Commutator Subgroup of Direct Product equals the Direct Product of the Commutator Subgroups












2












$begingroup$


I need to prove that $(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} = G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$, where $G^{prime}$ denotes the commutator subgroup of $G$ - i.e., $G^{prime}=[G,G]$, the subgroup generated by all commutators of elements of $G$.



Recall that the commutator of two elements $x$ and $y$ in a group $G$, denoted $[x,y]$ is defined to equal $x^{-1}y^{-1}xy$.



I have posted my proof as an answer below. Could somebody please take a look at it and let me know if it's okay? If not, please let me know what I need to do in order to fix it. Thank you. :)





Edit: I have been informed that my answer given below actually shows only equality of the set of commutators, and that $G^{prime}$ consists of products of commutators. So, this question is no longer a proof check, but I am asking specifically how to fix what I have written below in order to make it actually answer the thing I set out to prove. I am having a bit of trouble understanding some of the hints given me thus far, and am going to need more detail in any answers given in order for them to be helpful.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    I need to prove that $(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} = G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$, where $G^{prime}$ denotes the commutator subgroup of $G$ - i.e., $G^{prime}=[G,G]$, the subgroup generated by all commutators of elements of $G$.



    Recall that the commutator of two elements $x$ and $y$ in a group $G$, denoted $[x,y]$ is defined to equal $x^{-1}y^{-1}xy$.



    I have posted my proof as an answer below. Could somebody please take a look at it and let me know if it's okay? If not, please let me know what I need to do in order to fix it. Thank you. :)





    Edit: I have been informed that my answer given below actually shows only equality of the set of commutators, and that $G^{prime}$ consists of products of commutators. So, this question is no longer a proof check, but I am asking specifically how to fix what I have written below in order to make it actually answer the thing I set out to prove. I am having a bit of trouble understanding some of the hints given me thus far, and am going to need more detail in any answers given in order for them to be helpful.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I need to prove that $(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} = G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$, where $G^{prime}$ denotes the commutator subgroup of $G$ - i.e., $G^{prime}=[G,G]$, the subgroup generated by all commutators of elements of $G$.



      Recall that the commutator of two elements $x$ and $y$ in a group $G$, denoted $[x,y]$ is defined to equal $x^{-1}y^{-1}xy$.



      I have posted my proof as an answer below. Could somebody please take a look at it and let me know if it's okay? If not, please let me know what I need to do in order to fix it. Thank you. :)





      Edit: I have been informed that my answer given below actually shows only equality of the set of commutators, and that $G^{prime}$ consists of products of commutators. So, this question is no longer a proof check, but I am asking specifically how to fix what I have written below in order to make it actually answer the thing I set out to prove. I am having a bit of trouble understanding some of the hints given me thus far, and am going to need more detail in any answers given in order for them to be helpful.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I need to prove that $(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} = G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$, where $G^{prime}$ denotes the commutator subgroup of $G$ - i.e., $G^{prime}=[G,G]$, the subgroup generated by all commutators of elements of $G$.



      Recall that the commutator of two elements $x$ and $y$ in a group $G$, denoted $[x,y]$ is defined to equal $x^{-1}y^{-1}xy$.



      I have posted my proof as an answer below. Could somebody please take a look at it and let me know if it's okay? If not, please let me know what I need to do in order to fix it. Thank you. :)





      Edit: I have been informed that my answer given below actually shows only equality of the set of commutators, and that $G^{prime}$ consists of products of commutators. So, this question is no longer a proof check, but I am asking specifically how to fix what I have written below in order to make it actually answer the thing I set out to prove. I am having a bit of trouble understanding some of the hints given me thus far, and am going to need more detail in any answers given in order for them to be helpful.







      abstract-algebra group-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 3 '17 at 2:36







      ALannister

















      asked Jan 3 '17 at 2:26









      ALannisterALannister

      1,74731451




      1,74731451






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Let $(g_{1},g_{2}),,,(h_{1},h_{2}) in G_{1}times G_{2}$. Then, $begin{align}[(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2})]=(g_{1},g_{2})^{-1}(h_{1},h_{2})^{-1}(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2}) \ =(g_{1}^{-1},g_{2}^{-1})(h_{1}^{-1},h_{2}^{-1})(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2}) = (g_{1}^{-1}h_{1}^{-1}g_{1}h_{1},g_{2}^{-1}h_{2}^{-1}g_{2}h_{2}) \ = ([g_{1},h_{1}],[g_{2},h_{2}]) = ([g_{1},h_{1}],e_{G_{2}})(e_{G_{1}},[g_{2},h_{2}])end{align}$.



          So, each commutator in $G_{1} times G_{2}$ is the product of one in $G_{1}$ with one in $G_{2}$.



          Therefore, $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}subseteq G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$.



          Now, to get the inclusion in the other direction, let $(g,h) in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$. Then, $g = [g_{1},g_{2}]in G_{1}^{prime}$ and $h = [h_{1},h_{2}] in G_{2}^{prime}$.



          So,



          $begin{align}(g,h) = ([g_{1},g_{2}],[h_{1},h_{2}]) = (g_{1}^{-1}g_{2}^{-1}g_{1}g_{2}, h_{1}^{-1}h_{2}^{-1}h_{1}h_{2}) \ = (g_{1}^{-1},h_{1}^{-1})(g_{2}^{-1},h_{2}^{-1})(g_{1},h_{1})(g_{2},h_{2}) \ = (g_{1},h_{1})^{-1}(g_{2},h_{2})^{-1}(g_{1},h_{1})(g_{2},h_{2}) \= [(g_{1},h_{1}),(g_{2},h_{2})] end{align} $



          where $(g_{1},h_{1}), (g_{2},h_{2}) in G_{1} times G_{2}$.



          Therefore, the product of a commutator in $G_{1}$ with a commutator in $G_{2}$ is a commutator in $G_{1} times G_{2}$. Thus, $mathbf{G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime} subseteq (G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}}$.



          And so, we get our equality, $G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime} = (G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Technically you've shown an equality of the sets of commutators. Remember elements of $G'$ will in general be products of commutators.
            $endgroup$
            – arctic tern
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:28












          • $begingroup$
            @arctictern so what more do I need to say to make it perfect?
            $endgroup$
            – ALannister
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:29










          • $begingroup$
            For example, if you want to do it elementarily... Let $gin(G_1times G_2)'$. Then it can be written as $$g=[(a_1,b_1),(c_1,d_1)]cdots[(a_t,b_t),(c_t,d_t)].$$ But this equals $$([a_1,c_1]cdots[a_t,c_t],[b_1,d_1]cdots[b_t,d_t]) $$ which is in $G_1'times G_2'$.
            $endgroup$
            – arctic tern
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:31












          • $begingroup$
            @arctictern do you need to do induction for that?
            $endgroup$
            – ALannister
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:32










          • $begingroup$
            In other words: do I need to write down an induction proof for you to understand why the equalities are true? Well, that's up to you.
            $endgroup$
            – arctic tern
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:33





















          2












          $begingroup$

          Okay...I think this answer finally takes care of the difficulty. Thanks to arctictern for all his help :)





          Let $g in (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}$. Then, since $(G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}$ is the subgroup generated by all commutators of elements of $G_{1} times G_{2}$, $g$ is the product of commutators of elements of $G_{1} times G_{2}$. Letting $(a_{i},b_{i})$, $(c_{i},d_{i})in G_{1} times G_{2}$, we have that



          $begin{align} g = [(a_{1},b_{1}),(c_{1},d_{1})]cdot [(a_{2},b_{2}),(c_{2},d_{2})]cdot,, cdots ,, cdot[(a_{t},b_{t}),(c_{t},d_{t})],text{for some}, t, \ = (a_{1},b_{1})^{-1}(c_{1},d_{1})^{-1}(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2},b_{2})^{-1}(c_{2},d_{2})^{-1}(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t},b_{t})^{-1}(c_{t},d_{t})^{-1}(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1},b_{1}^{-1}) (c_{1}^{-1},d_{1}^{-1})(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2}^{-1},b_{2}^{-1})(c_{2}^{-1},d_{2}^{-1})(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t}^{-1},b_{t}^{-1})(c_{t}^{-1},d_{t}^{-1})(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1}c_{1}^{-1}a_{1}c_{1}a_{2}^{-1}c_{2}^{-1}a_{2}c_{2}cdots a_{t}^{-1}c_{t}^{-1}a_{t}c_{t}, ,b_{1}^{-1}d_{1}^{-1}b_{1}d_{1}b_{2}^{-1}d_{2}^{-1}b_{2}d_{2}cdots b_{t}^{-1}d_{t}^{-1}b_{t}d_{t}) \ = ([a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2},c_{2}]cdot ,, cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}], ,[b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2},d_{2}]cdot ,, cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}]) in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}end{align}$



          So, we have the inclusion $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}subseteq G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$





          In the other direction, let $h in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$.



          To belong in $ G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$, $h$ must be the direct product of an element of $G_{1}^{prime}$, which is the (group operation) product of commutators of elements of $G_{1}$, and an element of $G_{2}^{prime}$, which is the (group operation) product of commutators of elements of $G_{2}$.



          Let $h_{1}$ be such an element of $G_{1}^{prime}$ and let $h_{2}$ be such an element of $G_{2}^{prime}$, and let $h = h_{1} times h_{2}$. Then,



          $h_{1} = [a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2}, c_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}]$ for some $t$, where each $a_{i}$, $c_{i}$ is an element of $G_{1}$



          and $h_{2} =[b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2}, d_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}]$ for some $t$, where each $b_{i}$, $d_{i}$ is an element of $G_{2}$.



          So,



          $begin{align}h = h_{1} times h_{2} = ([a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2}, c_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}], [b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2}, d_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}])\ =(a_{1}^{-1}c_{1}^{-1}a_{1}c_{1}a_{2}^{-1}c_{2}^{-1}a_{2}c_{2}cdots a_{t}^{-1}c_{t}^{-1}a_{t}c_{t}, ,b_{1}^{-1}d_{1}^{-1}b_{1}d_{1}b_{2}^{-1}d_{2}^{-1}b_{2}d_{2}cdots b_{t}^{-1}d_{t}^{-1}b_{t}d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1},b_{1}^{-1}) (c_{1}^{-1},d_{1}^{-1})(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2}^{-1},b_{2}^{-1})(c_{2}^{-1},d_{2}^{-1})(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t}^{-1},b_{t}^{-1})(c_{t}^{-1},d_{t}^{-1})(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1},b_{1})^{-1}(c_{1},d_{1})^{-1}(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2},b_{2})^{-1}(c_{2},d_{2})^{-1}(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t},b_{t})^{-1}(c_{t},d_{t})^{-1}(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = [(a_{1},b_{1}),(c_{1},d_{1})]cdot [(a_{2},b_{2}),(c_{2},d_{2})]cdot,, cdots ,, cdot[(a_{t},b_{t}),(c_{t},d_{t})] in (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} end{align}$



          So, we have the inclusion $mathbf{G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime} subseteq (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}}$.





          Thus, since we have inclusion in both directions, we have established the equality $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} = G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$ for the right things this time, hopefully.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2081328%2fcommutator-subgroup-of-direct-product-equals-the-direct-product-of-the-commutato%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            Let $(g_{1},g_{2}),,,(h_{1},h_{2}) in G_{1}times G_{2}$. Then, $begin{align}[(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2})]=(g_{1},g_{2})^{-1}(h_{1},h_{2})^{-1}(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2}) \ =(g_{1}^{-1},g_{2}^{-1})(h_{1}^{-1},h_{2}^{-1})(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2}) = (g_{1}^{-1}h_{1}^{-1}g_{1}h_{1},g_{2}^{-1}h_{2}^{-1}g_{2}h_{2}) \ = ([g_{1},h_{1}],[g_{2},h_{2}]) = ([g_{1},h_{1}],e_{G_{2}})(e_{G_{1}},[g_{2},h_{2}])end{align}$.



            So, each commutator in $G_{1} times G_{2}$ is the product of one in $G_{1}$ with one in $G_{2}$.



            Therefore, $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}subseteq G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$.



            Now, to get the inclusion in the other direction, let $(g,h) in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$. Then, $g = [g_{1},g_{2}]in G_{1}^{prime}$ and $h = [h_{1},h_{2}] in G_{2}^{prime}$.



            So,



            $begin{align}(g,h) = ([g_{1},g_{2}],[h_{1},h_{2}]) = (g_{1}^{-1}g_{2}^{-1}g_{1}g_{2}, h_{1}^{-1}h_{2}^{-1}h_{1}h_{2}) \ = (g_{1}^{-1},h_{1}^{-1})(g_{2}^{-1},h_{2}^{-1})(g_{1},h_{1})(g_{2},h_{2}) \ = (g_{1},h_{1})^{-1}(g_{2},h_{2})^{-1}(g_{1},h_{1})(g_{2},h_{2}) \= [(g_{1},h_{1}),(g_{2},h_{2})] end{align} $



            where $(g_{1},h_{1}), (g_{2},h_{2}) in G_{1} times G_{2}$.



            Therefore, the product of a commutator in $G_{1}$ with a commutator in $G_{2}$ is a commutator in $G_{1} times G_{2}$. Thus, $mathbf{G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime} subseteq (G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}}$.



            And so, we get our equality, $G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime} = (G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Technically you've shown an equality of the sets of commutators. Remember elements of $G'$ will in general be products of commutators.
              $endgroup$
              – arctic tern
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:28












            • $begingroup$
              @arctictern so what more do I need to say to make it perfect?
              $endgroup$
              – ALannister
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:29










            • $begingroup$
              For example, if you want to do it elementarily... Let $gin(G_1times G_2)'$. Then it can be written as $$g=[(a_1,b_1),(c_1,d_1)]cdots[(a_t,b_t),(c_t,d_t)].$$ But this equals $$([a_1,c_1]cdots[a_t,c_t],[b_1,d_1]cdots[b_t,d_t]) $$ which is in $G_1'times G_2'$.
              $endgroup$
              – arctic tern
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:31












            • $begingroup$
              @arctictern do you need to do induction for that?
              $endgroup$
              – ALannister
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:32










            • $begingroup$
              In other words: do I need to write down an induction proof for you to understand why the equalities are true? Well, that's up to you.
              $endgroup$
              – arctic tern
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:33


















            3












            $begingroup$

            Let $(g_{1},g_{2}),,,(h_{1},h_{2}) in G_{1}times G_{2}$. Then, $begin{align}[(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2})]=(g_{1},g_{2})^{-1}(h_{1},h_{2})^{-1}(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2}) \ =(g_{1}^{-1},g_{2}^{-1})(h_{1}^{-1},h_{2}^{-1})(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2}) = (g_{1}^{-1}h_{1}^{-1}g_{1}h_{1},g_{2}^{-1}h_{2}^{-1}g_{2}h_{2}) \ = ([g_{1},h_{1}],[g_{2},h_{2}]) = ([g_{1},h_{1}],e_{G_{2}})(e_{G_{1}},[g_{2},h_{2}])end{align}$.



            So, each commutator in $G_{1} times G_{2}$ is the product of one in $G_{1}$ with one in $G_{2}$.



            Therefore, $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}subseteq G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$.



            Now, to get the inclusion in the other direction, let $(g,h) in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$. Then, $g = [g_{1},g_{2}]in G_{1}^{prime}$ and $h = [h_{1},h_{2}] in G_{2}^{prime}$.



            So,



            $begin{align}(g,h) = ([g_{1},g_{2}],[h_{1},h_{2}]) = (g_{1}^{-1}g_{2}^{-1}g_{1}g_{2}, h_{1}^{-1}h_{2}^{-1}h_{1}h_{2}) \ = (g_{1}^{-1},h_{1}^{-1})(g_{2}^{-1},h_{2}^{-1})(g_{1},h_{1})(g_{2},h_{2}) \ = (g_{1},h_{1})^{-1}(g_{2},h_{2})^{-1}(g_{1},h_{1})(g_{2},h_{2}) \= [(g_{1},h_{1}),(g_{2},h_{2})] end{align} $



            where $(g_{1},h_{1}), (g_{2},h_{2}) in G_{1} times G_{2}$.



            Therefore, the product of a commutator in $G_{1}$ with a commutator in $G_{2}$ is a commutator in $G_{1} times G_{2}$. Thus, $mathbf{G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime} subseteq (G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}}$.



            And so, we get our equality, $G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime} = (G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Technically you've shown an equality of the sets of commutators. Remember elements of $G'$ will in general be products of commutators.
              $endgroup$
              – arctic tern
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:28












            • $begingroup$
              @arctictern so what more do I need to say to make it perfect?
              $endgroup$
              – ALannister
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:29










            • $begingroup$
              For example, if you want to do it elementarily... Let $gin(G_1times G_2)'$. Then it can be written as $$g=[(a_1,b_1),(c_1,d_1)]cdots[(a_t,b_t),(c_t,d_t)].$$ But this equals $$([a_1,c_1]cdots[a_t,c_t],[b_1,d_1]cdots[b_t,d_t]) $$ which is in $G_1'times G_2'$.
              $endgroup$
              – arctic tern
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:31












            • $begingroup$
              @arctictern do you need to do induction for that?
              $endgroup$
              – ALannister
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:32










            • $begingroup$
              In other words: do I need to write down an induction proof for you to understand why the equalities are true? Well, that's up to you.
              $endgroup$
              – arctic tern
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:33
















            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            Let $(g_{1},g_{2}),,,(h_{1},h_{2}) in G_{1}times G_{2}$. Then, $begin{align}[(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2})]=(g_{1},g_{2})^{-1}(h_{1},h_{2})^{-1}(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2}) \ =(g_{1}^{-1},g_{2}^{-1})(h_{1}^{-1},h_{2}^{-1})(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2}) = (g_{1}^{-1}h_{1}^{-1}g_{1}h_{1},g_{2}^{-1}h_{2}^{-1}g_{2}h_{2}) \ = ([g_{1},h_{1}],[g_{2},h_{2}]) = ([g_{1},h_{1}],e_{G_{2}})(e_{G_{1}},[g_{2},h_{2}])end{align}$.



            So, each commutator in $G_{1} times G_{2}$ is the product of one in $G_{1}$ with one in $G_{2}$.



            Therefore, $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}subseteq G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$.



            Now, to get the inclusion in the other direction, let $(g,h) in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$. Then, $g = [g_{1},g_{2}]in G_{1}^{prime}$ and $h = [h_{1},h_{2}] in G_{2}^{prime}$.



            So,



            $begin{align}(g,h) = ([g_{1},g_{2}],[h_{1},h_{2}]) = (g_{1}^{-1}g_{2}^{-1}g_{1}g_{2}, h_{1}^{-1}h_{2}^{-1}h_{1}h_{2}) \ = (g_{1}^{-1},h_{1}^{-1})(g_{2}^{-1},h_{2}^{-1})(g_{1},h_{1})(g_{2},h_{2}) \ = (g_{1},h_{1})^{-1}(g_{2},h_{2})^{-1}(g_{1},h_{1})(g_{2},h_{2}) \= [(g_{1},h_{1}),(g_{2},h_{2})] end{align} $



            where $(g_{1},h_{1}), (g_{2},h_{2}) in G_{1} times G_{2}$.



            Therefore, the product of a commutator in $G_{1}$ with a commutator in $G_{2}$ is a commutator in $G_{1} times G_{2}$. Thus, $mathbf{G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime} subseteq (G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}}$.



            And so, we get our equality, $G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime} = (G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Let $(g_{1},g_{2}),,,(h_{1},h_{2}) in G_{1}times G_{2}$. Then, $begin{align}[(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2})]=(g_{1},g_{2})^{-1}(h_{1},h_{2})^{-1}(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2}) \ =(g_{1}^{-1},g_{2}^{-1})(h_{1}^{-1},h_{2}^{-1})(g_{1},g_{2})(h_{1},h_{2}) = (g_{1}^{-1}h_{1}^{-1}g_{1}h_{1},g_{2}^{-1}h_{2}^{-1}g_{2}h_{2}) \ = ([g_{1},h_{1}],[g_{2},h_{2}]) = ([g_{1},h_{1}],e_{G_{2}})(e_{G_{1}},[g_{2},h_{2}])end{align}$.



            So, each commutator in $G_{1} times G_{2}$ is the product of one in $G_{1}$ with one in $G_{2}$.



            Therefore, $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}subseteq G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$.



            Now, to get the inclusion in the other direction, let $(g,h) in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$. Then, $g = [g_{1},g_{2}]in G_{1}^{prime}$ and $h = [h_{1},h_{2}] in G_{2}^{prime}$.



            So,



            $begin{align}(g,h) = ([g_{1},g_{2}],[h_{1},h_{2}]) = (g_{1}^{-1}g_{2}^{-1}g_{1}g_{2}, h_{1}^{-1}h_{2}^{-1}h_{1}h_{2}) \ = (g_{1}^{-1},h_{1}^{-1})(g_{2}^{-1},h_{2}^{-1})(g_{1},h_{1})(g_{2},h_{2}) \ = (g_{1},h_{1})^{-1}(g_{2},h_{2})^{-1}(g_{1},h_{1})(g_{2},h_{2}) \= [(g_{1},h_{1}),(g_{2},h_{2})] end{align} $



            where $(g_{1},h_{1}), (g_{2},h_{2}) in G_{1} times G_{2}$.



            Therefore, the product of a commutator in $G_{1}$ with a commutator in $G_{2}$ is a commutator in $G_{1} times G_{2}$. Thus, $mathbf{G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime} subseteq (G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}}$.



            And so, we get our equality, $G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime} = (G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 3 '17 at 2:26









            ALannisterALannister

            1,74731451




            1,74731451












            • $begingroup$
              Technically you've shown an equality of the sets of commutators. Remember elements of $G'$ will in general be products of commutators.
              $endgroup$
              – arctic tern
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:28












            • $begingroup$
              @arctictern so what more do I need to say to make it perfect?
              $endgroup$
              – ALannister
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:29










            • $begingroup$
              For example, if you want to do it elementarily... Let $gin(G_1times G_2)'$. Then it can be written as $$g=[(a_1,b_1),(c_1,d_1)]cdots[(a_t,b_t),(c_t,d_t)].$$ But this equals $$([a_1,c_1]cdots[a_t,c_t],[b_1,d_1]cdots[b_t,d_t]) $$ which is in $G_1'times G_2'$.
              $endgroup$
              – arctic tern
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:31












            • $begingroup$
              @arctictern do you need to do induction for that?
              $endgroup$
              – ALannister
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:32










            • $begingroup$
              In other words: do I need to write down an induction proof for you to understand why the equalities are true? Well, that's up to you.
              $endgroup$
              – arctic tern
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:33




















            • $begingroup$
              Technically you've shown an equality of the sets of commutators. Remember elements of $G'$ will in general be products of commutators.
              $endgroup$
              – arctic tern
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:28












            • $begingroup$
              @arctictern so what more do I need to say to make it perfect?
              $endgroup$
              – ALannister
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:29










            • $begingroup$
              For example, if you want to do it elementarily... Let $gin(G_1times G_2)'$. Then it can be written as $$g=[(a_1,b_1),(c_1,d_1)]cdots[(a_t,b_t),(c_t,d_t)].$$ But this equals $$([a_1,c_1]cdots[a_t,c_t],[b_1,d_1]cdots[b_t,d_t]) $$ which is in $G_1'times G_2'$.
              $endgroup$
              – arctic tern
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:31












            • $begingroup$
              @arctictern do you need to do induction for that?
              $endgroup$
              – ALannister
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:32










            • $begingroup$
              In other words: do I need to write down an induction proof for you to understand why the equalities are true? Well, that's up to you.
              $endgroup$
              – arctic tern
              Jan 3 '17 at 2:33


















            $begingroup$
            Technically you've shown an equality of the sets of commutators. Remember elements of $G'$ will in general be products of commutators.
            $endgroup$
            – arctic tern
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:28






            $begingroup$
            Technically you've shown an equality of the sets of commutators. Remember elements of $G'$ will in general be products of commutators.
            $endgroup$
            – arctic tern
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:28














            $begingroup$
            @arctictern so what more do I need to say to make it perfect?
            $endgroup$
            – ALannister
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:29




            $begingroup$
            @arctictern so what more do I need to say to make it perfect?
            $endgroup$
            – ALannister
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:29












            $begingroup$
            For example, if you want to do it elementarily... Let $gin(G_1times G_2)'$. Then it can be written as $$g=[(a_1,b_1),(c_1,d_1)]cdots[(a_t,b_t),(c_t,d_t)].$$ But this equals $$([a_1,c_1]cdots[a_t,c_t],[b_1,d_1]cdots[b_t,d_t]) $$ which is in $G_1'times G_2'$.
            $endgroup$
            – arctic tern
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:31






            $begingroup$
            For example, if you want to do it elementarily... Let $gin(G_1times G_2)'$. Then it can be written as $$g=[(a_1,b_1),(c_1,d_1)]cdots[(a_t,b_t),(c_t,d_t)].$$ But this equals $$([a_1,c_1]cdots[a_t,c_t],[b_1,d_1]cdots[b_t,d_t]) $$ which is in $G_1'times G_2'$.
            $endgroup$
            – arctic tern
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:31














            $begingroup$
            @arctictern do you need to do induction for that?
            $endgroup$
            – ALannister
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:32




            $begingroup$
            @arctictern do you need to do induction for that?
            $endgroup$
            – ALannister
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:32












            $begingroup$
            In other words: do I need to write down an induction proof for you to understand why the equalities are true? Well, that's up to you.
            $endgroup$
            – arctic tern
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:33






            $begingroup$
            In other words: do I need to write down an induction proof for you to understand why the equalities are true? Well, that's up to you.
            $endgroup$
            – arctic tern
            Jan 3 '17 at 2:33













            2












            $begingroup$

            Okay...I think this answer finally takes care of the difficulty. Thanks to arctictern for all his help :)





            Let $g in (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}$. Then, since $(G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}$ is the subgroup generated by all commutators of elements of $G_{1} times G_{2}$, $g$ is the product of commutators of elements of $G_{1} times G_{2}$. Letting $(a_{i},b_{i})$, $(c_{i},d_{i})in G_{1} times G_{2}$, we have that



            $begin{align} g = [(a_{1},b_{1}),(c_{1},d_{1})]cdot [(a_{2},b_{2}),(c_{2},d_{2})]cdot,, cdots ,, cdot[(a_{t},b_{t}),(c_{t},d_{t})],text{for some}, t, \ = (a_{1},b_{1})^{-1}(c_{1},d_{1})^{-1}(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2},b_{2})^{-1}(c_{2},d_{2})^{-1}(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t},b_{t})^{-1}(c_{t},d_{t})^{-1}(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1},b_{1}^{-1}) (c_{1}^{-1},d_{1}^{-1})(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2}^{-1},b_{2}^{-1})(c_{2}^{-1},d_{2}^{-1})(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t}^{-1},b_{t}^{-1})(c_{t}^{-1},d_{t}^{-1})(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1}c_{1}^{-1}a_{1}c_{1}a_{2}^{-1}c_{2}^{-1}a_{2}c_{2}cdots a_{t}^{-1}c_{t}^{-1}a_{t}c_{t}, ,b_{1}^{-1}d_{1}^{-1}b_{1}d_{1}b_{2}^{-1}d_{2}^{-1}b_{2}d_{2}cdots b_{t}^{-1}d_{t}^{-1}b_{t}d_{t}) \ = ([a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2},c_{2}]cdot ,, cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}], ,[b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2},d_{2}]cdot ,, cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}]) in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}end{align}$



            So, we have the inclusion $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}subseteq G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$





            In the other direction, let $h in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$.



            To belong in $ G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$, $h$ must be the direct product of an element of $G_{1}^{prime}$, which is the (group operation) product of commutators of elements of $G_{1}$, and an element of $G_{2}^{prime}$, which is the (group operation) product of commutators of elements of $G_{2}$.



            Let $h_{1}$ be such an element of $G_{1}^{prime}$ and let $h_{2}$ be such an element of $G_{2}^{prime}$, and let $h = h_{1} times h_{2}$. Then,



            $h_{1} = [a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2}, c_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}]$ for some $t$, where each $a_{i}$, $c_{i}$ is an element of $G_{1}$



            and $h_{2} =[b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2}, d_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}]$ for some $t$, where each $b_{i}$, $d_{i}$ is an element of $G_{2}$.



            So,



            $begin{align}h = h_{1} times h_{2} = ([a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2}, c_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}], [b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2}, d_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}])\ =(a_{1}^{-1}c_{1}^{-1}a_{1}c_{1}a_{2}^{-1}c_{2}^{-1}a_{2}c_{2}cdots a_{t}^{-1}c_{t}^{-1}a_{t}c_{t}, ,b_{1}^{-1}d_{1}^{-1}b_{1}d_{1}b_{2}^{-1}d_{2}^{-1}b_{2}d_{2}cdots b_{t}^{-1}d_{t}^{-1}b_{t}d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1},b_{1}^{-1}) (c_{1}^{-1},d_{1}^{-1})(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2}^{-1},b_{2}^{-1})(c_{2}^{-1},d_{2}^{-1})(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t}^{-1},b_{t}^{-1})(c_{t}^{-1},d_{t}^{-1})(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1},b_{1})^{-1}(c_{1},d_{1})^{-1}(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2},b_{2})^{-1}(c_{2},d_{2})^{-1}(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t},b_{t})^{-1}(c_{t},d_{t})^{-1}(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = [(a_{1},b_{1}),(c_{1},d_{1})]cdot [(a_{2},b_{2}),(c_{2},d_{2})]cdot,, cdots ,, cdot[(a_{t},b_{t}),(c_{t},d_{t})] in (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} end{align}$



            So, we have the inclusion $mathbf{G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime} subseteq (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}}$.





            Thus, since we have inclusion in both directions, we have established the equality $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} = G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$ for the right things this time, hopefully.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              Okay...I think this answer finally takes care of the difficulty. Thanks to arctictern for all his help :)





              Let $g in (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}$. Then, since $(G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}$ is the subgroup generated by all commutators of elements of $G_{1} times G_{2}$, $g$ is the product of commutators of elements of $G_{1} times G_{2}$. Letting $(a_{i},b_{i})$, $(c_{i},d_{i})in G_{1} times G_{2}$, we have that



              $begin{align} g = [(a_{1},b_{1}),(c_{1},d_{1})]cdot [(a_{2},b_{2}),(c_{2},d_{2})]cdot,, cdots ,, cdot[(a_{t},b_{t}),(c_{t},d_{t})],text{for some}, t, \ = (a_{1},b_{1})^{-1}(c_{1},d_{1})^{-1}(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2},b_{2})^{-1}(c_{2},d_{2})^{-1}(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t},b_{t})^{-1}(c_{t},d_{t})^{-1}(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1},b_{1}^{-1}) (c_{1}^{-1},d_{1}^{-1})(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2}^{-1},b_{2}^{-1})(c_{2}^{-1},d_{2}^{-1})(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t}^{-1},b_{t}^{-1})(c_{t}^{-1},d_{t}^{-1})(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1}c_{1}^{-1}a_{1}c_{1}a_{2}^{-1}c_{2}^{-1}a_{2}c_{2}cdots a_{t}^{-1}c_{t}^{-1}a_{t}c_{t}, ,b_{1}^{-1}d_{1}^{-1}b_{1}d_{1}b_{2}^{-1}d_{2}^{-1}b_{2}d_{2}cdots b_{t}^{-1}d_{t}^{-1}b_{t}d_{t}) \ = ([a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2},c_{2}]cdot ,, cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}], ,[b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2},d_{2}]cdot ,, cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}]) in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}end{align}$



              So, we have the inclusion $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}subseteq G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$





              In the other direction, let $h in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$.



              To belong in $ G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$, $h$ must be the direct product of an element of $G_{1}^{prime}$, which is the (group operation) product of commutators of elements of $G_{1}$, and an element of $G_{2}^{prime}$, which is the (group operation) product of commutators of elements of $G_{2}$.



              Let $h_{1}$ be such an element of $G_{1}^{prime}$ and let $h_{2}$ be such an element of $G_{2}^{prime}$, and let $h = h_{1} times h_{2}$. Then,



              $h_{1} = [a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2}, c_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}]$ for some $t$, where each $a_{i}$, $c_{i}$ is an element of $G_{1}$



              and $h_{2} =[b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2}, d_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}]$ for some $t$, where each $b_{i}$, $d_{i}$ is an element of $G_{2}$.



              So,



              $begin{align}h = h_{1} times h_{2} = ([a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2}, c_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}], [b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2}, d_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}])\ =(a_{1}^{-1}c_{1}^{-1}a_{1}c_{1}a_{2}^{-1}c_{2}^{-1}a_{2}c_{2}cdots a_{t}^{-1}c_{t}^{-1}a_{t}c_{t}, ,b_{1}^{-1}d_{1}^{-1}b_{1}d_{1}b_{2}^{-1}d_{2}^{-1}b_{2}d_{2}cdots b_{t}^{-1}d_{t}^{-1}b_{t}d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1},b_{1}^{-1}) (c_{1}^{-1},d_{1}^{-1})(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2}^{-1},b_{2}^{-1})(c_{2}^{-1},d_{2}^{-1})(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t}^{-1},b_{t}^{-1})(c_{t}^{-1},d_{t}^{-1})(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1},b_{1})^{-1}(c_{1},d_{1})^{-1}(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2},b_{2})^{-1}(c_{2},d_{2})^{-1}(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t},b_{t})^{-1}(c_{t},d_{t})^{-1}(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = [(a_{1},b_{1}),(c_{1},d_{1})]cdot [(a_{2},b_{2}),(c_{2},d_{2})]cdot,, cdots ,, cdot[(a_{t},b_{t}),(c_{t},d_{t})] in (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} end{align}$



              So, we have the inclusion $mathbf{G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime} subseteq (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}}$.





              Thus, since we have inclusion in both directions, we have established the equality $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} = G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$ for the right things this time, hopefully.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Okay...I think this answer finally takes care of the difficulty. Thanks to arctictern for all his help :)





                Let $g in (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}$. Then, since $(G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}$ is the subgroup generated by all commutators of elements of $G_{1} times G_{2}$, $g$ is the product of commutators of elements of $G_{1} times G_{2}$. Letting $(a_{i},b_{i})$, $(c_{i},d_{i})in G_{1} times G_{2}$, we have that



                $begin{align} g = [(a_{1},b_{1}),(c_{1},d_{1})]cdot [(a_{2},b_{2}),(c_{2},d_{2})]cdot,, cdots ,, cdot[(a_{t},b_{t}),(c_{t},d_{t})],text{for some}, t, \ = (a_{1},b_{1})^{-1}(c_{1},d_{1})^{-1}(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2},b_{2})^{-1}(c_{2},d_{2})^{-1}(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t},b_{t})^{-1}(c_{t},d_{t})^{-1}(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1},b_{1}^{-1}) (c_{1}^{-1},d_{1}^{-1})(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2}^{-1},b_{2}^{-1})(c_{2}^{-1},d_{2}^{-1})(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t}^{-1},b_{t}^{-1})(c_{t}^{-1},d_{t}^{-1})(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1}c_{1}^{-1}a_{1}c_{1}a_{2}^{-1}c_{2}^{-1}a_{2}c_{2}cdots a_{t}^{-1}c_{t}^{-1}a_{t}c_{t}, ,b_{1}^{-1}d_{1}^{-1}b_{1}d_{1}b_{2}^{-1}d_{2}^{-1}b_{2}d_{2}cdots b_{t}^{-1}d_{t}^{-1}b_{t}d_{t}) \ = ([a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2},c_{2}]cdot ,, cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}], ,[b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2},d_{2}]cdot ,, cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}]) in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}end{align}$



                So, we have the inclusion $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}subseteq G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$





                In the other direction, let $h in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$.



                To belong in $ G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$, $h$ must be the direct product of an element of $G_{1}^{prime}$, which is the (group operation) product of commutators of elements of $G_{1}$, and an element of $G_{2}^{prime}$, which is the (group operation) product of commutators of elements of $G_{2}$.



                Let $h_{1}$ be such an element of $G_{1}^{prime}$ and let $h_{2}$ be such an element of $G_{2}^{prime}$, and let $h = h_{1} times h_{2}$. Then,



                $h_{1} = [a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2}, c_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}]$ for some $t$, where each $a_{i}$, $c_{i}$ is an element of $G_{1}$



                and $h_{2} =[b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2}, d_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}]$ for some $t$, where each $b_{i}$, $d_{i}$ is an element of $G_{2}$.



                So,



                $begin{align}h = h_{1} times h_{2} = ([a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2}, c_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}], [b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2}, d_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}])\ =(a_{1}^{-1}c_{1}^{-1}a_{1}c_{1}a_{2}^{-1}c_{2}^{-1}a_{2}c_{2}cdots a_{t}^{-1}c_{t}^{-1}a_{t}c_{t}, ,b_{1}^{-1}d_{1}^{-1}b_{1}d_{1}b_{2}^{-1}d_{2}^{-1}b_{2}d_{2}cdots b_{t}^{-1}d_{t}^{-1}b_{t}d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1},b_{1}^{-1}) (c_{1}^{-1},d_{1}^{-1})(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2}^{-1},b_{2}^{-1})(c_{2}^{-1},d_{2}^{-1})(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t}^{-1},b_{t}^{-1})(c_{t}^{-1},d_{t}^{-1})(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1},b_{1})^{-1}(c_{1},d_{1})^{-1}(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2},b_{2})^{-1}(c_{2},d_{2})^{-1}(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t},b_{t})^{-1}(c_{t},d_{t})^{-1}(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = [(a_{1},b_{1}),(c_{1},d_{1})]cdot [(a_{2},b_{2}),(c_{2},d_{2})]cdot,, cdots ,, cdot[(a_{t},b_{t}),(c_{t},d_{t})] in (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} end{align}$



                So, we have the inclusion $mathbf{G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime} subseteq (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}}$.





                Thus, since we have inclusion in both directions, we have established the equality $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} = G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$ for the right things this time, hopefully.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Okay...I think this answer finally takes care of the difficulty. Thanks to arctictern for all his help :)





                Let $g in (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}$. Then, since $(G_{1} times G_{2})^{prime}$ is the subgroup generated by all commutators of elements of $G_{1} times G_{2}$, $g$ is the product of commutators of elements of $G_{1} times G_{2}$. Letting $(a_{i},b_{i})$, $(c_{i},d_{i})in G_{1} times G_{2}$, we have that



                $begin{align} g = [(a_{1},b_{1}),(c_{1},d_{1})]cdot [(a_{2},b_{2}),(c_{2},d_{2})]cdot,, cdots ,, cdot[(a_{t},b_{t}),(c_{t},d_{t})],text{for some}, t, \ = (a_{1},b_{1})^{-1}(c_{1},d_{1})^{-1}(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2},b_{2})^{-1}(c_{2},d_{2})^{-1}(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t},b_{t})^{-1}(c_{t},d_{t})^{-1}(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1},b_{1}^{-1}) (c_{1}^{-1},d_{1}^{-1})(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2}^{-1},b_{2}^{-1})(c_{2}^{-1},d_{2}^{-1})(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t}^{-1},b_{t}^{-1})(c_{t}^{-1},d_{t}^{-1})(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1}c_{1}^{-1}a_{1}c_{1}a_{2}^{-1}c_{2}^{-1}a_{2}c_{2}cdots a_{t}^{-1}c_{t}^{-1}a_{t}c_{t}, ,b_{1}^{-1}d_{1}^{-1}b_{1}d_{1}b_{2}^{-1}d_{2}^{-1}b_{2}d_{2}cdots b_{t}^{-1}d_{t}^{-1}b_{t}d_{t}) \ = ([a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2},c_{2}]cdot ,, cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}], ,[b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2},d_{2}]cdot ,, cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}]) in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}end{align}$



                So, we have the inclusion $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}subseteq G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$





                In the other direction, let $h in G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$.



                To belong in $ G_{1}^{prime} times G_{2}^{prime}$, $h$ must be the direct product of an element of $G_{1}^{prime}$, which is the (group operation) product of commutators of elements of $G_{1}$, and an element of $G_{2}^{prime}$, which is the (group operation) product of commutators of elements of $G_{2}$.



                Let $h_{1}$ be such an element of $G_{1}^{prime}$ and let $h_{2}$ be such an element of $G_{2}^{prime}$, and let $h = h_{1} times h_{2}$. Then,



                $h_{1} = [a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2}, c_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}]$ for some $t$, where each $a_{i}$, $c_{i}$ is an element of $G_{1}$



                and $h_{2} =[b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2}, d_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}]$ for some $t$, where each $b_{i}$, $d_{i}$ is an element of $G_{2}$.



                So,



                $begin{align}h = h_{1} times h_{2} = ([a_{1},c_{1}]cdot [a_{2}, c_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [a_{t},c_{t}], [b_{1},d_{1}]cdot [b_{2}, d_{2}] cdot , , cdots , , cdot [b_{t},d_{t}])\ =(a_{1}^{-1}c_{1}^{-1}a_{1}c_{1}a_{2}^{-1}c_{2}^{-1}a_{2}c_{2}cdots a_{t}^{-1}c_{t}^{-1}a_{t}c_{t}, ,b_{1}^{-1}d_{1}^{-1}b_{1}d_{1}b_{2}^{-1}d_{2}^{-1}b_{2}d_{2}cdots b_{t}^{-1}d_{t}^{-1}b_{t}d_{t}) \ = (a_{1}^{-1},b_{1}^{-1}) (c_{1}^{-1},d_{1}^{-1})(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2}^{-1},b_{2}^{-1})(c_{2}^{-1},d_{2}^{-1})(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t}^{-1},b_{t}^{-1})(c_{t}^{-1},d_{t}^{-1})(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = (a_{1},b_{1})^{-1}(c_{1},d_{1})^{-1}(a_{1},b_{1})(c_{1},d_{1})cdot (a_{2},b_{2})^{-1}(c_{2},d_{2})^{-1}(a_{2},b_{2})(c_{2},d_{2})cdot , , cdots , ,cdot(a_{t},b_{t})^{-1}(c_{t},d_{t})^{-1}(a_{t},b_{t})(c_{t},d_{t}) \ = [(a_{1},b_{1}),(c_{1},d_{1})]cdot [(a_{2},b_{2}),(c_{2},d_{2})]cdot,, cdots ,, cdot[(a_{t},b_{t}),(c_{t},d_{t})] in (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} end{align}$



                So, we have the inclusion $mathbf{G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime} subseteq (G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime}}$.





                Thus, since we have inclusion in both directions, we have established the equality $mathbf{(G_{1}times G_{2})^{prime} = G_{1}^{prime}times G_{2}^{prime}}$ for the right things this time, hopefully.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 3 '17 at 4:22









                ALannisterALannister

                1,74731451




                1,74731451






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2081328%2fcommutator-subgroup-of-direct-product-equals-the-direct-product-of-the-commutato%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Human spaceflight

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                    張江高科駅