Find the orthogonal bases of the space $ V $ and $ V^{perp}$
$begingroup$
In space $mathbb R^3 $ f Find the orthogonal bases of the space $ V $ and $ V^{perp}$ where $$V = left{ vec{x} in mathbb R^3 : x_1 - 3x_2 + x_3 = 0 right} $$
On the begining, I know that may I ask you for basics of topic, but I truly have some doubts...
Ok, I found basis of $V$: $ [3,1,0]^T,[-1,0,1]^T$
and I have used Gram–Schmidt process to find orthogonal basis of $V$:
$[3,1,0]^T,[-1/10,3/10,1]^T$
Ok, now I should find basis of $ V^{perp} $ and on the same algorithm find orthogonal basis of $V^{perp}$ - but there is my question - if in basis of $V^{perp}$ I have all vectors which are perpendicular to vectors from basis $V$, the basis of $ V^{perp} $ will be just orthogonal basis of $V$? And orthogonal basis of $V^{perp}$ will be just basis of $V$? Have I right or there is something other to do?
linear-algebra orthogonality
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In space $mathbb R^3 $ f Find the orthogonal bases of the space $ V $ and $ V^{perp}$ where $$V = left{ vec{x} in mathbb R^3 : x_1 - 3x_2 + x_3 = 0 right} $$
On the begining, I know that may I ask you for basics of topic, but I truly have some doubts...
Ok, I found basis of $V$: $ [3,1,0]^T,[-1,0,1]^T$
and I have used Gram–Schmidt process to find orthogonal basis of $V$:
$[3,1,0]^T,[-1/10,3/10,1]^T$
Ok, now I should find basis of $ V^{perp} $ and on the same algorithm find orthogonal basis of $V^{perp}$ - but there is my question - if in basis of $V^{perp}$ I have all vectors which are perpendicular to vectors from basis $V$, the basis of $ V^{perp} $ will be just orthogonal basis of $V$? And orthogonal basis of $V^{perp}$ will be just basis of $V$? Have I right or there is something other to do?
linear-algebra orthogonality
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have asked this again with fixed symbols
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Jan 3 at 12:07
$begingroup$
You could simply edit the old question fixing those symbols (see the edit button). It is easier than retyping the whole thing as a new question.
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Jan 3 at 12:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In space $mathbb R^3 $ f Find the orthogonal bases of the space $ V $ and $ V^{perp}$ where $$V = left{ vec{x} in mathbb R^3 : x_1 - 3x_2 + x_3 = 0 right} $$
On the begining, I know that may I ask you for basics of topic, but I truly have some doubts...
Ok, I found basis of $V$: $ [3,1,0]^T,[-1,0,1]^T$
and I have used Gram–Schmidt process to find orthogonal basis of $V$:
$[3,1,0]^T,[-1/10,3/10,1]^T$
Ok, now I should find basis of $ V^{perp} $ and on the same algorithm find orthogonal basis of $V^{perp}$ - but there is my question - if in basis of $V^{perp}$ I have all vectors which are perpendicular to vectors from basis $V$, the basis of $ V^{perp} $ will be just orthogonal basis of $V$? And orthogonal basis of $V^{perp}$ will be just basis of $V$? Have I right or there is something other to do?
linear-algebra orthogonality
$endgroup$
In space $mathbb R^3 $ f Find the orthogonal bases of the space $ V $ and $ V^{perp}$ where $$V = left{ vec{x} in mathbb R^3 : x_1 - 3x_2 + x_3 = 0 right} $$
On the begining, I know that may I ask you for basics of topic, but I truly have some doubts...
Ok, I found basis of $V$: $ [3,1,0]^T,[-1,0,1]^T$
and I have used Gram–Schmidt process to find orthogonal basis of $V$:
$[3,1,0]^T,[-1/10,3/10,1]^T$
Ok, now I should find basis of $ V^{perp} $ and on the same algorithm find orthogonal basis of $V^{perp}$ - but there is my question - if in basis of $V^{perp}$ I have all vectors which are perpendicular to vectors from basis $V$, the basis of $ V^{perp} $ will be just orthogonal basis of $V$? And orthogonal basis of $V^{perp}$ will be just basis of $V$? Have I right or there is something other to do?
linear-algebra orthogonality
linear-algebra orthogonality
asked Jan 3 at 12:07
VirtualUserVirtualUser
69414
69414
$begingroup$
I have asked this again with fixed symbols
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Jan 3 at 12:07
$begingroup$
You could simply edit the old question fixing those symbols (see the edit button). It is easier than retyping the whole thing as a new question.
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Jan 3 at 12:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have asked this again with fixed symbols
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Jan 3 at 12:07
$begingroup$
You could simply edit the old question fixing those symbols (see the edit button). It is easier than retyping the whole thing as a new question.
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Jan 3 at 12:25
$begingroup$
I have asked this again with fixed symbols
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Jan 3 at 12:07
$begingroup$
I have asked this again with fixed symbols
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Jan 3 at 12:07
$begingroup$
You could simply edit the old question fixing those symbols (see the edit button). It is easier than retyping the whole thing as a new question.
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Jan 3 at 12:25
$begingroup$
You could simply edit the old question fixing those symbols (see the edit button). It is easier than retyping the whole thing as a new question.
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Jan 3 at 12:25
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You have a mistake in your Gram-Schmidt, it should be:
$$left{frac1{sqrt{10}}begin{bmatrix} 3 \ 1 \ 0end{bmatrix}, frac1{sqrt{110}}begin{bmatrix} -1 \ 3 \ 10end{bmatrix}right}$$
To find the orthonormal basis for $V^perp$, notice that $dim V^perp = dimmathbb{R}^3 - dim V = 3-2 = 1$ so it suffices to find one vector perpendicular to $V$ and normalize it:
$$frac1{sqrt{11}}begin{bmatrix} 1 \ -3 \ 1end{bmatrix}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There is no mistake. It says an orthogonal basis, not orthonormal.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:30
$begingroup$
@ShubhamJohri OP said they used Gram-Schmidt. Gram-Schmidt yields the basis from my answer.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Jan 3 at 12:35
1
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser Since you only want an orthogonal basis, normalization is not necessary, but it won't get you a wrong answer. An orthonormal basis is orthogonal too
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:45
1
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser That is correct. Take $(a,b,c)in V^perp$, then $forall(x_1,x_2,x_3)in V$, we have $(a,b,c)cdot(x_1,x_2,x_3)=0$. Now take $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ as any two vectors in $V$ to get $(a,b,c)=k(1,-3,1),kinBbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:38
1
$begingroup$
Alternatively, it is pretty easy to observe that $V$ is the plane with the equation $x-3y+z=0$, and any vector in $V^perp$ will be parallel to the normal to the plane whose direction ratios are given by the coefficients of $x,y,z$ in the equation of the plane.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:42
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
No, it's wrong. If you have an orthogonal basis $mathcal{B} = {v_1,cdots, v_n}$ of $V$, then for each $v_i$, it is perpendicular to other $v_j$'s but not to itself. So $v_inotin V^perp$ for all $i$. By the way, you can find an orthonormal basis of $V^perp$ easily from the definition of $V$ as
$$
V = {(1,-3,1)}^perp.
$$ (It's just ${frac{1}{sqrt{11}}(1,-3,1)'}$.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060495%2ffind-the-orthogonal-bases-of-the-space-v-and-v-perp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You have a mistake in your Gram-Schmidt, it should be:
$$left{frac1{sqrt{10}}begin{bmatrix} 3 \ 1 \ 0end{bmatrix}, frac1{sqrt{110}}begin{bmatrix} -1 \ 3 \ 10end{bmatrix}right}$$
To find the orthonormal basis for $V^perp$, notice that $dim V^perp = dimmathbb{R}^3 - dim V = 3-2 = 1$ so it suffices to find one vector perpendicular to $V$ and normalize it:
$$frac1{sqrt{11}}begin{bmatrix} 1 \ -3 \ 1end{bmatrix}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There is no mistake. It says an orthogonal basis, not orthonormal.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:30
$begingroup$
@ShubhamJohri OP said they used Gram-Schmidt. Gram-Schmidt yields the basis from my answer.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Jan 3 at 12:35
1
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser Since you only want an orthogonal basis, normalization is not necessary, but it won't get you a wrong answer. An orthonormal basis is orthogonal too
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:45
1
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser That is correct. Take $(a,b,c)in V^perp$, then $forall(x_1,x_2,x_3)in V$, we have $(a,b,c)cdot(x_1,x_2,x_3)=0$. Now take $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ as any two vectors in $V$ to get $(a,b,c)=k(1,-3,1),kinBbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:38
1
$begingroup$
Alternatively, it is pretty easy to observe that $V$ is the plane with the equation $x-3y+z=0$, and any vector in $V^perp$ will be parallel to the normal to the plane whose direction ratios are given by the coefficients of $x,y,z$ in the equation of the plane.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:42
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
You have a mistake in your Gram-Schmidt, it should be:
$$left{frac1{sqrt{10}}begin{bmatrix} 3 \ 1 \ 0end{bmatrix}, frac1{sqrt{110}}begin{bmatrix} -1 \ 3 \ 10end{bmatrix}right}$$
To find the orthonormal basis for $V^perp$, notice that $dim V^perp = dimmathbb{R}^3 - dim V = 3-2 = 1$ so it suffices to find one vector perpendicular to $V$ and normalize it:
$$frac1{sqrt{11}}begin{bmatrix} 1 \ -3 \ 1end{bmatrix}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There is no mistake. It says an orthogonal basis, not orthonormal.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:30
$begingroup$
@ShubhamJohri OP said they used Gram-Schmidt. Gram-Schmidt yields the basis from my answer.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Jan 3 at 12:35
1
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser Since you only want an orthogonal basis, normalization is not necessary, but it won't get you a wrong answer. An orthonormal basis is orthogonal too
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:45
1
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser That is correct. Take $(a,b,c)in V^perp$, then $forall(x_1,x_2,x_3)in V$, we have $(a,b,c)cdot(x_1,x_2,x_3)=0$. Now take $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ as any two vectors in $V$ to get $(a,b,c)=k(1,-3,1),kinBbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:38
1
$begingroup$
Alternatively, it is pretty easy to observe that $V$ is the plane with the equation $x-3y+z=0$, and any vector in $V^perp$ will be parallel to the normal to the plane whose direction ratios are given by the coefficients of $x,y,z$ in the equation of the plane.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:42
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
You have a mistake in your Gram-Schmidt, it should be:
$$left{frac1{sqrt{10}}begin{bmatrix} 3 \ 1 \ 0end{bmatrix}, frac1{sqrt{110}}begin{bmatrix} -1 \ 3 \ 10end{bmatrix}right}$$
To find the orthonormal basis for $V^perp$, notice that $dim V^perp = dimmathbb{R}^3 - dim V = 3-2 = 1$ so it suffices to find one vector perpendicular to $V$ and normalize it:
$$frac1{sqrt{11}}begin{bmatrix} 1 \ -3 \ 1end{bmatrix}$$
$endgroup$
You have a mistake in your Gram-Schmidt, it should be:
$$left{frac1{sqrt{10}}begin{bmatrix} 3 \ 1 \ 0end{bmatrix}, frac1{sqrt{110}}begin{bmatrix} -1 \ 3 \ 10end{bmatrix}right}$$
To find the orthonormal basis for $V^perp$, notice that $dim V^perp = dimmathbb{R}^3 - dim V = 3-2 = 1$ so it suffices to find one vector perpendicular to $V$ and normalize it:
$$frac1{sqrt{11}}begin{bmatrix} 1 \ -3 \ 1end{bmatrix}$$
answered Jan 3 at 12:19
mechanodroidmechanodroid
27.4k62447
27.4k62447
$begingroup$
There is no mistake. It says an orthogonal basis, not orthonormal.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:30
$begingroup$
@ShubhamJohri OP said they used Gram-Schmidt. Gram-Schmidt yields the basis from my answer.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Jan 3 at 12:35
1
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser Since you only want an orthogonal basis, normalization is not necessary, but it won't get you a wrong answer. An orthonormal basis is orthogonal too
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:45
1
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser That is correct. Take $(a,b,c)in V^perp$, then $forall(x_1,x_2,x_3)in V$, we have $(a,b,c)cdot(x_1,x_2,x_3)=0$. Now take $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ as any two vectors in $V$ to get $(a,b,c)=k(1,-3,1),kinBbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:38
1
$begingroup$
Alternatively, it is pretty easy to observe that $V$ is the plane with the equation $x-3y+z=0$, and any vector in $V^perp$ will be parallel to the normal to the plane whose direction ratios are given by the coefficients of $x,y,z$ in the equation of the plane.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:42
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
There is no mistake. It says an orthogonal basis, not orthonormal.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:30
$begingroup$
@ShubhamJohri OP said they used Gram-Schmidt. Gram-Schmidt yields the basis from my answer.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Jan 3 at 12:35
1
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser Since you only want an orthogonal basis, normalization is not necessary, but it won't get you a wrong answer. An orthonormal basis is orthogonal too
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:45
1
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser That is correct. Take $(a,b,c)in V^perp$, then $forall(x_1,x_2,x_3)in V$, we have $(a,b,c)cdot(x_1,x_2,x_3)=0$. Now take $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ as any two vectors in $V$ to get $(a,b,c)=k(1,-3,1),kinBbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:38
1
$begingroup$
Alternatively, it is pretty easy to observe that $V$ is the plane with the equation $x-3y+z=0$, and any vector in $V^perp$ will be parallel to the normal to the plane whose direction ratios are given by the coefficients of $x,y,z$ in the equation of the plane.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:42
$begingroup$
There is no mistake. It says an orthogonal basis, not orthonormal.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:30
$begingroup$
There is no mistake. It says an orthogonal basis, not orthonormal.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:30
$begingroup$
@ShubhamJohri OP said they used Gram-Schmidt. Gram-Schmidt yields the basis from my answer.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Jan 3 at 12:35
$begingroup$
@ShubhamJohri OP said they used Gram-Schmidt. Gram-Schmidt yields the basis from my answer.
$endgroup$
– mechanodroid
Jan 3 at 12:35
1
1
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser Since you only want an orthogonal basis, normalization is not necessary, but it won't get you a wrong answer. An orthonormal basis is orthogonal too
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:45
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser Since you only want an orthogonal basis, normalization is not necessary, but it won't get you a wrong answer. An orthonormal basis is orthogonal too
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 12:45
1
1
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser That is correct. Take $(a,b,c)in V^perp$, then $forall(x_1,x_2,x_3)in V$, we have $(a,b,c)cdot(x_1,x_2,x_3)=0$. Now take $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ as any two vectors in $V$ to get $(a,b,c)=k(1,-3,1),kinBbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:38
$begingroup$
@VirtualUser That is correct. Take $(a,b,c)in V^perp$, then $forall(x_1,x_2,x_3)in V$, we have $(a,b,c)cdot(x_1,x_2,x_3)=0$. Now take $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ as any two vectors in $V$ to get $(a,b,c)=k(1,-3,1),kinBbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:38
1
1
$begingroup$
Alternatively, it is pretty easy to observe that $V$ is the plane with the equation $x-3y+z=0$, and any vector in $V^perp$ will be parallel to the normal to the plane whose direction ratios are given by the coefficients of $x,y,z$ in the equation of the plane.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:42
$begingroup$
Alternatively, it is pretty easy to observe that $V$ is the plane with the equation $x-3y+z=0$, and any vector in $V^perp$ will be parallel to the normal to the plane whose direction ratios are given by the coefficients of $x,y,z$ in the equation of the plane.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 3 at 15:42
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
No, it's wrong. If you have an orthogonal basis $mathcal{B} = {v_1,cdots, v_n}$ of $V$, then for each $v_i$, it is perpendicular to other $v_j$'s but not to itself. So $v_inotin V^perp$ for all $i$. By the way, you can find an orthonormal basis of $V^perp$ easily from the definition of $V$ as
$$
V = {(1,-3,1)}^perp.
$$ (It's just ${frac{1}{sqrt{11}}(1,-3,1)'}$.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, it's wrong. If you have an orthogonal basis $mathcal{B} = {v_1,cdots, v_n}$ of $V$, then for each $v_i$, it is perpendicular to other $v_j$'s but not to itself. So $v_inotin V^perp$ for all $i$. By the way, you can find an orthonormal basis of $V^perp$ easily from the definition of $V$ as
$$
V = {(1,-3,1)}^perp.
$$ (It's just ${frac{1}{sqrt{11}}(1,-3,1)'}$.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, it's wrong. If you have an orthogonal basis $mathcal{B} = {v_1,cdots, v_n}$ of $V$, then for each $v_i$, it is perpendicular to other $v_j$'s but not to itself. So $v_inotin V^perp$ for all $i$. By the way, you can find an orthonormal basis of $V^perp$ easily from the definition of $V$ as
$$
V = {(1,-3,1)}^perp.
$$ (It's just ${frac{1}{sqrt{11}}(1,-3,1)'}$.)
$endgroup$
No, it's wrong. If you have an orthogonal basis $mathcal{B} = {v_1,cdots, v_n}$ of $V$, then for each $v_i$, it is perpendicular to other $v_j$'s but not to itself. So $v_inotin V^perp$ for all $i$. By the way, you can find an orthonormal basis of $V^perp$ easily from the definition of $V$ as
$$
V = {(1,-3,1)}^perp.
$$ (It's just ${frac{1}{sqrt{11}}(1,-3,1)'}$.)
answered Jan 3 at 12:10
SongSong
11.1k628
11.1k628
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060495%2ffind-the-orthogonal-bases-of-the-space-v-and-v-perp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I have asked this again with fixed symbols
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Jan 3 at 12:07
$begingroup$
You could simply edit the old question fixing those symbols (see the edit button). It is easier than retyping the whole thing as a new question.
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Jan 3 at 12:25