Using the normal distribution to find the probability of getting an exact value
$begingroup$
Take the following example. In the US, the average IQ is 100 points with a standard deviation of approx. 18 points. Find the following probability:
Find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of exactly 100 points.
Here is what I assume needs to be done, after which point we normalize and use tables.
a) $P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$
Does this look right?
As a further question, would we need to do something similar every time the question asks to find the probability of choosing an individual with a score over or under but also equal to a certain value? For example, find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of 130 points or more. Would it be done like this??
$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$
In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?
probability statistics normal-distribution
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take the following example. In the US, the average IQ is 100 points with a standard deviation of approx. 18 points. Find the following probability:
Find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of exactly 100 points.
Here is what I assume needs to be done, after which point we normalize and use tables.
a) $P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$
Does this look right?
As a further question, would we need to do something similar every time the question asks to find the probability of choosing an individual with a score over or under but also equal to a certain value? For example, find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of 130 points or more. Would it be done like this??
$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$
In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?
probability statistics normal-distribution
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
If $X$ has a continuous distribution, then $P(X=x)=0$ for any $x$. There are no point mass for a continuous random variable.
$endgroup$
– Just_to_Answer
Jan 9 at 3:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take the following example. In the US, the average IQ is 100 points with a standard deviation of approx. 18 points. Find the following probability:
Find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of exactly 100 points.
Here is what I assume needs to be done, after which point we normalize and use tables.
a) $P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$
Does this look right?
As a further question, would we need to do something similar every time the question asks to find the probability of choosing an individual with a score over or under but also equal to a certain value? For example, find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of 130 points or more. Would it be done like this??
$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$
In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?
probability statistics normal-distribution
$endgroup$
Take the following example. In the US, the average IQ is 100 points with a standard deviation of approx. 18 points. Find the following probability:
Find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of exactly 100 points.
Here is what I assume needs to be done, after which point we normalize and use tables.
a) $P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$
Does this look right?
As a further question, would we need to do something similar every time the question asks to find the probability of choosing an individual with a score over or under but also equal to a certain value? For example, find the probability that a randomly selected individual has an IQ of 130 points or more. Would it be done like this??
$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$
In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?
probability statistics normal-distribution
probability statistics normal-distribution
edited Jan 9 at 3:43
Ninosław Brzostowiecki
asked Jan 9 at 3:38
Ninosław BrzostowieckiNinosław Brzostowiecki
546414
546414
2
$begingroup$
If $X$ has a continuous distribution, then $P(X=x)=0$ for any $x$. There are no point mass for a continuous random variable.
$endgroup$
– Just_to_Answer
Jan 9 at 3:52
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
If $X$ has a continuous distribution, then $P(X=x)=0$ for any $x$. There are no point mass for a continuous random variable.
$endgroup$
– Just_to_Answer
Jan 9 at 3:52
2
2
$begingroup$
If $X$ has a continuous distribution, then $P(X=x)=0$ for any $x$. There are no point mass for a continuous random variable.
$endgroup$
– Just_to_Answer
Jan 9 at 3:52
$begingroup$
If $X$ has a continuous distribution, then $P(X=x)=0$ for any $x$. There are no point mass for a continuous random variable.
$endgroup$
– Just_to_Answer
Jan 9 at 3:52
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$
Does this look right?
Yes... assuming an IQ values can be any integer (which seems to be the case).
BTW: to avoid confusions you should use different letters for the real (discrete) random variable, and the one that corresponds to the normal approximation.
However, not using the continiuty correction (just evaluating the normal at $100$) is often also fine. That is, if $phi(x)$ is the normal density, we often approximate
$$ int_{X-h/2}^{X+h/2} phi(x) dx approx h phi(X)$$
just because it's simpler.
$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$
In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?
Yes. Of course, in that case the correction is (probably) less important.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067044%2fusing-the-normal-distribution-to-find-the-probability-of-getting-an-exact-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$
Does this look right?
Yes... assuming an IQ values can be any integer (which seems to be the case).
BTW: to avoid confusions you should use different letters for the real (discrete) random variable, and the one that corresponds to the normal approximation.
However, not using the continiuty correction (just evaluating the normal at $100$) is often also fine. That is, if $phi(x)$ is the normal density, we often approximate
$$ int_{X-h/2}^{X+h/2} phi(x) dx approx h phi(X)$$
just because it's simpler.
$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$
In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?
Yes. Of course, in that case the correction is (probably) less important.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$
Does this look right?
Yes... assuming an IQ values can be any integer (which seems to be the case).
BTW: to avoid confusions you should use different letters for the real (discrete) random variable, and the one that corresponds to the normal approximation.
However, not using the continiuty correction (just evaluating the normal at $100$) is often also fine. That is, if $phi(x)$ is the normal density, we often approximate
$$ int_{X-h/2}^{X+h/2} phi(x) dx approx h phi(X)$$
just because it's simpler.
$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$
In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?
Yes. Of course, in that case the correction is (probably) less important.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$
Does this look right?
Yes... assuming an IQ values can be any integer (which seems to be the case).
BTW: to avoid confusions you should use different letters for the real (discrete) random variable, and the one that corresponds to the normal approximation.
However, not using the continiuty correction (just evaluating the normal at $100$) is often also fine. That is, if $phi(x)$ is the normal density, we often approximate
$$ int_{X-h/2}^{X+h/2} phi(x) dx approx h phi(X)$$
just because it's simpler.
$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$
In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?
Yes. Of course, in that case the correction is (probably) less important.
$endgroup$
$P(X = 100) rightarrow P(99.5 < X < 100.5)$
Does this look right?
Yes... assuming an IQ values can be any integer (which seems to be the case).
BTW: to avoid confusions you should use different letters for the real (discrete) random variable, and the one that corresponds to the normal approximation.
However, not using the continiuty correction (just evaluating the normal at $100$) is often also fine. That is, if $phi(x)$ is the normal density, we often approximate
$$ int_{X-h/2}^{X+h/2} phi(x) dx approx h phi(X)$$
just because it's simpler.
$P(X geq 130) rightarrow P(X > 129.5)$
In other words, do we correct for continuity every time equality is involved?
Yes. Of course, in that case the correction is (probably) less important.
answered Jan 9 at 3:52
leonbloyleonbloy
41.3k645107
41.3k645107
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067044%2fusing-the-normal-distribution-to-find-the-probability-of-getting-an-exact-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
If $X$ has a continuous distribution, then $P(X=x)=0$ for any $x$. There are no point mass for a continuous random variable.
$endgroup$
– Just_to_Answer
Jan 9 at 3:52