The sum $sum_{n=1}^infty min_{kle n}{alpha k}$ for irrational $alpha$












8












$begingroup$


Let $alpha$ be an irrational number.
For every $n$ let $z_n$ be the integer closest to the number $alpha n$. Then we can define
$$A(alpha):= sum_{n=1}^infty |alpha n - z_n|.$$



We can also define somewhat similar quantity
$$B(alpha):= sum_{n=1}^infty left(alpha n - lfloor alpha n rfloor right).$$



$A(alpha)$ and $B(alpha)$ are sums of non-negative numbers, so the values can be real numbers of $+infty$.





EDIT: In fact, the above sums are clearly both equal to $+infty$, since $n alpha$ will be infinitely often arbitrarily close to and integer (and also to a number of the form $k+frac12$, $kinmathbb Z$). See, for example, Multiples of an irrational number forming a dense subset (and several other posts on MSE).



I have missed this obvious fact when posting the question. However the sums $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ described below might still be interesting.



I left here the part about $A(alpha)$ and $B(alpha)$, since some users already posted some comments about these sums. If I edited the first part of the post away, those comments would not make sense.





We can also make modifications where we replace the sequence with monotone sequences:
$$
begin{align*}
A'(alpha):=& sum_{n=1}^infty min_{kle n}|alpha k - z_k|;\
B'(alpha):=& sum_{n=1}^infty min_{kle n} left(alpha k - lfloor alpha k rfloorright).\
end{align*}
$$



In some sense, these quantities tell us how far $alpha$ is from rational numbers. (The monotone versions seem more closely related to question whether $alpha$ is rational or irrational, since for rational $alpha$ all but finitely many terms are zero, so the sum must be finite.)



My question is:




  • Were the numbers $A'(alpha)$, $B'(alpha)$ studied somewhere?

  • Can they be calculated for some specific irrational numbers? For example, can we calculate them for $alpha=ln 2$, $alpha=sqrt2$, $alpha=e$, $alpha=pi$ or some other well-know irrational numbers?

  • Do we get $A'(alpha)=infty$ or $B'(alpha)=infty$ for some numbers? If yes, can such numbers be characterized?

  • Are they related to irrationality measure or some other ways to measure how irrational a given number $alpha$ is?




To explain what lead me to these sums: I was thinking about question whether there is a counterexample to Minkowski's theorem for unbounded sets. (Such question was asked here. In the meantime I learned here that such example cannot be found.)
So I was trying to take a line $y=alpha x$ which does not contain any lattice points. I tried to replace the segments of this line by wider rectangles - this lead me to try to compute how wide rectangles I can add without hitting some lattice point. This is related to the question how far are the points $(n,nalpha)$ from lattice points.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You may wish to have a look at Pisot numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – A.P.
    May 2 '15 at 12:41












  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelBurr I meant to evaluate them. (I.e., if they are $+infty$ for each $alpha$, that would answer my question.) However, I do not think that $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ are always infinite.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    May 2 '15 at 12:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $A$ and $B$ should be infinite for all nonintegral $alpha$ (they are periodic for $mathbb{Q}setminusmathbb{Z}$). The other two sums are more interesting (indeed)
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    May 2 '15 at 12:46








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is not obvious to me that $A(alpha)$ is well-defined. Even if $n$ is the denominator of a convergent of the continued fraction of $alpha$ then $|alpha n-z_n|$ should behave like $frac{1}{n}$, leading to a divergent sum.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    May 2 '15 at 13:02






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I bet you can compute these sums for simple quadratic irrationals such as the golden ratio.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    May 9 '15 at 9:15
















8












$begingroup$


Let $alpha$ be an irrational number.
For every $n$ let $z_n$ be the integer closest to the number $alpha n$. Then we can define
$$A(alpha):= sum_{n=1}^infty |alpha n - z_n|.$$



We can also define somewhat similar quantity
$$B(alpha):= sum_{n=1}^infty left(alpha n - lfloor alpha n rfloor right).$$



$A(alpha)$ and $B(alpha)$ are sums of non-negative numbers, so the values can be real numbers of $+infty$.





EDIT: In fact, the above sums are clearly both equal to $+infty$, since $n alpha$ will be infinitely often arbitrarily close to and integer (and also to a number of the form $k+frac12$, $kinmathbb Z$). See, for example, Multiples of an irrational number forming a dense subset (and several other posts on MSE).



I have missed this obvious fact when posting the question. However the sums $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ described below might still be interesting.



I left here the part about $A(alpha)$ and $B(alpha)$, since some users already posted some comments about these sums. If I edited the first part of the post away, those comments would not make sense.





We can also make modifications where we replace the sequence with monotone sequences:
$$
begin{align*}
A'(alpha):=& sum_{n=1}^infty min_{kle n}|alpha k - z_k|;\
B'(alpha):=& sum_{n=1}^infty min_{kle n} left(alpha k - lfloor alpha k rfloorright).\
end{align*}
$$



In some sense, these quantities tell us how far $alpha$ is from rational numbers. (The monotone versions seem more closely related to question whether $alpha$ is rational or irrational, since for rational $alpha$ all but finitely many terms are zero, so the sum must be finite.)



My question is:




  • Were the numbers $A'(alpha)$, $B'(alpha)$ studied somewhere?

  • Can they be calculated for some specific irrational numbers? For example, can we calculate them for $alpha=ln 2$, $alpha=sqrt2$, $alpha=e$, $alpha=pi$ or some other well-know irrational numbers?

  • Do we get $A'(alpha)=infty$ or $B'(alpha)=infty$ for some numbers? If yes, can such numbers be characterized?

  • Are they related to irrationality measure or some other ways to measure how irrational a given number $alpha$ is?




To explain what lead me to these sums: I was thinking about question whether there is a counterexample to Minkowski's theorem for unbounded sets. (Such question was asked here. In the meantime I learned here that such example cannot be found.)
So I was trying to take a line $y=alpha x$ which does not contain any lattice points. I tried to replace the segments of this line by wider rectangles - this lead me to try to compute how wide rectangles I can add without hitting some lattice point. This is related to the question how far are the points $(n,nalpha)$ from lattice points.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You may wish to have a look at Pisot numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – A.P.
    May 2 '15 at 12:41












  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelBurr I meant to evaluate them. (I.e., if they are $+infty$ for each $alpha$, that would answer my question.) However, I do not think that $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ are always infinite.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    May 2 '15 at 12:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $A$ and $B$ should be infinite for all nonintegral $alpha$ (they are periodic for $mathbb{Q}setminusmathbb{Z}$). The other two sums are more interesting (indeed)
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    May 2 '15 at 12:46








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is not obvious to me that $A(alpha)$ is well-defined. Even if $n$ is the denominator of a convergent of the continued fraction of $alpha$ then $|alpha n-z_n|$ should behave like $frac{1}{n}$, leading to a divergent sum.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    May 2 '15 at 13:02






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I bet you can compute these sums for simple quadratic irrationals such as the golden ratio.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    May 9 '15 at 9:15














8












8








8


7



$begingroup$


Let $alpha$ be an irrational number.
For every $n$ let $z_n$ be the integer closest to the number $alpha n$. Then we can define
$$A(alpha):= sum_{n=1}^infty |alpha n - z_n|.$$



We can also define somewhat similar quantity
$$B(alpha):= sum_{n=1}^infty left(alpha n - lfloor alpha n rfloor right).$$



$A(alpha)$ and $B(alpha)$ are sums of non-negative numbers, so the values can be real numbers of $+infty$.





EDIT: In fact, the above sums are clearly both equal to $+infty$, since $n alpha$ will be infinitely often arbitrarily close to and integer (and also to a number of the form $k+frac12$, $kinmathbb Z$). See, for example, Multiples of an irrational number forming a dense subset (and several other posts on MSE).



I have missed this obvious fact when posting the question. However the sums $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ described below might still be interesting.



I left here the part about $A(alpha)$ and $B(alpha)$, since some users already posted some comments about these sums. If I edited the first part of the post away, those comments would not make sense.





We can also make modifications where we replace the sequence with monotone sequences:
$$
begin{align*}
A'(alpha):=& sum_{n=1}^infty min_{kle n}|alpha k - z_k|;\
B'(alpha):=& sum_{n=1}^infty min_{kle n} left(alpha k - lfloor alpha k rfloorright).\
end{align*}
$$



In some sense, these quantities tell us how far $alpha$ is from rational numbers. (The monotone versions seem more closely related to question whether $alpha$ is rational or irrational, since for rational $alpha$ all but finitely many terms are zero, so the sum must be finite.)



My question is:




  • Were the numbers $A'(alpha)$, $B'(alpha)$ studied somewhere?

  • Can they be calculated for some specific irrational numbers? For example, can we calculate them for $alpha=ln 2$, $alpha=sqrt2$, $alpha=e$, $alpha=pi$ or some other well-know irrational numbers?

  • Do we get $A'(alpha)=infty$ or $B'(alpha)=infty$ for some numbers? If yes, can such numbers be characterized?

  • Are they related to irrationality measure or some other ways to measure how irrational a given number $alpha$ is?




To explain what lead me to these sums: I was thinking about question whether there is a counterexample to Minkowski's theorem for unbounded sets. (Such question was asked here. In the meantime I learned here that such example cannot be found.)
So I was trying to take a line $y=alpha x$ which does not contain any lattice points. I tried to replace the segments of this line by wider rectangles - this lead me to try to compute how wide rectangles I can add without hitting some lattice point. This is related to the question how far are the points $(n,nalpha)$ from lattice points.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $alpha$ be an irrational number.
For every $n$ let $z_n$ be the integer closest to the number $alpha n$. Then we can define
$$A(alpha):= sum_{n=1}^infty |alpha n - z_n|.$$



We can also define somewhat similar quantity
$$B(alpha):= sum_{n=1}^infty left(alpha n - lfloor alpha n rfloor right).$$



$A(alpha)$ and $B(alpha)$ are sums of non-negative numbers, so the values can be real numbers of $+infty$.





EDIT: In fact, the above sums are clearly both equal to $+infty$, since $n alpha$ will be infinitely often arbitrarily close to and integer (and also to a number of the form $k+frac12$, $kinmathbb Z$). See, for example, Multiples of an irrational number forming a dense subset (and several other posts on MSE).



I have missed this obvious fact when posting the question. However the sums $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ described below might still be interesting.



I left here the part about $A(alpha)$ and $B(alpha)$, since some users already posted some comments about these sums. If I edited the first part of the post away, those comments would not make sense.





We can also make modifications where we replace the sequence with monotone sequences:
$$
begin{align*}
A'(alpha):=& sum_{n=1}^infty min_{kle n}|alpha k - z_k|;\
B'(alpha):=& sum_{n=1}^infty min_{kle n} left(alpha k - lfloor alpha k rfloorright).\
end{align*}
$$



In some sense, these quantities tell us how far $alpha$ is from rational numbers. (The monotone versions seem more closely related to question whether $alpha$ is rational or irrational, since for rational $alpha$ all but finitely many terms are zero, so the sum must be finite.)



My question is:




  • Were the numbers $A'(alpha)$, $B'(alpha)$ studied somewhere?

  • Can they be calculated for some specific irrational numbers? For example, can we calculate them for $alpha=ln 2$, $alpha=sqrt2$, $alpha=e$, $alpha=pi$ or some other well-know irrational numbers?

  • Do we get $A'(alpha)=infty$ or $B'(alpha)=infty$ for some numbers? If yes, can such numbers be characterized?

  • Are they related to irrationality measure or some other ways to measure how irrational a given number $alpha$ is?




To explain what lead me to these sums: I was thinking about question whether there is a counterexample to Minkowski's theorem for unbounded sets. (Such question was asked here. In the meantime I learned here that such example cannot be found.)
So I was trying to take a line $y=alpha x$ which does not contain any lattice points. I tried to replace the segments of this line by wider rectangles - this lead me to try to compute how wide rectangles I can add without hitting some lattice point. This is related to the question how far are the points $(n,nalpha)$ from lattice points.







sequences-and-series irrational-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:58









Community

1




1










asked May 2 '15 at 12:31









Martin SleziakMartin Sleziak

44.7k9117272




44.7k9117272








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You may wish to have a look at Pisot numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – A.P.
    May 2 '15 at 12:41












  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelBurr I meant to evaluate them. (I.e., if they are $+infty$ for each $alpha$, that would answer my question.) However, I do not think that $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ are always infinite.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    May 2 '15 at 12:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $A$ and $B$ should be infinite for all nonintegral $alpha$ (they are periodic for $mathbb{Q}setminusmathbb{Z}$). The other two sums are more interesting (indeed)
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    May 2 '15 at 12:46








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is not obvious to me that $A(alpha)$ is well-defined. Even if $n$ is the denominator of a convergent of the continued fraction of $alpha$ then $|alpha n-z_n|$ should behave like $frac{1}{n}$, leading to a divergent sum.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    May 2 '15 at 13:02






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I bet you can compute these sums for simple quadratic irrationals such as the golden ratio.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    May 9 '15 at 9:15














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You may wish to have a look at Pisot numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – A.P.
    May 2 '15 at 12:41












  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelBurr I meant to evaluate them. (I.e., if they are $+infty$ for each $alpha$, that would answer my question.) However, I do not think that $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ are always infinite.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    May 2 '15 at 12:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $A$ and $B$ should be infinite for all nonintegral $alpha$ (they are periodic for $mathbb{Q}setminusmathbb{Z}$). The other two sums are more interesting (indeed)
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    May 2 '15 at 12:46








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is not obvious to me that $A(alpha)$ is well-defined. Even if $n$ is the denominator of a convergent of the continued fraction of $alpha$ then $|alpha n-z_n|$ should behave like $frac{1}{n}$, leading to a divergent sum.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    May 2 '15 at 13:02






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I bet you can compute these sums for simple quadratic irrationals such as the golden ratio.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    May 9 '15 at 9:15








1




1




$begingroup$
You may wish to have a look at Pisot numbers.
$endgroup$
– A.P.
May 2 '15 at 12:41






$begingroup$
You may wish to have a look at Pisot numbers.
$endgroup$
– A.P.
May 2 '15 at 12:41














$begingroup$
@MichaelBurr I meant to evaluate them. (I.e., if they are $+infty$ for each $alpha$, that would answer my question.) However, I do not think that $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ are always infinite.
$endgroup$
– Martin Sleziak
May 2 '15 at 12:44




$begingroup$
@MichaelBurr I meant to evaluate them. (I.e., if they are $+infty$ for each $alpha$, that would answer my question.) However, I do not think that $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ are always infinite.
$endgroup$
– Martin Sleziak
May 2 '15 at 12:44




1




1




$begingroup$
$A$ and $B$ should be infinite for all nonintegral $alpha$ (they are periodic for $mathbb{Q}setminusmathbb{Z}$). The other two sums are more interesting (indeed)
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
May 2 '15 at 12:46






$begingroup$
$A$ and $B$ should be infinite for all nonintegral $alpha$ (they are periodic for $mathbb{Q}setminusmathbb{Z}$). The other two sums are more interesting (indeed)
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
May 2 '15 at 12:46






1




1




$begingroup$
It is not obvious to me that $A(alpha)$ is well-defined. Even if $n$ is the denominator of a convergent of the continued fraction of $alpha$ then $|alpha n-z_n|$ should behave like $frac{1}{n}$, leading to a divergent sum.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
May 2 '15 at 13:02




$begingroup$
It is not obvious to me that $A(alpha)$ is well-defined. Even if $n$ is the denominator of a convergent of the continued fraction of $alpha$ then $|alpha n-z_n|$ should behave like $frac{1}{n}$, leading to a divergent sum.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
May 2 '15 at 13:02




2




2




$begingroup$
I bet you can compute these sums for simple quadratic irrationals such as the golden ratio.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
May 9 '15 at 9:15




$begingroup$
I bet you can compute these sums for simple quadratic irrationals such as the golden ratio.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
May 9 '15 at 9:15










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

$newcommand{bivec}[2]{begin{bmatrix} #1 \ #2 end{bmatrix}}$
Excavating. Still the series for $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ both diverge always.



Let $alpha=[a_0;a_1,a_2,ldots]$ be the continued fraction expansion of $alpha$, and $p_n/q_n$ be its $n$-th convergent:
$$bivec{p_{-1}}{q_{-1}}=bivec{1}{0}, bivec{p_0}{q_0}=bivec{a_0}{1}, bivec{p_n}{q_n}=a_nbivec{p_{n-1}}{q_{n-1}}+bivec{p_{n-2}}{q_{n-2}}.$$
Then for $rgeqslant 0$ and $q_rleqslant n<q_{r+1}$ we have $displaystylemin_{kleqslant n}|alpha k-z_k|=|alpha q_r-p_r|$, which gives
$$A'(alpha)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}(q_{n+1}-q_n)cdot|alpha q_n-p_n|>sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{q_{n+1}-q_n}{q_{n+1}+q_n}$$
by "Theorem 5" here. But $r_n=q_{n+1}/q_n$ can't converge to $1$ because $r_n=a_{n+1}+1/r_{n-1}$.



(Therefore $dfrac{q_{n+1}-q_n}{q_{n+1}+q_n}=dfrac{r_n-1}{r_n+1}$ can't converge to $0$.)



Thus $A'(alpha)=+infty$ for any (irrational) $alpha$, and therefore $B'(alpha)=+infty$ too.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1261891%2fthe-sum-sum-n-1-infty-min-k-le-n-alpha-k-for-irrational-alpha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    $newcommand{bivec}[2]{begin{bmatrix} #1 \ #2 end{bmatrix}}$
    Excavating. Still the series for $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ both diverge always.



    Let $alpha=[a_0;a_1,a_2,ldots]$ be the continued fraction expansion of $alpha$, and $p_n/q_n$ be its $n$-th convergent:
    $$bivec{p_{-1}}{q_{-1}}=bivec{1}{0}, bivec{p_0}{q_0}=bivec{a_0}{1}, bivec{p_n}{q_n}=a_nbivec{p_{n-1}}{q_{n-1}}+bivec{p_{n-2}}{q_{n-2}}.$$
    Then for $rgeqslant 0$ and $q_rleqslant n<q_{r+1}$ we have $displaystylemin_{kleqslant n}|alpha k-z_k|=|alpha q_r-p_r|$, which gives
    $$A'(alpha)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}(q_{n+1}-q_n)cdot|alpha q_n-p_n|>sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{q_{n+1}-q_n}{q_{n+1}+q_n}$$
    by "Theorem 5" here. But $r_n=q_{n+1}/q_n$ can't converge to $1$ because $r_n=a_{n+1}+1/r_{n-1}$.



    (Therefore $dfrac{q_{n+1}-q_n}{q_{n+1}+q_n}=dfrac{r_n-1}{r_n+1}$ can't converge to $0$.)



    Thus $A'(alpha)=+infty$ for any (irrational) $alpha$, and therefore $B'(alpha)=+infty$ too.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      $newcommand{bivec}[2]{begin{bmatrix} #1 \ #2 end{bmatrix}}$
      Excavating. Still the series for $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ both diverge always.



      Let $alpha=[a_0;a_1,a_2,ldots]$ be the continued fraction expansion of $alpha$, and $p_n/q_n$ be its $n$-th convergent:
      $$bivec{p_{-1}}{q_{-1}}=bivec{1}{0}, bivec{p_0}{q_0}=bivec{a_0}{1}, bivec{p_n}{q_n}=a_nbivec{p_{n-1}}{q_{n-1}}+bivec{p_{n-2}}{q_{n-2}}.$$
      Then for $rgeqslant 0$ and $q_rleqslant n<q_{r+1}$ we have $displaystylemin_{kleqslant n}|alpha k-z_k|=|alpha q_r-p_r|$, which gives
      $$A'(alpha)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}(q_{n+1}-q_n)cdot|alpha q_n-p_n|>sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{q_{n+1}-q_n}{q_{n+1}+q_n}$$
      by "Theorem 5" here. But $r_n=q_{n+1}/q_n$ can't converge to $1$ because $r_n=a_{n+1}+1/r_{n-1}$.



      (Therefore $dfrac{q_{n+1}-q_n}{q_{n+1}+q_n}=dfrac{r_n-1}{r_n+1}$ can't converge to $0$.)



      Thus $A'(alpha)=+infty$ for any (irrational) $alpha$, and therefore $B'(alpha)=+infty$ too.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        $newcommand{bivec}[2]{begin{bmatrix} #1 \ #2 end{bmatrix}}$
        Excavating. Still the series for $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ both diverge always.



        Let $alpha=[a_0;a_1,a_2,ldots]$ be the continued fraction expansion of $alpha$, and $p_n/q_n$ be its $n$-th convergent:
        $$bivec{p_{-1}}{q_{-1}}=bivec{1}{0}, bivec{p_0}{q_0}=bivec{a_0}{1}, bivec{p_n}{q_n}=a_nbivec{p_{n-1}}{q_{n-1}}+bivec{p_{n-2}}{q_{n-2}}.$$
        Then for $rgeqslant 0$ and $q_rleqslant n<q_{r+1}$ we have $displaystylemin_{kleqslant n}|alpha k-z_k|=|alpha q_r-p_r|$, which gives
        $$A'(alpha)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}(q_{n+1}-q_n)cdot|alpha q_n-p_n|>sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{q_{n+1}-q_n}{q_{n+1}+q_n}$$
        by "Theorem 5" here. But $r_n=q_{n+1}/q_n$ can't converge to $1$ because $r_n=a_{n+1}+1/r_{n-1}$.



        (Therefore $dfrac{q_{n+1}-q_n}{q_{n+1}+q_n}=dfrac{r_n-1}{r_n+1}$ can't converge to $0$.)



        Thus $A'(alpha)=+infty$ for any (irrational) $alpha$, and therefore $B'(alpha)=+infty$ too.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        $newcommand{bivec}[2]{begin{bmatrix} #1 \ #2 end{bmatrix}}$
        Excavating. Still the series for $A'(alpha)$ and $B'(alpha)$ both diverge always.



        Let $alpha=[a_0;a_1,a_2,ldots]$ be the continued fraction expansion of $alpha$, and $p_n/q_n$ be its $n$-th convergent:
        $$bivec{p_{-1}}{q_{-1}}=bivec{1}{0}, bivec{p_0}{q_0}=bivec{a_0}{1}, bivec{p_n}{q_n}=a_nbivec{p_{n-1}}{q_{n-1}}+bivec{p_{n-2}}{q_{n-2}}.$$
        Then for $rgeqslant 0$ and $q_rleqslant n<q_{r+1}$ we have $displaystylemin_{kleqslant n}|alpha k-z_k|=|alpha q_r-p_r|$, which gives
        $$A'(alpha)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}(q_{n+1}-q_n)cdot|alpha q_n-p_n|>sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{q_{n+1}-q_n}{q_{n+1}+q_n}$$
        by "Theorem 5" here. But $r_n=q_{n+1}/q_n$ can't converge to $1$ because $r_n=a_{n+1}+1/r_{n-1}$.



        (Therefore $dfrac{q_{n+1}-q_n}{q_{n+1}+q_n}=dfrac{r_n-1}{r_n+1}$ can't converge to $0$.)



        Thus $A'(alpha)=+infty$ for any (irrational) $alpha$, and therefore $B'(alpha)=+infty$ too.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 3 at 17:48

























        answered Jan 3 at 11:49









        metamorphymetamorphy

        3,6821621




        3,6821621






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1261891%2fthe-sum-sum-n-1-infty-min-k-le-n-alpha-k-for-irrational-alpha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg