Action of $GL(Bbb F_2^3)$ on the sub-spaces of $Bbb F_2^3$ of dimension $2$












1












$begingroup$


Let $V=Bbb F_2^3$ and let $G=GL(V)$ act naturally on the set $X={Wsubset V:text{sub-vector space,}dim =2}$



If $Win X$ how do you determine the $Stab_G(W)$? and why shoud the cardinality of $Stab_G(W)$ be the same for different $W$'s?



If we want to prove that the action is transitive why is it enough to verify that there exists a matrix that sends $e_1$ to $u$, $e_2$ to $v$ and $e_3$ to $e_3$ for arbitrary linearly independent vectors $u,v$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The statement that you say it is enough to verify is false, for example with $u=e_1$ and $v=e_3$.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 15 at 14:09








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also, what does "for some arbitrary" mean? The words "some" and "arbitrary" contradict each other.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 15 at 14:12










  • $begingroup$
    So how should we verify that the action is transitive?
    $endgroup$
    – John Cataldo
    Jan 15 at 14:25










  • $begingroup$
    Your statement about transitivity is incorrect, but a slight modification is. To prove that the action is transitive, it is enough to prove that given any linearly independent vectors $u,v in V$, there exists matrix $M$ such that $Me_1 = u, Me_2 = v$, and $textbf{importantly}$ $Me_3$ is not contained within the two dimensional subspace of $V$ spanned by $u,v$. Can see you see why this is true? Note that the requirement on the image of $e_3$ under $M$ is equivalent to the requirement that $M$ is invertible.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 15 at 14:34








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is enough to verify that for all pairs $u,v$ of linearly independent vectors, there is an element of $G$ that maps $e_1$ to $u$ and $e_2$ to $v$. That follows immediately from the definition of transitivity.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 15 at 14:34
















1












$begingroup$


Let $V=Bbb F_2^3$ and let $G=GL(V)$ act naturally on the set $X={Wsubset V:text{sub-vector space,}dim =2}$



If $Win X$ how do you determine the $Stab_G(W)$? and why shoud the cardinality of $Stab_G(W)$ be the same for different $W$'s?



If we want to prove that the action is transitive why is it enough to verify that there exists a matrix that sends $e_1$ to $u$, $e_2$ to $v$ and $e_3$ to $e_3$ for arbitrary linearly independent vectors $u,v$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The statement that you say it is enough to verify is false, for example with $u=e_1$ and $v=e_3$.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 15 at 14:09








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also, what does "for some arbitrary" mean? The words "some" and "arbitrary" contradict each other.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 15 at 14:12










  • $begingroup$
    So how should we verify that the action is transitive?
    $endgroup$
    – John Cataldo
    Jan 15 at 14:25










  • $begingroup$
    Your statement about transitivity is incorrect, but a slight modification is. To prove that the action is transitive, it is enough to prove that given any linearly independent vectors $u,v in V$, there exists matrix $M$ such that $Me_1 = u, Me_2 = v$, and $textbf{importantly}$ $Me_3$ is not contained within the two dimensional subspace of $V$ spanned by $u,v$. Can see you see why this is true? Note that the requirement on the image of $e_3$ under $M$ is equivalent to the requirement that $M$ is invertible.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 15 at 14:34








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is enough to verify that for all pairs $u,v$ of linearly independent vectors, there is an element of $G$ that maps $e_1$ to $u$ and $e_2$ to $v$. That follows immediately from the definition of transitivity.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 15 at 14:34














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $V=Bbb F_2^3$ and let $G=GL(V)$ act naturally on the set $X={Wsubset V:text{sub-vector space,}dim =2}$



If $Win X$ how do you determine the $Stab_G(W)$? and why shoud the cardinality of $Stab_G(W)$ be the same for different $W$'s?



If we want to prove that the action is transitive why is it enough to verify that there exists a matrix that sends $e_1$ to $u$, $e_2$ to $v$ and $e_3$ to $e_3$ for arbitrary linearly independent vectors $u,v$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $V=Bbb F_2^3$ and let $G=GL(V)$ act naturally on the set $X={Wsubset V:text{sub-vector space,}dim =2}$



If $Win X$ how do you determine the $Stab_G(W)$? and why shoud the cardinality of $Stab_G(W)$ be the same for different $W$'s?



If we want to prove that the action is transitive why is it enough to verify that there exists a matrix that sends $e_1$ to $u$, $e_2$ to $v$ and $e_3$ to $e_3$ for arbitrary linearly independent vectors $u,v$?







group-theory vector-spaces group-actions general-linear-group






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 15 at 14:22







John Cataldo

















asked Jan 15 at 13:55









John CataldoJohn Cataldo

1,1931316




1,1931316








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The statement that you say it is enough to verify is false, for example with $u=e_1$ and $v=e_3$.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 15 at 14:09








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also, what does "for some arbitrary" mean? The words "some" and "arbitrary" contradict each other.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 15 at 14:12










  • $begingroup$
    So how should we verify that the action is transitive?
    $endgroup$
    – John Cataldo
    Jan 15 at 14:25










  • $begingroup$
    Your statement about transitivity is incorrect, but a slight modification is. To prove that the action is transitive, it is enough to prove that given any linearly independent vectors $u,v in V$, there exists matrix $M$ such that $Me_1 = u, Me_2 = v$, and $textbf{importantly}$ $Me_3$ is not contained within the two dimensional subspace of $V$ spanned by $u,v$. Can see you see why this is true? Note that the requirement on the image of $e_3$ under $M$ is equivalent to the requirement that $M$ is invertible.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 15 at 14:34








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is enough to verify that for all pairs $u,v$ of linearly independent vectors, there is an element of $G$ that maps $e_1$ to $u$ and $e_2$ to $v$. That follows immediately from the definition of transitivity.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 15 at 14:34














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The statement that you say it is enough to verify is false, for example with $u=e_1$ and $v=e_3$.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 15 at 14:09








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Also, what does "for some arbitrary" mean? The words "some" and "arbitrary" contradict each other.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 15 at 14:12










  • $begingroup$
    So how should we verify that the action is transitive?
    $endgroup$
    – John Cataldo
    Jan 15 at 14:25










  • $begingroup$
    Your statement about transitivity is incorrect, but a slight modification is. To prove that the action is transitive, it is enough to prove that given any linearly independent vectors $u,v in V$, there exists matrix $M$ such that $Me_1 = u, Me_2 = v$, and $textbf{importantly}$ $Me_3$ is not contained within the two dimensional subspace of $V$ spanned by $u,v$. Can see you see why this is true? Note that the requirement on the image of $e_3$ under $M$ is equivalent to the requirement that $M$ is invertible.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Higgins
    Jan 15 at 14:34








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is enough to verify that for all pairs $u,v$ of linearly independent vectors, there is an element of $G$ that maps $e_1$ to $u$ and $e_2$ to $v$. That follows immediately from the definition of transitivity.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 15 at 14:34








2




2




$begingroup$
The statement that you say it is enough to verify is false, for example with $u=e_1$ and $v=e_3$.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 15 at 14:09






$begingroup$
The statement that you say it is enough to verify is false, for example with $u=e_1$ and $v=e_3$.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 15 at 14:09






1




1




$begingroup$
Also, what does "for some arbitrary" mean? The words "some" and "arbitrary" contradict each other.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 15 at 14:12




$begingroup$
Also, what does "for some arbitrary" mean? The words "some" and "arbitrary" contradict each other.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 15 at 14:12












$begingroup$
So how should we verify that the action is transitive?
$endgroup$
– John Cataldo
Jan 15 at 14:25




$begingroup$
So how should we verify that the action is transitive?
$endgroup$
– John Cataldo
Jan 15 at 14:25












$begingroup$
Your statement about transitivity is incorrect, but a slight modification is. To prove that the action is transitive, it is enough to prove that given any linearly independent vectors $u,v in V$, there exists matrix $M$ such that $Me_1 = u, Me_2 = v$, and $textbf{importantly}$ $Me_3$ is not contained within the two dimensional subspace of $V$ spanned by $u,v$. Can see you see why this is true? Note that the requirement on the image of $e_3$ under $M$ is equivalent to the requirement that $M$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
– Adam Higgins
Jan 15 at 14:34






$begingroup$
Your statement about transitivity is incorrect, but a slight modification is. To prove that the action is transitive, it is enough to prove that given any linearly independent vectors $u,v in V$, there exists matrix $M$ such that $Me_1 = u, Me_2 = v$, and $textbf{importantly}$ $Me_3$ is not contained within the two dimensional subspace of $V$ spanned by $u,v$. Can see you see why this is true? Note that the requirement on the image of $e_3$ under $M$ is equivalent to the requirement that $M$ is invertible.
$endgroup$
– Adam Higgins
Jan 15 at 14:34






1




1




$begingroup$
It is enough to verify that for all pairs $u,v$ of linearly independent vectors, there is an element of $G$ that maps $e_1$ to $u$ and $e_2$ to $v$. That follows immediately from the definition of transitivity.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 15 at 14:34




$begingroup$
It is enough to verify that for all pairs $u,v$ of linearly independent vectors, there is an element of $G$ that maps $e_1$ to $u$ and $e_2$ to $v$. That follows immediately from the definition of transitivity.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 15 at 14:34










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

To prove transitivity it would be enough to verify that there exists a matrix that sends $e_1$ to $u$, $e_2$ to $v$ and $e_3$ to $e_3$ for arbitrary linearly independent vectors $u,v$, but unfortunately such a matrix does not always exist. After all, the vectors $u$, $v$ and $e_3$ may be linearly dependent.



Fortunately, it is already enough to show that for every pair of linearly independent vectors $u,vin V$ there exists a matrix in $G$ that maps $e_1$ to $u$ and $e_2$ to $v$. This would imply that the hyperplanes $operatorname{span}(e_1,e_2)$ and $operatorname{span}(u,v)$ are in the same orbit under the action of $G$, and hence that all hyperplanes are in the same orbit, i.e. that the action is transitive.



It is a basic fact (or simple exercise) on group actions that elements in the same $G$-orbit have conjugate stabilizers; in particular their stabilizers have the same cardinality.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Your question on transitivity has been answered in the comments, but with regards to your question on $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for $W$ a two dimensional subspace of $V$. Note that because we have transitivity, $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) cong operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W')$ for any pairs $W,W' in X$. Indeed, suppose that $W, W' in X$. Then by transitivity, there exists $g in G$ such that $gW = W'$. Now suppose that $h in operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W')$, then $hcdot w' in w'$ for every $w' in W'$, and so $(hg) cdot w in W'$ for every $w in W$, and so finally $(g^{-1}hg)cdot w in W$ for every $w in W$. This should make it clear that the map $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W') rightarrow operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ such that $h mapsto g^{-1}hg$ is an isomorphism. Thus, the stabalisers of pairs of elements of $X$ have the same cardinality, and so the stabiliser of all elements of $X$ must have the same cardinality.



    Note that the above also allows us to calculate $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for any $W$ by calculating $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for our favourite subspace $W = left< e_1, e_2 right> subseteq V$. It should be easy to see that for this $W$ we have



    $$
    operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) = left{ begin{pmatrix} a & b & p \ c & d & q \ 0 & 0 & r end{pmatrix} : ad - bc neq 0, r neq 0 right}
    $$



    and so



    $$
    left|operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) right| = left| operatorname{GL}_{2}left(mathbb{F}_2 right)right|left|mathbb{F}_2^{times} right|left| mathbb{F}_2 right|^{2} = 4left| operatorname{GL}_{2}left(mathbb{F}_2 right)right| = 4cdot 6 = 24
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074459%2faction-of-gl-bbb-f-23-on-the-sub-spaces-of-bbb-f-23-of-dimension-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      To prove transitivity it would be enough to verify that there exists a matrix that sends $e_1$ to $u$, $e_2$ to $v$ and $e_3$ to $e_3$ for arbitrary linearly independent vectors $u,v$, but unfortunately such a matrix does not always exist. After all, the vectors $u$, $v$ and $e_3$ may be linearly dependent.



      Fortunately, it is already enough to show that for every pair of linearly independent vectors $u,vin V$ there exists a matrix in $G$ that maps $e_1$ to $u$ and $e_2$ to $v$. This would imply that the hyperplanes $operatorname{span}(e_1,e_2)$ and $operatorname{span}(u,v)$ are in the same orbit under the action of $G$, and hence that all hyperplanes are in the same orbit, i.e. that the action is transitive.



      It is a basic fact (or simple exercise) on group actions that elements in the same $G$-orbit have conjugate stabilizers; in particular their stabilizers have the same cardinality.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        To prove transitivity it would be enough to verify that there exists a matrix that sends $e_1$ to $u$, $e_2$ to $v$ and $e_3$ to $e_3$ for arbitrary linearly independent vectors $u,v$, but unfortunately such a matrix does not always exist. After all, the vectors $u$, $v$ and $e_3$ may be linearly dependent.



        Fortunately, it is already enough to show that for every pair of linearly independent vectors $u,vin V$ there exists a matrix in $G$ that maps $e_1$ to $u$ and $e_2$ to $v$. This would imply that the hyperplanes $operatorname{span}(e_1,e_2)$ and $operatorname{span}(u,v)$ are in the same orbit under the action of $G$, and hence that all hyperplanes are in the same orbit, i.e. that the action is transitive.



        It is a basic fact (or simple exercise) on group actions that elements in the same $G$-orbit have conjugate stabilizers; in particular their stabilizers have the same cardinality.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          To prove transitivity it would be enough to verify that there exists a matrix that sends $e_1$ to $u$, $e_2$ to $v$ and $e_3$ to $e_3$ for arbitrary linearly independent vectors $u,v$, but unfortunately such a matrix does not always exist. After all, the vectors $u$, $v$ and $e_3$ may be linearly dependent.



          Fortunately, it is already enough to show that for every pair of linearly independent vectors $u,vin V$ there exists a matrix in $G$ that maps $e_1$ to $u$ and $e_2$ to $v$. This would imply that the hyperplanes $operatorname{span}(e_1,e_2)$ and $operatorname{span}(u,v)$ are in the same orbit under the action of $G$, and hence that all hyperplanes are in the same orbit, i.e. that the action is transitive.



          It is a basic fact (or simple exercise) on group actions that elements in the same $G$-orbit have conjugate stabilizers; in particular their stabilizers have the same cardinality.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          To prove transitivity it would be enough to verify that there exists a matrix that sends $e_1$ to $u$, $e_2$ to $v$ and $e_3$ to $e_3$ for arbitrary linearly independent vectors $u,v$, but unfortunately such a matrix does not always exist. After all, the vectors $u$, $v$ and $e_3$ may be linearly dependent.



          Fortunately, it is already enough to show that for every pair of linearly independent vectors $u,vin V$ there exists a matrix in $G$ that maps $e_1$ to $u$ and $e_2$ to $v$. This would imply that the hyperplanes $operatorname{span}(e_1,e_2)$ and $operatorname{span}(u,v)$ are in the same orbit under the action of $G$, and hence that all hyperplanes are in the same orbit, i.e. that the action is transitive.



          It is a basic fact (or simple exercise) on group actions that elements in the same $G$-orbit have conjugate stabilizers; in particular their stabilizers have the same cardinality.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 15 at 14:47









          ServaesServaes

          28.6k341101




          28.6k341101























              1












              $begingroup$

              Your question on transitivity has been answered in the comments, but with regards to your question on $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for $W$ a two dimensional subspace of $V$. Note that because we have transitivity, $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) cong operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W')$ for any pairs $W,W' in X$. Indeed, suppose that $W, W' in X$. Then by transitivity, there exists $g in G$ such that $gW = W'$. Now suppose that $h in operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W')$, then $hcdot w' in w'$ for every $w' in W'$, and so $(hg) cdot w in W'$ for every $w in W$, and so finally $(g^{-1}hg)cdot w in W$ for every $w in W$. This should make it clear that the map $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W') rightarrow operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ such that $h mapsto g^{-1}hg$ is an isomorphism. Thus, the stabalisers of pairs of elements of $X$ have the same cardinality, and so the stabiliser of all elements of $X$ must have the same cardinality.



              Note that the above also allows us to calculate $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for any $W$ by calculating $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for our favourite subspace $W = left< e_1, e_2 right> subseteq V$. It should be easy to see that for this $W$ we have



              $$
              operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) = left{ begin{pmatrix} a & b & p \ c & d & q \ 0 & 0 & r end{pmatrix} : ad - bc neq 0, r neq 0 right}
              $$



              and so



              $$
              left|operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) right| = left| operatorname{GL}_{2}left(mathbb{F}_2 right)right|left|mathbb{F}_2^{times} right|left| mathbb{F}_2 right|^{2} = 4left| operatorname{GL}_{2}left(mathbb{F}_2 right)right| = 4cdot 6 = 24
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Your question on transitivity has been answered in the comments, but with regards to your question on $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for $W$ a two dimensional subspace of $V$. Note that because we have transitivity, $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) cong operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W')$ for any pairs $W,W' in X$. Indeed, suppose that $W, W' in X$. Then by transitivity, there exists $g in G$ such that $gW = W'$. Now suppose that $h in operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W')$, then $hcdot w' in w'$ for every $w' in W'$, and so $(hg) cdot w in W'$ for every $w in W$, and so finally $(g^{-1}hg)cdot w in W$ for every $w in W$. This should make it clear that the map $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W') rightarrow operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ such that $h mapsto g^{-1}hg$ is an isomorphism. Thus, the stabalisers of pairs of elements of $X$ have the same cardinality, and so the stabiliser of all elements of $X$ must have the same cardinality.



                Note that the above also allows us to calculate $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for any $W$ by calculating $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for our favourite subspace $W = left< e_1, e_2 right> subseteq V$. It should be easy to see that for this $W$ we have



                $$
                operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) = left{ begin{pmatrix} a & b & p \ c & d & q \ 0 & 0 & r end{pmatrix} : ad - bc neq 0, r neq 0 right}
                $$



                and so



                $$
                left|operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) right| = left| operatorname{GL}_{2}left(mathbb{F}_2 right)right|left|mathbb{F}_2^{times} right|left| mathbb{F}_2 right|^{2} = 4left| operatorname{GL}_{2}left(mathbb{F}_2 right)right| = 4cdot 6 = 24
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Your question on transitivity has been answered in the comments, but with regards to your question on $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for $W$ a two dimensional subspace of $V$. Note that because we have transitivity, $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) cong operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W')$ for any pairs $W,W' in X$. Indeed, suppose that $W, W' in X$. Then by transitivity, there exists $g in G$ such that $gW = W'$. Now suppose that $h in operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W')$, then $hcdot w' in w'$ for every $w' in W'$, and so $(hg) cdot w in W'$ for every $w in W$, and so finally $(g^{-1}hg)cdot w in W$ for every $w in W$. This should make it clear that the map $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W') rightarrow operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ such that $h mapsto g^{-1}hg$ is an isomorphism. Thus, the stabalisers of pairs of elements of $X$ have the same cardinality, and so the stabiliser of all elements of $X$ must have the same cardinality.



                  Note that the above also allows us to calculate $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for any $W$ by calculating $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for our favourite subspace $W = left< e_1, e_2 right> subseteq V$. It should be easy to see that for this $W$ we have



                  $$
                  operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) = left{ begin{pmatrix} a & b & p \ c & d & q \ 0 & 0 & r end{pmatrix} : ad - bc neq 0, r neq 0 right}
                  $$



                  and so



                  $$
                  left|operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) right| = left| operatorname{GL}_{2}left(mathbb{F}_2 right)right|left|mathbb{F}_2^{times} right|left| mathbb{F}_2 right|^{2} = 4left| operatorname{GL}_{2}left(mathbb{F}_2 right)right| = 4cdot 6 = 24
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Your question on transitivity has been answered in the comments, but with regards to your question on $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for $W$ a two dimensional subspace of $V$. Note that because we have transitivity, $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) cong operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W')$ for any pairs $W,W' in X$. Indeed, suppose that $W, W' in X$. Then by transitivity, there exists $g in G$ such that $gW = W'$. Now suppose that $h in operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W')$, then $hcdot w' in w'$ for every $w' in W'$, and so $(hg) cdot w in W'$ for every $w in W$, and so finally $(g^{-1}hg)cdot w in W$ for every $w in W$. This should make it clear that the map $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W') rightarrow operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ such that $h mapsto g^{-1}hg$ is an isomorphism. Thus, the stabalisers of pairs of elements of $X$ have the same cardinality, and so the stabiliser of all elements of $X$ must have the same cardinality.



                  Note that the above also allows us to calculate $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for any $W$ by calculating $operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W)$ for our favourite subspace $W = left< e_1, e_2 right> subseteq V$. It should be easy to see that for this $W$ we have



                  $$
                  operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) = left{ begin{pmatrix} a & b & p \ c & d & q \ 0 & 0 & r end{pmatrix} : ad - bc neq 0, r neq 0 right}
                  $$



                  and so



                  $$
                  left|operatorname{Stab}_{G}(W) right| = left| operatorname{GL}_{2}left(mathbb{F}_2 right)right|left|mathbb{F}_2^{times} right|left| mathbb{F}_2 right|^{2} = 4left| operatorname{GL}_{2}left(mathbb{F}_2 right)right| = 4cdot 6 = 24
                  $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 15 at 14:56









                  Adam HigginsAdam Higgins

                  613113




                  613113






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074459%2faction-of-gl-bbb-f-23-on-the-sub-spaces-of-bbb-f-23-of-dimension-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Human spaceflight

                      Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                      File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg