Banach Algebra Isomorphism
$begingroup$
Let $X=l^1$ with coordinate multiplication - it is commutative Banach algebra without unit. The Gelfand transformation is defined as $widehat{x}(e_n)=x_n$ for $x in l^1$. I would like to prove, that this algebra is isomorphic to $C^*$-algebra. Any ideas ? Thanks.
group-isomorphism banach-algebras gelfand-representation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X=l^1$ with coordinate multiplication - it is commutative Banach algebra without unit. The Gelfand transformation is defined as $widehat{x}(e_n)=x_n$ for $x in l^1$. I would like to prove, that this algebra is isomorphic to $C^*$-algebra. Any ideas ? Thanks.
group-isomorphism banach-algebras gelfand-representation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X=l^1$ with coordinate multiplication - it is commutative Banach algebra without unit. The Gelfand transformation is defined as $widehat{x}(e_n)=x_n$ for $x in l^1$. I would like to prove, that this algebra is isomorphic to $C^*$-algebra. Any ideas ? Thanks.
group-isomorphism banach-algebras gelfand-representation
$endgroup$
Let $X=l^1$ with coordinate multiplication - it is commutative Banach algebra without unit. The Gelfand transformation is defined as $widehat{x}(e_n)=x_n$ for $x in l^1$. I would like to prove, that this algebra is isomorphic to $C^*$-algebra. Any ideas ? Thanks.
group-isomorphism banach-algebras gelfand-representation
group-isomorphism banach-algebras gelfand-representation
edited Jan 7 at 22:41
lojdmoj
asked Jan 4 at 21:48
lojdmojlojdmoj
877
877
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is definitely not, even as a Banach space. Commutative C*-algebras are isomorphic to $C_0(X)$ for some locally compact Hausdorff space, which is infinite when the algebra is infinite-dimensional. In such case, you will find a subalgebra isomorphic to $c_0$. The space $c_0$ does not embed isomorphically into $ell_1$ because the latter space is weakly sequentially complete.
Actually, it is easy to see that $ell_1$ does not satisfy the C*-condition under the original norm. Take $x=e_1 + e_2$. Then $xx^* = x$ but $|xx^*|=2neq |x|^2$. (In other words, observe that non-zero self-adjoint projections in C*-algebras have norm 1.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is it hold for general $l^p$ space for finite $p$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 22:15
$begingroup$
@lojdmoj, yes. Why don't you try to modify my arguments to see that?
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:16
$begingroup$
Well, $l^1$ does not satisfy the $C^{*}$-condition, but I would like to show, that there is no isomorphism between $l^{1}$ algebra and $C^{*}$ algebra. We have that $C_{0}(l^{1})=c_0$ but $c_0$ does not embed isomorphically into $l^{1}$. Is is true, that $C_{0}(l^{p})=c_0$ for $p>1$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 13:23
$begingroup$
@lodmoj, I have a feeling that you don't read my answers. I've shown that there is even no linear isomorphism between $ell_1$ and a C*-algebra...
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 7 at 13:45
$begingroup$
Yes, but I am confused. I still do not understand if algebra $l^p$ is isomorphic to $C^{*}$ algebra.
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 22:43
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062151%2fbanach-algebra-isomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is definitely not, even as a Banach space. Commutative C*-algebras are isomorphic to $C_0(X)$ for some locally compact Hausdorff space, which is infinite when the algebra is infinite-dimensional. In such case, you will find a subalgebra isomorphic to $c_0$. The space $c_0$ does not embed isomorphically into $ell_1$ because the latter space is weakly sequentially complete.
Actually, it is easy to see that $ell_1$ does not satisfy the C*-condition under the original norm. Take $x=e_1 + e_2$. Then $xx^* = x$ but $|xx^*|=2neq |x|^2$. (In other words, observe that non-zero self-adjoint projections in C*-algebras have norm 1.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is it hold for general $l^p$ space for finite $p$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 22:15
$begingroup$
@lojdmoj, yes. Why don't you try to modify my arguments to see that?
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:16
$begingroup$
Well, $l^1$ does not satisfy the $C^{*}$-condition, but I would like to show, that there is no isomorphism between $l^{1}$ algebra and $C^{*}$ algebra. We have that $C_{0}(l^{1})=c_0$ but $c_0$ does not embed isomorphically into $l^{1}$. Is is true, that $C_{0}(l^{p})=c_0$ for $p>1$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 13:23
$begingroup$
@lodmoj, I have a feeling that you don't read my answers. I've shown that there is even no linear isomorphism between $ell_1$ and a C*-algebra...
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 7 at 13:45
$begingroup$
Yes, but I am confused. I still do not understand if algebra $l^p$ is isomorphic to $C^{*}$ algebra.
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 22:43
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
It is definitely not, even as a Banach space. Commutative C*-algebras are isomorphic to $C_0(X)$ for some locally compact Hausdorff space, which is infinite when the algebra is infinite-dimensional. In such case, you will find a subalgebra isomorphic to $c_0$. The space $c_0$ does not embed isomorphically into $ell_1$ because the latter space is weakly sequentially complete.
Actually, it is easy to see that $ell_1$ does not satisfy the C*-condition under the original norm. Take $x=e_1 + e_2$. Then $xx^* = x$ but $|xx^*|=2neq |x|^2$. (In other words, observe that non-zero self-adjoint projections in C*-algebras have norm 1.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is it hold for general $l^p$ space for finite $p$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 22:15
$begingroup$
@lojdmoj, yes. Why don't you try to modify my arguments to see that?
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:16
$begingroup$
Well, $l^1$ does not satisfy the $C^{*}$-condition, but I would like to show, that there is no isomorphism between $l^{1}$ algebra and $C^{*}$ algebra. We have that $C_{0}(l^{1})=c_0$ but $c_0$ does not embed isomorphically into $l^{1}$. Is is true, that $C_{0}(l^{p})=c_0$ for $p>1$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 13:23
$begingroup$
@lodmoj, I have a feeling that you don't read my answers. I've shown that there is even no linear isomorphism between $ell_1$ and a C*-algebra...
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 7 at 13:45
$begingroup$
Yes, but I am confused. I still do not understand if algebra $l^p$ is isomorphic to $C^{*}$ algebra.
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 22:43
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
It is definitely not, even as a Banach space. Commutative C*-algebras are isomorphic to $C_0(X)$ for some locally compact Hausdorff space, which is infinite when the algebra is infinite-dimensional. In such case, you will find a subalgebra isomorphic to $c_0$. The space $c_0$ does not embed isomorphically into $ell_1$ because the latter space is weakly sequentially complete.
Actually, it is easy to see that $ell_1$ does not satisfy the C*-condition under the original norm. Take $x=e_1 + e_2$. Then $xx^* = x$ but $|xx^*|=2neq |x|^2$. (In other words, observe that non-zero self-adjoint projections in C*-algebras have norm 1.)
$endgroup$
It is definitely not, even as a Banach space. Commutative C*-algebras are isomorphic to $C_0(X)$ for some locally compact Hausdorff space, which is infinite when the algebra is infinite-dimensional. In such case, you will find a subalgebra isomorphic to $c_0$. The space $c_0$ does not embed isomorphically into $ell_1$ because the latter space is weakly sequentially complete.
Actually, it is easy to see that $ell_1$ does not satisfy the C*-condition under the original norm. Take $x=e_1 + e_2$. Then $xx^* = x$ but $|xx^*|=2neq |x|^2$. (In other words, observe that non-zero self-adjoint projections in C*-algebras have norm 1.)
answered Jan 4 at 21:59
Tomek KaniaTomek Kania
12.2k11944
12.2k11944
$begingroup$
Is it hold for general $l^p$ space for finite $p$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 22:15
$begingroup$
@lojdmoj, yes. Why don't you try to modify my arguments to see that?
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:16
$begingroup$
Well, $l^1$ does not satisfy the $C^{*}$-condition, but I would like to show, that there is no isomorphism between $l^{1}$ algebra and $C^{*}$ algebra. We have that $C_{0}(l^{1})=c_0$ but $c_0$ does not embed isomorphically into $l^{1}$. Is is true, that $C_{0}(l^{p})=c_0$ for $p>1$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 13:23
$begingroup$
@lodmoj, I have a feeling that you don't read my answers. I've shown that there is even no linear isomorphism between $ell_1$ and a C*-algebra...
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 7 at 13:45
$begingroup$
Yes, but I am confused. I still do not understand if algebra $l^p$ is isomorphic to $C^{*}$ algebra.
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 22:43
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Is it hold for general $l^p$ space for finite $p$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 22:15
$begingroup$
@lojdmoj, yes. Why don't you try to modify my arguments to see that?
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:16
$begingroup$
Well, $l^1$ does not satisfy the $C^{*}$-condition, but I would like to show, that there is no isomorphism between $l^{1}$ algebra and $C^{*}$ algebra. We have that $C_{0}(l^{1})=c_0$ but $c_0$ does not embed isomorphically into $l^{1}$. Is is true, that $C_{0}(l^{p})=c_0$ for $p>1$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 13:23
$begingroup$
@lodmoj, I have a feeling that you don't read my answers. I've shown that there is even no linear isomorphism between $ell_1$ and a C*-algebra...
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 7 at 13:45
$begingroup$
Yes, but I am confused. I still do not understand if algebra $l^p$ is isomorphic to $C^{*}$ algebra.
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 22:43
$begingroup$
Is it hold for general $l^p$ space for finite $p$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 22:15
$begingroup$
Is it hold for general $l^p$ space for finite $p$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 22:15
$begingroup$
@lojdmoj, yes. Why don't you try to modify my arguments to see that?
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:16
$begingroup$
@lojdmoj, yes. Why don't you try to modify my arguments to see that?
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:16
$begingroup$
Well, $l^1$ does not satisfy the $C^{*}$-condition, but I would like to show, that there is no isomorphism between $l^{1}$ algebra and $C^{*}$ algebra. We have that $C_{0}(l^{1})=c_0$ but $c_0$ does not embed isomorphically into $l^{1}$. Is is true, that $C_{0}(l^{p})=c_0$ for $p>1$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 13:23
$begingroup$
Well, $l^1$ does not satisfy the $C^{*}$-condition, but I would like to show, that there is no isomorphism between $l^{1}$ algebra and $C^{*}$ algebra. We have that $C_{0}(l^{1})=c_0$ but $c_0$ does not embed isomorphically into $l^{1}$. Is is true, that $C_{0}(l^{p})=c_0$ for $p>1$ ?
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 13:23
$begingroup$
@lodmoj, I have a feeling that you don't read my answers. I've shown that there is even no linear isomorphism between $ell_1$ and a C*-algebra...
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 7 at 13:45
$begingroup$
@lodmoj, I have a feeling that you don't read my answers. I've shown that there is even no linear isomorphism between $ell_1$ and a C*-algebra...
$endgroup$
– Tomek Kania
Jan 7 at 13:45
$begingroup$
Yes, but I am confused. I still do not understand if algebra $l^p$ is isomorphic to $C^{*}$ algebra.
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 22:43
$begingroup$
Yes, but I am confused. I still do not understand if algebra $l^p$ is isomorphic to $C^{*}$ algebra.
$endgroup$
– lojdmoj
Jan 7 at 22:43
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062151%2fbanach-algebra-isomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown