Is there a possible geometric method to find length of this equilateral triangle?
$begingroup$
Problem Given that $AD parallel BC$, $|AB| = |AD|$, $angle A=120^{circ}$, $E$ is the midpoint of $AD$, point $F$ lies on $BD$, $triangle EFC$ is a equilateral triangle and $|AB|=4$, find the length $|EF|$.
Attempt At first glance, I thought it could be solved using a geometric method. I considered the law of sines/cosines, similar triangles, Pythagorean theorem, even Menelaus' theorem, however, got properties which contributed nothing to calculate $|EF|$.
What I've got after draw a line perpendicular to $BC$ through $E$
$triangle ABH$ and $triangle AHD$ are both equilateral triangles of length 4.- $triangle EFD sim triangle GEH$
- $|EH|=2sqrt{3}$
Algebraic method Eventually, I've changed my mind to embrace algebra. I found it is easy to coordinate $E,A,B,D$ and $C$ is related to $F$ (rotation) and $B$ (same horizontal line). Make $E$ as the origin, $AD$ points to $x$-axis, $HE$ points to $y$-axis, we got
- $E = (0,0)$
- $A = (-2,0)$
- $B = (-4,-2sqrt{3})$
- $D = (2,0)$
Point $(x, y)$ in line $BD$ has $y=frac{1}{sqrt{3}}(x-2)$. Assume $F=(x_0,y_0)$, $C=(x_1,y_1)$, we can obtain $C$ by rotating $F$ around pivot $E$ $60^{circ}$ counter-clockwise
$$
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 \ y_1
end{bmatrix}
=
begin{bmatrix}
cos{theta} & -sin{theta} \
sin{theta} & cos{theta}
end{bmatrix}
begin{bmatrix}
x_0 \ y_0
end{bmatrix}
$$
, also we know that $BC$ is parallel to $x$-axis, then
$$
begin{align*}
y_1
& = sin{60^{circ}} x_0 + cos{60^{circ}} y_0 \
& = sin{60^{circ}} x_0 + cos{60^{circ}} frac{1}{sqrt{3}}(x_0-2) \
& = -2sqrt{3}
end{align*}
$$
, thus $F=(-frac{5}{2}, -frac{3sqrt{3}}{2})$, and finally $|EF|=sqrt{13}$
Thoughts afterwords I noticed that $F$ (through its coordinate) is actually the midpoint of $BK$. It may be a key point in geometric method, but I cannot prove it either.
Graph I made it in GeoGebra and it is shared. Please go and edit it to save your time if you have any idea.
Link: https://www.geogebra.org/graphing/yqhbzdem
geometry vectors euclidean-geometry analytic-geometry geometric-transformation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem Given that $AD parallel BC$, $|AB| = |AD|$, $angle A=120^{circ}$, $E$ is the midpoint of $AD$, point $F$ lies on $BD$, $triangle EFC$ is a equilateral triangle and $|AB|=4$, find the length $|EF|$.
Attempt At first glance, I thought it could be solved using a geometric method. I considered the law of sines/cosines, similar triangles, Pythagorean theorem, even Menelaus' theorem, however, got properties which contributed nothing to calculate $|EF|$.
What I've got after draw a line perpendicular to $BC$ through $E$
$triangle ABH$ and $triangle AHD$ are both equilateral triangles of length 4.- $triangle EFD sim triangle GEH$
- $|EH|=2sqrt{3}$
Algebraic method Eventually, I've changed my mind to embrace algebra. I found it is easy to coordinate $E,A,B,D$ and $C$ is related to $F$ (rotation) and $B$ (same horizontal line). Make $E$ as the origin, $AD$ points to $x$-axis, $HE$ points to $y$-axis, we got
- $E = (0,0)$
- $A = (-2,0)$
- $B = (-4,-2sqrt{3})$
- $D = (2,0)$
Point $(x, y)$ in line $BD$ has $y=frac{1}{sqrt{3}}(x-2)$. Assume $F=(x_0,y_0)$, $C=(x_1,y_1)$, we can obtain $C$ by rotating $F$ around pivot $E$ $60^{circ}$ counter-clockwise
$$
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 \ y_1
end{bmatrix}
=
begin{bmatrix}
cos{theta} & -sin{theta} \
sin{theta} & cos{theta}
end{bmatrix}
begin{bmatrix}
x_0 \ y_0
end{bmatrix}
$$
, also we know that $BC$ is parallel to $x$-axis, then
$$
begin{align*}
y_1
& = sin{60^{circ}} x_0 + cos{60^{circ}} y_0 \
& = sin{60^{circ}} x_0 + cos{60^{circ}} frac{1}{sqrt{3}}(x_0-2) \
& = -2sqrt{3}
end{align*}
$$
, thus $F=(-frac{5}{2}, -frac{3sqrt{3}}{2})$, and finally $|EF|=sqrt{13}$
Thoughts afterwords I noticed that $F$ (through its coordinate) is actually the midpoint of $BK$. It may be a key point in geometric method, but I cannot prove it either.
Graph I made it in GeoGebra and it is shared. Please go and edit it to save your time if you have any idea.
Link: https://www.geogebra.org/graphing/yqhbzdem
geometry vectors euclidean-geometry analytic-geometry geometric-transformation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem Given that $AD parallel BC$, $|AB| = |AD|$, $angle A=120^{circ}$, $E$ is the midpoint of $AD$, point $F$ lies on $BD$, $triangle EFC$ is a equilateral triangle and $|AB|=4$, find the length $|EF|$.
Attempt At first glance, I thought it could be solved using a geometric method. I considered the law of sines/cosines, similar triangles, Pythagorean theorem, even Menelaus' theorem, however, got properties which contributed nothing to calculate $|EF|$.
What I've got after draw a line perpendicular to $BC$ through $E$
$triangle ABH$ and $triangle AHD$ are both equilateral triangles of length 4.- $triangle EFD sim triangle GEH$
- $|EH|=2sqrt{3}$
Algebraic method Eventually, I've changed my mind to embrace algebra. I found it is easy to coordinate $E,A,B,D$ and $C$ is related to $F$ (rotation) and $B$ (same horizontal line). Make $E$ as the origin, $AD$ points to $x$-axis, $HE$ points to $y$-axis, we got
- $E = (0,0)$
- $A = (-2,0)$
- $B = (-4,-2sqrt{3})$
- $D = (2,0)$
Point $(x, y)$ in line $BD$ has $y=frac{1}{sqrt{3}}(x-2)$. Assume $F=(x_0,y_0)$, $C=(x_1,y_1)$, we can obtain $C$ by rotating $F$ around pivot $E$ $60^{circ}$ counter-clockwise
$$
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 \ y_1
end{bmatrix}
=
begin{bmatrix}
cos{theta} & -sin{theta} \
sin{theta} & cos{theta}
end{bmatrix}
begin{bmatrix}
x_0 \ y_0
end{bmatrix}
$$
, also we know that $BC$ is parallel to $x$-axis, then
$$
begin{align*}
y_1
& = sin{60^{circ}} x_0 + cos{60^{circ}} y_0 \
& = sin{60^{circ}} x_0 + cos{60^{circ}} frac{1}{sqrt{3}}(x_0-2) \
& = -2sqrt{3}
end{align*}
$$
, thus $F=(-frac{5}{2}, -frac{3sqrt{3}}{2})$, and finally $|EF|=sqrt{13}$
Thoughts afterwords I noticed that $F$ (through its coordinate) is actually the midpoint of $BK$. It may be a key point in geometric method, but I cannot prove it either.
Graph I made it in GeoGebra and it is shared. Please go and edit it to save your time if you have any idea.
Link: https://www.geogebra.org/graphing/yqhbzdem
geometry vectors euclidean-geometry analytic-geometry geometric-transformation
$endgroup$
Problem Given that $AD parallel BC$, $|AB| = |AD|$, $angle A=120^{circ}$, $E$ is the midpoint of $AD$, point $F$ lies on $BD$, $triangle EFC$ is a equilateral triangle and $|AB|=4$, find the length $|EF|$.
Attempt At first glance, I thought it could be solved using a geometric method. I considered the law of sines/cosines, similar triangles, Pythagorean theorem, even Menelaus' theorem, however, got properties which contributed nothing to calculate $|EF|$.
What I've got after draw a line perpendicular to $BC$ through $E$
$triangle ABH$ and $triangle AHD$ are both equilateral triangles of length 4.- $triangle EFD sim triangle GEH$
- $|EH|=2sqrt{3}$
Algebraic method Eventually, I've changed my mind to embrace algebra. I found it is easy to coordinate $E,A,B,D$ and $C$ is related to $F$ (rotation) and $B$ (same horizontal line). Make $E$ as the origin, $AD$ points to $x$-axis, $HE$ points to $y$-axis, we got
- $E = (0,0)$
- $A = (-2,0)$
- $B = (-4,-2sqrt{3})$
- $D = (2,0)$
Point $(x, y)$ in line $BD$ has $y=frac{1}{sqrt{3}}(x-2)$. Assume $F=(x_0,y_0)$, $C=(x_1,y_1)$, we can obtain $C$ by rotating $F$ around pivot $E$ $60^{circ}$ counter-clockwise
$$
begin{bmatrix}
x_1 \ y_1
end{bmatrix}
=
begin{bmatrix}
cos{theta} & -sin{theta} \
sin{theta} & cos{theta}
end{bmatrix}
begin{bmatrix}
x_0 \ y_0
end{bmatrix}
$$
, also we know that $BC$ is parallel to $x$-axis, then
$$
begin{align*}
y_1
& = sin{60^{circ}} x_0 + cos{60^{circ}} y_0 \
& = sin{60^{circ}} x_0 + cos{60^{circ}} frac{1}{sqrt{3}}(x_0-2) \
& = -2sqrt{3}
end{align*}
$$
, thus $F=(-frac{5}{2}, -frac{3sqrt{3}}{2})$, and finally $|EF|=sqrt{13}$
Thoughts afterwords I noticed that $F$ (through its coordinate) is actually the midpoint of $BK$. It may be a key point in geometric method, but I cannot prove it either.
Graph I made it in GeoGebra and it is shared. Please go and edit it to save your time if you have any idea.
Link: https://www.geogebra.org/graphing/yqhbzdem
geometry vectors euclidean-geometry analytic-geometry geometric-transformation
geometry vectors euclidean-geometry analytic-geometry geometric-transformation
edited Jan 28 at 5:33
alex4814
asked Jan 26 at 15:33
alex4814alex4814
1225
1225
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $$angle EDF = {1over 2}angle FCE $$ we see that $D$ is on a circle with center at $C$ and radius $CE =CF$ so $CD=CE$.
If $M$ is midpoint of $ED$ we have $$CE^2 = ME^2+CM^2 = 1+AG^2 = 13$$
so $CE = sqrt{13}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Extremely beautiful! +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
Jan 27 at 5:27
1
$begingroup$
I think the condition "$angle EDF = {1over 2}angle FCE$" is NOT strong enough to guarantee D lies on the same circle that is centered at C with radius = CF.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 3:54
$begingroup$
At least explain why the first assertion is true. The explanation takes care to list the obvious radius equality, but doesn't even explain the logic of the circle.
$endgroup$
– C Perkins
Jan 28 at 5:06
$begingroup$
Yes, just that it is not. But if you read further you see $CF=CE$! @Mick @C Perkins
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Jan 28 at 9:03
1
$begingroup$
That clarifies one thing. Another requirement we need to say is both C and D should be on the same side of the line EF, but the original diagram clearly showed they are.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 17:28
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $P$ be the perpendicular foot of $E$ to $BD$. We find that $|EP|=sin(angle EDP )cdot|ED|=1$.
We also find that $triangle EPF$ is congruent to $triangle CHE $ implying that
$$
|EP|=|CH|=1.
$$ By Pythagorean theorem, it follows
$$
|EC|^2 =|EH|^2 +|CH|^2 =13,
$$i.e. $$
|EF|=|EC| =sqrt{13}.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you post a diagram? I cannot visually follow this at all.
$endgroup$
– The Great Duck
Jan 26 at 17:47
1
$begingroup$
@TheGreatDuck I've added a figure. I hope this will help.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 18:19
1
$begingroup$
This makes sense (+1), but it would help if the diagram didn't show quite so many unneeded points and lines. CD is useless-but-distracting even though mentioned in the problem, and the intersection points I, J, K, L, M, N, O are completely irrelevant.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 19:57
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for suggesting, sir. I've updated the figure. I hope this is better ..
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 22:38
$begingroup$
Much nicer this way.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 23:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I like the following way.
Let $vec{AB}=vec{a}$, $vec{AD}=vec{b}$, $vec{BF}=pvec{BD}$ and $vec{BC}=kvec{AD}.$
Thus, $$vec{FE}=-p(-vec{a}+vec{b})-vec{a}+frac{1}{2}vec{b}=(p-1)vec{a}+left(frac{1}{2}-pright)vec{b}$$ and
$$vec{FC}=-p(-vec{a}+vec{b})+kvec{b}=pvec{a}+(k-p)vec{b}.$$
Now, we obtain the following system:
$$|vec{FE}|=|vec{FC}|$$ and
$$frac{vec{FE}cdot vec{FC}}{|vec{FE}||vec{FC}|}=frac{1}{2}$$
with variables $p$ and $k$.
We can solve this system and the rest is smooth.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $alpha=angle DEC$. We can apply the sine law to triangle $FED$:
$$
{EDoversin(90°-alpha)}={EFoversin30°}={FDoversin(alpha+60°)},
$$
that is:
$$
EF={1overcosalpha}quadtext{and}quad FD={2overcosalpha}sin(alpha+60°).
$$
Applying then the sine law to triangle $BFC$ one gets:
$$
FB={2overcosalpha}sin(alpha-60°)=4sqrt3-FD=4sqrt3-{2overcosalpha}sin(alpha+60°).
$$
From this it follows $tanalpha=2sqrt3$ and $EF^2=1/cos^2alpha=1+tan^2alpha=13$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088383%2fis-there-a-possible-geometric-method-to-find-length-of-this-equilateral-triangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $$angle EDF = {1over 2}angle FCE $$ we see that $D$ is on a circle with center at $C$ and radius $CE =CF$ so $CD=CE$.
If $M$ is midpoint of $ED$ we have $$CE^2 = ME^2+CM^2 = 1+AG^2 = 13$$
so $CE = sqrt{13}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Extremely beautiful! +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
Jan 27 at 5:27
1
$begingroup$
I think the condition "$angle EDF = {1over 2}angle FCE$" is NOT strong enough to guarantee D lies on the same circle that is centered at C with radius = CF.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 3:54
$begingroup$
At least explain why the first assertion is true. The explanation takes care to list the obvious radius equality, but doesn't even explain the logic of the circle.
$endgroup$
– C Perkins
Jan 28 at 5:06
$begingroup$
Yes, just that it is not. But if you read further you see $CF=CE$! @Mick @C Perkins
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Jan 28 at 9:03
1
$begingroup$
That clarifies one thing. Another requirement we need to say is both C and D should be on the same side of the line EF, but the original diagram clearly showed they are.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 17:28
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Since $$angle EDF = {1over 2}angle FCE $$ we see that $D$ is on a circle with center at $C$ and radius $CE =CF$ so $CD=CE$.
If $M$ is midpoint of $ED$ we have $$CE^2 = ME^2+CM^2 = 1+AG^2 = 13$$
so $CE = sqrt{13}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Extremely beautiful! +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
Jan 27 at 5:27
1
$begingroup$
I think the condition "$angle EDF = {1over 2}angle FCE$" is NOT strong enough to guarantee D lies on the same circle that is centered at C with radius = CF.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 3:54
$begingroup$
At least explain why the first assertion is true. The explanation takes care to list the obvious radius equality, but doesn't even explain the logic of the circle.
$endgroup$
– C Perkins
Jan 28 at 5:06
$begingroup$
Yes, just that it is not. But if you read further you see $CF=CE$! @Mick @C Perkins
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Jan 28 at 9:03
1
$begingroup$
That clarifies one thing. Another requirement we need to say is both C and D should be on the same side of the line EF, but the original diagram clearly showed they are.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 17:28
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Since $$angle EDF = {1over 2}angle FCE $$ we see that $D$ is on a circle with center at $C$ and radius $CE =CF$ so $CD=CE$.
If $M$ is midpoint of $ED$ we have $$CE^2 = ME^2+CM^2 = 1+AG^2 = 13$$
so $CE = sqrt{13}$.
$endgroup$
Since $$angle EDF = {1over 2}angle FCE $$ we see that $D$ is on a circle with center at $C$ and radius $CE =CF$ so $CD=CE$.
If $M$ is midpoint of $ED$ we have $$CE^2 = ME^2+CM^2 = 1+AG^2 = 13$$
so $CE = sqrt{13}$.
answered Jan 26 at 20:41
greedoidgreedoid
45.5k1159114
45.5k1159114
$begingroup$
Extremely beautiful! +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
Jan 27 at 5:27
1
$begingroup$
I think the condition "$angle EDF = {1over 2}angle FCE$" is NOT strong enough to guarantee D lies on the same circle that is centered at C with radius = CF.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 3:54
$begingroup$
At least explain why the first assertion is true. The explanation takes care to list the obvious radius equality, but doesn't even explain the logic of the circle.
$endgroup$
– C Perkins
Jan 28 at 5:06
$begingroup$
Yes, just that it is not. But if you read further you see $CF=CE$! @Mick @C Perkins
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Jan 28 at 9:03
1
$begingroup$
That clarifies one thing. Another requirement we need to say is both C and D should be on the same side of the line EF, but the original diagram clearly showed they are.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 17:28
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Extremely beautiful! +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
Jan 27 at 5:27
1
$begingroup$
I think the condition "$angle EDF = {1over 2}angle FCE$" is NOT strong enough to guarantee D lies on the same circle that is centered at C with radius = CF.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 3:54
$begingroup$
At least explain why the first assertion is true. The explanation takes care to list the obvious radius equality, but doesn't even explain the logic of the circle.
$endgroup$
– C Perkins
Jan 28 at 5:06
$begingroup$
Yes, just that it is not. But if you read further you see $CF=CE$! @Mick @C Perkins
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Jan 28 at 9:03
1
$begingroup$
That clarifies one thing. Another requirement we need to say is both C and D should be on the same side of the line EF, but the original diagram clearly showed they are.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 17:28
$begingroup$
Extremely beautiful! +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
Jan 27 at 5:27
$begingroup$
Extremely beautiful! +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
Jan 27 at 5:27
1
1
$begingroup$
I think the condition "$angle EDF = {1over 2}angle FCE$" is NOT strong enough to guarantee D lies on the same circle that is centered at C with radius = CF.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 3:54
$begingroup$
I think the condition "$angle EDF = {1over 2}angle FCE$" is NOT strong enough to guarantee D lies on the same circle that is centered at C with radius = CF.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 3:54
$begingroup$
At least explain why the first assertion is true. The explanation takes care to list the obvious radius equality, but doesn't even explain the logic of the circle.
$endgroup$
– C Perkins
Jan 28 at 5:06
$begingroup$
At least explain why the first assertion is true. The explanation takes care to list the obvious radius equality, but doesn't even explain the logic of the circle.
$endgroup$
– C Perkins
Jan 28 at 5:06
$begingroup$
Yes, just that it is not. But if you read further you see $CF=CE$! @Mick @C Perkins
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Jan 28 at 9:03
$begingroup$
Yes, just that it is not. But if you read further you see $CF=CE$! @Mick @C Perkins
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Jan 28 at 9:03
1
1
$begingroup$
That clarifies one thing. Another requirement we need to say is both C and D should be on the same side of the line EF, but the original diagram clearly showed they are.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 17:28
$begingroup$
That clarifies one thing. Another requirement we need to say is both C and D should be on the same side of the line EF, but the original diagram clearly showed they are.
$endgroup$
– Mick
Jan 28 at 17:28
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $P$ be the perpendicular foot of $E$ to $BD$. We find that $|EP|=sin(angle EDP )cdot|ED|=1$.
We also find that $triangle EPF$ is congruent to $triangle CHE $ implying that
$$
|EP|=|CH|=1.
$$ By Pythagorean theorem, it follows
$$
|EC|^2 =|EH|^2 +|CH|^2 =13,
$$i.e. $$
|EF|=|EC| =sqrt{13}.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you post a diagram? I cannot visually follow this at all.
$endgroup$
– The Great Duck
Jan 26 at 17:47
1
$begingroup$
@TheGreatDuck I've added a figure. I hope this will help.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 18:19
1
$begingroup$
This makes sense (+1), but it would help if the diagram didn't show quite so many unneeded points and lines. CD is useless-but-distracting even though mentioned in the problem, and the intersection points I, J, K, L, M, N, O are completely irrelevant.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 19:57
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for suggesting, sir. I've updated the figure. I hope this is better ..
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 22:38
$begingroup$
Much nicer this way.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 23:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $P$ be the perpendicular foot of $E$ to $BD$. We find that $|EP|=sin(angle EDP )cdot|ED|=1$.
We also find that $triangle EPF$ is congruent to $triangle CHE $ implying that
$$
|EP|=|CH|=1.
$$ By Pythagorean theorem, it follows
$$
|EC|^2 =|EH|^2 +|CH|^2 =13,
$$i.e. $$
|EF|=|EC| =sqrt{13}.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you post a diagram? I cannot visually follow this at all.
$endgroup$
– The Great Duck
Jan 26 at 17:47
1
$begingroup$
@TheGreatDuck I've added a figure. I hope this will help.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 18:19
1
$begingroup$
This makes sense (+1), but it would help if the diagram didn't show quite so many unneeded points and lines. CD is useless-but-distracting even though mentioned in the problem, and the intersection points I, J, K, L, M, N, O are completely irrelevant.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 19:57
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for suggesting, sir. I've updated the figure. I hope this is better ..
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 22:38
$begingroup$
Much nicer this way.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 23:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $P$ be the perpendicular foot of $E$ to $BD$. We find that $|EP|=sin(angle EDP )cdot|ED|=1$.
We also find that $triangle EPF$ is congruent to $triangle CHE $ implying that
$$
|EP|=|CH|=1.
$$ By Pythagorean theorem, it follows
$$
|EC|^2 =|EH|^2 +|CH|^2 =13,
$$i.e. $$
|EF|=|EC| =sqrt{13}.
$$
$endgroup$
Let $P$ be the perpendicular foot of $E$ to $BD$. We find that $|EP|=sin(angle EDP )cdot|ED|=1$.
We also find that $triangle EPF$ is congruent to $triangle CHE $ implying that
$$
|EP|=|CH|=1.
$$ By Pythagorean theorem, it follows
$$
|EC|^2 =|EH|^2 +|CH|^2 =13,
$$i.e. $$
|EF|=|EC| =sqrt{13}.
$$
edited Jan 26 at 22:23
answered Jan 26 at 16:15
SongSong
16.4k1741
16.4k1741
$begingroup$
Can you post a diagram? I cannot visually follow this at all.
$endgroup$
– The Great Duck
Jan 26 at 17:47
1
$begingroup$
@TheGreatDuck I've added a figure. I hope this will help.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 18:19
1
$begingroup$
This makes sense (+1), but it would help if the diagram didn't show quite so many unneeded points and lines. CD is useless-but-distracting even though mentioned in the problem, and the intersection points I, J, K, L, M, N, O are completely irrelevant.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 19:57
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for suggesting, sir. I've updated the figure. I hope this is better ..
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 22:38
$begingroup$
Much nicer this way.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 23:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can you post a diagram? I cannot visually follow this at all.
$endgroup$
– The Great Duck
Jan 26 at 17:47
1
$begingroup$
@TheGreatDuck I've added a figure. I hope this will help.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 18:19
1
$begingroup$
This makes sense (+1), but it would help if the diagram didn't show quite so many unneeded points and lines. CD is useless-but-distracting even though mentioned in the problem, and the intersection points I, J, K, L, M, N, O are completely irrelevant.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 19:57
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for suggesting, sir. I've updated the figure. I hope this is better ..
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 22:38
$begingroup$
Much nicer this way.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 23:49
$begingroup$
Can you post a diagram? I cannot visually follow this at all.
$endgroup$
– The Great Duck
Jan 26 at 17:47
$begingroup$
Can you post a diagram? I cannot visually follow this at all.
$endgroup$
– The Great Duck
Jan 26 at 17:47
1
1
$begingroup$
@TheGreatDuck I've added a figure. I hope this will help.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 18:19
$begingroup$
@TheGreatDuck I've added a figure. I hope this will help.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 18:19
1
1
$begingroup$
This makes sense (+1), but it would help if the diagram didn't show quite so many unneeded points and lines. CD is useless-but-distracting even though mentioned in the problem, and the intersection points I, J, K, L, M, N, O are completely irrelevant.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 19:57
$begingroup$
This makes sense (+1), but it would help if the diagram didn't show quite so many unneeded points and lines. CD is useless-but-distracting even though mentioned in the problem, and the intersection points I, J, K, L, M, N, O are completely irrelevant.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 19:57
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for suggesting, sir. I've updated the figure. I hope this is better ..
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 22:38
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for suggesting, sir. I've updated the figure. I hope this is better ..
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 26 at 22:38
$begingroup$
Much nicer this way.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 23:49
$begingroup$
Much nicer this way.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 26 at 23:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I like the following way.
Let $vec{AB}=vec{a}$, $vec{AD}=vec{b}$, $vec{BF}=pvec{BD}$ and $vec{BC}=kvec{AD}.$
Thus, $$vec{FE}=-p(-vec{a}+vec{b})-vec{a}+frac{1}{2}vec{b}=(p-1)vec{a}+left(frac{1}{2}-pright)vec{b}$$ and
$$vec{FC}=-p(-vec{a}+vec{b})+kvec{b}=pvec{a}+(k-p)vec{b}.$$
Now, we obtain the following system:
$$|vec{FE}|=|vec{FC}|$$ and
$$frac{vec{FE}cdot vec{FC}}{|vec{FE}||vec{FC}|}=frac{1}{2}$$
with variables $p$ and $k$.
We can solve this system and the rest is smooth.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I like the following way.
Let $vec{AB}=vec{a}$, $vec{AD}=vec{b}$, $vec{BF}=pvec{BD}$ and $vec{BC}=kvec{AD}.$
Thus, $$vec{FE}=-p(-vec{a}+vec{b})-vec{a}+frac{1}{2}vec{b}=(p-1)vec{a}+left(frac{1}{2}-pright)vec{b}$$ and
$$vec{FC}=-p(-vec{a}+vec{b})+kvec{b}=pvec{a}+(k-p)vec{b}.$$
Now, we obtain the following system:
$$|vec{FE}|=|vec{FC}|$$ and
$$frac{vec{FE}cdot vec{FC}}{|vec{FE}||vec{FC}|}=frac{1}{2}$$
with variables $p$ and $k$.
We can solve this system and the rest is smooth.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I like the following way.
Let $vec{AB}=vec{a}$, $vec{AD}=vec{b}$, $vec{BF}=pvec{BD}$ and $vec{BC}=kvec{AD}.$
Thus, $$vec{FE}=-p(-vec{a}+vec{b})-vec{a}+frac{1}{2}vec{b}=(p-1)vec{a}+left(frac{1}{2}-pright)vec{b}$$ and
$$vec{FC}=-p(-vec{a}+vec{b})+kvec{b}=pvec{a}+(k-p)vec{b}.$$
Now, we obtain the following system:
$$|vec{FE}|=|vec{FC}|$$ and
$$frac{vec{FE}cdot vec{FC}}{|vec{FE}||vec{FC}|}=frac{1}{2}$$
with variables $p$ and $k$.
We can solve this system and the rest is smooth.
$endgroup$
I like the following way.
Let $vec{AB}=vec{a}$, $vec{AD}=vec{b}$, $vec{BF}=pvec{BD}$ and $vec{BC}=kvec{AD}.$
Thus, $$vec{FE}=-p(-vec{a}+vec{b})-vec{a}+frac{1}{2}vec{b}=(p-1)vec{a}+left(frac{1}{2}-pright)vec{b}$$ and
$$vec{FC}=-p(-vec{a}+vec{b})+kvec{b}=pvec{a}+(k-p)vec{b}.$$
Now, we obtain the following system:
$$|vec{FE}|=|vec{FC}|$$ and
$$frac{vec{FE}cdot vec{FC}}{|vec{FE}||vec{FC}|}=frac{1}{2}$$
with variables $p$ and $k$.
We can solve this system and the rest is smooth.
answered Jan 26 at 15:55
Michael RozenbergMichael Rozenberg
106k1893198
106k1893198
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $alpha=angle DEC$. We can apply the sine law to triangle $FED$:
$$
{EDoversin(90°-alpha)}={EFoversin30°}={FDoversin(alpha+60°)},
$$
that is:
$$
EF={1overcosalpha}quadtext{and}quad FD={2overcosalpha}sin(alpha+60°).
$$
Applying then the sine law to triangle $BFC$ one gets:
$$
FB={2overcosalpha}sin(alpha-60°)=4sqrt3-FD=4sqrt3-{2overcosalpha}sin(alpha+60°).
$$
From this it follows $tanalpha=2sqrt3$ and $EF^2=1/cos^2alpha=1+tan^2alpha=13$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $alpha=angle DEC$. We can apply the sine law to triangle $FED$:
$$
{EDoversin(90°-alpha)}={EFoversin30°}={FDoversin(alpha+60°)},
$$
that is:
$$
EF={1overcosalpha}quadtext{and}quad FD={2overcosalpha}sin(alpha+60°).
$$
Applying then the sine law to triangle $BFC$ one gets:
$$
FB={2overcosalpha}sin(alpha-60°)=4sqrt3-FD=4sqrt3-{2overcosalpha}sin(alpha+60°).
$$
From this it follows $tanalpha=2sqrt3$ and $EF^2=1/cos^2alpha=1+tan^2alpha=13$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $alpha=angle DEC$. We can apply the sine law to triangle $FED$:
$$
{EDoversin(90°-alpha)}={EFoversin30°}={FDoversin(alpha+60°)},
$$
that is:
$$
EF={1overcosalpha}quadtext{and}quad FD={2overcosalpha}sin(alpha+60°).
$$
Applying then the sine law to triangle $BFC$ one gets:
$$
FB={2overcosalpha}sin(alpha-60°)=4sqrt3-FD=4sqrt3-{2overcosalpha}sin(alpha+60°).
$$
From this it follows $tanalpha=2sqrt3$ and $EF^2=1/cos^2alpha=1+tan^2alpha=13$.
$endgroup$
Let $alpha=angle DEC$. We can apply the sine law to triangle $FED$:
$$
{EDoversin(90°-alpha)}={EFoversin30°}={FDoversin(alpha+60°)},
$$
that is:
$$
EF={1overcosalpha}quadtext{and}quad FD={2overcosalpha}sin(alpha+60°).
$$
Applying then the sine law to triangle $BFC$ one gets:
$$
FB={2overcosalpha}sin(alpha-60°)=4sqrt3-FD=4sqrt3-{2overcosalpha}sin(alpha+60°).
$$
From this it follows $tanalpha=2sqrt3$ and $EF^2=1/cos^2alpha=1+tan^2alpha=13$.
answered Jan 26 at 16:30
AretinoAretino
24.7k21444
24.7k21444
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088383%2fis-there-a-possible-geometric-method-to-find-length-of-this-equilateral-triangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown