Find a file based on specifications












1















Maybe this is a duplicate but how do I find a file (that I don't know the name of) based on some specifications?



For example how do I find a file that:




  • Is human-readable

  • Has exactly 1033 bytes in size

  • Is not executable


In a certain directory with tons of files, some executable and some non human-readable?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    If you run man find on your system, it will show you all the commands you can use to find exactly what you are looking for.

    – Terrance
    Jan 11 at 14:48






  • 3





    What exactly do you mean by human-readable? Not binary?

    – terdon
    Jan 11 at 14:56











  • You may also need to consider by whom the file should be "not executable"

    – steeldriver
    Jan 11 at 15:32











  • @terdon I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 16:39
















1















Maybe this is a duplicate but how do I find a file (that I don't know the name of) based on some specifications?



For example how do I find a file that:




  • Is human-readable

  • Has exactly 1033 bytes in size

  • Is not executable


In a certain directory with tons of files, some executable and some non human-readable?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    If you run man find on your system, it will show you all the commands you can use to find exactly what you are looking for.

    – Terrance
    Jan 11 at 14:48






  • 3





    What exactly do you mean by human-readable? Not binary?

    – terdon
    Jan 11 at 14:56











  • You may also need to consider by whom the file should be "not executable"

    – steeldriver
    Jan 11 at 15:32











  • @terdon I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 16:39














1












1








1


2






Maybe this is a duplicate but how do I find a file (that I don't know the name of) based on some specifications?



For example how do I find a file that:




  • Is human-readable

  • Has exactly 1033 bytes in size

  • Is not executable


In a certain directory with tons of files, some executable and some non human-readable?










share|improve this question














Maybe this is a duplicate but how do I find a file (that I don't know the name of) based on some specifications?



For example how do I find a file that:




  • Is human-readable

  • Has exactly 1033 bytes in size

  • Is not executable


In a certain directory with tons of files, some executable and some non human-readable?







files filesystem directory find






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 11 at 14:42









PeroPero

214




214








  • 1





    If you run man find on your system, it will show you all the commands you can use to find exactly what you are looking for.

    – Terrance
    Jan 11 at 14:48






  • 3





    What exactly do you mean by human-readable? Not binary?

    – terdon
    Jan 11 at 14:56











  • You may also need to consider by whom the file should be "not executable"

    – steeldriver
    Jan 11 at 15:32











  • @terdon I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 16:39














  • 1





    If you run man find on your system, it will show you all the commands you can use to find exactly what you are looking for.

    – Terrance
    Jan 11 at 14:48






  • 3





    What exactly do you mean by human-readable? Not binary?

    – terdon
    Jan 11 at 14:56











  • You may also need to consider by whom the file should be "not executable"

    – steeldriver
    Jan 11 at 15:32











  • @terdon I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 16:39








1




1





If you run man find on your system, it will show you all the commands you can use to find exactly what you are looking for.

– Terrance
Jan 11 at 14:48





If you run man find on your system, it will show you all the commands you can use to find exactly what you are looking for.

– Terrance
Jan 11 at 14:48




3




3





What exactly do you mean by human-readable? Not binary?

– terdon
Jan 11 at 14:56





What exactly do you mean by human-readable? Not binary?

– terdon
Jan 11 at 14:56













You may also need to consider by whom the file should be "not executable"

– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:32





You may also need to consider by whom the file should be "not executable"

– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:32













@terdon I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code

– Pero
Jan 12 at 16:39





@terdon I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code

– Pero
Jan 12 at 16:39










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Thanks to Terrance's comment, I found the answer.



You can simply do find -readable -size 1033c, that finds a readable file with the size of 1033 bytes.






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    "readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing

    – steeldriver
    Jan 11 at 15:01













  • In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 16:39











  • @Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.

    – terdon
    Jan 12 at 17:01











  • Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 17:10











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1108882%2ffind-a-file-based-on-specifications%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














Thanks to Terrance's comment, I found the answer.



You can simply do find -readable -size 1033c, that finds a readable file with the size of 1033 bytes.






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    "readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing

    – steeldriver
    Jan 11 at 15:01













  • In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 16:39











  • @Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.

    – terdon
    Jan 12 at 17:01











  • Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 17:10
















1














Thanks to Terrance's comment, I found the answer.



You can simply do find -readable -size 1033c, that finds a readable file with the size of 1033 bytes.






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    "readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing

    – steeldriver
    Jan 11 at 15:01













  • In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 16:39











  • @Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.

    – terdon
    Jan 12 at 17:01











  • Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 17:10














1












1








1







Thanks to Terrance's comment, I found the answer.



You can simply do find -readable -size 1033c, that finds a readable file with the size of 1033 bytes.






share|improve this answer















Thanks to Terrance's comment, I found the answer.



You can simply do find -readable -size 1033c, that finds a readable file with the size of 1033 bytes.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jan 11 at 15:29









Zanna

50.6k13135241




50.6k13135241










answered Jan 11 at 14:56









PeroPero

214




214








  • 3





    "readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing

    – steeldriver
    Jan 11 at 15:01













  • In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 16:39











  • @Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.

    – terdon
    Jan 12 at 17:01











  • Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 17:10














  • 3





    "readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing

    – steeldriver
    Jan 11 at 15:01













  • In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 16:39











  • @Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.

    – terdon
    Jan 12 at 17:01











  • Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...

    – Pero
    Jan 12 at 17:10








3




3





"readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing

– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:01







"readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing

– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:01















In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code

– Pero
Jan 12 at 16:39





In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code

– Pero
Jan 12 at 16:39













@Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.

– terdon
Jan 12 at 17:01





@Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.

– terdon
Jan 12 at 17:01













Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...

– Pero
Jan 12 at 17:10





Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...

– Pero
Jan 12 at 17:10


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1108882%2ffind-a-file-based-on-specifications%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Questions related to Moebius Transform of Characteristic Function of the Primes

List of scandals in India

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?