi}(1) + frac{partial u}{partial eta}(1) = frac{partial u}{partial xi} + frac{partial u}{partial eta}$$



So which one is correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    From time to time, I suddenly get confused with a change of variables in a partial derivative.



    Here, I am trying to perform a change of variables $(x,t) mapsto (xi, eta)$ where



    $$xi = t qquad qquad text{and} qquad qquad eta = x+t$$



    The question is, how to compute $$frac{partial u}{partial t}$$ in the new coordinate system?



    Intuitively, since $xi = t$ (or rather $t=xi$), we should have



    $$frac{partial u}{partial t} = frac{partial u}{partial xi}$$



    However, applying the chain rule for partial derivatives, we instead get



    $$frac{partial u}{partial t} = frac{partial u}{partial xi}frac{partial xi}{partial t} + frac{partial u}{partial eta}frac{partial eta}{partial t} = frac{partial u}{partial xi}(1) + frac{partial u}{partial eta}(1) = frac{partial u}{partial xi} + frac{partial u}{partial eta}$$



    So which one is correct?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      From time to time, I suddenly get confused with a change of variables in a partial derivative.



      Here, I am trying to perform a change of variables $(x,t) mapsto (xi, eta)$ where



      $$xi = t qquad qquad text{and} qquad qquad eta = x+t$$



      The question is, how to compute $$frac{partial u}{partial t}$$ in the new coordinate system?



      Intuitively, since $xi = t$ (or rather $t=xi$), we should have



      $$frac{partial u}{partial t} = frac{partial u}{partial xi}$$



      However, applying the chain rule for partial derivatives, we instead get



      $$frac{partial u}{partial t} = frac{partial u}{partial xi}frac{partial xi}{partial t} + frac{partial u}{partial eta}frac{partial eta}{partial t} = frac{partial u}{partial xi}(1) + frac{partial u}{partial eta}(1) = frac{partial u}{partial xi} + frac{partial u}{partial eta}$$



      So which one is correct?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      From time to time, I suddenly get confused with a change of variables in a partial derivative.



      Here, I am trying to perform a change of variables $(x,t) mapsto (xi, eta)$ where



      $$xi = t qquad qquad text{and} qquad qquad eta = x+t$$



      The question is, how to compute $$frac{partial u}{partial t}$$ in the new coordinate system?



      Intuitively, since $xi = t$ (or rather $t=xi$), we should have



      $$frac{partial u}{partial t} = frac{partial u}{partial xi}$$



      However, applying the chain rule for partial derivatives, we instead get



      $$frac{partial u}{partial t} = frac{partial u}{partial xi}frac{partial xi}{partial t} + frac{partial u}{partial eta}frac{partial eta}{partial t} = frac{partial u}{partial xi}(1) + frac{partial u}{partial eta}(1) = frac{partial u}{partial xi} + frac{partial u}{partial eta}$$



      So which one is correct?







      multivariable-calculus partial-derivative change-of-variable






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 15 at 18:36









      Git Gud

      28.9k1050101




      28.9k1050101










      asked Jan 15 at 13:54









      glowstonetreesglowstonetrees

      2,380418




      2,380418






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          The second one is correct. Why is the other one wrong? Well when you write $$frac{partial u}{partial xi}$$what you really are saying is $$frac{partial u}{partial xi}{huge|}_eta$$, i.e. taking the derivative with respect to $xi$, but keeping $eta$ fixed. If we do this, we are restricting ourselves to the path $x=-t$, where $t$ varies. But we wanted to represent $$frac{partial u}{partial t}{huge|}_x$$with a fixed $x$. So this expression fails to express the same quantity. Using the chain rule works to ensure this error does not happen.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            Consider $u(x,t)=x^2+t^2$ and $xi=t, eta=x+t$.



            Then: $u(xi(x,t),eta(x,t))=(eta-xi)^2+xi^2$. We get:
            $$u_t=2(eta-xi)cdot (eta_t-xi_t)+2xicdot xi_t=\
            2(x+t-t)cdot (1-1)+2tcdot 1=\
            2t,$$

            which is true:
            $$u_t=(x^2+t^2)_t=2t.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$





















              1












              $begingroup$

              What follows is not only the correct way to handle this issue (most of the time people resort to what are to me confusing notational abuses and artifacts from a time when it was hard to be a bit more rigorous), it's a sketch of the answer that I'd like to be given.



              To simplify, in what's below I will only consider the whole spaces as domains, but it can be generalized to any open subset of these spaces.




              Theorem. Let $m, n$ and $p$ be natural numbers, and $Fcolon mathbb R^nto mathbb R^m$ and $Gcolonmathbb R^mto mathbb R^p$ differentiable functions. If $H=Gcirc F$, then $H$ is differentiable and for all $X$ in $mathbb R^n$ it holds that $$(DH)_X=(DG)_{F(X)}(DF)_X tag 1$$




              Considering that $F, G$ and $H$ can be written as
              $$
              F=(f_1, ldots, f_m),\
              G=(g_1, ldots, g_p),\
              H=(h_1, ldots , h_p)
              $$

              where:





              • $f_1, ldots, f_m$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^n$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


              • $g_1, ldots, g_p$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^m$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


              • $h_1, ldots, h_p$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^n$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


              $(1)$ can be rewritten as




              $$
              begin{bmatrix}
              partial _1h_1 & ldots & partial_nh_1\
              vdots & ddots & vdots\
              partial_1h_p & ldots & partial_nh_p
              end{bmatrix}_X
              =
              begin{bmatrix}
              partial _1g_1 & ldots & partial_mg_1\
              vdots & ddots & vdots\
              partial_1g_p & ldots & partial_mg_p
              end{bmatrix}_{F(X)}
              begin{bmatrix}
              partial _1f_1 & ldots & partial_nf_1\
              vdots & ddots & vdots\
              partial_1f_m & ldots & partial_nf_m
              end{bmatrix}_X
              tag{2}
              $$






              Armed with this formulation of this standard theorem, all that's left is to look at the problem through this lens.



              As I understand it you have a differentiable function $ucolon mathbb R^2to mathbb R$, a function $varphi colon mathbb R^2tomathbb R^2, (x,t)mapsto (t, x+t)$ (which is also differentiable) and you're asked to find $partial _2(ucirc varphi)$.



              Now it's easy. In the notation above we have $m=2=n$, $p=1$, $G=u$, $F=varphi$, $f_1colon mathbb R^2to mathbb R, (x,t)mapsto t$ and $f_2colon mathbb R^2to mathbb R, (x,t)mapsto x+t$. Set $H=ucirc varphi$ and conclude that for all $(x,t)$ in $mathbb R^2$ it holds that
              $$
              begin{align}
              begin{bmatrix}
              partial _1h_1 & partial_nh_1
              end{bmatrix}_{(x,t)}
              &=
              begin{bmatrix}
              partial _1u & partial_2u
              end{bmatrix}_{F(x,t)}
              begin{bmatrix}
              partial _1f_1 & partial_2f_1\
              partial_1f_2 & partial_2f_2
              end{bmatrix}_{(x,t)}\
              &=
              begin{bmatrix}
              left(partial _1uright)(t,x+t) & left(partial_2uright)(t,x+t)
              end{bmatrix}
              begin{bmatrix}
              0& 1\
              1 & 1
              end{bmatrix}\
              &=
              begin{bmatrix}
              left(partial _2uright)(t,x+t) & left(partial _1uright)(t,x+t)+left(partial_2uright)(t,x+t)
              end{bmatrix}_.
              end{align}
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$














                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074457%2fchange-of-variables-and-the-partial-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                2












                $begingroup$

                The second one is correct. Why is the other one wrong? Well when you write $$frac{partial u}{partial xi}$$what you really are saying is $$frac{partial u}{partial xi}{huge|}_eta$$, i.e. taking the derivative with respect to $xi$, but keeping $eta$ fixed. If we do this, we are restricting ourselves to the path $x=-t$, where $t$ varies. But we wanted to represent $$frac{partial u}{partial t}{huge|}_x$$with a fixed $x$. So this expression fails to express the same quantity. Using the chain rule works to ensure this error does not happen.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  The second one is correct. Why is the other one wrong? Well when you write $$frac{partial u}{partial xi}$$what you really are saying is $$frac{partial u}{partial xi}{huge|}_eta$$, i.e. taking the derivative with respect to $xi$, but keeping $eta$ fixed. If we do this, we are restricting ourselves to the path $x=-t$, where $t$ varies. But we wanted to represent $$frac{partial u}{partial t}{huge|}_x$$with a fixed $x$. So this expression fails to express the same quantity. Using the chain rule works to ensure this error does not happen.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    The second one is correct. Why is the other one wrong? Well when you write $$frac{partial u}{partial xi}$$what you really are saying is $$frac{partial u}{partial xi}{huge|}_eta$$, i.e. taking the derivative with respect to $xi$, but keeping $eta$ fixed. If we do this, we are restricting ourselves to the path $x=-t$, where $t$ varies. But we wanted to represent $$frac{partial u}{partial t}{huge|}_x$$with a fixed $x$. So this expression fails to express the same quantity. Using the chain rule works to ensure this error does not happen.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    The second one is correct. Why is the other one wrong? Well when you write $$frac{partial u}{partial xi}$$what you really are saying is $$frac{partial u}{partial xi}{huge|}_eta$$, i.e. taking the derivative with respect to $xi$, but keeping $eta$ fixed. If we do this, we are restricting ourselves to the path $x=-t$, where $t$ varies. But we wanted to represent $$frac{partial u}{partial t}{huge|}_x$$with a fixed $x$. So this expression fails to express the same quantity. Using the chain rule works to ensure this error does not happen.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 15 at 14:07









                    John DoeJohn Doe

                    11.3k11239




                    11.3k11239























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Consider $u(x,t)=x^2+t^2$ and $xi=t, eta=x+t$.



                        Then: $u(xi(x,t),eta(x,t))=(eta-xi)^2+xi^2$. We get:
                        $$u_t=2(eta-xi)cdot (eta_t-xi_t)+2xicdot xi_t=\
                        2(x+t-t)cdot (1-1)+2tcdot 1=\
                        2t,$$

                        which is true:
                        $$u_t=(x^2+t^2)_t=2t.$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          Consider $u(x,t)=x^2+t^2$ and $xi=t, eta=x+t$.



                          Then: $u(xi(x,t),eta(x,t))=(eta-xi)^2+xi^2$. We get:
                          $$u_t=2(eta-xi)cdot (eta_t-xi_t)+2xicdot xi_t=\
                          2(x+t-t)cdot (1-1)+2tcdot 1=\
                          2t,$$

                          which is true:
                          $$u_t=(x^2+t^2)_t=2t.$$






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            Consider $u(x,t)=x^2+t^2$ and $xi=t, eta=x+t$.



                            Then: $u(xi(x,t),eta(x,t))=(eta-xi)^2+xi^2$. We get:
                            $$u_t=2(eta-xi)cdot (eta_t-xi_t)+2xicdot xi_t=\
                            2(x+t-t)cdot (1-1)+2tcdot 1=\
                            2t,$$

                            which is true:
                            $$u_t=(x^2+t^2)_t=2t.$$






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Consider $u(x,t)=x^2+t^2$ and $xi=t, eta=x+t$.



                            Then: $u(xi(x,t),eta(x,t))=(eta-xi)^2+xi^2$. We get:
                            $$u_t=2(eta-xi)cdot (eta_t-xi_t)+2xicdot xi_t=\
                            2(x+t-t)cdot (1-1)+2tcdot 1=\
                            2t,$$

                            which is true:
                            $$u_t=(x^2+t^2)_t=2t.$$







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 15 at 16:33









                            farruhotafarruhota

                            21.7k2842




                            21.7k2842























                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                What follows is not only the correct way to handle this issue (most of the time people resort to what are to me confusing notational abuses and artifacts from a time when it was hard to be a bit more rigorous), it's a sketch of the answer that I'd like to be given.



                                To simplify, in what's below I will only consider the whole spaces as domains, but it can be generalized to any open subset of these spaces.




                                Theorem. Let $m, n$ and $p$ be natural numbers, and $Fcolon mathbb R^nto mathbb R^m$ and $Gcolonmathbb R^mto mathbb R^p$ differentiable functions. If $H=Gcirc F$, then $H$ is differentiable and for all $X$ in $mathbb R^n$ it holds that $$(DH)_X=(DG)_{F(X)}(DF)_X tag 1$$




                                Considering that $F, G$ and $H$ can be written as
                                $$
                                F=(f_1, ldots, f_m),\
                                G=(g_1, ldots, g_p),\
                                H=(h_1, ldots , h_p)
                                $$

                                where:





                                • $f_1, ldots, f_m$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^n$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


                                • $g_1, ldots, g_p$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^m$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


                                • $h_1, ldots, h_p$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^n$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


                                $(1)$ can be rewritten as




                                $$
                                begin{bmatrix}
                                partial _1h_1 & ldots & partial_nh_1\
                                vdots & ddots & vdots\
                                partial_1h_p & ldots & partial_nh_p
                                end{bmatrix}_X
                                =
                                begin{bmatrix}
                                partial _1g_1 & ldots & partial_mg_1\
                                vdots & ddots & vdots\
                                partial_1g_p & ldots & partial_mg_p
                                end{bmatrix}_{F(X)}
                                begin{bmatrix}
                                partial _1f_1 & ldots & partial_nf_1\
                                vdots & ddots & vdots\
                                partial_1f_m & ldots & partial_nf_m
                                end{bmatrix}_X
                                tag{2}
                                $$






                                Armed with this formulation of this standard theorem, all that's left is to look at the problem through this lens.



                                As I understand it you have a differentiable function $ucolon mathbb R^2to mathbb R$, a function $varphi colon mathbb R^2tomathbb R^2, (x,t)mapsto (t, x+t)$ (which is also differentiable) and you're asked to find $partial _2(ucirc varphi)$.



                                Now it's easy. In the notation above we have $m=2=n$, $p=1$, $G=u$, $F=varphi$, $f_1colon mathbb R^2to mathbb R, (x,t)mapsto t$ and $f_2colon mathbb R^2to mathbb R, (x,t)mapsto x+t$. Set $H=ucirc varphi$ and conclude that for all $(x,t)$ in $mathbb R^2$ it holds that
                                $$
                                begin{align}
                                begin{bmatrix}
                                partial _1h_1 & partial_nh_1
                                end{bmatrix}_{(x,t)}
                                &=
                                begin{bmatrix}
                                partial _1u & partial_2u
                                end{bmatrix}_{F(x,t)}
                                begin{bmatrix}
                                partial _1f_1 & partial_2f_1\
                                partial_1f_2 & partial_2f_2
                                end{bmatrix}_{(x,t)}\
                                &=
                                begin{bmatrix}
                                left(partial _1uright)(t,x+t) & left(partial_2uright)(t,x+t)
                                end{bmatrix}
                                begin{bmatrix}
                                0& 1\
                                1 & 1
                                end{bmatrix}\
                                &=
                                begin{bmatrix}
                                left(partial _2uright)(t,x+t) & left(partial _1uright)(t,x+t)+left(partial_2uright)(t,x+t)
                                end{bmatrix}_.
                                end{align}
                                $$






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$


















                                  1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  What follows is not only the correct way to handle this issue (most of the time people resort to what are to me confusing notational abuses and artifacts from a time when it was hard to be a bit more rigorous), it's a sketch of the answer that I'd like to be given.



                                  To simplify, in what's below I will only consider the whole spaces as domains, but it can be generalized to any open subset of these spaces.




                                  Theorem. Let $m, n$ and $p$ be natural numbers, and $Fcolon mathbb R^nto mathbb R^m$ and $Gcolonmathbb R^mto mathbb R^p$ differentiable functions. If $H=Gcirc F$, then $H$ is differentiable and for all $X$ in $mathbb R^n$ it holds that $$(DH)_X=(DG)_{F(X)}(DF)_X tag 1$$




                                  Considering that $F, G$ and $H$ can be written as
                                  $$
                                  F=(f_1, ldots, f_m),\
                                  G=(g_1, ldots, g_p),\
                                  H=(h_1, ldots , h_p)
                                  $$

                                  where:





                                  • $f_1, ldots, f_m$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^n$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


                                  • $g_1, ldots, g_p$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^m$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


                                  • $h_1, ldots, h_p$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^n$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


                                  $(1)$ can be rewritten as




                                  $$
                                  begin{bmatrix}
                                  partial _1h_1 & ldots & partial_nh_1\
                                  vdots & ddots & vdots\
                                  partial_1h_p & ldots & partial_nh_p
                                  end{bmatrix}_X
                                  =
                                  begin{bmatrix}
                                  partial _1g_1 & ldots & partial_mg_1\
                                  vdots & ddots & vdots\
                                  partial_1g_p & ldots & partial_mg_p
                                  end{bmatrix}_{F(X)}
                                  begin{bmatrix}
                                  partial _1f_1 & ldots & partial_nf_1\
                                  vdots & ddots & vdots\
                                  partial_1f_m & ldots & partial_nf_m
                                  end{bmatrix}_X
                                  tag{2}
                                  $$






                                  Armed with this formulation of this standard theorem, all that's left is to look at the problem through this lens.



                                  As I understand it you have a differentiable function $ucolon mathbb R^2to mathbb R$, a function $varphi colon mathbb R^2tomathbb R^2, (x,t)mapsto (t, x+t)$ (which is also differentiable) and you're asked to find $partial _2(ucirc varphi)$.



                                  Now it's easy. In the notation above we have $m=2=n$, $p=1$, $G=u$, $F=varphi$, $f_1colon mathbb R^2to mathbb R, (x,t)mapsto t$ and $f_2colon mathbb R^2to mathbb R, (x,t)mapsto x+t$. Set $H=ucirc varphi$ and conclude that for all $(x,t)$ in $mathbb R^2$ it holds that
                                  $$
                                  begin{align}
                                  begin{bmatrix}
                                  partial _1h_1 & partial_nh_1
                                  end{bmatrix}_{(x,t)}
                                  &=
                                  begin{bmatrix}
                                  partial _1u & partial_2u
                                  end{bmatrix}_{F(x,t)}
                                  begin{bmatrix}
                                  partial _1f_1 & partial_2f_1\
                                  partial_1f_2 & partial_2f_2
                                  end{bmatrix}_{(x,t)}\
                                  &=
                                  begin{bmatrix}
                                  left(partial _1uright)(t,x+t) & left(partial_2uright)(t,x+t)
                                  end{bmatrix}
                                  begin{bmatrix}
                                  0& 1\
                                  1 & 1
                                  end{bmatrix}\
                                  &=
                                  begin{bmatrix}
                                  left(partial _2uright)(t,x+t) & left(partial _1uright)(t,x+t)+left(partial_2uright)(t,x+t)
                                  end{bmatrix}_.
                                  end{align}
                                  $$






                                  share|cite|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$
















                                    1












                                    1








                                    1





                                    $begingroup$

                                    What follows is not only the correct way to handle this issue (most of the time people resort to what are to me confusing notational abuses and artifacts from a time when it was hard to be a bit more rigorous), it's a sketch of the answer that I'd like to be given.



                                    To simplify, in what's below I will only consider the whole spaces as domains, but it can be generalized to any open subset of these spaces.




                                    Theorem. Let $m, n$ and $p$ be natural numbers, and $Fcolon mathbb R^nto mathbb R^m$ and $Gcolonmathbb R^mto mathbb R^p$ differentiable functions. If $H=Gcirc F$, then $H$ is differentiable and for all $X$ in $mathbb R^n$ it holds that $$(DH)_X=(DG)_{F(X)}(DF)_X tag 1$$




                                    Considering that $F, G$ and $H$ can be written as
                                    $$
                                    F=(f_1, ldots, f_m),\
                                    G=(g_1, ldots, g_p),\
                                    H=(h_1, ldots , h_p)
                                    $$

                                    where:





                                    • $f_1, ldots, f_m$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^n$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


                                    • $g_1, ldots, g_p$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^m$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


                                    • $h_1, ldots, h_p$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^n$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


                                    $(1)$ can be rewritten as




                                    $$
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    partial _1h_1 & ldots & partial_nh_1\
                                    vdots & ddots & vdots\
                                    partial_1h_p & ldots & partial_nh_p
                                    end{bmatrix}_X
                                    =
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    partial _1g_1 & ldots & partial_mg_1\
                                    vdots & ddots & vdots\
                                    partial_1g_p & ldots & partial_mg_p
                                    end{bmatrix}_{F(X)}
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    partial _1f_1 & ldots & partial_nf_1\
                                    vdots & ddots & vdots\
                                    partial_1f_m & ldots & partial_nf_m
                                    end{bmatrix}_X
                                    tag{2}
                                    $$






                                    Armed with this formulation of this standard theorem, all that's left is to look at the problem through this lens.



                                    As I understand it you have a differentiable function $ucolon mathbb R^2to mathbb R$, a function $varphi colon mathbb R^2tomathbb R^2, (x,t)mapsto (t, x+t)$ (which is also differentiable) and you're asked to find $partial _2(ucirc varphi)$.



                                    Now it's easy. In the notation above we have $m=2=n$, $p=1$, $G=u$, $F=varphi$, $f_1colon mathbb R^2to mathbb R, (x,t)mapsto t$ and $f_2colon mathbb R^2to mathbb R, (x,t)mapsto x+t$. Set $H=ucirc varphi$ and conclude that for all $(x,t)$ in $mathbb R^2$ it holds that
                                    $$
                                    begin{align}
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    partial _1h_1 & partial_nh_1
                                    end{bmatrix}_{(x,t)}
                                    &=
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    partial _1u & partial_2u
                                    end{bmatrix}_{F(x,t)}
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    partial _1f_1 & partial_2f_1\
                                    partial_1f_2 & partial_2f_2
                                    end{bmatrix}_{(x,t)}\
                                    &=
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    left(partial _1uright)(t,x+t) & left(partial_2uright)(t,x+t)
                                    end{bmatrix}
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    0& 1\
                                    1 & 1
                                    end{bmatrix}\
                                    &=
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    left(partial _2uright)(t,x+t) & left(partial _1uright)(t,x+t)+left(partial_2uright)(t,x+t)
                                    end{bmatrix}_.
                                    end{align}
                                    $$






                                    share|cite|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$



                                    What follows is not only the correct way to handle this issue (most of the time people resort to what are to me confusing notational abuses and artifacts from a time when it was hard to be a bit more rigorous), it's a sketch of the answer that I'd like to be given.



                                    To simplify, in what's below I will only consider the whole spaces as domains, but it can be generalized to any open subset of these spaces.




                                    Theorem. Let $m, n$ and $p$ be natural numbers, and $Fcolon mathbb R^nto mathbb R^m$ and $Gcolonmathbb R^mto mathbb R^p$ differentiable functions. If $H=Gcirc F$, then $H$ is differentiable and for all $X$ in $mathbb R^n$ it holds that $$(DH)_X=(DG)_{F(X)}(DF)_X tag 1$$




                                    Considering that $F, G$ and $H$ can be written as
                                    $$
                                    F=(f_1, ldots, f_m),\
                                    G=(g_1, ldots, g_p),\
                                    H=(h_1, ldots , h_p)
                                    $$

                                    where:





                                    • $f_1, ldots, f_m$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^n$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


                                    • $g_1, ldots, g_p$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^m$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


                                    • $h_1, ldots, h_p$ are real functions whose domain is $mathbb R^n$ and whose partial derivatives all exist,


                                    $(1)$ can be rewritten as




                                    $$
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    partial _1h_1 & ldots & partial_nh_1\
                                    vdots & ddots & vdots\
                                    partial_1h_p & ldots & partial_nh_p
                                    end{bmatrix}_X
                                    =
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    partial _1g_1 & ldots & partial_mg_1\
                                    vdots & ddots & vdots\
                                    partial_1g_p & ldots & partial_mg_p
                                    end{bmatrix}_{F(X)}
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    partial _1f_1 & ldots & partial_nf_1\
                                    vdots & ddots & vdots\
                                    partial_1f_m & ldots & partial_nf_m
                                    end{bmatrix}_X
                                    tag{2}
                                    $$






                                    Armed with this formulation of this standard theorem, all that's left is to look at the problem through this lens.



                                    As I understand it you have a differentiable function $ucolon mathbb R^2to mathbb R$, a function $varphi colon mathbb R^2tomathbb R^2, (x,t)mapsto (t, x+t)$ (which is also differentiable) and you're asked to find $partial _2(ucirc varphi)$.



                                    Now it's easy. In the notation above we have $m=2=n$, $p=1$, $G=u$, $F=varphi$, $f_1colon mathbb R^2to mathbb R, (x,t)mapsto t$ and $f_2colon mathbb R^2to mathbb R, (x,t)mapsto x+t$. Set $H=ucirc varphi$ and conclude that for all $(x,t)$ in $mathbb R^2$ it holds that
                                    $$
                                    begin{align}
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    partial _1h_1 & partial_nh_1
                                    end{bmatrix}_{(x,t)}
                                    &=
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    partial _1u & partial_2u
                                    end{bmatrix}_{F(x,t)}
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    partial _1f_1 & partial_2f_1\
                                    partial_1f_2 & partial_2f_2
                                    end{bmatrix}_{(x,t)}\
                                    &=
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    left(partial _1uright)(t,x+t) & left(partial_2uright)(t,x+t)
                                    end{bmatrix}
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    0& 1\
                                    1 & 1
                                    end{bmatrix}\
                                    &=
                                    begin{bmatrix}
                                    left(partial _2uright)(t,x+t) & left(partial _1uright)(t,x+t)+left(partial_2uright)(t,x+t)
                                    end{bmatrix}_.
                                    end{align}
                                    $$







                                    share|cite|improve this answer














                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer








                                    edited Jan 15 at 22:34

























                                    answered Jan 15 at 18:35









                                    Git GudGit Gud

                                    28.9k1050101




                                    28.9k1050101






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074457%2fchange-of-variables-and-the-partial-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Human spaceflight

                                        Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                                        張江高科駅