How good is this bound?
$begingroup$
Suppose we have two events $A, B subset Omega$ in a probability space $(Omega, mathcal{F}, mathbf{P})$ and we want to know the probability of $A cap B$.
If $A$ and $B$ are independent, of course $mathbf{P}(A cap B) = mathbf{P}(A)mathbf{P}(B)$.
However, what can we say without independence? It seems that with Cauchy-Schwarz we have that
$$
mathbf{P}(A cap B) = mathbf{E} 1_A 1_B leq sqrt{mathbf{P}(A) mathbf{P}(B)}.
$$
Is this a good bound? Is it useful? That's a soft question, but I guess I am wondering if it is really useful at all.
probability-theory soft-question
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we have two events $A, B subset Omega$ in a probability space $(Omega, mathcal{F}, mathbf{P})$ and we want to know the probability of $A cap B$.
If $A$ and $B$ are independent, of course $mathbf{P}(A cap B) = mathbf{P}(A)mathbf{P}(B)$.
However, what can we say without independence? It seems that with Cauchy-Schwarz we have that
$$
mathbf{P}(A cap B) = mathbf{E} 1_A 1_B leq sqrt{mathbf{P}(A) mathbf{P}(B)}.
$$
Is this a good bound? Is it useful? That's a soft question, but I guess I am wondering if it is really useful at all.
probability-theory soft-question
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we have two events $A, B subset Omega$ in a probability space $(Omega, mathcal{F}, mathbf{P})$ and we want to know the probability of $A cap B$.
If $A$ and $B$ are independent, of course $mathbf{P}(A cap B) = mathbf{P}(A)mathbf{P}(B)$.
However, what can we say without independence? It seems that with Cauchy-Schwarz we have that
$$
mathbf{P}(A cap B) = mathbf{E} 1_A 1_B leq sqrt{mathbf{P}(A) mathbf{P}(B)}.
$$
Is this a good bound? Is it useful? That's a soft question, but I guess I am wondering if it is really useful at all.
probability-theory soft-question
$endgroup$
Suppose we have two events $A, B subset Omega$ in a probability space $(Omega, mathcal{F}, mathbf{P})$ and we want to know the probability of $A cap B$.
If $A$ and $B$ are independent, of course $mathbf{P}(A cap B) = mathbf{P}(A)mathbf{P}(B)$.
However, what can we say without independence? It seems that with Cauchy-Schwarz we have that
$$
mathbf{P}(A cap B) = mathbf{E} 1_A 1_B leq sqrt{mathbf{P}(A) mathbf{P}(B)}.
$$
Is this a good bound? Is it useful? That's a soft question, but I guess I am wondering if it is really useful at all.
probability-theory soft-question
probability-theory soft-question
edited Jan 3 at 4:52
Drew Brady
asked Jan 3 at 4:45
Drew BradyDrew Brady
712315
712315
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This bound is not really useful because $min({bf P}(A), {bf P}(B))$ is better. Note that $$sqrt{{bf P}(A) {bf P}(B)} ge min({bf P}(A),{bf P}(B)) ge {bf P}(A cap B)$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Fair. Recording another thought here, in case others find it useful: you might ask, okay what if $1 < p < infty$, $q$ solves $1/p + 1/q = 1$? Holder's inequality also gives you the bound $mathbf{P}(A cap B) leq mathbf{P}(A)^{1/p} mathbf{P}(B)^{1/q}$, but a similar argument above holds; this is also not useful.
$endgroup$
– Drew Brady
Jan 3 at 6:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060262%2fhow-good-is-this-bound%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This bound is not really useful because $min({bf P}(A), {bf P}(B))$ is better. Note that $$sqrt{{bf P}(A) {bf P}(B)} ge min({bf P}(A),{bf P}(B)) ge {bf P}(A cap B)$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Fair. Recording another thought here, in case others find it useful: you might ask, okay what if $1 < p < infty$, $q$ solves $1/p + 1/q = 1$? Holder's inequality also gives you the bound $mathbf{P}(A cap B) leq mathbf{P}(A)^{1/p} mathbf{P}(B)^{1/q}$, but a similar argument above holds; this is also not useful.
$endgroup$
– Drew Brady
Jan 3 at 6:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This bound is not really useful because $min({bf P}(A), {bf P}(B))$ is better. Note that $$sqrt{{bf P}(A) {bf P}(B)} ge min({bf P}(A),{bf P}(B)) ge {bf P}(A cap B)$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Fair. Recording another thought here, in case others find it useful: you might ask, okay what if $1 < p < infty$, $q$ solves $1/p + 1/q = 1$? Holder's inequality also gives you the bound $mathbf{P}(A cap B) leq mathbf{P}(A)^{1/p} mathbf{P}(B)^{1/q}$, but a similar argument above holds; this is also not useful.
$endgroup$
– Drew Brady
Jan 3 at 6:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This bound is not really useful because $min({bf P}(A), {bf P}(B))$ is better. Note that $$sqrt{{bf P}(A) {bf P}(B)} ge min({bf P}(A),{bf P}(B)) ge {bf P}(A cap B)$$
$endgroup$
This bound is not really useful because $min({bf P}(A), {bf P}(B))$ is better. Note that $$sqrt{{bf P}(A) {bf P}(B)} ge min({bf P}(A),{bf P}(B)) ge {bf P}(A cap B)$$
answered Jan 3 at 4:57
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
321k23210462
321k23210462
$begingroup$
Fair. Recording another thought here, in case others find it useful: you might ask, okay what if $1 < p < infty$, $q$ solves $1/p + 1/q = 1$? Holder's inequality also gives you the bound $mathbf{P}(A cap B) leq mathbf{P}(A)^{1/p} mathbf{P}(B)^{1/q}$, but a similar argument above holds; this is also not useful.
$endgroup$
– Drew Brady
Jan 3 at 6:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Fair. Recording another thought here, in case others find it useful: you might ask, okay what if $1 < p < infty$, $q$ solves $1/p + 1/q = 1$? Holder's inequality also gives you the bound $mathbf{P}(A cap B) leq mathbf{P}(A)^{1/p} mathbf{P}(B)^{1/q}$, but a similar argument above holds; this is also not useful.
$endgroup$
– Drew Brady
Jan 3 at 6:47
$begingroup$
Fair. Recording another thought here, in case others find it useful: you might ask, okay what if $1 < p < infty$, $q$ solves $1/p + 1/q = 1$? Holder's inequality also gives you the bound $mathbf{P}(A cap B) leq mathbf{P}(A)^{1/p} mathbf{P}(B)^{1/q}$, but a similar argument above holds; this is also not useful.
$endgroup$
– Drew Brady
Jan 3 at 6:47
$begingroup$
Fair. Recording another thought here, in case others find it useful: you might ask, okay what if $1 < p < infty$, $q$ solves $1/p + 1/q = 1$? Holder's inequality also gives you the bound $mathbf{P}(A cap B) leq mathbf{P}(A)^{1/p} mathbf{P}(B)^{1/q}$, but a similar argument above holds; this is also not useful.
$endgroup$
– Drew Brady
Jan 3 at 6:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060262%2fhow-good-is-this-bound%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown