Does the Snap Kick feat apply to Attacks of Opportunity?












4














Does the Snap Kick feat work on Attacks of Opportunity (letting you make another attack)?



If yes, is the -2 to attack rolls cumulative?










share|improve this question





























    4














    Does the Snap Kick feat work on Attacks of Opportunity (letting you make another attack)?



    If yes, is the -2 to attack rolls cumulative?










    share|improve this question



























      4












      4








      4


      1





      Does the Snap Kick feat work on Attacks of Opportunity (letting you make another attack)?



      If yes, is the -2 to attack rolls cumulative?










      share|improve this question















      Does the Snap Kick feat work on Attacks of Opportunity (letting you make another attack)?



      If yes, is the -2 to attack rolls cumulative?







      dnd-3.5e feats opportunity-attack attack






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      V2Blast

      19.6k356121




      19.6k356121










      asked 2 days ago









      András

      26.1k1092185




      26.1k1092185






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Yes, it does, and yes, it is.



          Snap Kick lets you put one more attack into any attack sequence, which is what makes it so good. The cumulative −2 is definitely a cost, and makes it hard to really abuse Snap Kick (a good thing!), but the feat is still really good.






          share|improve this answer





















          • It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
            – annoying imp
            6 hours ago










          • @annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
            – KRyan
            5 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137993%2fdoes-the-snap-kick-feat-apply-to-attacks-of-opportunity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          Yes, it does, and yes, it is.



          Snap Kick lets you put one more attack into any attack sequence, which is what makes it so good. The cumulative −2 is definitely a cost, and makes it hard to really abuse Snap Kick (a good thing!), but the feat is still really good.






          share|improve this answer





















          • It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
            – annoying imp
            6 hours ago










          • @annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
            – KRyan
            5 hours ago
















          4














          Yes, it does, and yes, it is.



          Snap Kick lets you put one more attack into any attack sequence, which is what makes it so good. The cumulative −2 is definitely a cost, and makes it hard to really abuse Snap Kick (a good thing!), but the feat is still really good.






          share|improve this answer





















          • It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
            – annoying imp
            6 hours ago










          • @annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
            – KRyan
            5 hours ago














          4












          4








          4






          Yes, it does, and yes, it is.



          Snap Kick lets you put one more attack into any attack sequence, which is what makes it so good. The cumulative −2 is definitely a cost, and makes it hard to really abuse Snap Kick (a good thing!), but the feat is still really good.






          share|improve this answer












          Yes, it does, and yes, it is.



          Snap Kick lets you put one more attack into any attack sequence, which is what makes it so good. The cumulative −2 is definitely a cost, and makes it hard to really abuse Snap Kick (a good thing!), but the feat is still really good.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          KRyan

          217k28542932




          217k28542932












          • It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
            – annoying imp
            6 hours ago










          • @annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
            – KRyan
            5 hours ago


















          • It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
            – annoying imp
            6 hours ago










          • @annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
            – KRyan
            5 hours ago
















          It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
          – annoying imp
          6 hours ago




          It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
          – annoying imp
          6 hours ago












          @annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
          – KRyan
          5 hours ago




          @annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
          – KRyan
          5 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137993%2fdoes-the-snap-kick-feat-apply-to-attacks-of-opportunity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Human spaceflight

          Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

          張江高科駅