Square Inches vs Inches Squared












1












$begingroup$


I was just asked the question, is there a difference between 12 square inches and 12 inches squared. At first I assumed that 12 inches squared mean a square with sides of 12 inches. In this case the answer would be no. 12 inches squared would be 144 square inches. I've been searching the web for quite a long time for what is meant by 12 inches squared. I can't find anything. Is there some formal use for the phrase "inches squared"?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, 12 inches squared is 144 square inches; 12 square inches could be a square Sqrt(12) along the sides.
    $endgroup$
    – user117644
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:12










  • $begingroup$
    I would contend that they are the same, with the caveat that the phrasing "12 inches, squared", emphasis on the comma, implies what @mistermarko suggests. I see the terminology used interchangeably, often depending on the speaker's native language.
    $endgroup$
    – Emily
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:21










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, it kind of hit me that 12 inches squared means 12 inches × 12 inches. The term in my industry is used in as jargon. I should have known that 12 inches squared literally meant 12 inches squared. Couldn't see the forest for the trees. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Jordan
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:21










  • $begingroup$
    @Arkamis, yeah, these people are confusing as hell! Don't get me started on what they mean by 100 thousandths. Hint, it's not 0.0001.
    $endgroup$
    – Jordan
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:23










  • $begingroup$
    I will also note that the interpretation that "12 inches squared" means "a square 12 inches on a side" only really makes sense in any context in which you actually expect a square -- such as manufacturing or something. It doesn't make any difference if you are talking about pressure, for instance: "fill the tire to 30 pounds per inches squared" is unambiguous, as the meaning is clear and you don't need to find any nice happy squares in your tire.
    $endgroup$
    – Emily
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:26
















1












$begingroup$


I was just asked the question, is there a difference between 12 square inches and 12 inches squared. At first I assumed that 12 inches squared mean a square with sides of 12 inches. In this case the answer would be no. 12 inches squared would be 144 square inches. I've been searching the web for quite a long time for what is meant by 12 inches squared. I can't find anything. Is there some formal use for the phrase "inches squared"?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, 12 inches squared is 144 square inches; 12 square inches could be a square Sqrt(12) along the sides.
    $endgroup$
    – user117644
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:12










  • $begingroup$
    I would contend that they are the same, with the caveat that the phrasing "12 inches, squared", emphasis on the comma, implies what @mistermarko suggests. I see the terminology used interchangeably, often depending on the speaker's native language.
    $endgroup$
    – Emily
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:21










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, it kind of hit me that 12 inches squared means 12 inches × 12 inches. The term in my industry is used in as jargon. I should have known that 12 inches squared literally meant 12 inches squared. Couldn't see the forest for the trees. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Jordan
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:21










  • $begingroup$
    @Arkamis, yeah, these people are confusing as hell! Don't get me started on what they mean by 100 thousandths. Hint, it's not 0.0001.
    $endgroup$
    – Jordan
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:23










  • $begingroup$
    I will also note that the interpretation that "12 inches squared" means "a square 12 inches on a side" only really makes sense in any context in which you actually expect a square -- such as manufacturing or something. It doesn't make any difference if you are talking about pressure, for instance: "fill the tire to 30 pounds per inches squared" is unambiguous, as the meaning is clear and you don't need to find any nice happy squares in your tire.
    $endgroup$
    – Emily
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:26














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I was just asked the question, is there a difference between 12 square inches and 12 inches squared. At first I assumed that 12 inches squared mean a square with sides of 12 inches. In this case the answer would be no. 12 inches squared would be 144 square inches. I've been searching the web for quite a long time for what is meant by 12 inches squared. I can't find anything. Is there some formal use for the phrase "inches squared"?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I was just asked the question, is there a difference between 12 square inches and 12 inches squared. At first I assumed that 12 inches squared mean a square with sides of 12 inches. In this case the answer would be no. 12 inches squared would be 144 square inches. I've been searching the web for quite a long time for what is meant by 12 inches squared. I can't find anything. Is there some formal use for the phrase "inches squared"?







unit-of-measure






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Sep 16 '14 at 15:09









JordanJordan

123117




123117












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, 12 inches squared is 144 square inches; 12 square inches could be a square Sqrt(12) along the sides.
    $endgroup$
    – user117644
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:12










  • $begingroup$
    I would contend that they are the same, with the caveat that the phrasing "12 inches, squared", emphasis on the comma, implies what @mistermarko suggests. I see the terminology used interchangeably, often depending on the speaker's native language.
    $endgroup$
    – Emily
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:21










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, it kind of hit me that 12 inches squared means 12 inches × 12 inches. The term in my industry is used in as jargon. I should have known that 12 inches squared literally meant 12 inches squared. Couldn't see the forest for the trees. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Jordan
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:21










  • $begingroup$
    @Arkamis, yeah, these people are confusing as hell! Don't get me started on what they mean by 100 thousandths. Hint, it's not 0.0001.
    $endgroup$
    – Jordan
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:23










  • $begingroup$
    I will also note that the interpretation that "12 inches squared" means "a square 12 inches on a side" only really makes sense in any context in which you actually expect a square -- such as manufacturing or something. It doesn't make any difference if you are talking about pressure, for instance: "fill the tire to 30 pounds per inches squared" is unambiguous, as the meaning is clear and you don't need to find any nice happy squares in your tire.
    $endgroup$
    – Emily
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:26


















  • $begingroup$
    Yes, 12 inches squared is 144 square inches; 12 square inches could be a square Sqrt(12) along the sides.
    $endgroup$
    – user117644
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:12










  • $begingroup$
    I would contend that they are the same, with the caveat that the phrasing "12 inches, squared", emphasis on the comma, implies what @mistermarko suggests. I see the terminology used interchangeably, often depending on the speaker's native language.
    $endgroup$
    – Emily
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:21










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, it kind of hit me that 12 inches squared means 12 inches × 12 inches. The term in my industry is used in as jargon. I should have known that 12 inches squared literally meant 12 inches squared. Couldn't see the forest for the trees. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Jordan
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:21










  • $begingroup$
    @Arkamis, yeah, these people are confusing as hell! Don't get me started on what they mean by 100 thousandths. Hint, it's not 0.0001.
    $endgroup$
    – Jordan
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:23










  • $begingroup$
    I will also note that the interpretation that "12 inches squared" means "a square 12 inches on a side" only really makes sense in any context in which you actually expect a square -- such as manufacturing or something. It doesn't make any difference if you are talking about pressure, for instance: "fill the tire to 30 pounds per inches squared" is unambiguous, as the meaning is clear and you don't need to find any nice happy squares in your tire.
    $endgroup$
    – Emily
    Sep 16 '14 at 15:26
















$begingroup$
Yes, 12 inches squared is 144 square inches; 12 square inches could be a square Sqrt(12) along the sides.
$endgroup$
– user117644
Sep 16 '14 at 15:12




$begingroup$
Yes, 12 inches squared is 144 square inches; 12 square inches could be a square Sqrt(12) along the sides.
$endgroup$
– user117644
Sep 16 '14 at 15:12












$begingroup$
I would contend that they are the same, with the caveat that the phrasing "12 inches, squared", emphasis on the comma, implies what @mistermarko suggests. I see the terminology used interchangeably, often depending on the speaker's native language.
$endgroup$
– Emily
Sep 16 '14 at 15:21




$begingroup$
I would contend that they are the same, with the caveat that the phrasing "12 inches, squared", emphasis on the comma, implies what @mistermarko suggests. I see the terminology used interchangeably, often depending on the speaker's native language.
$endgroup$
– Emily
Sep 16 '14 at 15:21












$begingroup$
Yeah, it kind of hit me that 12 inches squared means 12 inches × 12 inches. The term in my industry is used in as jargon. I should have known that 12 inches squared literally meant 12 inches squared. Couldn't see the forest for the trees. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Jordan
Sep 16 '14 at 15:21




$begingroup$
Yeah, it kind of hit me that 12 inches squared means 12 inches × 12 inches. The term in my industry is used in as jargon. I should have known that 12 inches squared literally meant 12 inches squared. Couldn't see the forest for the trees. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Jordan
Sep 16 '14 at 15:21












$begingroup$
@Arkamis, yeah, these people are confusing as hell! Don't get me started on what they mean by 100 thousandths. Hint, it's not 0.0001.
$endgroup$
– Jordan
Sep 16 '14 at 15:23




$begingroup$
@Arkamis, yeah, these people are confusing as hell! Don't get me started on what they mean by 100 thousandths. Hint, it's not 0.0001.
$endgroup$
– Jordan
Sep 16 '14 at 15:23












$begingroup$
I will also note that the interpretation that "12 inches squared" means "a square 12 inches on a side" only really makes sense in any context in which you actually expect a square -- such as manufacturing or something. It doesn't make any difference if you are talking about pressure, for instance: "fill the tire to 30 pounds per inches squared" is unambiguous, as the meaning is clear and you don't need to find any nice happy squares in your tire.
$endgroup$
– Emily
Sep 16 '14 at 15:26




$begingroup$
I will also note that the interpretation that "12 inches squared" means "a square 12 inches on a side" only really makes sense in any context in which you actually expect a square -- such as manufacturing or something. It doesn't make any difference if you are talking about pressure, for instance: "fill the tire to 30 pounds per inches squared" is unambiguous, as the meaning is clear and you don't need to find any nice happy squares in your tire.
$endgroup$
– Emily
Sep 16 '14 at 15:26










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

In a context in which you actually expect a square -- such as manufacturing -- one can naturally interpret "12 inches square[d]" as "a square 12 inches on a side". This would be the area of $144$ square inches.



In other context, "inches squared" may be used synonymously with "square inches". This may also depend on the speaker's native language.





Based on comments by Arkamis






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Dr. Math from the Math Forum gives a pretty good explanation here:




    It's written as $12 m^2$ (that is, with an exponent of 2), but is better
    read as "12 square meters" than as "12 meters squared."



    The reason for this is as you say, that the latter sounds as if it
    means $(12 m)^2$, the square of 12 meters, rather than $12 (m^2)$, as it
    really is, 12 times one meter squared.



    The fact is, however, that you will find both forms used; I think it
    is generally agreed that "12 square meters" is better, in order to
    avoid that problem, but both are "correct." That is, the problem is
    not that "12 meters squared" MEANS the area of a 12-meter square, but
    that it can be taken either way, and is thus ambiguous. We simply want
    to avoid the ambiguity.







    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Also important to note, m here is not a variable. It is a unit. The ² is part of the unit not the degree of an unknown. It's not like ƒ(m) = 12m². This isn't algebra per se.
      $endgroup$
      – Jordan
      Jan 15 at 20:08





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Inches squared is right. Square inches is wrong






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      It depends on the context. A 3" by 4" rectangle would be 12 square inches in area. A 12" by 12" rectangle would be 12 inches squared. Completely different areas so they refer to completely different things, but they are both valid.
      $endgroup$
      – Jordan
      Feb 8 '17 at 16:23



















    -1












    $begingroup$

    I always understood the “squared” part of __inches squared was pertaining to the inch itself, not the quantity of inches. An inch squared is a 1” x 1” square, not a linear one dimensional inch.
    That’s why 12 inches squared is 12 square inches, whether 6x2, 3x4, or 12x1.



    Taken literally, 12 inches squared would simply be a linear 144” and in no way refer to area. Then it would be written 12^2 inches, not 12”^2.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f933745%2fsquare-inches-vs-inches-squared%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      In a context in which you actually expect a square -- such as manufacturing -- one can naturally interpret "12 inches square[d]" as "a square 12 inches on a side". This would be the area of $144$ square inches.



      In other context, "inches squared" may be used synonymously with "square inches". This may also depend on the speaker's native language.





      Based on comments by Arkamis






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        In a context in which you actually expect a square -- such as manufacturing -- one can naturally interpret "12 inches square[d]" as "a square 12 inches on a side". This would be the area of $144$ square inches.



        In other context, "inches squared" may be used synonymously with "square inches". This may also depend on the speaker's native language.





        Based on comments by Arkamis






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          In a context in which you actually expect a square -- such as manufacturing -- one can naturally interpret "12 inches square[d]" as "a square 12 inches on a side". This would be the area of $144$ square inches.



          In other context, "inches squared" may be used synonymously with "square inches". This may also depend on the speaker's native language.





          Based on comments by Arkamis






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          In a context in which you actually expect a square -- such as manufacturing -- one can naturally interpret "12 inches square[d]" as "a square 12 inches on a side". This would be the area of $144$ square inches.



          In other context, "inches squared" may be used synonymously with "square inches". This may also depend on the speaker's native language.





          Based on comments by Arkamis







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21


























          community wiki





          2 revs
          user147263
























              1












              $begingroup$

              Dr. Math from the Math Forum gives a pretty good explanation here:




              It's written as $12 m^2$ (that is, with an exponent of 2), but is better
              read as "12 square meters" than as "12 meters squared."



              The reason for this is as you say, that the latter sounds as if it
              means $(12 m)^2$, the square of 12 meters, rather than $12 (m^2)$, as it
              really is, 12 times one meter squared.



              The fact is, however, that you will find both forms used; I think it
              is generally agreed that "12 square meters" is better, in order to
              avoid that problem, but both are "correct." That is, the problem is
              not that "12 meters squared" MEANS the area of a 12-meter square, but
              that it can be taken either way, and is thus ambiguous. We simply want
              to avoid the ambiguity.







              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Also important to note, m here is not a variable. It is a unit. The ² is part of the unit not the degree of an unknown. It's not like ƒ(m) = 12m². This isn't algebra per se.
                $endgroup$
                – Jordan
                Jan 15 at 20:08


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Dr. Math from the Math Forum gives a pretty good explanation here:




              It's written as $12 m^2$ (that is, with an exponent of 2), but is better
              read as "12 square meters" than as "12 meters squared."



              The reason for this is as you say, that the latter sounds as if it
              means $(12 m)^2$, the square of 12 meters, rather than $12 (m^2)$, as it
              really is, 12 times one meter squared.



              The fact is, however, that you will find both forms used; I think it
              is generally agreed that "12 square meters" is better, in order to
              avoid that problem, but both are "correct." That is, the problem is
              not that "12 meters squared" MEANS the area of a 12-meter square, but
              that it can be taken either way, and is thus ambiguous. We simply want
              to avoid the ambiguity.







              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Also important to note, m here is not a variable. It is a unit. The ² is part of the unit not the degree of an unknown. It's not like ƒ(m) = 12m². This isn't algebra per se.
                $endgroup$
                – Jordan
                Jan 15 at 20:08
















              1












              1








              1





              $begingroup$

              Dr. Math from the Math Forum gives a pretty good explanation here:




              It's written as $12 m^2$ (that is, with an exponent of 2), but is better
              read as "12 square meters" than as "12 meters squared."



              The reason for this is as you say, that the latter sounds as if it
              means $(12 m)^2$, the square of 12 meters, rather than $12 (m^2)$, as it
              really is, 12 times one meter squared.



              The fact is, however, that you will find both forms used; I think it
              is generally agreed that "12 square meters" is better, in order to
              avoid that problem, but both are "correct." That is, the problem is
              not that "12 meters squared" MEANS the area of a 12-meter square, but
              that it can be taken either way, and is thus ambiguous. We simply want
              to avoid the ambiguity.







              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Dr. Math from the Math Forum gives a pretty good explanation here:




              It's written as $12 m^2$ (that is, with an exponent of 2), but is better
              read as "12 square meters" than as "12 meters squared."



              The reason for this is as you say, that the latter sounds as if it
              means $(12 m)^2$, the square of 12 meters, rather than $12 (m^2)$, as it
              really is, 12 times one meter squared.



              The fact is, however, that you will find both forms used; I think it
              is generally agreed that "12 square meters" is better, in order to
              avoid that problem, but both are "correct." That is, the problem is
              not that "12 meters squared" MEANS the area of a 12-meter square, but
              that it can be taken either way, and is thus ambiguous. We simply want
              to avoid the ambiguity.








              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Jan 14 at 15:42









              johnnyodonnelljohnnyodonnell

              1597




              1597












              • $begingroup$
                Also important to note, m here is not a variable. It is a unit. The ² is part of the unit not the degree of an unknown. It's not like ƒ(m) = 12m². This isn't algebra per se.
                $endgroup$
                – Jordan
                Jan 15 at 20:08




















              • $begingroup$
                Also important to note, m here is not a variable. It is a unit. The ² is part of the unit not the degree of an unknown. It's not like ƒ(m) = 12m². This isn't algebra per se.
                $endgroup$
                – Jordan
                Jan 15 at 20:08


















              $begingroup$
              Also important to note, m here is not a variable. It is a unit. The ² is part of the unit not the degree of an unknown. It's not like ƒ(m) = 12m². This isn't algebra per se.
              $endgroup$
              – Jordan
              Jan 15 at 20:08






              $begingroup$
              Also important to note, m here is not a variable. It is a unit. The ² is part of the unit not the degree of an unknown. It's not like ƒ(m) = 12m². This isn't algebra per se.
              $endgroup$
              – Jordan
              Jan 15 at 20:08













              0












              $begingroup$

              Inches squared is right. Square inches is wrong






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                It depends on the context. A 3" by 4" rectangle would be 12 square inches in area. A 12" by 12" rectangle would be 12 inches squared. Completely different areas so they refer to completely different things, but they are both valid.
                $endgroup$
                – Jordan
                Feb 8 '17 at 16:23
















              0












              $begingroup$

              Inches squared is right. Square inches is wrong






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                It depends on the context. A 3" by 4" rectangle would be 12 square inches in area. A 12" by 12" rectangle would be 12 inches squared. Completely different areas so they refer to completely different things, but they are both valid.
                $endgroup$
                – Jordan
                Feb 8 '17 at 16:23














              0












              0








              0





              $begingroup$

              Inches squared is right. Square inches is wrong






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Inches squared is right. Square inches is wrong







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Feb 6 '17 at 18:36









              XavierXavier

              1




              1












              • $begingroup$
                It depends on the context. A 3" by 4" rectangle would be 12 square inches in area. A 12" by 12" rectangle would be 12 inches squared. Completely different areas so they refer to completely different things, but they are both valid.
                $endgroup$
                – Jordan
                Feb 8 '17 at 16:23


















              • $begingroup$
                It depends on the context. A 3" by 4" rectangle would be 12 square inches in area. A 12" by 12" rectangle would be 12 inches squared. Completely different areas so they refer to completely different things, but they are both valid.
                $endgroup$
                – Jordan
                Feb 8 '17 at 16:23
















              $begingroup$
              It depends on the context. A 3" by 4" rectangle would be 12 square inches in area. A 12" by 12" rectangle would be 12 inches squared. Completely different areas so they refer to completely different things, but they are both valid.
              $endgroup$
              – Jordan
              Feb 8 '17 at 16:23




              $begingroup$
              It depends on the context. A 3" by 4" rectangle would be 12 square inches in area. A 12" by 12" rectangle would be 12 inches squared. Completely different areas so they refer to completely different things, but they are both valid.
              $endgroup$
              – Jordan
              Feb 8 '17 at 16:23











              -1












              $begingroup$

              I always understood the “squared” part of __inches squared was pertaining to the inch itself, not the quantity of inches. An inch squared is a 1” x 1” square, not a linear one dimensional inch.
              That’s why 12 inches squared is 12 square inches, whether 6x2, 3x4, or 12x1.



              Taken literally, 12 inches squared would simply be a linear 144” and in no way refer to area. Then it would be written 12^2 inches, not 12”^2.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                -1












                $begingroup$

                I always understood the “squared” part of __inches squared was pertaining to the inch itself, not the quantity of inches. An inch squared is a 1” x 1” square, not a linear one dimensional inch.
                That’s why 12 inches squared is 12 square inches, whether 6x2, 3x4, or 12x1.



                Taken literally, 12 inches squared would simply be a linear 144” and in no way refer to area. Then it would be written 12^2 inches, not 12”^2.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  -1












                  -1








                  -1





                  $begingroup$

                  I always understood the “squared” part of __inches squared was pertaining to the inch itself, not the quantity of inches. An inch squared is a 1” x 1” square, not a linear one dimensional inch.
                  That’s why 12 inches squared is 12 square inches, whether 6x2, 3x4, or 12x1.



                  Taken literally, 12 inches squared would simply be a linear 144” and in no way refer to area. Then it would be written 12^2 inches, not 12”^2.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I always understood the “squared” part of __inches squared was pertaining to the inch itself, not the quantity of inches. An inch squared is a 1” x 1” square, not a linear one dimensional inch.
                  That’s why 12 inches squared is 12 square inches, whether 6x2, 3x4, or 12x1.



                  Taken literally, 12 inches squared would simply be a linear 144” and in no way refer to area. Then it would be written 12^2 inches, not 12”^2.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 11 at 11:27









                  DimsyDimsy

                  1




                  1






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f933745%2fsquare-inches-vs-inches-squared%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Human spaceflight

                      Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                      張江高科駅