Lifting idempotents modulo a nilpotent ideal
$begingroup$
The problem is this:
Suppose $I subseteq R$ is a nilpotent ideal and there is $r in R$ with $r equiv r^2 pmod I$. Show $r equiv e pmod I$ for some $e in R$ idempotent.
I have spent a few hours rolling around in abstracta with no destination. I believe that if I could write down a concrete example of this, the example could guide me through the abstract definitions and show me where to look for an idempotent in $R$. I have looked at 2x2 matrices and could not find any such examples. Might anybody have one?
abstract-algebra ring-theory noncommutative-algebra nilpotence
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem is this:
Suppose $I subseteq R$ is a nilpotent ideal and there is $r in R$ with $r equiv r^2 pmod I$. Show $r equiv e pmod I$ for some $e in R$ idempotent.
I have spent a few hours rolling around in abstracta with no destination. I believe that if I could write down a concrete example of this, the example could guide me through the abstract definitions and show me where to look for an idempotent in $R$. I have looked at 2x2 matrices and could not find any such examples. Might anybody have one?
abstract-algebra ring-theory noncommutative-algebra nilpotence
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This is called idempotent lifting. See stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00J9 .
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '16 at 19:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem is this:
Suppose $I subseteq R$ is a nilpotent ideal and there is $r in R$ with $r equiv r^2 pmod I$. Show $r equiv e pmod I$ for some $e in R$ idempotent.
I have spent a few hours rolling around in abstracta with no destination. I believe that if I could write down a concrete example of this, the example could guide me through the abstract definitions and show me where to look for an idempotent in $R$. I have looked at 2x2 matrices and could not find any such examples. Might anybody have one?
abstract-algebra ring-theory noncommutative-algebra nilpotence
$endgroup$
The problem is this:
Suppose $I subseteq R$ is a nilpotent ideal and there is $r in R$ with $r equiv r^2 pmod I$. Show $r equiv e pmod I$ for some $e in R$ idempotent.
I have spent a few hours rolling around in abstracta with no destination. I believe that if I could write down a concrete example of this, the example could guide me through the abstract definitions and show me where to look for an idempotent in $R$. I have looked at 2x2 matrices and could not find any such examples. Might anybody have one?
abstract-algebra ring-theory noncommutative-algebra nilpotence
abstract-algebra ring-theory noncommutative-algebra nilpotence
edited Dec 2 '16 at 15:47
user26857
39.4k124183
39.4k124183
asked Nov 20 '16 at 19:08
user309475
2
$begingroup$
This is called idempotent lifting. See stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00J9 .
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '16 at 19:32
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
This is called idempotent lifting. See stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00J9 .
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '16 at 19:32
2
2
$begingroup$
This is called idempotent lifting. See stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00J9 .
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '16 at 19:32
$begingroup$
This is called idempotent lifting. See stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00J9 .
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '16 at 19:32
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The proof I've seen is a sort of surgery that is not hard, but also not obvious. I will adjust notation a bit:
Suppose $bar r$ is idempotent in $R/I$, and consider its preimage $rin R$. To make things easier to look at, define $s=1-r$. Notice that $bar s$ is also an idempotent in $R/I$, and $bar r + bar s equiv bar 1$.
We have that $rs=r-r^2in I$, and obviously $rs=sr$, so there's some $k$ such that $r^ks^k=0$. Since $bar r^k+bar s^kequiv bar r+bar sequiv bar 1$, we have $x=1-r^k-s^kin I$ is nilpotent, and then $1-x=r^k+s^k$ is invertible in $R$, with inverse $u=1+x+x^2+ldots +x^{l-1}$ where $x^l=0$. Notice that $bar uequivbar1$, and $u$ commutes with $r$ and $s$ (since $x$ does).
Finally, we have $ur^k+us^k=1$. Multiplying both sides by $ur^k$ we see $(ur^k)^2+u^2r^ks^k=ur^k$, but $u^2r^ks^k=0$ by our efforts. Furthermore $overline{ur^k}equivbar ubar r^kequivbar 1bar requiv bar r$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
So in the end it's a bit of a miracle that you can take $r$ and $1-r$, swap them for orthogonal items, then swap them for orthogonal items that add up to $1$.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Nov 21 '16 at 15:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that we may assume that $R$ is generated by $r$ (if not, just restrict the problem to the subring generated by $R$). In particular, this lets us assume that $R$ is commutative, which makes the machinery of algebraic geometry available. But this result is basically trivial in the language of algebraic geometry, using the correspondence between idempotents and clopen subsets.
In detail, since $I$ is contained in the nilradical of $R$, the quotient map $q:Rto R/I$ induces a homeomorphism $q^*:operatorname{Spec} R/Ito operatorname{Spec} R$. Now, an idempotent element of a ring corresponds to a clopen subset of its spectrum, with the idempotent element being $1$ on the clopen subset and $0$ on the complement. So there is some clopen subset $Asubseteqoperatorname{Spec} R/I$ such that $q(r)$ is $1$ on $A$ and $0$ on the complement of $A$. But then $q^*(A)$ is a clopen subset of $operatorname{Spec} R$, so there is some element $ein R$ which is $1$ on $q^*(A)$ and $0$ on its complement. This $e$ will then be idempotent, and $q(e)=q(r)$ (since they are both $1$ on $A$ and $0$ on its complement) and so $e-rin I$.
(As is typical in this sort of argument, much of the real work is hidden in the proof that the structure sheaf of Spec of a ring really is a sheaf. Indeed, that is what we are using to construct the element $e$, by gluing together sections of the structure sheaf of $operatorname{Spec} R$ over $A$ and its complement.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2023115%2flifting-idempotents-modulo-a-nilpotent-ideal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The proof I've seen is a sort of surgery that is not hard, but also not obvious. I will adjust notation a bit:
Suppose $bar r$ is idempotent in $R/I$, and consider its preimage $rin R$. To make things easier to look at, define $s=1-r$. Notice that $bar s$ is also an idempotent in $R/I$, and $bar r + bar s equiv bar 1$.
We have that $rs=r-r^2in I$, and obviously $rs=sr$, so there's some $k$ such that $r^ks^k=0$. Since $bar r^k+bar s^kequiv bar r+bar sequiv bar 1$, we have $x=1-r^k-s^kin I$ is nilpotent, and then $1-x=r^k+s^k$ is invertible in $R$, with inverse $u=1+x+x^2+ldots +x^{l-1}$ where $x^l=0$. Notice that $bar uequivbar1$, and $u$ commutes with $r$ and $s$ (since $x$ does).
Finally, we have $ur^k+us^k=1$. Multiplying both sides by $ur^k$ we see $(ur^k)^2+u^2r^ks^k=ur^k$, but $u^2r^ks^k=0$ by our efforts. Furthermore $overline{ur^k}equivbar ubar r^kequivbar 1bar requiv bar r$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
So in the end it's a bit of a miracle that you can take $r$ and $1-r$, swap them for orthogonal items, then swap them for orthogonal items that add up to $1$.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Nov 21 '16 at 15:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The proof I've seen is a sort of surgery that is not hard, but also not obvious. I will adjust notation a bit:
Suppose $bar r$ is idempotent in $R/I$, and consider its preimage $rin R$. To make things easier to look at, define $s=1-r$. Notice that $bar s$ is also an idempotent in $R/I$, and $bar r + bar s equiv bar 1$.
We have that $rs=r-r^2in I$, and obviously $rs=sr$, so there's some $k$ such that $r^ks^k=0$. Since $bar r^k+bar s^kequiv bar r+bar sequiv bar 1$, we have $x=1-r^k-s^kin I$ is nilpotent, and then $1-x=r^k+s^k$ is invertible in $R$, with inverse $u=1+x+x^2+ldots +x^{l-1}$ where $x^l=0$. Notice that $bar uequivbar1$, and $u$ commutes with $r$ and $s$ (since $x$ does).
Finally, we have $ur^k+us^k=1$. Multiplying both sides by $ur^k$ we see $(ur^k)^2+u^2r^ks^k=ur^k$, but $u^2r^ks^k=0$ by our efforts. Furthermore $overline{ur^k}equivbar ubar r^kequivbar 1bar requiv bar r$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
So in the end it's a bit of a miracle that you can take $r$ and $1-r$, swap them for orthogonal items, then swap them for orthogonal items that add up to $1$.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Nov 21 '16 at 15:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The proof I've seen is a sort of surgery that is not hard, but also not obvious. I will adjust notation a bit:
Suppose $bar r$ is idempotent in $R/I$, and consider its preimage $rin R$. To make things easier to look at, define $s=1-r$. Notice that $bar s$ is also an idempotent in $R/I$, and $bar r + bar s equiv bar 1$.
We have that $rs=r-r^2in I$, and obviously $rs=sr$, so there's some $k$ such that $r^ks^k=0$. Since $bar r^k+bar s^kequiv bar r+bar sequiv bar 1$, we have $x=1-r^k-s^kin I$ is nilpotent, and then $1-x=r^k+s^k$ is invertible in $R$, with inverse $u=1+x+x^2+ldots +x^{l-1}$ where $x^l=0$. Notice that $bar uequivbar1$, and $u$ commutes with $r$ and $s$ (since $x$ does).
Finally, we have $ur^k+us^k=1$. Multiplying both sides by $ur^k$ we see $(ur^k)^2+u^2r^ks^k=ur^k$, but $u^2r^ks^k=0$ by our efforts. Furthermore $overline{ur^k}equivbar ubar r^kequivbar 1bar requiv bar r$.
$endgroup$
The proof I've seen is a sort of surgery that is not hard, but also not obvious. I will adjust notation a bit:
Suppose $bar r$ is idempotent in $R/I$, and consider its preimage $rin R$. To make things easier to look at, define $s=1-r$. Notice that $bar s$ is also an idempotent in $R/I$, and $bar r + bar s equiv bar 1$.
We have that $rs=r-r^2in I$, and obviously $rs=sr$, so there's some $k$ such that $r^ks^k=0$. Since $bar r^k+bar s^kequiv bar r+bar sequiv bar 1$, we have $x=1-r^k-s^kin I$ is nilpotent, and then $1-x=r^k+s^k$ is invertible in $R$, with inverse $u=1+x+x^2+ldots +x^{l-1}$ where $x^l=0$. Notice that $bar uequivbar1$, and $u$ commutes with $r$ and $s$ (since $x$ does).
Finally, we have $ur^k+us^k=1$. Multiplying both sides by $ur^k$ we see $(ur^k)^2+u^2r^ks^k=ur^k$, but $u^2r^ks^k=0$ by our efforts. Furthermore $overline{ur^k}equivbar ubar r^kequivbar 1bar requiv bar r$.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:20
Community♦
1
1
answered Nov 21 '16 at 14:38
rschwiebrschwieb
107k12103252
107k12103252
1
$begingroup$
So in the end it's a bit of a miracle that you can take $r$ and $1-r$, swap them for orthogonal items, then swap them for orthogonal items that add up to $1$.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Nov 21 '16 at 15:32
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
So in the end it's a bit of a miracle that you can take $r$ and $1-r$, swap them for orthogonal items, then swap them for orthogonal items that add up to $1$.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Nov 21 '16 at 15:32
1
1
$begingroup$
So in the end it's a bit of a miracle that you can take $r$ and $1-r$, swap them for orthogonal items, then swap them for orthogonal items that add up to $1$.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Nov 21 '16 at 15:32
$begingroup$
So in the end it's a bit of a miracle that you can take $r$ and $1-r$, swap them for orthogonal items, then swap them for orthogonal items that add up to $1$.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Nov 21 '16 at 15:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that we may assume that $R$ is generated by $r$ (if not, just restrict the problem to the subring generated by $R$). In particular, this lets us assume that $R$ is commutative, which makes the machinery of algebraic geometry available. But this result is basically trivial in the language of algebraic geometry, using the correspondence between idempotents and clopen subsets.
In detail, since $I$ is contained in the nilradical of $R$, the quotient map $q:Rto R/I$ induces a homeomorphism $q^*:operatorname{Spec} R/Ito operatorname{Spec} R$. Now, an idempotent element of a ring corresponds to a clopen subset of its spectrum, with the idempotent element being $1$ on the clopen subset and $0$ on the complement. So there is some clopen subset $Asubseteqoperatorname{Spec} R/I$ such that $q(r)$ is $1$ on $A$ and $0$ on the complement of $A$. But then $q^*(A)$ is a clopen subset of $operatorname{Spec} R$, so there is some element $ein R$ which is $1$ on $q^*(A)$ and $0$ on its complement. This $e$ will then be idempotent, and $q(e)=q(r)$ (since they are both $1$ on $A$ and $0$ on its complement) and so $e-rin I$.
(As is typical in this sort of argument, much of the real work is hidden in the proof that the structure sheaf of Spec of a ring really is a sheaf. Indeed, that is what we are using to construct the element $e$, by gluing together sections of the structure sheaf of $operatorname{Spec} R$ over $A$ and its complement.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that we may assume that $R$ is generated by $r$ (if not, just restrict the problem to the subring generated by $R$). In particular, this lets us assume that $R$ is commutative, which makes the machinery of algebraic geometry available. But this result is basically trivial in the language of algebraic geometry, using the correspondence between idempotents and clopen subsets.
In detail, since $I$ is contained in the nilradical of $R$, the quotient map $q:Rto R/I$ induces a homeomorphism $q^*:operatorname{Spec} R/Ito operatorname{Spec} R$. Now, an idempotent element of a ring corresponds to a clopen subset of its spectrum, with the idempotent element being $1$ on the clopen subset and $0$ on the complement. So there is some clopen subset $Asubseteqoperatorname{Spec} R/I$ such that $q(r)$ is $1$ on $A$ and $0$ on the complement of $A$. But then $q^*(A)$ is a clopen subset of $operatorname{Spec} R$, so there is some element $ein R$ which is $1$ on $q^*(A)$ and $0$ on its complement. This $e$ will then be idempotent, and $q(e)=q(r)$ (since they are both $1$ on $A$ and $0$ on its complement) and so $e-rin I$.
(As is typical in this sort of argument, much of the real work is hidden in the proof that the structure sheaf of Spec of a ring really is a sheaf. Indeed, that is what we are using to construct the element $e$, by gluing together sections of the structure sheaf of $operatorname{Spec} R$ over $A$ and its complement.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that we may assume that $R$ is generated by $r$ (if not, just restrict the problem to the subring generated by $R$). In particular, this lets us assume that $R$ is commutative, which makes the machinery of algebraic geometry available. But this result is basically trivial in the language of algebraic geometry, using the correspondence between idempotents and clopen subsets.
In detail, since $I$ is contained in the nilradical of $R$, the quotient map $q:Rto R/I$ induces a homeomorphism $q^*:operatorname{Spec} R/Ito operatorname{Spec} R$. Now, an idempotent element of a ring corresponds to a clopen subset of its spectrum, with the idempotent element being $1$ on the clopen subset and $0$ on the complement. So there is some clopen subset $Asubseteqoperatorname{Spec} R/I$ such that $q(r)$ is $1$ on $A$ and $0$ on the complement of $A$. But then $q^*(A)$ is a clopen subset of $operatorname{Spec} R$, so there is some element $ein R$ which is $1$ on $q^*(A)$ and $0$ on its complement. This $e$ will then be idempotent, and $q(e)=q(r)$ (since they are both $1$ on $A$ and $0$ on its complement) and so $e-rin I$.
(As is typical in this sort of argument, much of the real work is hidden in the proof that the structure sheaf of Spec of a ring really is a sheaf. Indeed, that is what we are using to construct the element $e$, by gluing together sections of the structure sheaf of $operatorname{Spec} R$ over $A$ and its complement.)
$endgroup$
Note that we may assume that $R$ is generated by $r$ (if not, just restrict the problem to the subring generated by $R$). In particular, this lets us assume that $R$ is commutative, which makes the machinery of algebraic geometry available. But this result is basically trivial in the language of algebraic geometry, using the correspondence between idempotents and clopen subsets.
In detail, since $I$ is contained in the nilradical of $R$, the quotient map $q:Rto R/I$ induces a homeomorphism $q^*:operatorname{Spec} R/Ito operatorname{Spec} R$. Now, an idempotent element of a ring corresponds to a clopen subset of its spectrum, with the idempotent element being $1$ on the clopen subset and $0$ on the complement. So there is some clopen subset $Asubseteqoperatorname{Spec} R/I$ such that $q(r)$ is $1$ on $A$ and $0$ on the complement of $A$. But then $q^*(A)$ is a clopen subset of $operatorname{Spec} R$, so there is some element $ein R$ which is $1$ on $q^*(A)$ and $0$ on its complement. This $e$ will then be idempotent, and $q(e)=q(r)$ (since they are both $1$ on $A$ and $0$ on its complement) and so $e-rin I$.
(As is typical in this sort of argument, much of the real work is hidden in the proof that the structure sheaf of Spec of a ring really is a sheaf. Indeed, that is what we are using to construct the element $e$, by gluing together sections of the structure sheaf of $operatorname{Spec} R$ over $A$ and its complement.)
edited Jan 15 at 8:30
answered Jan 15 at 4:57
Eric WofseyEric Wofsey
191k14216349
191k14216349
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2023115%2flifting-idempotents-modulo-a-nilpotent-ideal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
This is called idempotent lifting. See stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00J9 .
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Nov 20 '16 at 19:32