Can this be solved to remove the floor function and simplify the answer?
$begingroup$
I've been working through a derivation and have arrived at the following exprssion:
$$E = 1 - frac{x}y left( bigglfloor dfrac{2x+yx-2}{2y} biggrfloor right)^{-1}$$
where $x,y in mathbb{R^+}$.
I would like to know whether this can be reduced further, by removing the floor function and reduce the number of terms to simplify expression?
Kind regards!
floor-function ceiling-function
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've been working through a derivation and have arrived at the following exprssion:
$$E = 1 - frac{x}y left( bigglfloor dfrac{2x+yx-2}{2y} biggrfloor right)^{-1}$$
where $x,y in mathbb{R^+}$.
I would like to know whether this can be reduced further, by removing the floor function and reduce the number of terms to simplify expression?
Kind regards!
floor-function ceiling-function
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Could you add further context? Specifically, what derivation were you working on, and what work did you do to get to the equation you posted?
$endgroup$
– kkc
Jan 9 at 3:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've been working through a derivation and have arrived at the following exprssion:
$$E = 1 - frac{x}y left( bigglfloor dfrac{2x+yx-2}{2y} biggrfloor right)^{-1}$$
where $x,y in mathbb{R^+}$.
I would like to know whether this can be reduced further, by removing the floor function and reduce the number of terms to simplify expression?
Kind regards!
floor-function ceiling-function
$endgroup$
I've been working through a derivation and have arrived at the following exprssion:
$$E = 1 - frac{x}y left( bigglfloor dfrac{2x+yx-2}{2y} biggrfloor right)^{-1}$$
where $x,y in mathbb{R^+}$.
I would like to know whether this can be reduced further, by removing the floor function and reduce the number of terms to simplify expression?
Kind regards!
floor-function ceiling-function
floor-function ceiling-function
edited Jan 9 at 10:06
Lee David Chung Lin
4,38031241
4,38031241
asked Jan 9 at 2:59
AfroeskimoAfroeskimo
114
114
1
$begingroup$
Could you add further context? Specifically, what derivation were you working on, and what work did you do to get to the equation you posted?
$endgroup$
– kkc
Jan 9 at 3:25
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Could you add further context? Specifically, what derivation were you working on, and what work did you do to get to the equation you posted?
$endgroup$
– kkc
Jan 9 at 3:25
1
1
$begingroup$
Could you add further context? Specifically, what derivation were you working on, and what work did you do to get to the equation you posted?
$endgroup$
– kkc
Jan 9 at 3:25
$begingroup$
Could you add further context? Specifically, what derivation were you working on, and what work did you do to get to the equation you posted?
$endgroup$
– kkc
Jan 9 at 3:25
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
An observation rather than a general answer
Because you haven't said what you mean by "simplify" (fewer operations? Fewer characters? Fewer divisions? ...) this isn't really answerable in its current form. But it's still possible to make at least one observation:
For a moment, fix $y = 2$. Then your formula becomes
$$
E(x) = 1 - frac{x}{2lfloor x-frac{1}{2} rfloor}
$$
At every point $x$ of the form $0.5, 1.5, 2.5, ldots$, $E$ has a discontinuity.
If you're hoping for a simpler expression, it needs to be one that can be discontinuous at a countable number of locations. You could probably generate this using something like the "signum" function and a "mod", but that's really no less complex than "floor". But if you're hoping to generate it with polynomials, trig functions, etc., I don't see an obvious way to make it happen.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, a floor function cannot be simplified away: it creates an often-infinite series of discontinuities that make it impossible to characterize the function without a way to get all the discontinuities in. For this, the floor function is ideal, and so we use it.
In this particular case, we have a large division-by-zero area when $2y>2x+yx-2$, equal to when $y > 2frac{x-1}{2-x}, x < 2$, and a series of curves of the form $y=2frac{x-1}{2k-x}, kinmathbb{Z}$ where the function is discontinuous. Without the floor function, or something similar (and frankly, the floor function is way nicer than the alternatives), we cannot describe these discontinuities and thus the behavior of the function in a finite fashion.
In this image, I have plotted the area where the function is undefined, and many of the curves where the function is discontinuous. As $k$ increases, the discontinuity curves get closer and closer to the $x$ axis; I've only plotted to $k=100$.

$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067021%2fcan-this-be-solved-to-remove-the-floor-function-and-simplify-the-answer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
An observation rather than a general answer
Because you haven't said what you mean by "simplify" (fewer operations? Fewer characters? Fewer divisions? ...) this isn't really answerable in its current form. But it's still possible to make at least one observation:
For a moment, fix $y = 2$. Then your formula becomes
$$
E(x) = 1 - frac{x}{2lfloor x-frac{1}{2} rfloor}
$$
At every point $x$ of the form $0.5, 1.5, 2.5, ldots$, $E$ has a discontinuity.
If you're hoping for a simpler expression, it needs to be one that can be discontinuous at a countable number of locations. You could probably generate this using something like the "signum" function and a "mod", but that's really no less complex than "floor". But if you're hoping to generate it with polynomials, trig functions, etc., I don't see an obvious way to make it happen.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An observation rather than a general answer
Because you haven't said what you mean by "simplify" (fewer operations? Fewer characters? Fewer divisions? ...) this isn't really answerable in its current form. But it's still possible to make at least one observation:
For a moment, fix $y = 2$. Then your formula becomes
$$
E(x) = 1 - frac{x}{2lfloor x-frac{1}{2} rfloor}
$$
At every point $x$ of the form $0.5, 1.5, 2.5, ldots$, $E$ has a discontinuity.
If you're hoping for a simpler expression, it needs to be one that can be discontinuous at a countable number of locations. You could probably generate this using something like the "signum" function and a "mod", but that's really no less complex than "floor". But if you're hoping to generate it with polynomials, trig functions, etc., I don't see an obvious way to make it happen.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An observation rather than a general answer
Because you haven't said what you mean by "simplify" (fewer operations? Fewer characters? Fewer divisions? ...) this isn't really answerable in its current form. But it's still possible to make at least one observation:
For a moment, fix $y = 2$. Then your formula becomes
$$
E(x) = 1 - frac{x}{2lfloor x-frac{1}{2} rfloor}
$$
At every point $x$ of the form $0.5, 1.5, 2.5, ldots$, $E$ has a discontinuity.
If you're hoping for a simpler expression, it needs to be one that can be discontinuous at a countable number of locations. You could probably generate this using something like the "signum" function and a "mod", but that's really no less complex than "floor". But if you're hoping to generate it with polynomials, trig functions, etc., I don't see an obvious way to make it happen.
$endgroup$
An observation rather than a general answer
Because you haven't said what you mean by "simplify" (fewer operations? Fewer characters? Fewer divisions? ...) this isn't really answerable in its current form. But it's still possible to make at least one observation:
For a moment, fix $y = 2$. Then your formula becomes
$$
E(x) = 1 - frac{x}{2lfloor x-frac{1}{2} rfloor}
$$
At every point $x$ of the form $0.5, 1.5, 2.5, ldots$, $E$ has a discontinuity.
If you're hoping for a simpler expression, it needs to be one that can be discontinuous at a countable number of locations. You could probably generate this using something like the "signum" function and a "mod", but that's really no less complex than "floor". But if you're hoping to generate it with polynomials, trig functions, etc., I don't see an obvious way to make it happen.
answered Jan 9 at 10:48
John HughesJohn Hughes
64.3k24191
64.3k24191
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, a floor function cannot be simplified away: it creates an often-infinite series of discontinuities that make it impossible to characterize the function without a way to get all the discontinuities in. For this, the floor function is ideal, and so we use it.
In this particular case, we have a large division-by-zero area when $2y>2x+yx-2$, equal to when $y > 2frac{x-1}{2-x}, x < 2$, and a series of curves of the form $y=2frac{x-1}{2k-x}, kinmathbb{Z}$ where the function is discontinuous. Without the floor function, or something similar (and frankly, the floor function is way nicer than the alternatives), we cannot describe these discontinuities and thus the behavior of the function in a finite fashion.
In this image, I have plotted the area where the function is undefined, and many of the curves where the function is discontinuous. As $k$ increases, the discontinuity curves get closer and closer to the $x$ axis; I've only plotted to $k=100$.

$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, a floor function cannot be simplified away: it creates an often-infinite series of discontinuities that make it impossible to characterize the function without a way to get all the discontinuities in. For this, the floor function is ideal, and so we use it.
In this particular case, we have a large division-by-zero area when $2y>2x+yx-2$, equal to when $y > 2frac{x-1}{2-x}, x < 2$, and a series of curves of the form $y=2frac{x-1}{2k-x}, kinmathbb{Z}$ where the function is discontinuous. Without the floor function, or something similar (and frankly, the floor function is way nicer than the alternatives), we cannot describe these discontinuities and thus the behavior of the function in a finite fashion.
In this image, I have plotted the area where the function is undefined, and many of the curves where the function is discontinuous. As $k$ increases, the discontinuity curves get closer and closer to the $x$ axis; I've only plotted to $k=100$.

$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, a floor function cannot be simplified away: it creates an often-infinite series of discontinuities that make it impossible to characterize the function without a way to get all the discontinuities in. For this, the floor function is ideal, and so we use it.
In this particular case, we have a large division-by-zero area when $2y>2x+yx-2$, equal to when $y > 2frac{x-1}{2-x}, x < 2$, and a series of curves of the form $y=2frac{x-1}{2k-x}, kinmathbb{Z}$ where the function is discontinuous. Without the floor function, or something similar (and frankly, the floor function is way nicer than the alternatives), we cannot describe these discontinuities and thus the behavior of the function in a finite fashion.
In this image, I have plotted the area where the function is undefined, and many of the curves where the function is discontinuous. As $k$ increases, the discontinuity curves get closer and closer to the $x$ axis; I've only plotted to $k=100$.

$endgroup$
In general, a floor function cannot be simplified away: it creates an often-infinite series of discontinuities that make it impossible to characterize the function without a way to get all the discontinuities in. For this, the floor function is ideal, and so we use it.
In this particular case, we have a large division-by-zero area when $2y>2x+yx-2$, equal to when $y > 2frac{x-1}{2-x}, x < 2$, and a series of curves of the form $y=2frac{x-1}{2k-x}, kinmathbb{Z}$ where the function is discontinuous. Without the floor function, or something similar (and frankly, the floor function is way nicer than the alternatives), we cannot describe these discontinuities and thus the behavior of the function in a finite fashion.
In this image, I have plotted the area where the function is undefined, and many of the curves where the function is discontinuous. As $k$ increases, the discontinuity curves get closer and closer to the $x$ axis; I've only plotted to $k=100$.

answered Jan 9 at 11:06
Dan UznanskiDan Uznanski
6,86521528
6,86521528
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067021%2fcan-this-be-solved-to-remove-the-floor-function-and-simplify-the-answer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Could you add further context? Specifically, what derivation were you working on, and what work did you do to get to the equation you posted?
$endgroup$
– kkc
Jan 9 at 3:25