Differentiability Vs. Continuity












0












$begingroup$


Let $$f(x)=frac{x^2+x-6}{x^2+5x+6}$$ Is $f$ continuous at the point $x=-3$? Is $f$ differentiable at point $x=-3$? Is it really possible that a function is differentiable on a point (not in domain) but not continuous on that point?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Differentiability implies continuity. The contrapositive is also true: discontinuity implies non-differentiability. What can you say about $f(-3)$? Does it exist?
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 18 at 8:36












  • $begingroup$
    $f(x)=frac {x-2} {x+2}$. If you define the value of $f$ at $-3$ to be $5$ then it is differentiable (and hence continuous). As it is, it is neither continuous nor differentiable
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 18 at 8:36












  • $begingroup$
    The left and right hand limits are both 5 @shubham johri
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 8:40










  • $begingroup$
    Im confuse about continuity because -3 is not part of its domain. So its means that f is continuous everywhere except -3 and -2.
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 8:43
















0












$begingroup$


Let $$f(x)=frac{x^2+x-6}{x^2+5x+6}$$ Is $f$ continuous at the point $x=-3$? Is $f$ differentiable at point $x=-3$? Is it really possible that a function is differentiable on a point (not in domain) but not continuous on that point?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Differentiability implies continuity. The contrapositive is also true: discontinuity implies non-differentiability. What can you say about $f(-3)$? Does it exist?
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 18 at 8:36












  • $begingroup$
    $f(x)=frac {x-2} {x+2}$. If you define the value of $f$ at $-3$ to be $5$ then it is differentiable (and hence continuous). As it is, it is neither continuous nor differentiable
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 18 at 8:36












  • $begingroup$
    The left and right hand limits are both 5 @shubham johri
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 8:40










  • $begingroup$
    Im confuse about continuity because -3 is not part of its domain. So its means that f is continuous everywhere except -3 and -2.
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 8:43














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $$f(x)=frac{x^2+x-6}{x^2+5x+6}$$ Is $f$ continuous at the point $x=-3$? Is $f$ differentiable at point $x=-3$? Is it really possible that a function is differentiable on a point (not in domain) but not continuous on that point?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $$f(x)=frac{x^2+x-6}{x^2+5x+6}$$ Is $f$ continuous at the point $x=-3$? Is $f$ differentiable at point $x=-3$? Is it really possible that a function is differentiable on a point (not in domain) but not continuous on that point?







calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 18 at 8:40









idriskameni

749321




749321










asked Jan 18 at 8:34









perfectnumberperfectnumber

1




1












  • $begingroup$
    Differentiability implies continuity. The contrapositive is also true: discontinuity implies non-differentiability. What can you say about $f(-3)$? Does it exist?
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 18 at 8:36












  • $begingroup$
    $f(x)=frac {x-2} {x+2}$. If you define the value of $f$ at $-3$ to be $5$ then it is differentiable (and hence continuous). As it is, it is neither continuous nor differentiable
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 18 at 8:36












  • $begingroup$
    The left and right hand limits are both 5 @shubham johri
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 8:40










  • $begingroup$
    Im confuse about continuity because -3 is not part of its domain. So its means that f is continuous everywhere except -3 and -2.
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 8:43


















  • $begingroup$
    Differentiability implies continuity. The contrapositive is also true: discontinuity implies non-differentiability. What can you say about $f(-3)$? Does it exist?
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 18 at 8:36












  • $begingroup$
    $f(x)=frac {x-2} {x+2}$. If you define the value of $f$ at $-3$ to be $5$ then it is differentiable (and hence continuous). As it is, it is neither continuous nor differentiable
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 18 at 8:36












  • $begingroup$
    The left and right hand limits are both 5 @shubham johri
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 8:40










  • $begingroup$
    Im confuse about continuity because -3 is not part of its domain. So its means that f is continuous everywhere except -3 and -2.
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 8:43
















$begingroup$
Differentiability implies continuity. The contrapositive is also true: discontinuity implies non-differentiability. What can you say about $f(-3)$? Does it exist?
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 18 at 8:36






$begingroup$
Differentiability implies continuity. The contrapositive is also true: discontinuity implies non-differentiability. What can you say about $f(-3)$? Does it exist?
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 18 at 8:36














$begingroup$
$f(x)=frac {x-2} {x+2}$. If you define the value of $f$ at $-3$ to be $5$ then it is differentiable (and hence continuous). As it is, it is neither continuous nor differentiable
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 18 at 8:36






$begingroup$
$f(x)=frac {x-2} {x+2}$. If you define the value of $f$ at $-3$ to be $5$ then it is differentiable (and hence continuous). As it is, it is neither continuous nor differentiable
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 18 at 8:36














$begingroup$
The left and right hand limits are both 5 @shubham johri
$endgroup$
– perfectnumber
Jan 18 at 8:40




$begingroup$
The left and right hand limits are both 5 @shubham johri
$endgroup$
– perfectnumber
Jan 18 at 8:40












$begingroup$
Im confuse about continuity because -3 is not part of its domain. So its means that f is continuous everywhere except -3 and -2.
$endgroup$
– perfectnumber
Jan 18 at 8:43




$begingroup$
Im confuse about continuity because -3 is not part of its domain. So its means that f is continuous everywhere except -3 and -2.
$endgroup$
– perfectnumber
Jan 18 at 8:43










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

A function cannot be continuous and it can't be differentiable at a point where it isn't defined. Your function $f$ is only defined on $Bbb Rsetminus {-3, -2}$, and thus asking whether it's continuous at $x = -3$ is meaningless. Note that the function isn't discontinuous either. Asking whether it's discontinuous at $x = -3$ is equally meaningless.



That being said, for all other values of $x$, we have that $f(x)$ is equal to $frac{x-2}{x+2}$, and that function is defined and continuous at $x = -3$. Thus we way that $f$ has a removable singularity at $x = -3$. If we remove this singularity, then yes, the new function is both continuous and differentiable at $x = -3$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I am still confused especially with the removable singularity. :|
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 8:56












  • $begingroup$
    @perfectnumber You can remove the singularity, but that would result in a new, different function. The original function isn't defined at $x = -3$, and thus it can't be continuous there. It doesn't matter what kind of "undefinability" it has. Removable or not, the function simply isn't defined, and that's the end of it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 18 at 9:01










  • $begingroup$
    In other words, f is not continuous at x=-3 hence not differentiable?
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 9:04










  • $begingroup$
    @perfectnumber Exactly. I think i would personally use "and" instead of "hence" in this specific case. As I see it, the function not being defined stops both properties, rather than it stopping continuity, which in turn stops differentiability. But that's a matter of philosophy and esthetics, and what you said is entirely correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 18 at 9:08












  • $begingroup$
    One clarification @Arthur, it doesn't mean that the derivative of f is defined at x=-3, f is also differentiable at x=-3?
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 9:17












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077975%2fdifferentiability-vs-continuity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

A function cannot be continuous and it can't be differentiable at a point where it isn't defined. Your function $f$ is only defined on $Bbb Rsetminus {-3, -2}$, and thus asking whether it's continuous at $x = -3$ is meaningless. Note that the function isn't discontinuous either. Asking whether it's discontinuous at $x = -3$ is equally meaningless.



That being said, for all other values of $x$, we have that $f(x)$ is equal to $frac{x-2}{x+2}$, and that function is defined and continuous at $x = -3$. Thus we way that $f$ has a removable singularity at $x = -3$. If we remove this singularity, then yes, the new function is both continuous and differentiable at $x = -3$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I am still confused especially with the removable singularity. :|
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 8:56












  • $begingroup$
    @perfectnumber You can remove the singularity, but that would result in a new, different function. The original function isn't defined at $x = -3$, and thus it can't be continuous there. It doesn't matter what kind of "undefinability" it has. Removable or not, the function simply isn't defined, and that's the end of it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 18 at 9:01










  • $begingroup$
    In other words, f is not continuous at x=-3 hence not differentiable?
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 9:04










  • $begingroup$
    @perfectnumber Exactly. I think i would personally use "and" instead of "hence" in this specific case. As I see it, the function not being defined stops both properties, rather than it stopping continuity, which in turn stops differentiability. But that's a matter of philosophy and esthetics, and what you said is entirely correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 18 at 9:08












  • $begingroup$
    One clarification @Arthur, it doesn't mean that the derivative of f is defined at x=-3, f is also differentiable at x=-3?
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 9:17
















2












$begingroup$

A function cannot be continuous and it can't be differentiable at a point where it isn't defined. Your function $f$ is only defined on $Bbb Rsetminus {-3, -2}$, and thus asking whether it's continuous at $x = -3$ is meaningless. Note that the function isn't discontinuous either. Asking whether it's discontinuous at $x = -3$ is equally meaningless.



That being said, for all other values of $x$, we have that $f(x)$ is equal to $frac{x-2}{x+2}$, and that function is defined and continuous at $x = -3$. Thus we way that $f$ has a removable singularity at $x = -3$. If we remove this singularity, then yes, the new function is both continuous and differentiable at $x = -3$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I am still confused especially with the removable singularity. :|
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 8:56












  • $begingroup$
    @perfectnumber You can remove the singularity, but that would result in a new, different function. The original function isn't defined at $x = -3$, and thus it can't be continuous there. It doesn't matter what kind of "undefinability" it has. Removable or not, the function simply isn't defined, and that's the end of it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 18 at 9:01










  • $begingroup$
    In other words, f is not continuous at x=-3 hence not differentiable?
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 9:04










  • $begingroup$
    @perfectnumber Exactly. I think i would personally use "and" instead of "hence" in this specific case. As I see it, the function not being defined stops both properties, rather than it stopping continuity, which in turn stops differentiability. But that's a matter of philosophy and esthetics, and what you said is entirely correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 18 at 9:08












  • $begingroup$
    One clarification @Arthur, it doesn't mean that the derivative of f is defined at x=-3, f is also differentiable at x=-3?
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 9:17














2












2








2





$begingroup$

A function cannot be continuous and it can't be differentiable at a point where it isn't defined. Your function $f$ is only defined on $Bbb Rsetminus {-3, -2}$, and thus asking whether it's continuous at $x = -3$ is meaningless. Note that the function isn't discontinuous either. Asking whether it's discontinuous at $x = -3$ is equally meaningless.



That being said, for all other values of $x$, we have that $f(x)$ is equal to $frac{x-2}{x+2}$, and that function is defined and continuous at $x = -3$. Thus we way that $f$ has a removable singularity at $x = -3$. If we remove this singularity, then yes, the new function is both continuous and differentiable at $x = -3$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



A function cannot be continuous and it can't be differentiable at a point where it isn't defined. Your function $f$ is only defined on $Bbb Rsetminus {-3, -2}$, and thus asking whether it's continuous at $x = -3$ is meaningless. Note that the function isn't discontinuous either. Asking whether it's discontinuous at $x = -3$ is equally meaningless.



That being said, for all other values of $x$, we have that $f(x)$ is equal to $frac{x-2}{x+2}$, and that function is defined and continuous at $x = -3$. Thus we way that $f$ has a removable singularity at $x = -3$. If we remove this singularity, then yes, the new function is both continuous and differentiable at $x = -3$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 18 at 8:41









ArthurArthur

123k7122211




123k7122211












  • $begingroup$
    I am still confused especially with the removable singularity. :|
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 8:56












  • $begingroup$
    @perfectnumber You can remove the singularity, but that would result in a new, different function. The original function isn't defined at $x = -3$, and thus it can't be continuous there. It doesn't matter what kind of "undefinability" it has. Removable or not, the function simply isn't defined, and that's the end of it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 18 at 9:01










  • $begingroup$
    In other words, f is not continuous at x=-3 hence not differentiable?
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 9:04










  • $begingroup$
    @perfectnumber Exactly. I think i would personally use "and" instead of "hence" in this specific case. As I see it, the function not being defined stops both properties, rather than it stopping continuity, which in turn stops differentiability. But that's a matter of philosophy and esthetics, and what you said is entirely correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 18 at 9:08












  • $begingroup$
    One clarification @Arthur, it doesn't mean that the derivative of f is defined at x=-3, f is also differentiable at x=-3?
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 9:17


















  • $begingroup$
    I am still confused especially with the removable singularity. :|
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 8:56












  • $begingroup$
    @perfectnumber You can remove the singularity, but that would result in a new, different function. The original function isn't defined at $x = -3$, and thus it can't be continuous there. It doesn't matter what kind of "undefinability" it has. Removable or not, the function simply isn't defined, and that's the end of it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 18 at 9:01










  • $begingroup$
    In other words, f is not continuous at x=-3 hence not differentiable?
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 9:04










  • $begingroup$
    @perfectnumber Exactly. I think i would personally use "and" instead of "hence" in this specific case. As I see it, the function not being defined stops both properties, rather than it stopping continuity, which in turn stops differentiability. But that's a matter of philosophy and esthetics, and what you said is entirely correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 18 at 9:08












  • $begingroup$
    One clarification @Arthur, it doesn't mean that the derivative of f is defined at x=-3, f is also differentiable at x=-3?
    $endgroup$
    – perfectnumber
    Jan 18 at 9:17
















$begingroup$
I am still confused especially with the removable singularity. :|
$endgroup$
– perfectnumber
Jan 18 at 8:56






$begingroup$
I am still confused especially with the removable singularity. :|
$endgroup$
– perfectnumber
Jan 18 at 8:56














$begingroup$
@perfectnumber You can remove the singularity, but that would result in a new, different function. The original function isn't defined at $x = -3$, and thus it can't be continuous there. It doesn't matter what kind of "undefinability" it has. Removable or not, the function simply isn't defined, and that's the end of it.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 18 at 9:01




$begingroup$
@perfectnumber You can remove the singularity, but that would result in a new, different function. The original function isn't defined at $x = -3$, and thus it can't be continuous there. It doesn't matter what kind of "undefinability" it has. Removable or not, the function simply isn't defined, and that's the end of it.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 18 at 9:01












$begingroup$
In other words, f is not continuous at x=-3 hence not differentiable?
$endgroup$
– perfectnumber
Jan 18 at 9:04




$begingroup$
In other words, f is not continuous at x=-3 hence not differentiable?
$endgroup$
– perfectnumber
Jan 18 at 9:04












$begingroup$
@perfectnumber Exactly. I think i would personally use "and" instead of "hence" in this specific case. As I see it, the function not being defined stops both properties, rather than it stopping continuity, which in turn stops differentiability. But that's a matter of philosophy and esthetics, and what you said is entirely correct.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 18 at 9:08






$begingroup$
@perfectnumber Exactly. I think i would personally use "and" instead of "hence" in this specific case. As I see it, the function not being defined stops both properties, rather than it stopping continuity, which in turn stops differentiability. But that's a matter of philosophy and esthetics, and what you said is entirely correct.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 18 at 9:08














$begingroup$
One clarification @Arthur, it doesn't mean that the derivative of f is defined at x=-3, f is also differentiable at x=-3?
$endgroup$
– perfectnumber
Jan 18 at 9:17




$begingroup$
One clarification @Arthur, it doesn't mean that the derivative of f is defined at x=-3, f is also differentiable at x=-3?
$endgroup$
– perfectnumber
Jan 18 at 9:17


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077975%2fdifferentiability-vs-continuity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg