Slice a $4 times 25$ rectangle into $3$ pieces, so these pieces can then construct a single square [closed]
Cut a $4 times 25$ rectangle into 3 pieces so that these pieces can be assembled into a square.
geometry
New contributor
closed as off-topic by KReiser, Steve Kass, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, sds Dec 26 '18 at 21:04
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – KReiser, Steve Kass, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, sds
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
|
show 7 more comments
Cut a $4 times 25$ rectangle into 3 pieces so that these pieces can be assembled into a square.
geometry
New contributor
closed as off-topic by KReiser, Steve Kass, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, sds Dec 26 '18 at 21:04
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – KReiser, Steve Kass, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, sds
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
What's the source of this question? Do you have evidence it can be done? What tools do you have available? What fruit or ...not so fruit... have your own investigations come up with?
– Dan Uznanski
Dec 26 '18 at 20:21
Math teacher gave it to my son, so yes, it can be done. you have scissors ...
– Dzagana
Dec 26 '18 at 20:28
2
This should not be placed on hold given questions like this are accepted: math.stackexchange.com/questions/96776/…
– David G. Stork
Dec 26 '18 at 21:15
1
@DavidG.Stork The question you linked to was from close to seven years ago. The standards have evolved since. This is a somewhat persistent source of disagreement in meta. Take a look if you want to weigh in. Do search first. A huge plague on the site nowadays is answerers not checking for duplicates.. Anyway, isolated problem statements (instead of QUESTIONS) have been frowned upon for a number of years already.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 26 '18 at 21:48
1
I found a name for my attempt: Montucla's Dissection. For 4x25 it gives five pieces.
– Dan Uznanski
Dec 26 '18 at 22:00
|
show 7 more comments
Cut a $4 times 25$ rectangle into 3 pieces so that these pieces can be assembled into a square.
geometry
New contributor
Cut a $4 times 25$ rectangle into 3 pieces so that these pieces can be assembled into a square.
geometry
geometry
New contributor
New contributor
edited Dec 26 '18 at 21:34
David G. Stork
9,78721232
9,78721232
New contributor
asked Dec 26 '18 at 20:10
Dzagana
121
121
New contributor
New contributor
closed as off-topic by KReiser, Steve Kass, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, sds Dec 26 '18 at 21:04
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – KReiser, Steve Kass, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, sds
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by KReiser, Steve Kass, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, sds Dec 26 '18 at 21:04
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – KReiser, Steve Kass, amWhy, José Carlos Santos, sds
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
What's the source of this question? Do you have evidence it can be done? What tools do you have available? What fruit or ...not so fruit... have your own investigations come up with?
– Dan Uznanski
Dec 26 '18 at 20:21
Math teacher gave it to my son, so yes, it can be done. you have scissors ...
– Dzagana
Dec 26 '18 at 20:28
2
This should not be placed on hold given questions like this are accepted: math.stackexchange.com/questions/96776/…
– David G. Stork
Dec 26 '18 at 21:15
1
@DavidG.Stork The question you linked to was from close to seven years ago. The standards have evolved since. This is a somewhat persistent source of disagreement in meta. Take a look if you want to weigh in. Do search first. A huge plague on the site nowadays is answerers not checking for duplicates.. Anyway, isolated problem statements (instead of QUESTIONS) have been frowned upon for a number of years already.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 26 '18 at 21:48
1
I found a name for my attempt: Montucla's Dissection. For 4x25 it gives five pieces.
– Dan Uznanski
Dec 26 '18 at 22:00
|
show 7 more comments
What's the source of this question? Do you have evidence it can be done? What tools do you have available? What fruit or ...not so fruit... have your own investigations come up with?
– Dan Uznanski
Dec 26 '18 at 20:21
Math teacher gave it to my son, so yes, it can be done. you have scissors ...
– Dzagana
Dec 26 '18 at 20:28
2
This should not be placed on hold given questions like this are accepted: math.stackexchange.com/questions/96776/…
– David G. Stork
Dec 26 '18 at 21:15
1
@DavidG.Stork The question you linked to was from close to seven years ago. The standards have evolved since. This is a somewhat persistent source of disagreement in meta. Take a look if you want to weigh in. Do search first. A huge plague on the site nowadays is answerers not checking for duplicates.. Anyway, isolated problem statements (instead of QUESTIONS) have been frowned upon for a number of years already.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 26 '18 at 21:48
1
I found a name for my attempt: Montucla's Dissection. For 4x25 it gives five pieces.
– Dan Uznanski
Dec 26 '18 at 22:00
What's the source of this question? Do you have evidence it can be done? What tools do you have available? What fruit or ...not so fruit... have your own investigations come up with?
– Dan Uznanski
Dec 26 '18 at 20:21
What's the source of this question? Do you have evidence it can be done? What tools do you have available? What fruit or ...not so fruit... have your own investigations come up with?
– Dan Uznanski
Dec 26 '18 at 20:21
Math teacher gave it to my son, so yes, it can be done. you have scissors ...
– Dzagana
Dec 26 '18 at 20:28
Math teacher gave it to my son, so yes, it can be done. you have scissors ...
– Dzagana
Dec 26 '18 at 20:28
2
2
This should not be placed on hold given questions like this are accepted: math.stackexchange.com/questions/96776/…
– David G. Stork
Dec 26 '18 at 21:15
This should not be placed on hold given questions like this are accepted: math.stackexchange.com/questions/96776/…
– David G. Stork
Dec 26 '18 at 21:15
1
1
@DavidG.Stork The question you linked to was from close to seven years ago. The standards have evolved since. This is a somewhat persistent source of disagreement in meta. Take a look if you want to weigh in. Do search first. A huge plague on the site nowadays is answerers not checking for duplicates.. Anyway, isolated problem statements (instead of QUESTIONS) have been frowned upon for a number of years already.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 26 '18 at 21:48
@DavidG.Stork The question you linked to was from close to seven years ago. The standards have evolved since. This is a somewhat persistent source of disagreement in meta. Take a look if you want to weigh in. Do search first. A huge plague on the site nowadays is answerers not checking for duplicates.. Anyway, isolated problem statements (instead of QUESTIONS) have been frowned upon for a number of years already.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 26 '18 at 21:48
1
1
I found a name for my attempt: Montucla's Dissection. For 4x25 it gives five pieces.
– Dan Uznanski
Dec 26 '18 at 22:00
I found a name for my attempt: Montucla's Dissection. For 4x25 it gives five pieces.
– Dan Uznanski
Dec 26 '18 at 22:00
|
show 7 more comments
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
What's the source of this question? Do you have evidence it can be done? What tools do you have available? What fruit or ...not so fruit... have your own investigations come up with?
– Dan Uznanski
Dec 26 '18 at 20:21
Math teacher gave it to my son, so yes, it can be done. you have scissors ...
– Dzagana
Dec 26 '18 at 20:28
2
This should not be placed on hold given questions like this are accepted: math.stackexchange.com/questions/96776/…
– David G. Stork
Dec 26 '18 at 21:15
1
@DavidG.Stork The question you linked to was from close to seven years ago. The standards have evolved since. This is a somewhat persistent source of disagreement in meta. Take a look if you want to weigh in. Do search first. A huge plague on the site nowadays is answerers not checking for duplicates.. Anyway, isolated problem statements (instead of QUESTIONS) have been frowned upon for a number of years already.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 26 '18 at 21:48
1
I found a name for my attempt: Montucla's Dissection. For 4x25 it gives five pieces.
– Dan Uznanski
Dec 26 '18 at 22:00