Computing degrees and ramification indices of some extensions of $mathbb{Q}_2$












2














Let $K=mathbb{Q}_2$ and $F = K(zeta_3,alpha)$ where $zeta$ is a primitive third root of unity and $alpha$ is a cubic root of $2$, i.e. $alpha^3 = 2$.Let $K_1 = K(zeta_3)$, $K_2 = K(alpha)$ and $L=K_1(beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 alpha$.



Now I would like to compute the degrees and ramification indices of $L/K_1$.



Discoveries and attempts:




  • I noticed that $L$ contains $F$ since $beta^3/zeta_3 = alpha$.

  • I know that $F/K_1$ is a totally ramified extension of degree $3$. This can be seen by taking a look at the extensions $F/K_1/K$ and $F/K_2/K$ and noticing that $K_1/K$ is unramified of degree $2$ and $K_2/K$ is totally ramified of degree $3$.


Could you please explain what can I do now to get information about $L/K_1$ resp. $L/F$? Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question






















  • $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/mathbb{Z}_2$ is unramified of degree $2$ (that is $(2)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ so $[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/(2) : mathbb{Z}_2/(2)]=[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]:mathbb{Z}_2]$). $ mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]/mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ is totally ramified of degree $3$ ($pi=2^{1/3}$ then $(pi)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]$ and $pi^3 / 2 in mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]^times$). $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_32^{1/3}]$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2[2^{1/3}]$ since $2^{1/3},zeta_32^{1/3}$ have the same minimal polynomial
    – reuns
    Dec 23 at 1:43












  • @reuns: Thank you for your response! Could you please explain how your observation can be used for this problem? I am not able to see any relation.
    – Diglett
    Dec 23 at 11:52
















2














Let $K=mathbb{Q}_2$ and $F = K(zeta_3,alpha)$ where $zeta$ is a primitive third root of unity and $alpha$ is a cubic root of $2$, i.e. $alpha^3 = 2$.Let $K_1 = K(zeta_3)$, $K_2 = K(alpha)$ and $L=K_1(beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 alpha$.



Now I would like to compute the degrees and ramification indices of $L/K_1$.



Discoveries and attempts:




  • I noticed that $L$ contains $F$ since $beta^3/zeta_3 = alpha$.

  • I know that $F/K_1$ is a totally ramified extension of degree $3$. This can be seen by taking a look at the extensions $F/K_1/K$ and $F/K_2/K$ and noticing that $K_1/K$ is unramified of degree $2$ and $K_2/K$ is totally ramified of degree $3$.


Could you please explain what can I do now to get information about $L/K_1$ resp. $L/F$? Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question






















  • $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/mathbb{Z}_2$ is unramified of degree $2$ (that is $(2)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ so $[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/(2) : mathbb{Z}_2/(2)]=[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]:mathbb{Z}_2]$). $ mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]/mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ is totally ramified of degree $3$ ($pi=2^{1/3}$ then $(pi)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]$ and $pi^3 / 2 in mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]^times$). $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_32^{1/3}]$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2[2^{1/3}]$ since $2^{1/3},zeta_32^{1/3}$ have the same minimal polynomial
    – reuns
    Dec 23 at 1:43












  • @reuns: Thank you for your response! Could you please explain how your observation can be used for this problem? I am not able to see any relation.
    – Diglett
    Dec 23 at 11:52














2












2








2







Let $K=mathbb{Q}_2$ and $F = K(zeta_3,alpha)$ where $zeta$ is a primitive third root of unity and $alpha$ is a cubic root of $2$, i.e. $alpha^3 = 2$.Let $K_1 = K(zeta_3)$, $K_2 = K(alpha)$ and $L=K_1(beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 alpha$.



Now I would like to compute the degrees and ramification indices of $L/K_1$.



Discoveries and attempts:




  • I noticed that $L$ contains $F$ since $beta^3/zeta_3 = alpha$.

  • I know that $F/K_1$ is a totally ramified extension of degree $3$. This can be seen by taking a look at the extensions $F/K_1/K$ and $F/K_2/K$ and noticing that $K_1/K$ is unramified of degree $2$ and $K_2/K$ is totally ramified of degree $3$.


Could you please explain what can I do now to get information about $L/K_1$ resp. $L/F$? Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question













Let $K=mathbb{Q}_2$ and $F = K(zeta_3,alpha)$ where $zeta$ is a primitive third root of unity and $alpha$ is a cubic root of $2$, i.e. $alpha^3 = 2$.Let $K_1 = K(zeta_3)$, $K_2 = K(alpha)$ and $L=K_1(beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 alpha$.



Now I would like to compute the degrees and ramification indices of $L/K_1$.



Discoveries and attempts:




  • I noticed that $L$ contains $F$ since $beta^3/zeta_3 = alpha$.

  • I know that $F/K_1$ is a totally ramified extension of degree $3$. This can be seen by taking a look at the extensions $F/K_1/K$ and $F/K_2/K$ and noticing that $K_1/K$ is unramified of degree $2$ and $K_2/K$ is totally ramified of degree $3$.


Could you please explain what can I do now to get information about $L/K_1$ resp. $L/F$? Thank you!







abstract-algebra algebraic-number-theory extension-field local-field ramification






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 22 at 21:01









Diglett

879520




879520












  • $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/mathbb{Z}_2$ is unramified of degree $2$ (that is $(2)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ so $[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/(2) : mathbb{Z}_2/(2)]=[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]:mathbb{Z}_2]$). $ mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]/mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ is totally ramified of degree $3$ ($pi=2^{1/3}$ then $(pi)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]$ and $pi^3 / 2 in mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]^times$). $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_32^{1/3}]$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2[2^{1/3}]$ since $2^{1/3},zeta_32^{1/3}$ have the same minimal polynomial
    – reuns
    Dec 23 at 1:43












  • @reuns: Thank you for your response! Could you please explain how your observation can be used for this problem? I am not able to see any relation.
    – Diglett
    Dec 23 at 11:52


















  • $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/mathbb{Z}_2$ is unramified of degree $2$ (that is $(2)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ so $[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/(2) : mathbb{Z}_2/(2)]=[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]:mathbb{Z}_2]$). $ mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]/mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ is totally ramified of degree $3$ ($pi=2^{1/3}$ then $(pi)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]$ and $pi^3 / 2 in mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]^times$). $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_32^{1/3}]$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2[2^{1/3}]$ since $2^{1/3},zeta_32^{1/3}$ have the same minimal polynomial
    – reuns
    Dec 23 at 1:43












  • @reuns: Thank you for your response! Could you please explain how your observation can be used for this problem? I am not able to see any relation.
    – Diglett
    Dec 23 at 11:52
















$mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/mathbb{Z}_2$ is unramified of degree $2$ (that is $(2)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ so $[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/(2) : mathbb{Z}_2/(2)]=[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]:mathbb{Z}_2]$). $ mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]/mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ is totally ramified of degree $3$ ($pi=2^{1/3}$ then $(pi)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]$ and $pi^3 / 2 in mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]^times$). $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_32^{1/3}]$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2[2^{1/3}]$ since $2^{1/3},zeta_32^{1/3}$ have the same minimal polynomial
– reuns
Dec 23 at 1:43






$mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/mathbb{Z}_2$ is unramified of degree $2$ (that is $(2)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ so $[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]/(2) : mathbb{Z}_2/(2)]=[mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]:mathbb{Z}_2]$). $ mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]/mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3]$ is totally ramified of degree $3$ ($pi=2^{1/3}$ then $(pi)$ is the unique prime ideal of $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]$ and $pi^3 / 2 in mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_3,2^{1/3}]^times$). $mathbb{Z}_2[zeta_32^{1/3}]$ is isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_2[2^{1/3}]$ since $2^{1/3},zeta_32^{1/3}$ have the same minimal polynomial
– reuns
Dec 23 at 1:43














@reuns: Thank you for your response! Could you please explain how your observation can be used for this problem? I am not able to see any relation.
– Diglett
Dec 23 at 11:52




@reuns: Thank you for your response! Could you please explain how your observation can be used for this problem? I am not able to see any relation.
– Diglett
Dec 23 at 11:52










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Let $L_{1}=mathbb{Q}_{2}(beta)$ and note that $beta$ is a root of $x^{9}-2$ over $K$, which is an Eisenstein polynomial. Therefore $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified of degree 9 (see e.g. Proposition 3.6 of Local Fields and Their Extensions by Fesenko & Vostokov for a proof if you don't know this result). Now, $K_{1}/K$ is Galois of degree 2, therefore we have by Galois theory
$$[L:L_{1}]=[K_{1}:K],$$
because $L=L_{1}K_{1}$. Therefore we conclude that $[L:L_{1}]=2$. So $[L:K]=18$ by the tower formula, whence $[L:K_{1}]=9$.



Now, note that
$$f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}),$$
because $K_{1}/K$ is unramified (where $f(L/K)$ means the inertia degree of the extension $L/K$). Also
$$e(L/K)=e(L/L_{1})e(L_{1}/K)=9e(L/L_{1}),$$
because $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified (where $e(L/K)$ means the ramification index of the extension $L/K$). Thus we see that $2mid f(L/K)$ and $9mid e(L/K)$. By the fundamental identity we have $$18=[L:K]=e(L/K)f(L/K),$$
whence $f(L/K)=2$ and $e(L/K)=9$. This implies that $f(L/K_{1})=1$ because
$$2=f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}).$$
It also implies that $e(L/K_{1})=9$ because
$$9=e(L/K)=e(L/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=e(L/K_{1}).$$



Now for the extension $L/F$ we have
$$2=f(L/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/F)f(F/K_{1}),$$
whence $f(L/F)=1$. Furthermore
$$9=e(L/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=3e(L/F),$$
whence $e(L/F)=3$ and we conclude that $[L:F]=e(L/F)f(L/F)=3$.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049847%2fcomputing-degrees-and-ramification-indices-of-some-extensions-of-mathbbq-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Let $L_{1}=mathbb{Q}_{2}(beta)$ and note that $beta$ is a root of $x^{9}-2$ over $K$, which is an Eisenstein polynomial. Therefore $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified of degree 9 (see e.g. Proposition 3.6 of Local Fields and Their Extensions by Fesenko & Vostokov for a proof if you don't know this result). Now, $K_{1}/K$ is Galois of degree 2, therefore we have by Galois theory
    $$[L:L_{1}]=[K_{1}:K],$$
    because $L=L_{1}K_{1}$. Therefore we conclude that $[L:L_{1}]=2$. So $[L:K]=18$ by the tower formula, whence $[L:K_{1}]=9$.



    Now, note that
    $$f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}),$$
    because $K_{1}/K$ is unramified (where $f(L/K)$ means the inertia degree of the extension $L/K$). Also
    $$e(L/K)=e(L/L_{1})e(L_{1}/K)=9e(L/L_{1}),$$
    because $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified (where $e(L/K)$ means the ramification index of the extension $L/K$). Thus we see that $2mid f(L/K)$ and $9mid e(L/K)$. By the fundamental identity we have $$18=[L:K]=e(L/K)f(L/K),$$
    whence $f(L/K)=2$ and $e(L/K)=9$. This implies that $f(L/K_{1})=1$ because
    $$2=f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}).$$
    It also implies that $e(L/K_{1})=9$ because
    $$9=e(L/K)=e(L/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=e(L/K_{1}).$$



    Now for the extension $L/F$ we have
    $$2=f(L/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/F)f(F/K_{1}),$$
    whence $f(L/F)=1$. Furthermore
    $$9=e(L/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=3e(L/F),$$
    whence $e(L/F)=3$ and we conclude that $[L:F]=e(L/F)f(L/F)=3$.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      0














      Let $L_{1}=mathbb{Q}_{2}(beta)$ and note that $beta$ is a root of $x^{9}-2$ over $K$, which is an Eisenstein polynomial. Therefore $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified of degree 9 (see e.g. Proposition 3.6 of Local Fields and Their Extensions by Fesenko & Vostokov for a proof if you don't know this result). Now, $K_{1}/K$ is Galois of degree 2, therefore we have by Galois theory
      $$[L:L_{1}]=[K_{1}:K],$$
      because $L=L_{1}K_{1}$. Therefore we conclude that $[L:L_{1}]=2$. So $[L:K]=18$ by the tower formula, whence $[L:K_{1}]=9$.



      Now, note that
      $$f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}),$$
      because $K_{1}/K$ is unramified (where $f(L/K)$ means the inertia degree of the extension $L/K$). Also
      $$e(L/K)=e(L/L_{1})e(L_{1}/K)=9e(L/L_{1}),$$
      because $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified (where $e(L/K)$ means the ramification index of the extension $L/K$). Thus we see that $2mid f(L/K)$ and $9mid e(L/K)$. By the fundamental identity we have $$18=[L:K]=e(L/K)f(L/K),$$
      whence $f(L/K)=2$ and $e(L/K)=9$. This implies that $f(L/K_{1})=1$ because
      $$2=f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}).$$
      It also implies that $e(L/K_{1})=9$ because
      $$9=e(L/K)=e(L/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=e(L/K_{1}).$$



      Now for the extension $L/F$ we have
      $$2=f(L/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/F)f(F/K_{1}),$$
      whence $f(L/F)=1$. Furthermore
      $$9=e(L/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=3e(L/F),$$
      whence $e(L/F)=3$ and we conclude that $[L:F]=e(L/F)f(L/F)=3$.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0






        Let $L_{1}=mathbb{Q}_{2}(beta)$ and note that $beta$ is a root of $x^{9}-2$ over $K$, which is an Eisenstein polynomial. Therefore $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified of degree 9 (see e.g. Proposition 3.6 of Local Fields and Their Extensions by Fesenko & Vostokov for a proof if you don't know this result). Now, $K_{1}/K$ is Galois of degree 2, therefore we have by Galois theory
        $$[L:L_{1}]=[K_{1}:K],$$
        because $L=L_{1}K_{1}$. Therefore we conclude that $[L:L_{1}]=2$. So $[L:K]=18$ by the tower formula, whence $[L:K_{1}]=9$.



        Now, note that
        $$f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}),$$
        because $K_{1}/K$ is unramified (where $f(L/K)$ means the inertia degree of the extension $L/K$). Also
        $$e(L/K)=e(L/L_{1})e(L_{1}/K)=9e(L/L_{1}),$$
        because $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified (where $e(L/K)$ means the ramification index of the extension $L/K$). Thus we see that $2mid f(L/K)$ and $9mid e(L/K)$. By the fundamental identity we have $$18=[L:K]=e(L/K)f(L/K),$$
        whence $f(L/K)=2$ and $e(L/K)=9$. This implies that $f(L/K_{1})=1$ because
        $$2=f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}).$$
        It also implies that $e(L/K_{1})=9$ because
        $$9=e(L/K)=e(L/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=e(L/K_{1}).$$



        Now for the extension $L/F$ we have
        $$2=f(L/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/F)f(F/K_{1}),$$
        whence $f(L/F)=1$. Furthermore
        $$9=e(L/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=3e(L/F),$$
        whence $e(L/F)=3$ and we conclude that $[L:F]=e(L/F)f(L/F)=3$.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Let $L_{1}=mathbb{Q}_{2}(beta)$ and note that $beta$ is a root of $x^{9}-2$ over $K$, which is an Eisenstein polynomial. Therefore $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified of degree 9 (see e.g. Proposition 3.6 of Local Fields and Their Extensions by Fesenko & Vostokov for a proof if you don't know this result). Now, $K_{1}/K$ is Galois of degree 2, therefore we have by Galois theory
        $$[L:L_{1}]=[K_{1}:K],$$
        because $L=L_{1}K_{1}$. Therefore we conclude that $[L:L_{1}]=2$. So $[L:K]=18$ by the tower formula, whence $[L:K_{1}]=9$.



        Now, note that
        $$f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}),$$
        because $K_{1}/K$ is unramified (where $f(L/K)$ means the inertia degree of the extension $L/K$). Also
        $$e(L/K)=e(L/L_{1})e(L_{1}/K)=9e(L/L_{1}),$$
        because $L_{1}/K$ is totally ramified (where $e(L/K)$ means the ramification index of the extension $L/K$). Thus we see that $2mid f(L/K)$ and $9mid e(L/K)$. By the fundamental identity we have $$18=[L:K]=e(L/K)f(L/K),$$
        whence $f(L/K)=2$ and $e(L/K)=9$. This implies that $f(L/K_{1})=1$ because
        $$2=f(L/K)=f(L/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/K_{1}).$$
        It also implies that $e(L/K_{1})=9$ because
        $$9=e(L/K)=e(L/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=e(L/K_{1}).$$



        Now for the extension $L/F$ we have
        $$2=f(L/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K)=f(L/F)f(F/K_{1})f(K_{1}/K)=2f(L/F)f(F/K_{1}),$$
        whence $f(L/F)=1$. Furthermore
        $$9=e(L/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K)=e(L/F)e(F/K_{1})e(K_{1}/K)=3e(L/F),$$
        whence $e(L/F)=3$ and we conclude that $[L:F]=e(L/F)f(L/F)=3$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago

























        answered 2 days ago









        YumekuiMath

        34114




        34114






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049847%2fcomputing-degrees-and-ramification-indices-of-some-extensions-of-mathbbq-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            張江高科駅