How to rotate n individuals at a dinner party so that every guest meets every other guests












14












$begingroup$


I'm throwing an event where every individual is suppose to meet every other individual so I'm trying figure out how to rotate them. My friends say its easy but they have yet to come up with an answer and our event looms closer and closer.



We are shooting for n = 20 but my gut says n has to be a power of 2 for this to work. The first half is easy, you just have the odds stay in their seats and rotate evens. Then take the 10 odds, renumber them, repeat. Then split to 5... oops. you've got an odd number. but thats ok, you've got 4 groups with 5 each so create 2 pairs and you've got 5 sets of 2 pairs.



At this point, my head hurts and it's taking more time to tell my guests who to meet than they spend meeting them.



Is there a simpler answer for n=20?



(edit: lots of questions about the table setup and who they are suppose to meet. Assume whatever table arrangement works, we have a variety. Regardless, i think the long narrow solution below works.)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Man, this word problem seems more practical than train a leaves the station at 8pm.... Where were these in school?
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin Peno
    Apr 21 '11 at 16:53










  • $begingroup$
    Can you clarify the requirements you'd like to impose exactly? Are guests seated around one large round table? Does "meet" mean being seated next to a person? Are you trying to minimize the overall number of "shuffles", or something about the magnitude of the shuffles as well (e.g. you may worry less about two people swapping seats than about half the people getting up and moving elsewhere).
    $endgroup$
    – Alon Amit
    Apr 21 '11 at 17:09










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatorial_design
    $endgroup$
    – Fixee
    Apr 21 '11 at 17:24










  • $begingroup$
    A lot hinges on what you mean by "meet." Do you mean one-on-one conversation for a certain amount of time or would it be enough for, say, four people to introduce themselves to each other and do a quick activity?
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:01










  • $begingroup$
    Assuming meet means one-on-one, how familiar are your guests with binary? If they are pretty familiar, you can group them by successively longer prefixes of their number in binary. Within each group, the ones whose bit after the prefix is 0 are evens and the others odds. Although, the best way is still to work everything out in advance, write it down on cards and have everyone take a card on arrival.
    $endgroup$
    – Aubrey da Cunha
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:19


















14












$begingroup$


I'm throwing an event where every individual is suppose to meet every other individual so I'm trying figure out how to rotate them. My friends say its easy but they have yet to come up with an answer and our event looms closer and closer.



We are shooting for n = 20 but my gut says n has to be a power of 2 for this to work. The first half is easy, you just have the odds stay in their seats and rotate evens. Then take the 10 odds, renumber them, repeat. Then split to 5... oops. you've got an odd number. but thats ok, you've got 4 groups with 5 each so create 2 pairs and you've got 5 sets of 2 pairs.



At this point, my head hurts and it's taking more time to tell my guests who to meet than they spend meeting them.



Is there a simpler answer for n=20?



(edit: lots of questions about the table setup and who they are suppose to meet. Assume whatever table arrangement works, we have a variety. Regardless, i think the long narrow solution below works.)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Man, this word problem seems more practical than train a leaves the station at 8pm.... Where were these in school?
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin Peno
    Apr 21 '11 at 16:53










  • $begingroup$
    Can you clarify the requirements you'd like to impose exactly? Are guests seated around one large round table? Does "meet" mean being seated next to a person? Are you trying to minimize the overall number of "shuffles", or something about the magnitude of the shuffles as well (e.g. you may worry less about two people swapping seats than about half the people getting up and moving elsewhere).
    $endgroup$
    – Alon Amit
    Apr 21 '11 at 17:09










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatorial_design
    $endgroup$
    – Fixee
    Apr 21 '11 at 17:24










  • $begingroup$
    A lot hinges on what you mean by "meet." Do you mean one-on-one conversation for a certain amount of time or would it be enough for, say, four people to introduce themselves to each other and do a quick activity?
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:01










  • $begingroup$
    Assuming meet means one-on-one, how familiar are your guests with binary? If they are pretty familiar, you can group them by successively longer prefixes of their number in binary. Within each group, the ones whose bit after the prefix is 0 are evens and the others odds. Although, the best way is still to work everything out in advance, write it down on cards and have everyone take a card on arrival.
    $endgroup$
    – Aubrey da Cunha
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:19
















14












14








14


2



$begingroup$


I'm throwing an event where every individual is suppose to meet every other individual so I'm trying figure out how to rotate them. My friends say its easy but they have yet to come up with an answer and our event looms closer and closer.



We are shooting for n = 20 but my gut says n has to be a power of 2 for this to work. The first half is easy, you just have the odds stay in their seats and rotate evens. Then take the 10 odds, renumber them, repeat. Then split to 5... oops. you've got an odd number. but thats ok, you've got 4 groups with 5 each so create 2 pairs and you've got 5 sets of 2 pairs.



At this point, my head hurts and it's taking more time to tell my guests who to meet than they spend meeting them.



Is there a simpler answer for n=20?



(edit: lots of questions about the table setup and who they are suppose to meet. Assume whatever table arrangement works, we have a variety. Regardless, i think the long narrow solution below works.)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm throwing an event where every individual is suppose to meet every other individual so I'm trying figure out how to rotate them. My friends say its easy but they have yet to come up with an answer and our event looms closer and closer.



We are shooting for n = 20 but my gut says n has to be a power of 2 for this to work. The first half is easy, you just have the odds stay in their seats and rotate evens. Then take the 10 odds, renumber them, repeat. Then split to 5... oops. you've got an odd number. but thats ok, you've got 4 groups with 5 each so create 2 pairs and you've got 5 sets of 2 pairs.



At this point, my head hurts and it's taking more time to tell my guests who to meet than they spend meeting them.



Is there a simpler answer for n=20?



(edit: lots of questions about the table setup and who they are suppose to meet. Assume whatever table arrangement works, we have a variety. Regardless, i think the long narrow solution below works.)







combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jun 29 '11 at 16:17







DanielEli

















asked Apr 21 '11 at 16:50









DanielEliDanielEli

173117




173117












  • $begingroup$
    Man, this word problem seems more practical than train a leaves the station at 8pm.... Where were these in school?
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin Peno
    Apr 21 '11 at 16:53










  • $begingroup$
    Can you clarify the requirements you'd like to impose exactly? Are guests seated around one large round table? Does "meet" mean being seated next to a person? Are you trying to minimize the overall number of "shuffles", or something about the magnitude of the shuffles as well (e.g. you may worry less about two people swapping seats than about half the people getting up and moving elsewhere).
    $endgroup$
    – Alon Amit
    Apr 21 '11 at 17:09










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatorial_design
    $endgroup$
    – Fixee
    Apr 21 '11 at 17:24










  • $begingroup$
    A lot hinges on what you mean by "meet." Do you mean one-on-one conversation for a certain amount of time or would it be enough for, say, four people to introduce themselves to each other and do a quick activity?
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:01










  • $begingroup$
    Assuming meet means one-on-one, how familiar are your guests with binary? If they are pretty familiar, you can group them by successively longer prefixes of their number in binary. Within each group, the ones whose bit after the prefix is 0 are evens and the others odds. Although, the best way is still to work everything out in advance, write it down on cards and have everyone take a card on arrival.
    $endgroup$
    – Aubrey da Cunha
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:19




















  • $begingroup$
    Man, this word problem seems more practical than train a leaves the station at 8pm.... Where were these in school?
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin Peno
    Apr 21 '11 at 16:53










  • $begingroup$
    Can you clarify the requirements you'd like to impose exactly? Are guests seated around one large round table? Does "meet" mean being seated next to a person? Are you trying to minimize the overall number of "shuffles", or something about the magnitude of the shuffles as well (e.g. you may worry less about two people swapping seats than about half the people getting up and moving elsewhere).
    $endgroup$
    – Alon Amit
    Apr 21 '11 at 17:09










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatorial_design
    $endgroup$
    – Fixee
    Apr 21 '11 at 17:24










  • $begingroup$
    A lot hinges on what you mean by "meet." Do you mean one-on-one conversation for a certain amount of time or would it be enough for, say, four people to introduce themselves to each other and do a quick activity?
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:01










  • $begingroup$
    Assuming meet means one-on-one, how familiar are your guests with binary? If they are pretty familiar, you can group them by successively longer prefixes of their number in binary. Within each group, the ones whose bit after the prefix is 0 are evens and the others odds. Although, the best way is still to work everything out in advance, write it down on cards and have everyone take a card on arrival.
    $endgroup$
    – Aubrey da Cunha
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:19


















$begingroup$
Man, this word problem seems more practical than train a leaves the station at 8pm.... Where were these in school?
$endgroup$
– Kevin Peno
Apr 21 '11 at 16:53




$begingroup$
Man, this word problem seems more practical than train a leaves the station at 8pm.... Where were these in school?
$endgroup$
– Kevin Peno
Apr 21 '11 at 16:53












$begingroup$
Can you clarify the requirements you'd like to impose exactly? Are guests seated around one large round table? Does "meet" mean being seated next to a person? Are you trying to minimize the overall number of "shuffles", or something about the magnitude of the shuffles as well (e.g. you may worry less about two people swapping seats than about half the people getting up and moving elsewhere).
$endgroup$
– Alon Amit
Apr 21 '11 at 17:09




$begingroup$
Can you clarify the requirements you'd like to impose exactly? Are guests seated around one large round table? Does "meet" mean being seated next to a person? Are you trying to minimize the overall number of "shuffles", or something about the magnitude of the shuffles as well (e.g. you may worry less about two people swapping seats than about half the people getting up and moving elsewhere).
$endgroup$
– Alon Amit
Apr 21 '11 at 17:09












$begingroup$
You might want to check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatorial_design
$endgroup$
– Fixee
Apr 21 '11 at 17:24




$begingroup$
You might want to check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatorial_design
$endgroup$
– Fixee
Apr 21 '11 at 17:24












$begingroup$
A lot hinges on what you mean by "meet." Do you mean one-on-one conversation for a certain amount of time or would it be enough for, say, four people to introduce themselves to each other and do a quick activity?
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Apr 21 '11 at 18:01




$begingroup$
A lot hinges on what you mean by "meet." Do you mean one-on-one conversation for a certain amount of time or would it be enough for, say, four people to introduce themselves to each other and do a quick activity?
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Apr 21 '11 at 18:01












$begingroup$
Assuming meet means one-on-one, how familiar are your guests with binary? If they are pretty familiar, you can group them by successively longer prefixes of their number in binary. Within each group, the ones whose bit after the prefix is 0 are evens and the others odds. Although, the best way is still to work everything out in advance, write it down on cards and have everyone take a card on arrival.
$endgroup$
– Aubrey da Cunha
Apr 21 '11 at 18:19






$begingroup$
Assuming meet means one-on-one, how familiar are your guests with binary? If they are pretty familiar, you can group them by successively longer prefixes of their number in binary. Within each group, the ones whose bit after the prefix is 0 are evens and the others odds. Although, the best way is still to work everything out in advance, write it down on cards and have everyone take a card on arrival.
$endgroup$
– Aubrey da Cunha
Apr 21 '11 at 18:19












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Seat your guests at a long banquet table, but don't seat anyone at the heads of the table. So like this:



A B C D E F
L K J I H G


then have them rotate:



L A B C D E 
K J I H G F


K L A B C D
J I H G F E


And so on.



Done!



(Only you will have 10 on each side.)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In your example, A meets L,J,H,F,D,B, and then back to L. So this is equivalent to fixing the odds and rotating the evens.
    $endgroup$
    – Aubrey da Cunha
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:16










  • $begingroup$
    OK I see that now.
    $endgroup$
    – futurebird
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:33










  • $begingroup$
    With this solution, every person will only meet half the other people (like speed-dating). By keeping one person fixed (see below), everyone will meet everyone else (like speed-networking).
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Fruitman
    Mar 18 '15 at 20:45



















10












$begingroup$

I think the answer is:

Make one person stationary, rotate all the folks. This actually works.



Example with N=6. 1 is stationary. (Each person in the top row "meets" the corresponding person just below in the bottom row.)



1) (#1:4) (#2:5) (#3:6) (#4:1) (#5:2) (#6:3)



1 2 3
4 5 6


2) (#1:4,5) (#2:5,3) (#3:6,2) (#4:1,6) (#5:2,1) (#6:3,4)



1 4 2
5 6 3


3) (#1:4,5,6) (#2:5,3,4) (#3:6,2,5) (#4:1,6,2) (#5:2,1,3) (#6:3,4,1)



1 5 4
6 3 2


4) (#1:4,5,6,3) (#2:5,3,4,6) (#3:6,2,5,1) (4:1,6,2,5) (5:2,1,3,4) (6:3,4,1,2)



1 6 5
3 2 4


5) (#1: 4,5,6,3,2) (#2:5,3,4,6,1) (#3:6,2,5,1,4) (4:1,6,2,5,3) (5:2,1,3,4,6) (6:3,4,1,2,5)



1 3 6
2 4 5





share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I tried to show the stages above. Hard to do w/out a diagram. Draw it out: 1) draw six circles (a network graph), then draw a line w/ 1,2,3 on one side, 4,5,6 on the other. Make a box around 1, it is stationary. For each couplet (sitting across the line), make a line on the graph connecting them. in round 1, you connect, 1-4, 2-5, 3-6. Round 2, rotate all the numbers around the line, except 1 (it's in a box). You'll see that it just works out. I don't know why.
    $endgroup$
    – Jesse Phillips
    Apr 21 '11 at 17:53






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is an elegant and simple answer-- it is actually less confusing to follow than the "speed date" plan of successively dividing groups in half. For any group of 2n people, there will be 2n-1 rounds, with everyone meeting everyone else once. If you have an odd number of people, just add an imaginary person to the mix, with the result that each person has one round off from meeting anyone. Jesse Phillips suggests seating everyone at a long banquet table and rotating as in a little don's answer, but one person sitting at a corner remains fixed, while the other 2n-1 people rotate cyclically.
    $endgroup$
    – Jonas Kibelbek
    Apr 21 '11 at 20:07












  • $begingroup$
    Label the stationary person (in one corner) by $p_0$ and the people in the cycle in order counter-clockwise by $p_i$ for $1 leq i leq 2n-1$, with $p_1$ opposite $p_0$ . Clearly, $p_0$ meets everyone once and the other $p_i$ are symmetric; so it suffices to check that $p_1$ meets everyone. Here is the list of partners for $p_1$, as everyone but $p_0$ moves counterclockwise each round: $p_0, p_{2n-2}, p_{2n-4}, ldots, p_4, p_2, p_{2n-1}, p_{2n-3}, p_{2n-5}, dots , p_5, p_3$. Very nice solution!
    $endgroup$
    – Jonas Kibelbek
    Apr 21 '11 at 20:26












  • $begingroup$
    I changed the formatting in the answer from "vertical" (which wasn't working) to "horizontal", but feel free to revert. BTW, this solution which you independently found is also present on Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – ShreevatsaR
    Jun 29 '11 at 16:34





















0












$begingroup$

For sixteen people, sort them into four groups of four: A,B,C,D. Then seat them at two tables of eight:

ABAB CDCD

ABAB CDCD

then

ACAC BDBD

ACAC BDBD

then

ADAD BCBC

ADAD BCBC



Rotate the people within A, and those within B, etc, so they meet everyone within their own group.

Then, counting neighbours as next-to, opposite, and opposite's next-to, some people can meet all 15 others, but everyone else meets only 11 others.



--



For twelve people, number the chairs 1 to 6 on one side of the table, and 7 to 12 on the other side, so 1 faces 7, 2 faces 8 and so on. Everyone moves from seat $n$ to seat $3n (mod 13)$ after each course.

ABCDEF

GHIJKL

then

IEAJFB

KGCLHD

then

CFILBE

HKADGJ

In this arrangement, everyone meets everyone else (next-to, opposite or opposite's next-to) except for BK, EH and FG.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34328%2fhow-to-rotate-n-individuals-at-a-dinner-party-so-that-every-guest-meets-every-ot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Seat your guests at a long banquet table, but don't seat anyone at the heads of the table. So like this:



    A B C D E F
    L K J I H G


    then have them rotate:



    L A B C D E 
    K J I H G F


    K L A B C D
    J I H G F E


    And so on.



    Done!



    (Only you will have 10 on each side.)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      In your example, A meets L,J,H,F,D,B, and then back to L. So this is equivalent to fixing the odds and rotating the evens.
      $endgroup$
      – Aubrey da Cunha
      Apr 21 '11 at 18:16










    • $begingroup$
      OK I see that now.
      $endgroup$
      – futurebird
      Apr 21 '11 at 18:33










    • $begingroup$
      With this solution, every person will only meet half the other people (like speed-dating). By keeping one person fixed (see below), everyone will meet everyone else (like speed-networking).
      $endgroup$
      – Barry Fruitman
      Mar 18 '15 at 20:45
















    1












    $begingroup$

    Seat your guests at a long banquet table, but don't seat anyone at the heads of the table. So like this:



    A B C D E F
    L K J I H G


    then have them rotate:



    L A B C D E 
    K J I H G F


    K L A B C D
    J I H G F E


    And so on.



    Done!



    (Only you will have 10 on each side.)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      In your example, A meets L,J,H,F,D,B, and then back to L. So this is equivalent to fixing the odds and rotating the evens.
      $endgroup$
      – Aubrey da Cunha
      Apr 21 '11 at 18:16










    • $begingroup$
      OK I see that now.
      $endgroup$
      – futurebird
      Apr 21 '11 at 18:33










    • $begingroup$
      With this solution, every person will only meet half the other people (like speed-dating). By keeping one person fixed (see below), everyone will meet everyone else (like speed-networking).
      $endgroup$
      – Barry Fruitman
      Mar 18 '15 at 20:45














    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    Seat your guests at a long banquet table, but don't seat anyone at the heads of the table. So like this:



    A B C D E F
    L K J I H G


    then have them rotate:



    L A B C D E 
    K J I H G F


    K L A B C D
    J I H G F E


    And so on.



    Done!



    (Only you will have 10 on each side.)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Seat your guests at a long banquet table, but don't seat anyone at the heads of the table. So like this:



    A B C D E F
    L K J I H G


    then have them rotate:



    L A B C D E 
    K J I H G F


    K L A B C D
    J I H G F E


    And so on.



    Done!



    (Only you will have 10 on each side.)







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Apr 21 '11 at 17:48









    futurebirdfuturebird

    3,60412752




    3,60412752








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      In your example, A meets L,J,H,F,D,B, and then back to L. So this is equivalent to fixing the odds and rotating the evens.
      $endgroup$
      – Aubrey da Cunha
      Apr 21 '11 at 18:16










    • $begingroup$
      OK I see that now.
      $endgroup$
      – futurebird
      Apr 21 '11 at 18:33










    • $begingroup$
      With this solution, every person will only meet half the other people (like speed-dating). By keeping one person fixed (see below), everyone will meet everyone else (like speed-networking).
      $endgroup$
      – Barry Fruitman
      Mar 18 '15 at 20:45














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      In your example, A meets L,J,H,F,D,B, and then back to L. So this is equivalent to fixing the odds and rotating the evens.
      $endgroup$
      – Aubrey da Cunha
      Apr 21 '11 at 18:16










    • $begingroup$
      OK I see that now.
      $endgroup$
      – futurebird
      Apr 21 '11 at 18:33










    • $begingroup$
      With this solution, every person will only meet half the other people (like speed-dating). By keeping one person fixed (see below), everyone will meet everyone else (like speed-networking).
      $endgroup$
      – Barry Fruitman
      Mar 18 '15 at 20:45








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    In your example, A meets L,J,H,F,D,B, and then back to L. So this is equivalent to fixing the odds and rotating the evens.
    $endgroup$
    – Aubrey da Cunha
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:16




    $begingroup$
    In your example, A meets L,J,H,F,D,B, and then back to L. So this is equivalent to fixing the odds and rotating the evens.
    $endgroup$
    – Aubrey da Cunha
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:16












    $begingroup$
    OK I see that now.
    $endgroup$
    – futurebird
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:33




    $begingroup$
    OK I see that now.
    $endgroup$
    – futurebird
    Apr 21 '11 at 18:33












    $begingroup$
    With this solution, every person will only meet half the other people (like speed-dating). By keeping one person fixed (see below), everyone will meet everyone else (like speed-networking).
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Fruitman
    Mar 18 '15 at 20:45




    $begingroup$
    With this solution, every person will only meet half the other people (like speed-dating). By keeping one person fixed (see below), everyone will meet everyone else (like speed-networking).
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Fruitman
    Mar 18 '15 at 20:45











    10












    $begingroup$

    I think the answer is:

    Make one person stationary, rotate all the folks. This actually works.



    Example with N=6. 1 is stationary. (Each person in the top row "meets" the corresponding person just below in the bottom row.)



    1) (#1:4) (#2:5) (#3:6) (#4:1) (#5:2) (#6:3)



    1 2 3
    4 5 6


    2) (#1:4,5) (#2:5,3) (#3:6,2) (#4:1,6) (#5:2,1) (#6:3,4)



    1 4 2
    5 6 3


    3) (#1:4,5,6) (#2:5,3,4) (#3:6,2,5) (#4:1,6,2) (#5:2,1,3) (#6:3,4,1)



    1 5 4
    6 3 2


    4) (#1:4,5,6,3) (#2:5,3,4,6) (#3:6,2,5,1) (4:1,6,2,5) (5:2,1,3,4) (6:3,4,1,2)



    1 6 5
    3 2 4


    5) (#1: 4,5,6,3,2) (#2:5,3,4,6,1) (#3:6,2,5,1,4) (4:1,6,2,5,3) (5:2,1,3,4,6) (6:3,4,1,2,5)



    1 3 6
    2 4 5





    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I tried to show the stages above. Hard to do w/out a diagram. Draw it out: 1) draw six circles (a network graph), then draw a line w/ 1,2,3 on one side, 4,5,6 on the other. Make a box around 1, it is stationary. For each couplet (sitting across the line), make a line on the graph connecting them. in round 1, you connect, 1-4, 2-5, 3-6. Round 2, rotate all the numbers around the line, except 1 (it's in a box). You'll see that it just works out. I don't know why.
      $endgroup$
      – Jesse Phillips
      Apr 21 '11 at 17:53






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      This is an elegant and simple answer-- it is actually less confusing to follow than the "speed date" plan of successively dividing groups in half. For any group of 2n people, there will be 2n-1 rounds, with everyone meeting everyone else once. If you have an odd number of people, just add an imaginary person to the mix, with the result that each person has one round off from meeting anyone. Jesse Phillips suggests seating everyone at a long banquet table and rotating as in a little don's answer, but one person sitting at a corner remains fixed, while the other 2n-1 people rotate cyclically.
      $endgroup$
      – Jonas Kibelbek
      Apr 21 '11 at 20:07












    • $begingroup$
      Label the stationary person (in one corner) by $p_0$ and the people in the cycle in order counter-clockwise by $p_i$ for $1 leq i leq 2n-1$, with $p_1$ opposite $p_0$ . Clearly, $p_0$ meets everyone once and the other $p_i$ are symmetric; so it suffices to check that $p_1$ meets everyone. Here is the list of partners for $p_1$, as everyone but $p_0$ moves counterclockwise each round: $p_0, p_{2n-2}, p_{2n-4}, ldots, p_4, p_2, p_{2n-1}, p_{2n-3}, p_{2n-5}, dots , p_5, p_3$. Very nice solution!
      $endgroup$
      – Jonas Kibelbek
      Apr 21 '11 at 20:26












    • $begingroup$
      I changed the formatting in the answer from "vertical" (which wasn't working) to "horizontal", but feel free to revert. BTW, this solution which you independently found is also present on Wikipedia.
      $endgroup$
      – ShreevatsaR
      Jun 29 '11 at 16:34


















    10












    $begingroup$

    I think the answer is:

    Make one person stationary, rotate all the folks. This actually works.



    Example with N=6. 1 is stationary. (Each person in the top row "meets" the corresponding person just below in the bottom row.)



    1) (#1:4) (#2:5) (#3:6) (#4:1) (#5:2) (#6:3)



    1 2 3
    4 5 6


    2) (#1:4,5) (#2:5,3) (#3:6,2) (#4:1,6) (#5:2,1) (#6:3,4)



    1 4 2
    5 6 3


    3) (#1:4,5,6) (#2:5,3,4) (#3:6,2,5) (#4:1,6,2) (#5:2,1,3) (#6:3,4,1)



    1 5 4
    6 3 2


    4) (#1:4,5,6,3) (#2:5,3,4,6) (#3:6,2,5,1) (4:1,6,2,5) (5:2,1,3,4) (6:3,4,1,2)



    1 6 5
    3 2 4


    5) (#1: 4,5,6,3,2) (#2:5,3,4,6,1) (#3:6,2,5,1,4) (4:1,6,2,5,3) (5:2,1,3,4,6) (6:3,4,1,2,5)



    1 3 6
    2 4 5





    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I tried to show the stages above. Hard to do w/out a diagram. Draw it out: 1) draw six circles (a network graph), then draw a line w/ 1,2,3 on one side, 4,5,6 on the other. Make a box around 1, it is stationary. For each couplet (sitting across the line), make a line on the graph connecting them. in round 1, you connect, 1-4, 2-5, 3-6. Round 2, rotate all the numbers around the line, except 1 (it's in a box). You'll see that it just works out. I don't know why.
      $endgroup$
      – Jesse Phillips
      Apr 21 '11 at 17:53






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      This is an elegant and simple answer-- it is actually less confusing to follow than the "speed date" plan of successively dividing groups in half. For any group of 2n people, there will be 2n-1 rounds, with everyone meeting everyone else once. If you have an odd number of people, just add an imaginary person to the mix, with the result that each person has one round off from meeting anyone. Jesse Phillips suggests seating everyone at a long banquet table and rotating as in a little don's answer, but one person sitting at a corner remains fixed, while the other 2n-1 people rotate cyclically.
      $endgroup$
      – Jonas Kibelbek
      Apr 21 '11 at 20:07












    • $begingroup$
      Label the stationary person (in one corner) by $p_0$ and the people in the cycle in order counter-clockwise by $p_i$ for $1 leq i leq 2n-1$, with $p_1$ opposite $p_0$ . Clearly, $p_0$ meets everyone once and the other $p_i$ are symmetric; so it suffices to check that $p_1$ meets everyone. Here is the list of partners for $p_1$, as everyone but $p_0$ moves counterclockwise each round: $p_0, p_{2n-2}, p_{2n-4}, ldots, p_4, p_2, p_{2n-1}, p_{2n-3}, p_{2n-5}, dots , p_5, p_3$. Very nice solution!
      $endgroup$
      – Jonas Kibelbek
      Apr 21 '11 at 20:26












    • $begingroup$
      I changed the formatting in the answer from "vertical" (which wasn't working) to "horizontal", but feel free to revert. BTW, this solution which you independently found is also present on Wikipedia.
      $endgroup$
      – ShreevatsaR
      Jun 29 '11 at 16:34
















    10












    10








    10





    $begingroup$

    I think the answer is:

    Make one person stationary, rotate all the folks. This actually works.



    Example with N=6. 1 is stationary. (Each person in the top row "meets" the corresponding person just below in the bottom row.)



    1) (#1:4) (#2:5) (#3:6) (#4:1) (#5:2) (#6:3)



    1 2 3
    4 5 6


    2) (#1:4,5) (#2:5,3) (#3:6,2) (#4:1,6) (#5:2,1) (#6:3,4)



    1 4 2
    5 6 3


    3) (#1:4,5,6) (#2:5,3,4) (#3:6,2,5) (#4:1,6,2) (#5:2,1,3) (#6:3,4,1)



    1 5 4
    6 3 2


    4) (#1:4,5,6,3) (#2:5,3,4,6) (#3:6,2,5,1) (4:1,6,2,5) (5:2,1,3,4) (6:3,4,1,2)



    1 6 5
    3 2 4


    5) (#1: 4,5,6,3,2) (#2:5,3,4,6,1) (#3:6,2,5,1,4) (4:1,6,2,5,3) (5:2,1,3,4,6) (6:3,4,1,2,5)



    1 3 6
    2 4 5





    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    I think the answer is:

    Make one person stationary, rotate all the folks. This actually works.



    Example with N=6. 1 is stationary. (Each person in the top row "meets" the corresponding person just below in the bottom row.)



    1) (#1:4) (#2:5) (#3:6) (#4:1) (#5:2) (#6:3)



    1 2 3
    4 5 6


    2) (#1:4,5) (#2:5,3) (#3:6,2) (#4:1,6) (#5:2,1) (#6:3,4)



    1 4 2
    5 6 3


    3) (#1:4,5,6) (#2:5,3,4) (#3:6,2,5) (#4:1,6,2) (#5:2,1,3) (#6:3,4,1)



    1 5 4
    6 3 2


    4) (#1:4,5,6,3) (#2:5,3,4,6) (#3:6,2,5,1) (4:1,6,2,5) (5:2,1,3,4) (6:3,4,1,2)



    1 6 5
    3 2 4


    5) (#1: 4,5,6,3,2) (#2:5,3,4,6,1) (#3:6,2,5,1,4) (4:1,6,2,5,3) (5:2,1,3,4,6) (6:3,4,1,2,5)



    1 3 6
    2 4 5






    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Mar 3 '18 at 20:05









    Community

    1




    1










    answered Apr 21 '11 at 17:36









    Jesse PhillipsJesse Phillips

    1012




    1012












    • $begingroup$
      I tried to show the stages above. Hard to do w/out a diagram. Draw it out: 1) draw six circles (a network graph), then draw a line w/ 1,2,3 on one side, 4,5,6 on the other. Make a box around 1, it is stationary. For each couplet (sitting across the line), make a line on the graph connecting them. in round 1, you connect, 1-4, 2-5, 3-6. Round 2, rotate all the numbers around the line, except 1 (it's in a box). You'll see that it just works out. I don't know why.
      $endgroup$
      – Jesse Phillips
      Apr 21 '11 at 17:53






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      This is an elegant and simple answer-- it is actually less confusing to follow than the "speed date" plan of successively dividing groups in half. For any group of 2n people, there will be 2n-1 rounds, with everyone meeting everyone else once. If you have an odd number of people, just add an imaginary person to the mix, with the result that each person has one round off from meeting anyone. Jesse Phillips suggests seating everyone at a long banquet table and rotating as in a little don's answer, but one person sitting at a corner remains fixed, while the other 2n-1 people rotate cyclically.
      $endgroup$
      – Jonas Kibelbek
      Apr 21 '11 at 20:07












    • $begingroup$
      Label the stationary person (in one corner) by $p_0$ and the people in the cycle in order counter-clockwise by $p_i$ for $1 leq i leq 2n-1$, with $p_1$ opposite $p_0$ . Clearly, $p_0$ meets everyone once and the other $p_i$ are symmetric; so it suffices to check that $p_1$ meets everyone. Here is the list of partners for $p_1$, as everyone but $p_0$ moves counterclockwise each round: $p_0, p_{2n-2}, p_{2n-4}, ldots, p_4, p_2, p_{2n-1}, p_{2n-3}, p_{2n-5}, dots , p_5, p_3$. Very nice solution!
      $endgroup$
      – Jonas Kibelbek
      Apr 21 '11 at 20:26












    • $begingroup$
      I changed the formatting in the answer from "vertical" (which wasn't working) to "horizontal", but feel free to revert. BTW, this solution which you independently found is also present on Wikipedia.
      $endgroup$
      – ShreevatsaR
      Jun 29 '11 at 16:34




















    • $begingroup$
      I tried to show the stages above. Hard to do w/out a diagram. Draw it out: 1) draw six circles (a network graph), then draw a line w/ 1,2,3 on one side, 4,5,6 on the other. Make a box around 1, it is stationary. For each couplet (sitting across the line), make a line on the graph connecting them. in round 1, you connect, 1-4, 2-5, 3-6. Round 2, rotate all the numbers around the line, except 1 (it's in a box). You'll see that it just works out. I don't know why.
      $endgroup$
      – Jesse Phillips
      Apr 21 '11 at 17:53






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      This is an elegant and simple answer-- it is actually less confusing to follow than the "speed date" plan of successively dividing groups in half. For any group of 2n people, there will be 2n-1 rounds, with everyone meeting everyone else once. If you have an odd number of people, just add an imaginary person to the mix, with the result that each person has one round off from meeting anyone. Jesse Phillips suggests seating everyone at a long banquet table and rotating as in a little don's answer, but one person sitting at a corner remains fixed, while the other 2n-1 people rotate cyclically.
      $endgroup$
      – Jonas Kibelbek
      Apr 21 '11 at 20:07












    • $begingroup$
      Label the stationary person (in one corner) by $p_0$ and the people in the cycle in order counter-clockwise by $p_i$ for $1 leq i leq 2n-1$, with $p_1$ opposite $p_0$ . Clearly, $p_0$ meets everyone once and the other $p_i$ are symmetric; so it suffices to check that $p_1$ meets everyone. Here is the list of partners for $p_1$, as everyone but $p_0$ moves counterclockwise each round: $p_0, p_{2n-2}, p_{2n-4}, ldots, p_4, p_2, p_{2n-1}, p_{2n-3}, p_{2n-5}, dots , p_5, p_3$. Very nice solution!
      $endgroup$
      – Jonas Kibelbek
      Apr 21 '11 at 20:26












    • $begingroup$
      I changed the formatting in the answer from "vertical" (which wasn't working) to "horizontal", but feel free to revert. BTW, this solution which you independently found is also present on Wikipedia.
      $endgroup$
      – ShreevatsaR
      Jun 29 '11 at 16:34


















    $begingroup$
    I tried to show the stages above. Hard to do w/out a diagram. Draw it out: 1) draw six circles (a network graph), then draw a line w/ 1,2,3 on one side, 4,5,6 on the other. Make a box around 1, it is stationary. For each couplet (sitting across the line), make a line on the graph connecting them. in round 1, you connect, 1-4, 2-5, 3-6. Round 2, rotate all the numbers around the line, except 1 (it's in a box). You'll see that it just works out. I don't know why.
    $endgroup$
    – Jesse Phillips
    Apr 21 '11 at 17:53




    $begingroup$
    I tried to show the stages above. Hard to do w/out a diagram. Draw it out: 1) draw six circles (a network graph), then draw a line w/ 1,2,3 on one side, 4,5,6 on the other. Make a box around 1, it is stationary. For each couplet (sitting across the line), make a line on the graph connecting them. in round 1, you connect, 1-4, 2-5, 3-6. Round 2, rotate all the numbers around the line, except 1 (it's in a box). You'll see that it just works out. I don't know why.
    $endgroup$
    – Jesse Phillips
    Apr 21 '11 at 17:53




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    This is an elegant and simple answer-- it is actually less confusing to follow than the "speed date" plan of successively dividing groups in half. For any group of 2n people, there will be 2n-1 rounds, with everyone meeting everyone else once. If you have an odd number of people, just add an imaginary person to the mix, with the result that each person has one round off from meeting anyone. Jesse Phillips suggests seating everyone at a long banquet table and rotating as in a little don's answer, but one person sitting at a corner remains fixed, while the other 2n-1 people rotate cyclically.
    $endgroup$
    – Jonas Kibelbek
    Apr 21 '11 at 20:07






    $begingroup$
    This is an elegant and simple answer-- it is actually less confusing to follow than the "speed date" plan of successively dividing groups in half. For any group of 2n people, there will be 2n-1 rounds, with everyone meeting everyone else once. If you have an odd number of people, just add an imaginary person to the mix, with the result that each person has one round off from meeting anyone. Jesse Phillips suggests seating everyone at a long banquet table and rotating as in a little don's answer, but one person sitting at a corner remains fixed, while the other 2n-1 people rotate cyclically.
    $endgroup$
    – Jonas Kibelbek
    Apr 21 '11 at 20:07














    $begingroup$
    Label the stationary person (in one corner) by $p_0$ and the people in the cycle in order counter-clockwise by $p_i$ for $1 leq i leq 2n-1$, with $p_1$ opposite $p_0$ . Clearly, $p_0$ meets everyone once and the other $p_i$ are symmetric; so it suffices to check that $p_1$ meets everyone. Here is the list of partners for $p_1$, as everyone but $p_0$ moves counterclockwise each round: $p_0, p_{2n-2}, p_{2n-4}, ldots, p_4, p_2, p_{2n-1}, p_{2n-3}, p_{2n-5}, dots , p_5, p_3$. Very nice solution!
    $endgroup$
    – Jonas Kibelbek
    Apr 21 '11 at 20:26






    $begingroup$
    Label the stationary person (in one corner) by $p_0$ and the people in the cycle in order counter-clockwise by $p_i$ for $1 leq i leq 2n-1$, with $p_1$ opposite $p_0$ . Clearly, $p_0$ meets everyone once and the other $p_i$ are symmetric; so it suffices to check that $p_1$ meets everyone. Here is the list of partners for $p_1$, as everyone but $p_0$ moves counterclockwise each round: $p_0, p_{2n-2}, p_{2n-4}, ldots, p_4, p_2, p_{2n-1}, p_{2n-3}, p_{2n-5}, dots , p_5, p_3$. Very nice solution!
    $endgroup$
    – Jonas Kibelbek
    Apr 21 '11 at 20:26














    $begingroup$
    I changed the formatting in the answer from "vertical" (which wasn't working) to "horizontal", but feel free to revert. BTW, this solution which you independently found is also present on Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – ShreevatsaR
    Jun 29 '11 at 16:34






    $begingroup$
    I changed the formatting in the answer from "vertical" (which wasn't working) to "horizontal", but feel free to revert. BTW, this solution which you independently found is also present on Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – ShreevatsaR
    Jun 29 '11 at 16:34













    0












    $begingroup$

    For sixteen people, sort them into four groups of four: A,B,C,D. Then seat them at two tables of eight:

    ABAB CDCD

    ABAB CDCD

    then

    ACAC BDBD

    ACAC BDBD

    then

    ADAD BCBC

    ADAD BCBC



    Rotate the people within A, and those within B, etc, so they meet everyone within their own group.

    Then, counting neighbours as next-to, opposite, and opposite's next-to, some people can meet all 15 others, but everyone else meets only 11 others.



    --



    For twelve people, number the chairs 1 to 6 on one side of the table, and 7 to 12 on the other side, so 1 faces 7, 2 faces 8 and so on. Everyone moves from seat $n$ to seat $3n (mod 13)$ after each course.

    ABCDEF

    GHIJKL

    then

    IEAJFB

    KGCLHD

    then

    CFILBE

    HKADGJ

    In this arrangement, everyone meets everyone else (next-to, opposite or opposite's next-to) except for BK, EH and FG.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      For sixteen people, sort them into four groups of four: A,B,C,D. Then seat them at two tables of eight:

      ABAB CDCD

      ABAB CDCD

      then

      ACAC BDBD

      ACAC BDBD

      then

      ADAD BCBC

      ADAD BCBC



      Rotate the people within A, and those within B, etc, so they meet everyone within their own group.

      Then, counting neighbours as next-to, opposite, and opposite's next-to, some people can meet all 15 others, but everyone else meets only 11 others.



      --



      For twelve people, number the chairs 1 to 6 on one side of the table, and 7 to 12 on the other side, so 1 faces 7, 2 faces 8 and so on. Everyone moves from seat $n$ to seat $3n (mod 13)$ after each course.

      ABCDEF

      GHIJKL

      then

      IEAJFB

      KGCLHD

      then

      CFILBE

      HKADGJ

      In this arrangement, everyone meets everyone else (next-to, opposite or opposite's next-to) except for BK, EH and FG.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        For sixteen people, sort them into four groups of four: A,B,C,D. Then seat them at two tables of eight:

        ABAB CDCD

        ABAB CDCD

        then

        ACAC BDBD

        ACAC BDBD

        then

        ADAD BCBC

        ADAD BCBC



        Rotate the people within A, and those within B, etc, so they meet everyone within their own group.

        Then, counting neighbours as next-to, opposite, and opposite's next-to, some people can meet all 15 others, but everyone else meets only 11 others.



        --



        For twelve people, number the chairs 1 to 6 on one side of the table, and 7 to 12 on the other side, so 1 faces 7, 2 faces 8 and so on. Everyone moves from seat $n$ to seat $3n (mod 13)$ after each course.

        ABCDEF

        GHIJKL

        then

        IEAJFB

        KGCLHD

        then

        CFILBE

        HKADGJ

        In this arrangement, everyone meets everyone else (next-to, opposite or opposite's next-to) except for BK, EH and FG.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        For sixteen people, sort them into four groups of four: A,B,C,D. Then seat them at two tables of eight:

        ABAB CDCD

        ABAB CDCD

        then

        ACAC BDBD

        ACAC BDBD

        then

        ADAD BCBC

        ADAD BCBC



        Rotate the people within A, and those within B, etc, so they meet everyone within their own group.

        Then, counting neighbours as next-to, opposite, and opposite's next-to, some people can meet all 15 others, but everyone else meets only 11 others.



        --



        For twelve people, number the chairs 1 to 6 on one side of the table, and 7 to 12 on the other side, so 1 faces 7, 2 faces 8 and so on. Everyone moves from seat $n$ to seat $3n (mod 13)$ after each course.

        ABCDEF

        GHIJKL

        then

        IEAJFB

        KGCLHD

        then

        CFILBE

        HKADGJ

        In this arrangement, everyone meets everyone else (next-to, opposite or opposite's next-to) except for BK, EH and FG.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Sep 23 '13 at 7:56

























        answered Sep 23 '13 at 7:28









        Empy2Empy2

        33.6k12362




        33.6k12362






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34328%2fhow-to-rotate-n-individuals-at-a-dinner-party-so-that-every-guest-meets-every-ot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            張江高科駅