How to set default umask in Ubuntu 17.04?
In the past, I have always set umask
at ~/.profile
. I set a umask
of 077
so my documents get a permission of 600 (rw-------)
. But setting this at ~/.profile
no longer works in Ubuntu 17.04.
So as new documents get created in a gnome session on Ubuntu 17.04, where can I configure so that they get created with permission 600?
permissions 17.04 .profile gnome-session umask
add a comment |
In the past, I have always set umask
at ~/.profile
. I set a umask
of 077
so my documents get a permission of 600 (rw-------)
. But setting this at ~/.profile
no longer works in Ubuntu 17.04.
So as new documents get created in a gnome session on Ubuntu 17.04, where can I configure so that they get created with permission 600?
permissions 17.04 .profile gnome-session umask
add a comment |
In the past, I have always set umask
at ~/.profile
. I set a umask
of 077
so my documents get a permission of 600 (rw-------)
. But setting this at ~/.profile
no longer works in Ubuntu 17.04.
So as new documents get created in a gnome session on Ubuntu 17.04, where can I configure so that they get created with permission 600?
permissions 17.04 .profile gnome-session umask
In the past, I have always set umask
at ~/.profile
. I set a umask
of 077
so my documents get a permission of 600 (rw-------)
. But setting this at ~/.profile
no longer works in Ubuntu 17.04.
So as new documents get created in a gnome session on Ubuntu 17.04, where can I configure so that they get created with permission 600?
permissions 17.04 .profile gnome-session umask
permissions 17.04 .profile gnome-session umask
edited Jun 27 '17 at 11:45
Ravexina
32.7k1487113
32.7k1487113
asked Jun 27 '17 at 0:18
G.W.G.W.
3113
3113
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
To set permissions for all directories and files that are created day-forward by any user:
- sudo nano /etc/pam.d/common-session
- Find the line with "session optional pam_umask.so"
- Change this to "session optional pam_umask.so umask=0077"
- Save the file.
- Reboot.
New files will be 600.
New directories will be 700.
add a comment |
If you're using GDM, it doesn't read ~/.profile
like LightDM does. And the terminal normally opens a non-login shell. The net effect is that ~/.profile
is not loaded at all when you open a terminal after logging in using GDM.
Either:
- put your settings in
~/.bashrc
, or - set your terminal to start a login shell, or
- switch to LightDM
Actually I just confirmed his issue on a freshly installed 17.04 version. Has nothing to do with GDM since by default lightDM is still used.
– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:56
OK, so? Did I say his issue doesn't exist?
– muru
Jun 28 '17 at 8:57
add a comment |
# the default umask is set in /etc/profile; for setting the umask
# for ssh logins, install and configure the libpam-umask package.
#umask 022
That's literally what your ~/.profile
says. Did you relogin once changed? It should work fine.
Also:
This file is not read by bash(1), if ~/.bash_profile or ~/.bash_login exists.
Actually confirmed the issue on a freshly installed ubuntu 17.04. Even fully updating still causes this issue to arise and even ~/.bash_profile
is ignored, there seems to be an issue with the command interpreter not reading those files after login.
You can use ~/.bashrc
for now, which still works fine and is read during login.
So after digging a little into it, it seems bash is not run by default with the --login anymore which means it doesn't read the ~/.profile. Starting a new bash with the umask in ~/.profile with bash --login
sets the umask correctly starting a bash without it though ignores the ~/.profile. Not sure what was changed but this seems like a bug to me unless it was intentionally changed.
Yes, I relogged in.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 14:47
And the only ~/.bash files I have are .bashrc, .bash_logout, .bash_history. I ran a find search. .bash_profile and .bash_login do NOT exist on machine.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 16:31
Oh, I'm sorry you are actually right. I just freshly installed a 17.04 to test it on a new installation and it actually isn't read from ~/.profile for some reason. I haven't digged into it yet. But you can add your umask into~/.bashrc
for now this is still read during startup.
– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:36
Ziazis, setting umask in .bashrc only works for docs created in terminal. I'm looking to get umask applied for example from doc created in gedit. You have found a fix withbash -login
? How do I implement this exactly? Or is this unfixable until a bug is fixed?
– G.W.
Jun 28 '17 at 14:42
add a comment |
Ubuntu 18.04, should work for 17.04 and others
According to the man pages, there are several places where we can set the umask
for the PAM module to find; it even gives an example. I'll set it in /etc/pam.d/login
. Note this file does not exist on my version of Ubuntu, in which case we can create it.
$ sudo sh -c "echo 'session optional pam_umask.so umask=0027' >> /etc/default/login"
$ more /etc/default/login
session optional pam_umask.so umask=0027
Evil Bug
Now if we restart and ask for the umask in the terminal we still get 0022
and not the 0027
that was set. See Bug #1685754.
But if we open an application, for example the Text Editor, and save a file we'll notice the new umask is set correctly. Open it from the menu, not from the terminal as it seems to pick up the (bad) umask
from the terminal.
$ touch terminal-file
$ ls -l
-rw-r----- 1 daniel daniel 0 jan 28 21:21 gedit-file
-rw-r--r-- 1 daniel daniel 0 jan 28 21:22 terminal-file
References
- Ubuntu Manpage for
pam_umask
- Bug #1685754, since 17.04
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f929439%2fhow-to-set-default-umask-in-ubuntu-17-04%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
To set permissions for all directories and files that are created day-forward by any user:
- sudo nano /etc/pam.d/common-session
- Find the line with "session optional pam_umask.so"
- Change this to "session optional pam_umask.so umask=0077"
- Save the file.
- Reboot.
New files will be 600.
New directories will be 700.
add a comment |
To set permissions for all directories and files that are created day-forward by any user:
- sudo nano /etc/pam.d/common-session
- Find the line with "session optional pam_umask.so"
- Change this to "session optional pam_umask.so umask=0077"
- Save the file.
- Reboot.
New files will be 600.
New directories will be 700.
add a comment |
To set permissions for all directories and files that are created day-forward by any user:
- sudo nano /etc/pam.d/common-session
- Find the line with "session optional pam_umask.so"
- Change this to "session optional pam_umask.so umask=0077"
- Save the file.
- Reboot.
New files will be 600.
New directories will be 700.
To set permissions for all directories and files that are created day-forward by any user:
- sudo nano /etc/pam.d/common-session
- Find the line with "session optional pam_umask.so"
- Change this to "session optional pam_umask.so umask=0077"
- Save the file.
- Reboot.
New files will be 600.
New directories will be 700.
answered Jun 28 '17 at 19:07
TooManyPetsTooManyPets
30116
30116
add a comment |
add a comment |
If you're using GDM, it doesn't read ~/.profile
like LightDM does. And the terminal normally opens a non-login shell. The net effect is that ~/.profile
is not loaded at all when you open a terminal after logging in using GDM.
Either:
- put your settings in
~/.bashrc
, or - set your terminal to start a login shell, or
- switch to LightDM
Actually I just confirmed his issue on a freshly installed 17.04 version. Has nothing to do with GDM since by default lightDM is still used.
– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:56
OK, so? Did I say his issue doesn't exist?
– muru
Jun 28 '17 at 8:57
add a comment |
If you're using GDM, it doesn't read ~/.profile
like LightDM does. And the terminal normally opens a non-login shell. The net effect is that ~/.profile
is not loaded at all when you open a terminal after logging in using GDM.
Either:
- put your settings in
~/.bashrc
, or - set your terminal to start a login shell, or
- switch to LightDM
Actually I just confirmed his issue on a freshly installed 17.04 version. Has nothing to do with GDM since by default lightDM is still used.
– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:56
OK, so? Did I say his issue doesn't exist?
– muru
Jun 28 '17 at 8:57
add a comment |
If you're using GDM, it doesn't read ~/.profile
like LightDM does. And the terminal normally opens a non-login shell. The net effect is that ~/.profile
is not loaded at all when you open a terminal after logging in using GDM.
Either:
- put your settings in
~/.bashrc
, or - set your terminal to start a login shell, or
- switch to LightDM
If you're using GDM, it doesn't read ~/.profile
like LightDM does. And the terminal normally opens a non-login shell. The net effect is that ~/.profile
is not loaded at all when you open a terminal after logging in using GDM.
Either:
- put your settings in
~/.bashrc
, or - set your terminal to start a login shell, or
- switch to LightDM
answered Jun 28 '17 at 8:41
murumuru
1
1
Actually I just confirmed his issue on a freshly installed 17.04 version. Has nothing to do with GDM since by default lightDM is still used.
– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:56
OK, so? Did I say his issue doesn't exist?
– muru
Jun 28 '17 at 8:57
add a comment |
Actually I just confirmed his issue on a freshly installed 17.04 version. Has nothing to do with GDM since by default lightDM is still used.
– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:56
OK, so? Did I say his issue doesn't exist?
– muru
Jun 28 '17 at 8:57
Actually I just confirmed his issue on a freshly installed 17.04 version. Has nothing to do with GDM since by default lightDM is still used.
– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:56
Actually I just confirmed his issue on a freshly installed 17.04 version. Has nothing to do with GDM since by default lightDM is still used.
– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:56
OK, so? Did I say his issue doesn't exist?
– muru
Jun 28 '17 at 8:57
OK, so? Did I say his issue doesn't exist?
– muru
Jun 28 '17 at 8:57
add a comment |
# the default umask is set in /etc/profile; for setting the umask
# for ssh logins, install and configure the libpam-umask package.
#umask 022
That's literally what your ~/.profile
says. Did you relogin once changed? It should work fine.
Also:
This file is not read by bash(1), if ~/.bash_profile or ~/.bash_login exists.
Actually confirmed the issue on a freshly installed ubuntu 17.04. Even fully updating still causes this issue to arise and even ~/.bash_profile
is ignored, there seems to be an issue with the command interpreter not reading those files after login.
You can use ~/.bashrc
for now, which still works fine and is read during login.
So after digging a little into it, it seems bash is not run by default with the --login anymore which means it doesn't read the ~/.profile. Starting a new bash with the umask in ~/.profile with bash --login
sets the umask correctly starting a bash without it though ignores the ~/.profile. Not sure what was changed but this seems like a bug to me unless it was intentionally changed.
Yes, I relogged in.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 14:47
And the only ~/.bash files I have are .bashrc, .bash_logout, .bash_history. I ran a find search. .bash_profile and .bash_login do NOT exist on machine.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 16:31
Oh, I'm sorry you are actually right. I just freshly installed a 17.04 to test it on a new installation and it actually isn't read from ~/.profile for some reason. I haven't digged into it yet. But you can add your umask into~/.bashrc
for now this is still read during startup.
– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:36
Ziazis, setting umask in .bashrc only works for docs created in terminal. I'm looking to get umask applied for example from doc created in gedit. You have found a fix withbash -login
? How do I implement this exactly? Or is this unfixable until a bug is fixed?
– G.W.
Jun 28 '17 at 14:42
add a comment |
# the default umask is set in /etc/profile; for setting the umask
# for ssh logins, install and configure the libpam-umask package.
#umask 022
That's literally what your ~/.profile
says. Did you relogin once changed? It should work fine.
Also:
This file is not read by bash(1), if ~/.bash_profile or ~/.bash_login exists.
Actually confirmed the issue on a freshly installed ubuntu 17.04. Even fully updating still causes this issue to arise and even ~/.bash_profile
is ignored, there seems to be an issue with the command interpreter not reading those files after login.
You can use ~/.bashrc
for now, which still works fine and is read during login.
So after digging a little into it, it seems bash is not run by default with the --login anymore which means it doesn't read the ~/.profile. Starting a new bash with the umask in ~/.profile with bash --login
sets the umask correctly starting a bash without it though ignores the ~/.profile. Not sure what was changed but this seems like a bug to me unless it was intentionally changed.
Yes, I relogged in.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 14:47
And the only ~/.bash files I have are .bashrc, .bash_logout, .bash_history. I ran a find search. .bash_profile and .bash_login do NOT exist on machine.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 16:31
Oh, I'm sorry you are actually right. I just freshly installed a 17.04 to test it on a new installation and it actually isn't read from ~/.profile for some reason. I haven't digged into it yet. But you can add your umask into~/.bashrc
for now this is still read during startup.
– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:36
Ziazis, setting umask in .bashrc only works for docs created in terminal. I'm looking to get umask applied for example from doc created in gedit. You have found a fix withbash -login
? How do I implement this exactly? Or is this unfixable until a bug is fixed?
– G.W.
Jun 28 '17 at 14:42
add a comment |
# the default umask is set in /etc/profile; for setting the umask
# for ssh logins, install and configure the libpam-umask package.
#umask 022
That's literally what your ~/.profile
says. Did you relogin once changed? It should work fine.
Also:
This file is not read by bash(1), if ~/.bash_profile or ~/.bash_login exists.
Actually confirmed the issue on a freshly installed ubuntu 17.04. Even fully updating still causes this issue to arise and even ~/.bash_profile
is ignored, there seems to be an issue with the command interpreter not reading those files after login.
You can use ~/.bashrc
for now, which still works fine and is read during login.
So after digging a little into it, it seems bash is not run by default with the --login anymore which means it doesn't read the ~/.profile. Starting a new bash with the umask in ~/.profile with bash --login
sets the umask correctly starting a bash without it though ignores the ~/.profile. Not sure what was changed but this seems like a bug to me unless it was intentionally changed.
# the default umask is set in /etc/profile; for setting the umask
# for ssh logins, install and configure the libpam-umask package.
#umask 022
That's literally what your ~/.profile
says. Did you relogin once changed? It should work fine.
Also:
This file is not read by bash(1), if ~/.bash_profile or ~/.bash_login exists.
Actually confirmed the issue on a freshly installed ubuntu 17.04. Even fully updating still causes this issue to arise and even ~/.bash_profile
is ignored, there seems to be an issue with the command interpreter not reading those files after login.
You can use ~/.bashrc
for now, which still works fine and is read during login.
So after digging a little into it, it seems bash is not run by default with the --login anymore which means it doesn't read the ~/.profile. Starting a new bash with the umask in ~/.profile with bash --login
sets the umask correctly starting a bash without it though ignores the ~/.profile. Not sure what was changed but this seems like a bug to me unless it was intentionally changed.
edited Jun 28 '17 at 8:59
answered Jun 27 '17 at 11:04
ZiazisZiazis
1,878419
1,878419
Yes, I relogged in.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 14:47
And the only ~/.bash files I have are .bashrc, .bash_logout, .bash_history. I ran a find search. .bash_profile and .bash_login do NOT exist on machine.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 16:31
Oh, I'm sorry you are actually right. I just freshly installed a 17.04 to test it on a new installation and it actually isn't read from ~/.profile for some reason. I haven't digged into it yet. But you can add your umask into~/.bashrc
for now this is still read during startup.
– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:36
Ziazis, setting umask in .bashrc only works for docs created in terminal. I'm looking to get umask applied for example from doc created in gedit. You have found a fix withbash -login
? How do I implement this exactly? Or is this unfixable until a bug is fixed?
– G.W.
Jun 28 '17 at 14:42
add a comment |
Yes, I relogged in.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 14:47
And the only ~/.bash files I have are .bashrc, .bash_logout, .bash_history. I ran a find search. .bash_profile and .bash_login do NOT exist on machine.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 16:31
Oh, I'm sorry you are actually right. I just freshly installed a 17.04 to test it on a new installation and it actually isn't read from ~/.profile for some reason. I haven't digged into it yet. But you can add your umask into~/.bashrc
for now this is still read during startup.
– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:36
Ziazis, setting umask in .bashrc only works for docs created in terminal. I'm looking to get umask applied for example from doc created in gedit. You have found a fix withbash -login
? How do I implement this exactly? Or is this unfixable until a bug is fixed?
– G.W.
Jun 28 '17 at 14:42
Yes, I relogged in.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 14:47
Yes, I relogged in.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 14:47
And the only ~/.bash files I have are .bashrc, .bash_logout, .bash_history. I ran a find search. .bash_profile and .bash_login do NOT exist on machine.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 16:31
And the only ~/.bash files I have are .bashrc, .bash_logout, .bash_history. I ran a find search. .bash_profile and .bash_login do NOT exist on machine.
– G.W.
Jun 27 '17 at 16:31
Oh, I'm sorry you are actually right. I just freshly installed a 17.04 to test it on a new installation and it actually isn't read from ~/.profile for some reason. I haven't digged into it yet. But you can add your umask into
~/.bashrc
for now this is still read during startup.– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:36
Oh, I'm sorry you are actually right. I just freshly installed a 17.04 to test it on a new installation and it actually isn't read from ~/.profile for some reason. I haven't digged into it yet. But you can add your umask into
~/.bashrc
for now this is still read during startup.– Ziazis
Jun 28 '17 at 8:36
Ziazis, setting umask in .bashrc only works for docs created in terminal. I'm looking to get umask applied for example from doc created in gedit. You have found a fix with
bash -login
? How do I implement this exactly? Or is this unfixable until a bug is fixed?– G.W.
Jun 28 '17 at 14:42
Ziazis, setting umask in .bashrc only works for docs created in terminal. I'm looking to get umask applied for example from doc created in gedit. You have found a fix with
bash -login
? How do I implement this exactly? Or is this unfixable until a bug is fixed?– G.W.
Jun 28 '17 at 14:42
add a comment |
Ubuntu 18.04, should work for 17.04 and others
According to the man pages, there are several places where we can set the umask
for the PAM module to find; it even gives an example. I'll set it in /etc/pam.d/login
. Note this file does not exist on my version of Ubuntu, in which case we can create it.
$ sudo sh -c "echo 'session optional pam_umask.so umask=0027' >> /etc/default/login"
$ more /etc/default/login
session optional pam_umask.so umask=0027
Evil Bug
Now if we restart and ask for the umask in the terminal we still get 0022
and not the 0027
that was set. See Bug #1685754.
But if we open an application, for example the Text Editor, and save a file we'll notice the new umask is set correctly. Open it from the menu, not from the terminal as it seems to pick up the (bad) umask
from the terminal.
$ touch terminal-file
$ ls -l
-rw-r----- 1 daniel daniel 0 jan 28 21:21 gedit-file
-rw-r--r-- 1 daniel daniel 0 jan 28 21:22 terminal-file
References
- Ubuntu Manpage for
pam_umask
- Bug #1685754, since 17.04
add a comment |
Ubuntu 18.04, should work for 17.04 and others
According to the man pages, there are several places where we can set the umask
for the PAM module to find; it even gives an example. I'll set it in /etc/pam.d/login
. Note this file does not exist on my version of Ubuntu, in which case we can create it.
$ sudo sh -c "echo 'session optional pam_umask.so umask=0027' >> /etc/default/login"
$ more /etc/default/login
session optional pam_umask.so umask=0027
Evil Bug
Now if we restart and ask for the umask in the terminal we still get 0022
and not the 0027
that was set. See Bug #1685754.
But if we open an application, for example the Text Editor, and save a file we'll notice the new umask is set correctly. Open it from the menu, not from the terminal as it seems to pick up the (bad) umask
from the terminal.
$ touch terminal-file
$ ls -l
-rw-r----- 1 daniel daniel 0 jan 28 21:21 gedit-file
-rw-r--r-- 1 daniel daniel 0 jan 28 21:22 terminal-file
References
- Ubuntu Manpage for
pam_umask
- Bug #1685754, since 17.04
add a comment |
Ubuntu 18.04, should work for 17.04 and others
According to the man pages, there are several places where we can set the umask
for the PAM module to find; it even gives an example. I'll set it in /etc/pam.d/login
. Note this file does not exist on my version of Ubuntu, in which case we can create it.
$ sudo sh -c "echo 'session optional pam_umask.so umask=0027' >> /etc/default/login"
$ more /etc/default/login
session optional pam_umask.so umask=0027
Evil Bug
Now if we restart and ask for the umask in the terminal we still get 0022
and not the 0027
that was set. See Bug #1685754.
But if we open an application, for example the Text Editor, and save a file we'll notice the new umask is set correctly. Open it from the menu, not from the terminal as it seems to pick up the (bad) umask
from the terminal.
$ touch terminal-file
$ ls -l
-rw-r----- 1 daniel daniel 0 jan 28 21:21 gedit-file
-rw-r--r-- 1 daniel daniel 0 jan 28 21:22 terminal-file
References
- Ubuntu Manpage for
pam_umask
- Bug #1685754, since 17.04
Ubuntu 18.04, should work for 17.04 and others
According to the man pages, there are several places where we can set the umask
for the PAM module to find; it even gives an example. I'll set it in /etc/pam.d/login
. Note this file does not exist on my version of Ubuntu, in which case we can create it.
$ sudo sh -c "echo 'session optional pam_umask.so umask=0027' >> /etc/default/login"
$ more /etc/default/login
session optional pam_umask.so umask=0027
Evil Bug
Now if we restart and ask for the umask in the terminal we still get 0022
and not the 0027
that was set. See Bug #1685754.
But if we open an application, for example the Text Editor, and save a file we'll notice the new umask is set correctly. Open it from the menu, not from the terminal as it seems to pick up the (bad) umask
from the terminal.
$ touch terminal-file
$ ls -l
-rw-r----- 1 daniel daniel 0 jan 28 21:21 gedit-file
-rw-r--r-- 1 daniel daniel 0 jan 28 21:22 terminal-file
References
- Ubuntu Manpage for
pam_umask
- Bug #1685754, since 17.04
answered Jan 28 at 21:29
DanielDaniel
1,46121427
1,46121427
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f929439%2fhow-to-set-default-umask-in-ubuntu-17-04%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown