Using the normal distribution to find the probability of getting an exact value












1












$begingroup$


Take the following example. In the US, the average IQ is 100 points with a standard deviation of approx. 18 points. Find the following probability:



Find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of exactly 100 points.



Here is what I assume needs to be done, after which point we normalize and use tables.



a) $P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$



Does this look right?



As a further question, would we need to do something similar every time the question asks to find the probability of choosing an individual with a score over or under but also equal to a certain value? For example, find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of 130 points or more. Would it be done like this??



$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$



In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $X$ has a continuous distribution, then $P(X=x)=0$ for any $x$. There are no point mass for a continuous random variable.
    $endgroup$
    – Just_to_Answer
    Jan 9 at 3:52
















1












$begingroup$


Take the following example. In the US, the average IQ is 100 points with a standard deviation of approx. 18 points. Find the following probability:



Find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of exactly 100 points.



Here is what I assume needs to be done, after which point we normalize and use tables.



a) $P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$



Does this look right?



As a further question, would we need to do something similar every time the question asks to find the probability of choosing an individual with a score over or under but also equal to a certain value? For example, find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of 130 points or more. Would it be done like this??



$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$



In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $X$ has a continuous distribution, then $P(X=x)=0$ for any $x$. There are no point mass for a continuous random variable.
    $endgroup$
    – Just_to_Answer
    Jan 9 at 3:52














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


Take the following example. In the US, the average IQ is 100 points with a standard deviation of approx. 18 points. Find the following probability:



Find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of exactly 100 points.



Here is what I assume needs to be done, after which point we normalize and use tables.



a) $P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$



Does this look right?



As a further question, would we need to do something similar every time the question asks to find the probability of choosing an individual with a score over or under but also equal to a certain value? For example, find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of 130 points or more. Would it be done like this??



$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$



In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Take the following example. In the US, the average IQ is 100 points with a standard deviation of approx. 18 points. Find the following probability:



Find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of exactly 100 points.



Here is what I assume needs to be done, after which point we normalize and use tables.



a) $P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$



Does this look right?



As a further question, would we need to do something similar every time the question asks to find the probability of choosing an individual with a score over or under but also equal to a certain value? For example, find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of 130 points or more. Would it be done like this??



$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$



In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?







probability statistics normal-distribution






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 9 at 3:43







Ninosław Brzostowiecki

















asked Jan 9 at 3:38









Ninosław BrzostowieckiNinosław Brzostowiecki

546414




546414








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $X$ has a continuous distribution, then $P(X=x)=0$ for any $x$. There are no point mass for a continuous random variable.
    $endgroup$
    – Just_to_Answer
    Jan 9 at 3:52














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $X$ has a continuous distribution, then $P(X=x)=0$ for any $x$. There are no point mass for a continuous random variable.
    $endgroup$
    – Just_to_Answer
    Jan 9 at 3:52








2




2




$begingroup$
If $X$ has a continuous distribution, then $P(X=x)=0$ for any $x$. There are no point mass for a continuous random variable.
$endgroup$
– Just_to_Answer
Jan 9 at 3:52




$begingroup$
If $X$ has a continuous distribution, then $P(X=x)=0$ for any $x$. There are no point mass for a continuous random variable.
$endgroup$
– Just_to_Answer
Jan 9 at 3:52










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$


$P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$



Does this look right?




Yes... assuming an IQ values can be any integer (which seems to be the case).



BTW: to avoid confusions you should use different letters for the real (discrete) random variable, and the one that corresponds to the normal approximation.



However, not using the continiuty correction (just evaluating the normal at $100$) is often also fine. That is, if $phi(x)$ is the normal density, we often approximate



$$ int_{X-h/2}^{X+h/2} phi(x) dx approx h phi(X)$$



just because it's simpler.




$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$



In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?




Yes. Of course, in that case the correction is (probably) less important.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067044%2fusing-the-normal-distribution-to-find-the-probability-of-getting-an-exact-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$


    $P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$



    Does this look right?




    Yes... assuming an IQ values can be any integer (which seems to be the case).



    BTW: to avoid confusions you should use different letters for the real (discrete) random variable, and the one that corresponds to the normal approximation.



    However, not using the continiuty correction (just evaluating the normal at $100$) is often also fine. That is, if $phi(x)$ is the normal density, we often approximate



    $$ int_{X-h/2}^{X+h/2} phi(x) dx approx h phi(X)$$



    just because it's simpler.




    $P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$



    In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?




    Yes. Of course, in that case the correction is (probably) less important.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$


      $P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$



      Does this look right?




      Yes... assuming an IQ values can be any integer (which seems to be the case).



      BTW: to avoid confusions you should use different letters for the real (discrete) random variable, and the one that corresponds to the normal approximation.



      However, not using the continiuty correction (just evaluating the normal at $100$) is often also fine. That is, if $phi(x)$ is the normal density, we often approximate



      $$ int_{X-h/2}^{X+h/2} phi(x) dx approx h phi(X)$$



      just because it's simpler.




      $P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$



      In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?




      Yes. Of course, in that case the correction is (probably) less important.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$


        $P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$



        Does this look right?




        Yes... assuming an IQ values can be any integer (which seems to be the case).



        BTW: to avoid confusions you should use different letters for the real (discrete) random variable, and the one that corresponds to the normal approximation.



        However, not using the continiuty correction (just evaluating the normal at $100$) is often also fine. That is, if $phi(x)$ is the normal density, we often approximate



        $$ int_{X-h/2}^{X+h/2} phi(x) dx approx h phi(X)$$



        just because it's simpler.




        $P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$



        In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?




        Yes. Of course, in that case the correction is (probably) less important.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




        $P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$



        Does this look right?




        Yes... assuming an IQ values can be any integer (which seems to be the case).



        BTW: to avoid confusions you should use different letters for the real (discrete) random variable, and the one that corresponds to the normal approximation.



        However, not using the continiuty correction (just evaluating the normal at $100$) is often also fine. That is, if $phi(x)$ is the normal density, we often approximate



        $$ int_{X-h/2}^{X+h/2} phi(x) dx approx h phi(X)$$



        just because it's simpler.




        $P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$



        In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?




        Yes. Of course, in that case the correction is (probably) less important.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 9 at 3:52









        leonbloyleonbloy

        41.3k645107




        41.3k645107






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067044%2fusing-the-normal-distribution-to-find-the-probability-of-getting-an-exact-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            張江高科駅