truss structure geometry - geometric induction?












1












$begingroup$


This might be a really simple Geometry rule that I'm missing, but I can't understand how in this problem they automatically knew to extend the truss to point X and knew that it was an additional 2 little triangles. I know that if I were to solve the entire truss using the typical tools like law of sines/cosines, and pythagorus, I could perhaps conclude the same thing, but it seems like there is a big shortcut I am missing to do this instantly.



attached are print screens from Meriam & Kraige Statics textbook of the problem and the solution:



The problem



Solution










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    This might be a really simple Geometry rule that I'm missing, but I can't understand how in this problem they automatically knew to extend the truss to point X and knew that it was an additional 2 little triangles. I know that if I were to solve the entire truss using the typical tools like law of sines/cosines, and pythagorus, I could perhaps conclude the same thing, but it seems like there is a big shortcut I am missing to do this instantly.



    attached are print screens from Meriam & Kraige Statics textbook of the problem and the solution:



    The problem



    Solution










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      This might be a really simple Geometry rule that I'm missing, but I can't understand how in this problem they automatically knew to extend the truss to point X and knew that it was an additional 2 little triangles. I know that if I were to solve the entire truss using the typical tools like law of sines/cosines, and pythagorus, I could perhaps conclude the same thing, but it seems like there is a big shortcut I am missing to do this instantly.



      attached are print screens from Meriam & Kraige Statics textbook of the problem and the solution:



      The problem



      Solution










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      This might be a really simple Geometry rule that I'm missing, but I can't understand how in this problem they automatically knew to extend the truss to point X and knew that it was an additional 2 little triangles. I know that if I were to solve the entire truss using the typical tools like law of sines/cosines, and pythagorus, I could perhaps conclude the same thing, but it seems like there is a big shortcut I am missing to do this instantly.



      attached are print screens from Meriam & Kraige Statics textbook of the problem and the solution:



      The problem



      Solution







      geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked May 16 '12 at 11:08









      nofenofe

      565513




      565513






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I think that what they did here is a standard "trick" used a lot in geometry-trigonometry problems: they draw a a help-line (or help-circle or whatever) in order to make the problem easier and/or more manageable.



          In the present case, they extend in a straight way the line FJ from the side of J all the way until it meets in point X the straight extension of line OL in order to form the straight-angle triangle $,Delta FOX,$, with $,angle FOX=90,$ , and now they can use trigonometric functions to do stuff...!






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Similar to DonAntonio's answer, it's often the case when working with (non-parallelogram) trapezoids that it's easier to consider the trapezoid as a truncated triangle—that is, extend the nonparallel sides of the trapezoid to their point of intersection, giving the triangle containing the trapezoid and the triangle outside the trapezoid, which are similar triangles. This is also particularly common in settings like yours, where you've got two nonparallel lines intersected by a number of parallel lines forming several trapezoids with parallel bases and nonparallel sides that lie on the same two lines.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145827%2ftruss-structure-geometry-geometric-induction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              I think that what they did here is a standard "trick" used a lot in geometry-trigonometry problems: they draw a a help-line (or help-circle or whatever) in order to make the problem easier and/or more manageable.



              In the present case, they extend in a straight way the line FJ from the side of J all the way until it meets in point X the straight extension of line OL in order to form the straight-angle triangle $,Delta FOX,$, with $,angle FOX=90,$ , and now they can use trigonometric functions to do stuff...!






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                I think that what they did here is a standard "trick" used a lot in geometry-trigonometry problems: they draw a a help-line (or help-circle or whatever) in order to make the problem easier and/or more manageable.



                In the present case, they extend in a straight way the line FJ from the side of J all the way until it meets in point X the straight extension of line OL in order to form the straight-angle triangle $,Delta FOX,$, with $,angle FOX=90,$ , and now they can use trigonometric functions to do stuff...!






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  I think that what they did here is a standard "trick" used a lot in geometry-trigonometry problems: they draw a a help-line (or help-circle or whatever) in order to make the problem easier and/or more manageable.



                  In the present case, they extend in a straight way the line FJ from the side of J all the way until it meets in point X the straight extension of line OL in order to form the straight-angle triangle $,Delta FOX,$, with $,angle FOX=90,$ , and now they can use trigonometric functions to do stuff...!






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I think that what they did here is a standard "trick" used a lot in geometry-trigonometry problems: they draw a a help-line (or help-circle or whatever) in order to make the problem easier and/or more manageable.



                  In the present case, they extend in a straight way the line FJ from the side of J all the way until it meets in point X the straight extension of line OL in order to form the straight-angle triangle $,Delta FOX,$, with $,angle FOX=90,$ , and now they can use trigonometric functions to do stuff...!







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered May 16 '12 at 11:32









                  DonAntonioDonAntonio

                  180k1494233




                  180k1494233























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Similar to DonAntonio's answer, it's often the case when working with (non-parallelogram) trapezoids that it's easier to consider the trapezoid as a truncated triangle—that is, extend the nonparallel sides of the trapezoid to their point of intersection, giving the triangle containing the trapezoid and the triangle outside the trapezoid, which are similar triangles. This is also particularly common in settings like yours, where you've got two nonparallel lines intersected by a number of parallel lines forming several trapezoids with parallel bases and nonparallel sides that lie on the same two lines.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Similar to DonAntonio's answer, it's often the case when working with (non-parallelogram) trapezoids that it's easier to consider the trapezoid as a truncated triangle—that is, extend the nonparallel sides of the trapezoid to their point of intersection, giving the triangle containing the trapezoid and the triangle outside the trapezoid, which are similar triangles. This is also particularly common in settings like yours, where you've got two nonparallel lines intersected by a number of parallel lines forming several trapezoids with parallel bases and nonparallel sides that lie on the same two lines.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          Similar to DonAntonio's answer, it's often the case when working with (non-parallelogram) trapezoids that it's easier to consider the trapezoid as a truncated triangle—that is, extend the nonparallel sides of the trapezoid to their point of intersection, giving the triangle containing the trapezoid and the triangle outside the trapezoid, which are similar triangles. This is also particularly common in settings like yours, where you've got two nonparallel lines intersected by a number of parallel lines forming several trapezoids with parallel bases and nonparallel sides that lie on the same two lines.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          Similar to DonAntonio's answer, it's often the case when working with (non-parallelogram) trapezoids that it's easier to consider the trapezoid as a truncated triangle—that is, extend the nonparallel sides of the trapezoid to their point of intersection, giving the triangle containing the trapezoid and the triangle outside the trapezoid, which are similar triangles. This is also particularly common in settings like yours, where you've got two nonparallel lines intersected by a number of parallel lines forming several trapezoids with parallel bases and nonparallel sides that lie on the same two lines.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21









                          Community

                          1




                          1










                          answered May 17 '12 at 22:12









                          IsaacIsaac

                          30.1k1285128




                          30.1k1285128






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145827%2ftruss-structure-geometry-geometric-induction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Human spaceflight

                              Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                              張江高科駅