Why is “loop14” not listed in lsblk?












2















Upon listing the blocks using lsblk, I found 14 look blocks listed, from loop 0 to loop 13.



me@alpha:~$ lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
loop0 7:0 0 87.9M 1 loop /snap/core/5662
loop1 7:1 0 140.7M 1 loop /snap/gnome-3-26-1604/74
loop2 7:2 0 3.7M 1 loop /snap/gnome-system-monitor/57
loop3 7:3 0 140.9M 1 loop /snap/gnome-3-26-1604/70
loop4 7:4 0 34.6M 1 loop /snap/gtk-common-themes/818
loop5 7:5 0 42.1M 1 loop /snap/gtk-common-themes/701
loop6 7:6 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6130
loop7 7:7 0 2.3M 1 loop /snap/gnome-calculator/238
loop8 7:8 0 130.2M 1 loop /snap/gnome-3-28-1804/4
loop9 7:9 0 14.5M 1 loop /snap/gnome-logs/45
loop10 7:10 0 13M 1 loop /snap/gnome-characters/124
loop11 7:11 0 53.7M 1 loop /snap/core18/536
loop12 7:12 0 13M 1 loop /snap/gnome-characters/139
loop13 7:13 0 2.3M 1 loop /snap/gnome-calculator/260
sda 8:0 0 113G 0 disk
├─sda1 8:1 0 512M 0 part /boot/efi
└─sda2 8:2 0 112.5G 0 part /


However, when I list using ls /dev and find blocks using grep 'loop', I found 15 blocks listed, with an extra loop14 shown.



me@alpha:~$ ls /dev | grep 'loop'
loop0
loop1
loop10
loop11
loop12
loop13
loop14
loop2
loop3
loop4
loop5
loop6
loop7
loop8
loop9
loop-control


Why loop14 is not listed from lsblk?










share|improve this question





























    2















    Upon listing the blocks using lsblk, I found 14 look blocks listed, from loop 0 to loop 13.



    me@alpha:~$ lsblk
    NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
    loop0 7:0 0 87.9M 1 loop /snap/core/5662
    loop1 7:1 0 140.7M 1 loop /snap/gnome-3-26-1604/74
    loop2 7:2 0 3.7M 1 loop /snap/gnome-system-monitor/57
    loop3 7:3 0 140.9M 1 loop /snap/gnome-3-26-1604/70
    loop4 7:4 0 34.6M 1 loop /snap/gtk-common-themes/818
    loop5 7:5 0 42.1M 1 loop /snap/gtk-common-themes/701
    loop6 7:6 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6130
    loop7 7:7 0 2.3M 1 loop /snap/gnome-calculator/238
    loop8 7:8 0 130.2M 1 loop /snap/gnome-3-28-1804/4
    loop9 7:9 0 14.5M 1 loop /snap/gnome-logs/45
    loop10 7:10 0 13M 1 loop /snap/gnome-characters/124
    loop11 7:11 0 53.7M 1 loop /snap/core18/536
    loop12 7:12 0 13M 1 loop /snap/gnome-characters/139
    loop13 7:13 0 2.3M 1 loop /snap/gnome-calculator/260
    sda 8:0 0 113G 0 disk
    ├─sda1 8:1 0 512M 0 part /boot/efi
    └─sda2 8:2 0 112.5G 0 part /


    However, when I list using ls /dev and find blocks using grep 'loop', I found 15 blocks listed, with an extra loop14 shown.



    me@alpha:~$ ls /dev | grep 'loop'
    loop0
    loop1
    loop10
    loop11
    loop12
    loop13
    loop14
    loop2
    loop3
    loop4
    loop5
    loop6
    loop7
    loop8
    loop9
    loop-control


    Why loop14 is not listed from lsblk?










    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2








      Upon listing the blocks using lsblk, I found 14 look blocks listed, from loop 0 to loop 13.



      me@alpha:~$ lsblk
      NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
      loop0 7:0 0 87.9M 1 loop /snap/core/5662
      loop1 7:1 0 140.7M 1 loop /snap/gnome-3-26-1604/74
      loop2 7:2 0 3.7M 1 loop /snap/gnome-system-monitor/57
      loop3 7:3 0 140.9M 1 loop /snap/gnome-3-26-1604/70
      loop4 7:4 0 34.6M 1 loop /snap/gtk-common-themes/818
      loop5 7:5 0 42.1M 1 loop /snap/gtk-common-themes/701
      loop6 7:6 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6130
      loop7 7:7 0 2.3M 1 loop /snap/gnome-calculator/238
      loop8 7:8 0 130.2M 1 loop /snap/gnome-3-28-1804/4
      loop9 7:9 0 14.5M 1 loop /snap/gnome-logs/45
      loop10 7:10 0 13M 1 loop /snap/gnome-characters/124
      loop11 7:11 0 53.7M 1 loop /snap/core18/536
      loop12 7:12 0 13M 1 loop /snap/gnome-characters/139
      loop13 7:13 0 2.3M 1 loop /snap/gnome-calculator/260
      sda 8:0 0 113G 0 disk
      ├─sda1 8:1 0 512M 0 part /boot/efi
      └─sda2 8:2 0 112.5G 0 part /


      However, when I list using ls /dev and find blocks using grep 'loop', I found 15 blocks listed, with an extra loop14 shown.



      me@alpha:~$ ls /dev | grep 'loop'
      loop0
      loop1
      loop10
      loop11
      loop12
      loop13
      loop14
      loop2
      loop3
      loop4
      loop5
      loop6
      loop7
      loop8
      loop9
      loop-control


      Why loop14 is not listed from lsblk?










      share|improve this question
















      Upon listing the blocks using lsblk, I found 14 look blocks listed, from loop 0 to loop 13.



      me@alpha:~$ lsblk
      NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
      loop0 7:0 0 87.9M 1 loop /snap/core/5662
      loop1 7:1 0 140.7M 1 loop /snap/gnome-3-26-1604/74
      loop2 7:2 0 3.7M 1 loop /snap/gnome-system-monitor/57
      loop3 7:3 0 140.9M 1 loop /snap/gnome-3-26-1604/70
      loop4 7:4 0 34.6M 1 loop /snap/gtk-common-themes/818
      loop5 7:5 0 42.1M 1 loop /snap/gtk-common-themes/701
      loop6 7:6 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6130
      loop7 7:7 0 2.3M 1 loop /snap/gnome-calculator/238
      loop8 7:8 0 130.2M 1 loop /snap/gnome-3-28-1804/4
      loop9 7:9 0 14.5M 1 loop /snap/gnome-logs/45
      loop10 7:10 0 13M 1 loop /snap/gnome-characters/124
      loop11 7:11 0 53.7M 1 loop /snap/core18/536
      loop12 7:12 0 13M 1 loop /snap/gnome-characters/139
      loop13 7:13 0 2.3M 1 loop /snap/gnome-calculator/260
      sda 8:0 0 113G 0 disk
      ├─sda1 8:1 0 512M 0 part /boot/efi
      └─sda2 8:2 0 112.5G 0 part /


      However, when I list using ls /dev and find blocks using grep 'loop', I found 15 blocks listed, with an extra loop14 shown.



      me@alpha:~$ ls /dev | grep 'loop'
      loop0
      loop1
      loop10
      loop11
      loop12
      loop13
      loop14
      loop2
      loop3
      loop4
      loop5
      loop6
      loop7
      loop8
      loop9
      loop-control


      Why loop14 is not listed from lsblk?







      command-line loop-device






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 22 at 13:23









      Olorin

      2,433822




      2,433822










      asked Jan 22 at 5:41









      AliceAlice

      415110




      415110






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          lsblk lists loop devices with a backing file. In your case, loop devices 0-13 have backing files, and show up.



          losetup --find, used to find the next available loop device, automatically creates a new loop device if all existing loop devices are in use (if run as root). So some process might have run losetup --find as root to look for an available loop device, and probably didn't use it.



          Example:



          I have seven loop devices, all backed:



          $ sudo losetup --list --all         
          NAME SIZELIMIT OFFSET AUTOCLEAR RO BACK-FILE
          /dev/loop1 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_5897.snap
          /dev/loop6 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
          /dev/loop4 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
          /dev/loop2 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_6130.snap
          /dev/loop0 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/vuze-vs_3.snap
          /dev/loop7 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
          /dev/loop5 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
          /dev/loop3 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_6034.snap
          $ ls /dev/loop*
          /dev/loop0 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop4 /dev/loop6 /dev/loop-control
          /dev/loop1 /dev/loop3 /dev/loop5 /dev/loop7


          I ask losetup for the next available loop device as root:



          $ sudo losetup --find       
          /dev/loop8


          And losetup has created this for me:



          $ ls /dev/loop*             
          /dev/loop0 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop4 /dev/loop6 /dev/loop8
          /dev/loop1 /dev/loop3 /dev/loop5 /dev/loop7 /dev/loop-control


          But it's not in lsblk:



          $ lsblk              
          NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
          loop1 7:1 0 88.2M 1 loop /snap/core/5897
          loop6 7:6 0 1M 0 loop
          loop4 7:4 0 1M 0 loop
          sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
          loop2 7:2 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6130
          loop0 7:0 0 280.2M 1 loop /snap/vuze-vs/3
          loop7 7:7 0 1M 0 loop
          sda 8:0 0 41G 0 disk
          └─sda1 8:1 0 41G 0 part /
          loop5 7:5 0 1M 0 loop
          loop3 7:3 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6034


          Because it's not backed by anything usable as a block device.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "89"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1111852%2fwhy-is-loop14-not-listed-in-lsblk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            lsblk lists loop devices with a backing file. In your case, loop devices 0-13 have backing files, and show up.



            losetup --find, used to find the next available loop device, automatically creates a new loop device if all existing loop devices are in use (if run as root). So some process might have run losetup --find as root to look for an available loop device, and probably didn't use it.



            Example:



            I have seven loop devices, all backed:



            $ sudo losetup --list --all         
            NAME SIZELIMIT OFFSET AUTOCLEAR RO BACK-FILE
            /dev/loop1 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_5897.snap
            /dev/loop6 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
            /dev/loop4 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
            /dev/loop2 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_6130.snap
            /dev/loop0 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/vuze-vs_3.snap
            /dev/loop7 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
            /dev/loop5 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
            /dev/loop3 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_6034.snap
            $ ls /dev/loop*
            /dev/loop0 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop4 /dev/loop6 /dev/loop-control
            /dev/loop1 /dev/loop3 /dev/loop5 /dev/loop7


            I ask losetup for the next available loop device as root:



            $ sudo losetup --find       
            /dev/loop8


            And losetup has created this for me:



            $ ls /dev/loop*             
            /dev/loop0 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop4 /dev/loop6 /dev/loop8
            /dev/loop1 /dev/loop3 /dev/loop5 /dev/loop7 /dev/loop-control


            But it's not in lsblk:



            $ lsblk              
            NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
            loop1 7:1 0 88.2M 1 loop /snap/core/5897
            loop6 7:6 0 1M 0 loop
            loop4 7:4 0 1M 0 loop
            sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
            loop2 7:2 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6130
            loop0 7:0 0 280.2M 1 loop /snap/vuze-vs/3
            loop7 7:7 0 1M 0 loop
            sda 8:0 0 41G 0 disk
            └─sda1 8:1 0 41G 0 part /
            loop5 7:5 0 1M 0 loop
            loop3 7:3 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6034


            Because it's not backed by anything usable as a block device.






            share|improve this answer




























              3














              lsblk lists loop devices with a backing file. In your case, loop devices 0-13 have backing files, and show up.



              losetup --find, used to find the next available loop device, automatically creates a new loop device if all existing loop devices are in use (if run as root). So some process might have run losetup --find as root to look for an available loop device, and probably didn't use it.



              Example:



              I have seven loop devices, all backed:



              $ sudo losetup --list --all         
              NAME SIZELIMIT OFFSET AUTOCLEAR RO BACK-FILE
              /dev/loop1 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_5897.snap
              /dev/loop6 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
              /dev/loop4 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
              /dev/loop2 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_6130.snap
              /dev/loop0 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/vuze-vs_3.snap
              /dev/loop7 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
              /dev/loop5 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
              /dev/loop3 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_6034.snap
              $ ls /dev/loop*
              /dev/loop0 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop4 /dev/loop6 /dev/loop-control
              /dev/loop1 /dev/loop3 /dev/loop5 /dev/loop7


              I ask losetup for the next available loop device as root:



              $ sudo losetup --find       
              /dev/loop8


              And losetup has created this for me:



              $ ls /dev/loop*             
              /dev/loop0 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop4 /dev/loop6 /dev/loop8
              /dev/loop1 /dev/loop3 /dev/loop5 /dev/loop7 /dev/loop-control


              But it's not in lsblk:



              $ lsblk              
              NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
              loop1 7:1 0 88.2M 1 loop /snap/core/5897
              loop6 7:6 0 1M 0 loop
              loop4 7:4 0 1M 0 loop
              sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
              loop2 7:2 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6130
              loop0 7:0 0 280.2M 1 loop /snap/vuze-vs/3
              loop7 7:7 0 1M 0 loop
              sda 8:0 0 41G 0 disk
              └─sda1 8:1 0 41G 0 part /
              loop5 7:5 0 1M 0 loop
              loop3 7:3 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6034


              Because it's not backed by anything usable as a block device.






              share|improve this answer


























                3












                3








                3







                lsblk lists loop devices with a backing file. In your case, loop devices 0-13 have backing files, and show up.



                losetup --find, used to find the next available loop device, automatically creates a new loop device if all existing loop devices are in use (if run as root). So some process might have run losetup --find as root to look for an available loop device, and probably didn't use it.



                Example:



                I have seven loop devices, all backed:



                $ sudo losetup --list --all         
                NAME SIZELIMIT OFFSET AUTOCLEAR RO BACK-FILE
                /dev/loop1 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_5897.snap
                /dev/loop6 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
                /dev/loop4 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
                /dev/loop2 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_6130.snap
                /dev/loop0 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/vuze-vs_3.snap
                /dev/loop7 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
                /dev/loop5 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
                /dev/loop3 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_6034.snap
                $ ls /dev/loop*
                /dev/loop0 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop4 /dev/loop6 /dev/loop-control
                /dev/loop1 /dev/loop3 /dev/loop5 /dev/loop7


                I ask losetup for the next available loop device as root:



                $ sudo losetup --find       
                /dev/loop8


                And losetup has created this for me:



                $ ls /dev/loop*             
                /dev/loop0 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop4 /dev/loop6 /dev/loop8
                /dev/loop1 /dev/loop3 /dev/loop5 /dev/loop7 /dev/loop-control


                But it's not in lsblk:



                $ lsblk              
                NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
                loop1 7:1 0 88.2M 1 loop /snap/core/5897
                loop6 7:6 0 1M 0 loop
                loop4 7:4 0 1M 0 loop
                sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
                loop2 7:2 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6130
                loop0 7:0 0 280.2M 1 loop /snap/vuze-vs/3
                loop7 7:7 0 1M 0 loop
                sda 8:0 0 41G 0 disk
                └─sda1 8:1 0 41G 0 part /
                loop5 7:5 0 1M 0 loop
                loop3 7:3 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6034


                Because it's not backed by anything usable as a block device.






                share|improve this answer













                lsblk lists loop devices with a backing file. In your case, loop devices 0-13 have backing files, and show up.



                losetup --find, used to find the next available loop device, automatically creates a new loop device if all existing loop devices are in use (if run as root). So some process might have run losetup --find as root to look for an available loop device, and probably didn't use it.



                Example:



                I have seven loop devices, all backed:



                $ sudo losetup --list --all         
                NAME SIZELIMIT OFFSET AUTOCLEAR RO BACK-FILE
                /dev/loop1 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_5897.snap
                /dev/loop6 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
                /dev/loop4 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
                /dev/loop2 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_6130.snap
                /dev/loop0 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/vuze-vs_3.snap
                /dev/loop7 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
                /dev/loop5 0 0 0 0 /tmp/foo
                /dev/loop3 0 0 1 1 /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_6034.snap
                $ ls /dev/loop*
                /dev/loop0 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop4 /dev/loop6 /dev/loop-control
                /dev/loop1 /dev/loop3 /dev/loop5 /dev/loop7


                I ask losetup for the next available loop device as root:



                $ sudo losetup --find       
                /dev/loop8


                And losetup has created this for me:



                $ ls /dev/loop*             
                /dev/loop0 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop4 /dev/loop6 /dev/loop8
                /dev/loop1 /dev/loop3 /dev/loop5 /dev/loop7 /dev/loop-control


                But it's not in lsblk:



                $ lsblk              
                NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
                loop1 7:1 0 88.2M 1 loop /snap/core/5897
                loop6 7:6 0 1M 0 loop
                loop4 7:4 0 1M 0 loop
                sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
                loop2 7:2 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6130
                loop0 7:0 0 280.2M 1 loop /snap/vuze-vs/3
                loop7 7:7 0 1M 0 loop
                sda 8:0 0 41G 0 disk
                └─sda1 8:1 0 41G 0 part /
                loop5 7:5 0 1M 0 loop
                loop3 7:3 0 89.5M 1 loop /snap/core/6034


                Because it's not backed by anything usable as a block device.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Jan 22 at 6:26









                OlorinOlorin

                2,433822




                2,433822






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1111852%2fwhy-is-loop14-not-listed-in-lsblk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Human spaceflight

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                    張江高科駅