Group cohomology over ring












3












$begingroup$


For any group $G$ and $G$-module ($mathbb{Z}[G]$-module) $M$, we can define a group cohomology $H^{n}(G, M)$ as



$$
H^{n}(G, M):=mathrm{Ext}_{mathbb{Z}[G]}^{n}(mathbb{Z}, M).
$$
However, I think one can replace $mathbb{Z}$ with other rings $R$, if $M$ is $R$-module and $G$ acts on it (i.e. $M$ is $R[G]$-module). We can define
$$
H^{n}_{R}(G, M):=mathrm{Ext}_{R[G]}^{n}(R, M).
$$
Is there any reference about this cohomology group? Actually, there is an exercise about group cohomology of finite dimensional $mathbb{F}_{p}$-vector space in Dummit-Foote Algebra (Exercise 20, 21 of chapter 17.2). In this case, it seems that we are computing cohomology group when $R=mathbb{F}_{p}$, not $mathbb{Z}$.
Also, is this group is useful for number theory? Thanks in advance.



The exercise in Dummit-Foote










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    For any group $G$ and $G$-module ($mathbb{Z}[G]$-module) $M$, we can define a group cohomology $H^{n}(G, M)$ as



    $$
    H^{n}(G, M):=mathrm{Ext}_{mathbb{Z}[G]}^{n}(mathbb{Z}, M).
    $$
    However, I think one can replace $mathbb{Z}$ with other rings $R$, if $M$ is $R$-module and $G$ acts on it (i.e. $M$ is $R[G]$-module). We can define
    $$
    H^{n}_{R}(G, M):=mathrm{Ext}_{R[G]}^{n}(R, M).
    $$
    Is there any reference about this cohomology group? Actually, there is an exercise about group cohomology of finite dimensional $mathbb{F}_{p}$-vector space in Dummit-Foote Algebra (Exercise 20, 21 of chapter 17.2). In this case, it seems that we are computing cohomology group when $R=mathbb{F}_{p}$, not $mathbb{Z}$.
    Also, is this group is useful for number theory? Thanks in advance.



    The exercise in Dummit-Foote










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      For any group $G$ and $G$-module ($mathbb{Z}[G]$-module) $M$, we can define a group cohomology $H^{n}(G, M)$ as



      $$
      H^{n}(G, M):=mathrm{Ext}_{mathbb{Z}[G]}^{n}(mathbb{Z}, M).
      $$
      However, I think one can replace $mathbb{Z}$ with other rings $R$, if $M$ is $R$-module and $G$ acts on it (i.e. $M$ is $R[G]$-module). We can define
      $$
      H^{n}_{R}(G, M):=mathrm{Ext}_{R[G]}^{n}(R, M).
      $$
      Is there any reference about this cohomology group? Actually, there is an exercise about group cohomology of finite dimensional $mathbb{F}_{p}$-vector space in Dummit-Foote Algebra (Exercise 20, 21 of chapter 17.2). In this case, it seems that we are computing cohomology group when $R=mathbb{F}_{p}$, not $mathbb{Z}$.
      Also, is this group is useful for number theory? Thanks in advance.



      The exercise in Dummit-Foote










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      For any group $G$ and $G$-module ($mathbb{Z}[G]$-module) $M$, we can define a group cohomology $H^{n}(G, M)$ as



      $$
      H^{n}(G, M):=mathrm{Ext}_{mathbb{Z}[G]}^{n}(mathbb{Z}, M).
      $$
      However, I think one can replace $mathbb{Z}$ with other rings $R$, if $M$ is $R$-module and $G$ acts on it (i.e. $M$ is $R[G]$-module). We can define
      $$
      H^{n}_{R}(G, M):=mathrm{Ext}_{R[G]}^{n}(R, M).
      $$
      Is there any reference about this cohomology group? Actually, there is an exercise about group cohomology of finite dimensional $mathbb{F}_{p}$-vector space in Dummit-Foote Algebra (Exercise 20, 21 of chapter 17.2). In this case, it seems that we are computing cohomology group when $R=mathbb{F}_{p}$, not $mathbb{Z}$.
      Also, is this group is useful for number theory? Thanks in advance.



      The exercise in Dummit-Foote







      group-cohomology






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 8 '17 at 5:21









      Seewoo LeeSeewoo Lee

      6,895927




      6,895927






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Actually, for every (commutative) ring $R$ we have an isomorphism of $mathbb Z$-modules:



          $DeclareMathOperator{Ext}{Ext} Ext^n_{R[G]}(R, M) cong Ext^n_{mathbb Z[G]}(mathbb Z, M),$



          see https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0DVD (they discuss there topological groups, but you can always take the discrete topology).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2510211%2fgroup-cohomology-over-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Actually, for every (commutative) ring $R$ we have an isomorphism of $mathbb Z$-modules:



            $DeclareMathOperator{Ext}{Ext} Ext^n_{R[G]}(R, M) cong Ext^n_{mathbb Z[G]}(mathbb Z, M),$



            see https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0DVD (they discuss there topological groups, but you can always take the discrete topology).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              Actually, for every (commutative) ring $R$ we have an isomorphism of $mathbb Z$-modules:



              $DeclareMathOperator{Ext}{Ext} Ext^n_{R[G]}(R, M) cong Ext^n_{mathbb Z[G]}(mathbb Z, M),$



              see https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0DVD (they discuss there topological groups, but you can always take the discrete topology).






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Actually, for every (commutative) ring $R$ we have an isomorphism of $mathbb Z$-modules:



                $DeclareMathOperator{Ext}{Ext} Ext^n_{R[G]}(R, M) cong Ext^n_{mathbb Z[G]}(mathbb Z, M),$



                see https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0DVD (they discuss there topological groups, but you can always take the discrete topology).






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Actually, for every (commutative) ring $R$ we have an isomorphism of $mathbb Z$-modules:



                $DeclareMathOperator{Ext}{Ext} Ext^n_{R[G]}(R, M) cong Ext^n_{mathbb Z[G]}(mathbb Z, M),$



                see https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0DVD (they discuss there topological groups, but you can always take the discrete topology).







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 8 at 13:21









                Jędrzej GarnekJędrzej Garnek

                416




                416






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2510211%2fgroup-cohomology-over-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Human spaceflight

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                    File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg