Let $mathfrak{A}$ be a ordered field and $mathfrak{X}$ be the smallest subfield of $mathfrak{A}$. Is $X$...
$begingroup$
Let $mathfrak{A}=langle A,<,+,cdot,0',1' rangle$ be an ordered field and $mathfrak{X}=langle X,<,+,cdot,0',1' rangle$ be the smallest subfield of $mathfrak{A}$.
It is well-known that $mathfrak{X}$ is uniquely isomorphic to $langle Bbb Q,<,+,cdot,0,1 rangle$ where $Bbb Q$ is the set of rationals.
I would like to ask if $X$ is dense in $A$.
Thank you for your help!
ordered-fields
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mathfrak{A}=langle A,<,+,cdot,0',1' rangle$ be an ordered field and $mathfrak{X}=langle X,<,+,cdot,0',1' rangle$ be the smallest subfield of $mathfrak{A}$.
It is well-known that $mathfrak{X}$ is uniquely isomorphic to $langle Bbb Q,<,+,cdot,0,1 rangle$ where $Bbb Q$ is the set of rationals.
I would like to ask if $X$ is dense in $A$.
Thank you for your help!
ordered-fields
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mathfrak{A}=langle A,<,+,cdot,0',1' rangle$ be an ordered field and $mathfrak{X}=langle X,<,+,cdot,0',1' rangle$ be the smallest subfield of $mathfrak{A}$.
It is well-known that $mathfrak{X}$ is uniquely isomorphic to $langle Bbb Q,<,+,cdot,0,1 rangle$ where $Bbb Q$ is the set of rationals.
I would like to ask if $X$ is dense in $A$.
Thank you for your help!
ordered-fields
$endgroup$
Let $mathfrak{A}=langle A,<,+,cdot,0',1' rangle$ be an ordered field and $mathfrak{X}=langle X,<,+,cdot,0',1' rangle$ be the smallest subfield of $mathfrak{A}$.
It is well-known that $mathfrak{X}$ is uniquely isomorphic to $langle Bbb Q,<,+,cdot,0,1 rangle$ where $Bbb Q$ is the set of rationals.
I would like to ask if $X$ is dense in $A$.
Thank you for your help!
ordered-fields
ordered-fields
asked Jan 9 at 4:20
Le Anh DungLe Anh Dung
1,2471621
1,2471621
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Well, no. In brief, we can make an ordered field out of rational functions with real coefficients. A rational function is called positive if its value is positive for all sufficiently large positive $x$
I'm looking up some details, give me a minute.
Added: yes, I got it right, Proposition 18.1, pages 158-159 in Hartshorne, Geometry: Euclid and Beyond
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I gave you not only 1 minute but also +1 vote ^^
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:28
$begingroup$
Hi @Will. If $mathfrak{A}$ is a complete ordered field, then $X$ is dense in $A$. Is it right?
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:33
2
$begingroup$
@LeAnhDung en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordered_field " Any Dedekind-complete ordered field is isomorphic to the real numbers."
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 9 at 4:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
There are ordered fields of arbitrary high cardinality.
Every field has a countable subfield. (Therefore, its smallest subfield is countable.)
If a totally ordered set has a countable dense subset, then its cardinality is at most $2^{aleph_0}$. (Call the ordered set $A$ and the countable dense subset $Q$; then the map $amapsto{qin Q:qlt a}$ is an injection from $A$ to the power set of $Q$.)
Hence any ordered field of cardinality greater than $2^{aleph_0}$ is a counterexample.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your great insight!
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 5:10
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067060%2flet-mathfraka-be-a-ordered-field-and-mathfrakx-be-the-smallest-subfiel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Well, no. In brief, we can make an ordered field out of rational functions with real coefficients. A rational function is called positive if its value is positive for all sufficiently large positive $x$
I'm looking up some details, give me a minute.
Added: yes, I got it right, Proposition 18.1, pages 158-159 in Hartshorne, Geometry: Euclid and Beyond
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I gave you not only 1 minute but also +1 vote ^^
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:28
$begingroup$
Hi @Will. If $mathfrak{A}$ is a complete ordered field, then $X$ is dense in $A$. Is it right?
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:33
2
$begingroup$
@LeAnhDung en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordered_field " Any Dedekind-complete ordered field is isomorphic to the real numbers."
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 9 at 4:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, no. In brief, we can make an ordered field out of rational functions with real coefficients. A rational function is called positive if its value is positive for all sufficiently large positive $x$
I'm looking up some details, give me a minute.
Added: yes, I got it right, Proposition 18.1, pages 158-159 in Hartshorne, Geometry: Euclid and Beyond
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I gave you not only 1 minute but also +1 vote ^^
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:28
$begingroup$
Hi @Will. If $mathfrak{A}$ is a complete ordered field, then $X$ is dense in $A$. Is it right?
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:33
2
$begingroup$
@LeAnhDung en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordered_field " Any Dedekind-complete ordered field is isomorphic to the real numbers."
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 9 at 4:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, no. In brief, we can make an ordered field out of rational functions with real coefficients. A rational function is called positive if its value is positive for all sufficiently large positive $x$
I'm looking up some details, give me a minute.
Added: yes, I got it right, Proposition 18.1, pages 158-159 in Hartshorne, Geometry: Euclid and Beyond
$endgroup$
Well, no. In brief, we can make an ordered field out of rational functions with real coefficients. A rational function is called positive if its value is positive for all sufficiently large positive $x$
I'm looking up some details, give me a minute.
Added: yes, I got it right, Proposition 18.1, pages 158-159 in Hartshorne, Geometry: Euclid and Beyond
edited Jan 9 at 4:29
answered Jan 9 at 4:26
Will JagyWill Jagy
103k5102200
103k5102200
$begingroup$
I gave you not only 1 minute but also +1 vote ^^
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:28
$begingroup$
Hi @Will. If $mathfrak{A}$ is a complete ordered field, then $X$ is dense in $A$. Is it right?
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:33
2
$begingroup$
@LeAnhDung en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordered_field " Any Dedekind-complete ordered field is isomorphic to the real numbers."
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 9 at 4:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I gave you not only 1 minute but also +1 vote ^^
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:28
$begingroup$
Hi @Will. If $mathfrak{A}$ is a complete ordered field, then $X$ is dense in $A$. Is it right?
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:33
2
$begingroup$
@LeAnhDung en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordered_field " Any Dedekind-complete ordered field is isomorphic to the real numbers."
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 9 at 4:39
$begingroup$
I gave you not only 1 minute but also +1 vote ^^
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:28
$begingroup$
I gave you not only 1 minute but also +1 vote ^^
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:28
$begingroup$
Hi @Will. If $mathfrak{A}$ is a complete ordered field, then $X$ is dense in $A$. Is it right?
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:33
$begingroup$
Hi @Will. If $mathfrak{A}$ is a complete ordered field, then $X$ is dense in $A$. Is it right?
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 4:33
2
2
$begingroup$
@LeAnhDung en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordered_field " Any Dedekind-complete ordered field is isomorphic to the real numbers."
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 9 at 4:39
$begingroup$
@LeAnhDung en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordered_field " Any Dedekind-complete ordered field is isomorphic to the real numbers."
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 9 at 4:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
There are ordered fields of arbitrary high cardinality.
Every field has a countable subfield. (Therefore, its smallest subfield is countable.)
If a totally ordered set has a countable dense subset, then its cardinality is at most $2^{aleph_0}$. (Call the ordered set $A$ and the countable dense subset $Q$; then the map $amapsto{qin Q:qlt a}$ is an injection from $A$ to the power set of $Q$.)
Hence any ordered field of cardinality greater than $2^{aleph_0}$ is a counterexample.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your great insight!
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 5:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
There are ordered fields of arbitrary high cardinality.
Every field has a countable subfield. (Therefore, its smallest subfield is countable.)
If a totally ordered set has a countable dense subset, then its cardinality is at most $2^{aleph_0}$. (Call the ordered set $A$ and the countable dense subset $Q$; then the map $amapsto{qin Q:qlt a}$ is an injection from $A$ to the power set of $Q$.)
Hence any ordered field of cardinality greater than $2^{aleph_0}$ is a counterexample.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your great insight!
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 5:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
There are ordered fields of arbitrary high cardinality.
Every field has a countable subfield. (Therefore, its smallest subfield is countable.)
If a totally ordered set has a countable dense subset, then its cardinality is at most $2^{aleph_0}$. (Call the ordered set $A$ and the countable dense subset $Q$; then the map $amapsto{qin Q:qlt a}$ is an injection from $A$ to the power set of $Q$.)
Hence any ordered field of cardinality greater than $2^{aleph_0}$ is a counterexample.
$endgroup$
No.
There are ordered fields of arbitrary high cardinality.
Every field has a countable subfield. (Therefore, its smallest subfield is countable.)
If a totally ordered set has a countable dense subset, then its cardinality is at most $2^{aleph_0}$. (Call the ordered set $A$ and the countable dense subset $Q$; then the map $amapsto{qin Q:qlt a}$ is an injection from $A$ to the power set of $Q$.)
Hence any ordered field of cardinality greater than $2^{aleph_0}$ is a counterexample.
answered Jan 9 at 4:41
bofbof
52.1k558121
52.1k558121
$begingroup$
Thank you for your great insight!
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 5:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for your great insight!
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 5:10
$begingroup$
Thank you for your great insight!
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 5:10
$begingroup$
Thank you for your great insight!
$endgroup$
– Le Anh Dung
Jan 9 at 5:10
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067060%2flet-mathfraka-be-a-ordered-field-and-mathfrakx-be-the-smallest-subfiel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown