Need some help proving the following statements in Thermodyamics?












5












$begingroup$


So in my second year thermodynamics class we are currently talking about entropy and deriving its definition from the 1st law.



$$mathrm{d}q_{rev} = dU - dw_{rev}$$
$$= C_{V}(T)dT + PdV$$
$$= C_{V}(T)dT + frac{nRT}{V}dV$$



And then it just says since the mixed second partial derivatives aren't equal, i.e.



$$(frac{delta Cv(T)}{delta V})_T neq (frac{delta(frac{nRT}{V})}{delta T})_V$$ dq is not an exact differential (no proof of this is given). It then stipulates by dividing both sides of the equation by T



$$frac{mathrm{d}q_{rev}}{T} = frac{C_{V}(T)}{T}dT + frac{nR}{V}dV$$
suddenly it becomes an exact differential because



$$(frac{delta Cv(T)/T}{delta V})_T = (frac{delta(frac{nR}{V})}{delta T})_V$$
Can anybody give me a proof of this with calculus because my textbook gives 0 proof whatsoever and it irks me because I want to understand the theory underlying this. Thanks!










share|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    5












    $begingroup$


    So in my second year thermodynamics class we are currently talking about entropy and deriving its definition from the 1st law.



    $$mathrm{d}q_{rev} = dU - dw_{rev}$$
    $$= C_{V}(T)dT + PdV$$
    $$= C_{V}(T)dT + frac{nRT}{V}dV$$



    And then it just says since the mixed second partial derivatives aren't equal, i.e.



    $$(frac{delta Cv(T)}{delta V})_T neq (frac{delta(frac{nRT}{V})}{delta T})_V$$ dq is not an exact differential (no proof of this is given). It then stipulates by dividing both sides of the equation by T



    $$frac{mathrm{d}q_{rev}}{T} = frac{C_{V}(T)}{T}dT + frac{nR}{V}dV$$
    suddenly it becomes an exact differential because



    $$(frac{delta Cv(T)/T}{delta V})_T = (frac{delta(frac{nR}{V})}{delta T})_V$$
    Can anybody give me a proof of this with calculus because my textbook gives 0 proof whatsoever and it irks me because I want to understand the theory underlying this. Thanks!










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5


      1



      $begingroup$


      So in my second year thermodynamics class we are currently talking about entropy and deriving its definition from the 1st law.



      $$mathrm{d}q_{rev} = dU - dw_{rev}$$
      $$= C_{V}(T)dT + PdV$$
      $$= C_{V}(T)dT + frac{nRT}{V}dV$$



      And then it just says since the mixed second partial derivatives aren't equal, i.e.



      $$(frac{delta Cv(T)}{delta V})_T neq (frac{delta(frac{nRT}{V})}{delta T})_V$$ dq is not an exact differential (no proof of this is given). It then stipulates by dividing both sides of the equation by T



      $$frac{mathrm{d}q_{rev}}{T} = frac{C_{V}(T)}{T}dT + frac{nR}{V}dV$$
      suddenly it becomes an exact differential because



      $$(frac{delta Cv(T)/T}{delta V})_T = (frac{delta(frac{nR}{V})}{delta T})_V$$
      Can anybody give me a proof of this with calculus because my textbook gives 0 proof whatsoever and it irks me because I want to understand the theory underlying this. Thanks!










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      So in my second year thermodynamics class we are currently talking about entropy and deriving its definition from the 1st law.



      $$mathrm{d}q_{rev} = dU - dw_{rev}$$
      $$= C_{V}(T)dT + PdV$$
      $$= C_{V}(T)dT + frac{nRT}{V}dV$$



      And then it just says since the mixed second partial derivatives aren't equal, i.e.



      $$(frac{delta Cv(T)}{delta V})_T neq (frac{delta(frac{nRT}{V})}{delta T})_V$$ dq is not an exact differential (no proof of this is given). It then stipulates by dividing both sides of the equation by T



      $$frac{mathrm{d}q_{rev}}{T} = frac{C_{V}(T)}{T}dT + frac{nR}{V}dV$$
      suddenly it becomes an exact differential because



      $$(frac{delta Cv(T)/T}{delta V})_T = (frac{delta(frac{nR}{V})}{delta T})_V$$
      Can anybody give me a proof of this with calculus because my textbook gives 0 proof whatsoever and it irks me because I want to understand the theory underlying this. Thanks!







      thermodynamics






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Feb 12 at 3:34









      rofldude188rofldude188

      363




      363






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8












          $begingroup$

          These statements can be proved in general i.e. irrespective of whether you take your system as ideal gas or not. As you have used in the question $PV = nRT$, you inherently assuming that your system of thermodynamic interest is an ideal gas. So, let's first prove this for an ideal gas and then do the general proof.



          $textbf{Case I : Ideal Gas}$



          For an ideal gas, $C_V(T)$ is independent of volume $V$, which means that $big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T =0$. (We will prove the general relation in the next section, and this statement will be obvious from that proof. ), But on the other hand $big(frac{partial (nR T/V)}{partial T}big)_V = frac{nR}{V}$ by simple partial derivative. So, thus you get the proof that $big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T neq big(frac{partial (nR T/V)}{partial T}big)_V$. Thus $delta q_{rev}$ is not an exact differential.



          On the other hand if you divide both sides by $T$, you still have, $big(frac{partial (C_V(T)/T)}{partial V}big)_T = frac{1}{T}big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T =0$. And also on the other hand you have, $big(frac{partial (nR /V)}{partial T}big)_V = -frac{nR}{V^2}big(frac{partial V}{partial T}big)_V = 0$ (obviously, as we are taking partial derivative of a constant term. Thus, by the equality of mixed partial derivatives of $frac{delta q_{rev}}{T}$ it becomes exact differential.



          $textbf{Case II : General System}$



          For general system we have, $delta q_{rev} = dU +PdV$. But remember we can't write, $dU = C_V(T) dT $ and $PV =nRT$. We have to write $dU = C_V(T)dT + big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T dV$ .



          So, now we have $delta q_{rev} = C_V(T)dT + Big(big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T + PBig)dV $.



          Also, from the definition of Helmholtz free energy ($A = U - TS $ and $dA = -SdT -PdV$) and by using Maxwell's relation it can be shown that $Big(big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T + PBig) = T big(frac{partial P}{partial T}big)_V$



          Now, it can be shown properly that
          $$left(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}right)_T = frac{partial^2 U}{partial T partial V} = T left(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}right)_V qquad(= 0text{ if } PV=nRT)tag{i} $$
          $$left(frac{partial (frac{C_V(T)}{T})}{partial V}right)_T = frac{1}{T} frac{partial^2 U}{partial T partial V} = left(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}right)_V tag{ii}$$
          and for the right hand side
          $$frac{partial}{partial T}Bigg(TBig(frac{partial P}{partial T}Big)_VBigg)_V = TBig(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}Big)_V + left(frac{partial P}{partial T}right)_Vtag{iii}$$
          and if you divide the right side by $T$ and then check the partial derivative criterion, you will ultimately get $Big(frac{partial^2 P}{partial
          T^2}Big)_V$
          on the r.h.s also (exactly same as $(ii)$ ) , But note that, $(i) neq (iii) $. Thus $frac{delta q_{rev}}{T}$ will become exact differntial but $delta q_{rev}$ will remain inexact.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "431"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109395%2fneed-some-help-proving-the-following-statements-in-thermodyamics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            8












            $begingroup$

            These statements can be proved in general i.e. irrespective of whether you take your system as ideal gas or not. As you have used in the question $PV = nRT$, you inherently assuming that your system of thermodynamic interest is an ideal gas. So, let's first prove this for an ideal gas and then do the general proof.



            $textbf{Case I : Ideal Gas}$



            For an ideal gas, $C_V(T)$ is independent of volume $V$, which means that $big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T =0$. (We will prove the general relation in the next section, and this statement will be obvious from that proof. ), But on the other hand $big(frac{partial (nR T/V)}{partial T}big)_V = frac{nR}{V}$ by simple partial derivative. So, thus you get the proof that $big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T neq big(frac{partial (nR T/V)}{partial T}big)_V$. Thus $delta q_{rev}$ is not an exact differential.



            On the other hand if you divide both sides by $T$, you still have, $big(frac{partial (C_V(T)/T)}{partial V}big)_T = frac{1}{T}big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T =0$. And also on the other hand you have, $big(frac{partial (nR /V)}{partial T}big)_V = -frac{nR}{V^2}big(frac{partial V}{partial T}big)_V = 0$ (obviously, as we are taking partial derivative of a constant term. Thus, by the equality of mixed partial derivatives of $frac{delta q_{rev}}{T}$ it becomes exact differential.



            $textbf{Case II : General System}$



            For general system we have, $delta q_{rev} = dU +PdV$. But remember we can't write, $dU = C_V(T) dT $ and $PV =nRT$. We have to write $dU = C_V(T)dT + big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T dV$ .



            So, now we have $delta q_{rev} = C_V(T)dT + Big(big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T + PBig)dV $.



            Also, from the definition of Helmholtz free energy ($A = U - TS $ and $dA = -SdT -PdV$) and by using Maxwell's relation it can be shown that $Big(big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T + PBig) = T big(frac{partial P}{partial T}big)_V$



            Now, it can be shown properly that
            $$left(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}right)_T = frac{partial^2 U}{partial T partial V} = T left(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}right)_V qquad(= 0text{ if } PV=nRT)tag{i} $$
            $$left(frac{partial (frac{C_V(T)}{T})}{partial V}right)_T = frac{1}{T} frac{partial^2 U}{partial T partial V} = left(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}right)_V tag{ii}$$
            and for the right hand side
            $$frac{partial}{partial T}Bigg(TBig(frac{partial P}{partial T}Big)_VBigg)_V = TBig(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}Big)_V + left(frac{partial P}{partial T}right)_Vtag{iii}$$
            and if you divide the right side by $T$ and then check the partial derivative criterion, you will ultimately get $Big(frac{partial^2 P}{partial
            T^2}Big)_V$
            on the r.h.s also (exactly same as $(ii)$ ) , But note that, $(i) neq (iii) $. Thus $frac{delta q_{rev}}{T}$ will become exact differntial but $delta q_{rev}$ will remain inexact.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              8












              $begingroup$

              These statements can be proved in general i.e. irrespective of whether you take your system as ideal gas or not. As you have used in the question $PV = nRT$, you inherently assuming that your system of thermodynamic interest is an ideal gas. So, let's first prove this for an ideal gas and then do the general proof.



              $textbf{Case I : Ideal Gas}$



              For an ideal gas, $C_V(T)$ is independent of volume $V$, which means that $big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T =0$. (We will prove the general relation in the next section, and this statement will be obvious from that proof. ), But on the other hand $big(frac{partial (nR T/V)}{partial T}big)_V = frac{nR}{V}$ by simple partial derivative. So, thus you get the proof that $big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T neq big(frac{partial (nR T/V)}{partial T}big)_V$. Thus $delta q_{rev}$ is not an exact differential.



              On the other hand if you divide both sides by $T$, you still have, $big(frac{partial (C_V(T)/T)}{partial V}big)_T = frac{1}{T}big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T =0$. And also on the other hand you have, $big(frac{partial (nR /V)}{partial T}big)_V = -frac{nR}{V^2}big(frac{partial V}{partial T}big)_V = 0$ (obviously, as we are taking partial derivative of a constant term. Thus, by the equality of mixed partial derivatives of $frac{delta q_{rev}}{T}$ it becomes exact differential.



              $textbf{Case II : General System}$



              For general system we have, $delta q_{rev} = dU +PdV$. But remember we can't write, $dU = C_V(T) dT $ and $PV =nRT$. We have to write $dU = C_V(T)dT + big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T dV$ .



              So, now we have $delta q_{rev} = C_V(T)dT + Big(big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T + PBig)dV $.



              Also, from the definition of Helmholtz free energy ($A = U - TS $ and $dA = -SdT -PdV$) and by using Maxwell's relation it can be shown that $Big(big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T + PBig) = T big(frac{partial P}{partial T}big)_V$



              Now, it can be shown properly that
              $$left(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}right)_T = frac{partial^2 U}{partial T partial V} = T left(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}right)_V qquad(= 0text{ if } PV=nRT)tag{i} $$
              $$left(frac{partial (frac{C_V(T)}{T})}{partial V}right)_T = frac{1}{T} frac{partial^2 U}{partial T partial V} = left(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}right)_V tag{ii}$$
              and for the right hand side
              $$frac{partial}{partial T}Bigg(TBig(frac{partial P}{partial T}Big)_VBigg)_V = TBig(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}Big)_V + left(frac{partial P}{partial T}right)_Vtag{iii}$$
              and if you divide the right side by $T$ and then check the partial derivative criterion, you will ultimately get $Big(frac{partial^2 P}{partial
              T^2}Big)_V$
              on the r.h.s also (exactly same as $(ii)$ ) , But note that, $(i) neq (iii) $. Thus $frac{delta q_{rev}}{T}$ will become exact differntial but $delta q_{rev}$ will remain inexact.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                8












                8








                8





                $begingroup$

                These statements can be proved in general i.e. irrespective of whether you take your system as ideal gas or not. As you have used in the question $PV = nRT$, you inherently assuming that your system of thermodynamic interest is an ideal gas. So, let's first prove this for an ideal gas and then do the general proof.



                $textbf{Case I : Ideal Gas}$



                For an ideal gas, $C_V(T)$ is independent of volume $V$, which means that $big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T =0$. (We will prove the general relation in the next section, and this statement will be obvious from that proof. ), But on the other hand $big(frac{partial (nR T/V)}{partial T}big)_V = frac{nR}{V}$ by simple partial derivative. So, thus you get the proof that $big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T neq big(frac{partial (nR T/V)}{partial T}big)_V$. Thus $delta q_{rev}$ is not an exact differential.



                On the other hand if you divide both sides by $T$, you still have, $big(frac{partial (C_V(T)/T)}{partial V}big)_T = frac{1}{T}big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T =0$. And also on the other hand you have, $big(frac{partial (nR /V)}{partial T}big)_V = -frac{nR}{V^2}big(frac{partial V}{partial T}big)_V = 0$ (obviously, as we are taking partial derivative of a constant term. Thus, by the equality of mixed partial derivatives of $frac{delta q_{rev}}{T}$ it becomes exact differential.



                $textbf{Case II : General System}$



                For general system we have, $delta q_{rev} = dU +PdV$. But remember we can't write, $dU = C_V(T) dT $ and $PV =nRT$. We have to write $dU = C_V(T)dT + big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T dV$ .



                So, now we have $delta q_{rev} = C_V(T)dT + Big(big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T + PBig)dV $.



                Also, from the definition of Helmholtz free energy ($A = U - TS $ and $dA = -SdT -PdV$) and by using Maxwell's relation it can be shown that $Big(big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T + PBig) = T big(frac{partial P}{partial T}big)_V$



                Now, it can be shown properly that
                $$left(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}right)_T = frac{partial^2 U}{partial T partial V} = T left(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}right)_V qquad(= 0text{ if } PV=nRT)tag{i} $$
                $$left(frac{partial (frac{C_V(T)}{T})}{partial V}right)_T = frac{1}{T} frac{partial^2 U}{partial T partial V} = left(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}right)_V tag{ii}$$
                and for the right hand side
                $$frac{partial}{partial T}Bigg(TBig(frac{partial P}{partial T}Big)_VBigg)_V = TBig(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}Big)_V + left(frac{partial P}{partial T}right)_Vtag{iii}$$
                and if you divide the right side by $T$ and then check the partial derivative criterion, you will ultimately get $Big(frac{partial^2 P}{partial
                T^2}Big)_V$
                on the r.h.s also (exactly same as $(ii)$ ) , But note that, $(i) neq (iii) $. Thus $frac{delta q_{rev}}{T}$ will become exact differntial but $delta q_{rev}$ will remain inexact.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                These statements can be proved in general i.e. irrespective of whether you take your system as ideal gas or not. As you have used in the question $PV = nRT$, you inherently assuming that your system of thermodynamic interest is an ideal gas. So, let's first prove this for an ideal gas and then do the general proof.



                $textbf{Case I : Ideal Gas}$



                For an ideal gas, $C_V(T)$ is independent of volume $V$, which means that $big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T =0$. (We will prove the general relation in the next section, and this statement will be obvious from that proof. ), But on the other hand $big(frac{partial (nR T/V)}{partial T}big)_V = frac{nR}{V}$ by simple partial derivative. So, thus you get the proof that $big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T neq big(frac{partial (nR T/V)}{partial T}big)_V$. Thus $delta q_{rev}$ is not an exact differential.



                On the other hand if you divide both sides by $T$, you still have, $big(frac{partial (C_V(T)/T)}{partial V}big)_T = frac{1}{T}big(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}big)_T =0$. And also on the other hand you have, $big(frac{partial (nR /V)}{partial T}big)_V = -frac{nR}{V^2}big(frac{partial V}{partial T}big)_V = 0$ (obviously, as we are taking partial derivative of a constant term. Thus, by the equality of mixed partial derivatives of $frac{delta q_{rev}}{T}$ it becomes exact differential.



                $textbf{Case II : General System}$



                For general system we have, $delta q_{rev} = dU +PdV$. But remember we can't write, $dU = C_V(T) dT $ and $PV =nRT$. We have to write $dU = C_V(T)dT + big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T dV$ .



                So, now we have $delta q_{rev} = C_V(T)dT + Big(big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T + PBig)dV $.



                Also, from the definition of Helmholtz free energy ($A = U - TS $ and $dA = -SdT -PdV$) and by using Maxwell's relation it can be shown that $Big(big(frac{partial U}{partial V}big)_T + PBig) = T big(frac{partial P}{partial T}big)_V$



                Now, it can be shown properly that
                $$left(frac{partial C_V(T)}{partial V}right)_T = frac{partial^2 U}{partial T partial V} = T left(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}right)_V qquad(= 0text{ if } PV=nRT)tag{i} $$
                $$left(frac{partial (frac{C_V(T)}{T})}{partial V}right)_T = frac{1}{T} frac{partial^2 U}{partial T partial V} = left(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}right)_V tag{ii}$$
                and for the right hand side
                $$frac{partial}{partial T}Bigg(TBig(frac{partial P}{partial T}Big)_VBigg)_V = TBig(frac{partial^2 P}{partial T^2}Big)_V + left(frac{partial P}{partial T}right)_Vtag{iii}$$
                and if you divide the right side by $T$ and then check the partial derivative criterion, you will ultimately get $Big(frac{partial^2 P}{partial
                T^2}Big)_V$
                on the r.h.s also (exactly same as $(ii)$ ) , But note that, $(i) neq (iii) $. Thus $frac{delta q_{rev}}{T}$ will become exact differntial but $delta q_{rev}$ will remain inexact.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Feb 12 at 8:35









                Ivan Neretin

                23.9k34990




                23.9k34990










                answered Feb 12 at 8:05









                Soumik DasSoumik Das

                4,2511422




                4,2511422






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109395%2fneed-some-help-proving-the-following-statements-in-thermodyamics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Human spaceflight

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                    File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg