Is Using Tikzmarknode within Tikz Matrix possible?












4















I was not able to use tikzmarknodes within the matrix example below. I have included an image of the arrows I want to draw and the MWE



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{tikzmark,matrix,calc}

begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);}]
matrix[matrix of math nodes,nodes={align=center,inner sep=3pt,
text height=1.5ex,text depth=.25ex,draw=gray!40,ultra thin},draw,inner
sep=0pt,ampersand replacement=&] (mat1)
at (-5,0){
|[fill=green!40!gray,text width=15mm]| x, text{or} 2^{y} & |
[fill=green!40!gray,text width=11mm]| y \
|[text width=15mm]| 1 & |[text
width=11mm]|
{pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
|[text width=15mm]| 2
& |[text width=11mm]|
{pgfmathparse{f(2)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
|[text width=15mm]| 4
& |[text width=11mm]|
{pgfmathparse{f(4)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
|[text width=15mm]| 8
& |[text width=11mm]|
{pgfmathparse{f(8)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
|[text width=15mm]| frac{1}{2}
& |[text width=11mm]|
{pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
|[text width=15mm]| frac{1}{4}
& |[text width=11mm]|
{pgfmathparse{f(.25)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
};
node at ([yshift=-.8cm,xshift=2cm]mat1.south)
[circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt] (1){$1$};
node at (1) [right=5pt,text=red] {Select $y$};
node at ([yshift=-1.5cm,xshift=.7cm]mat1.south)
[circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt] (2){$2$};
node at (2) [right=5pt,text=red] {Compute $x$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


This outputs:



enter image description here



The arrows I am trying to draw :



enter image description here










share|improve this question



























    4















    I was not able to use tikzmarknodes within the matrix example below. I have included an image of the arrows I want to draw and the MWE



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz}
    usetikzlibrary{tikzmark,matrix,calc}

    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);}]
    matrix[matrix of math nodes,nodes={align=center,inner sep=3pt,
    text height=1.5ex,text depth=.25ex,draw=gray!40,ultra thin},draw,inner
    sep=0pt,ampersand replacement=&] (mat1)
    at (-5,0){
    |[fill=green!40!gray,text width=15mm]| x, text{or} 2^{y} & |
    [fill=green!40!gray,text width=11mm]| y \
    |[text width=15mm]| 1 & |[text
    width=11mm]|
    {pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
    |[text width=15mm]| 2
    & |[text width=11mm]|
    {pgfmathparse{f(2)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
    |[text width=15mm]| 4
    & |[text width=11mm]|
    {pgfmathparse{f(4)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
    |[text width=15mm]| 8
    & |[text width=11mm]|
    {pgfmathparse{f(8)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
    |[text width=15mm]| frac{1}{2}
    & |[text width=11mm]|
    {pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
    |[text width=15mm]| frac{1}{4}
    & |[text width=11mm]|
    {pgfmathparse{f(.25)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
    };
    node at ([yshift=-.8cm,xshift=2cm]mat1.south)
    [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt] (1){$1$};
    node at (1) [right=5pt,text=red] {Select $y$};
    node at ([yshift=-1.5cm,xshift=.7cm]mat1.south)
    [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt] (2){$2$};
    node at (2) [right=5pt,text=red] {Compute $x$};
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    This outputs:



    enter image description here



    The arrows I am trying to draw :



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question

























      4












      4








      4








      I was not able to use tikzmarknodes within the matrix example below. I have included an image of the arrows I want to draw and the MWE



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usetikzlibrary{tikzmark,matrix,calc}

      begin{document}
      begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);}]
      matrix[matrix of math nodes,nodes={align=center,inner sep=3pt,
      text height=1.5ex,text depth=.25ex,draw=gray!40,ultra thin},draw,inner
      sep=0pt,ampersand replacement=&] (mat1)
      at (-5,0){
      |[fill=green!40!gray,text width=15mm]| x, text{or} 2^{y} & |
      [fill=green!40!gray,text width=11mm]| y \
      |[text width=15mm]| 1 & |[text
      width=11mm]|
      {pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
      |[text width=15mm]| 2
      & |[text width=11mm]|
      {pgfmathparse{f(2)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
      |[text width=15mm]| 4
      & |[text width=11mm]|
      {pgfmathparse{f(4)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
      |[text width=15mm]| 8
      & |[text width=11mm]|
      {pgfmathparse{f(8)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
      |[text width=15mm]| frac{1}{2}
      & |[text width=11mm]|
      {pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
      |[text width=15mm]| frac{1}{4}
      & |[text width=11mm]|
      {pgfmathparse{f(.25)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
      };
      node at ([yshift=-.8cm,xshift=2cm]mat1.south)
      [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt] (1){$1$};
      node at (1) [right=5pt,text=red] {Select $y$};
      node at ([yshift=-1.5cm,xshift=.7cm]mat1.south)
      [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt] (2){$2$};
      node at (2) [right=5pt,text=red] {Compute $x$};
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}


      This outputs:



      enter image description here



      The arrows I am trying to draw :



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question














      I was not able to use tikzmarknodes within the matrix example below. I have included an image of the arrows I want to draw and the MWE



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usetikzlibrary{tikzmark,matrix,calc}

      begin{document}
      begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);}]
      matrix[matrix of math nodes,nodes={align=center,inner sep=3pt,
      text height=1.5ex,text depth=.25ex,draw=gray!40,ultra thin},draw,inner
      sep=0pt,ampersand replacement=&] (mat1)
      at (-5,0){
      |[fill=green!40!gray,text width=15mm]| x, text{or} 2^{y} & |
      [fill=green!40!gray,text width=11mm]| y \
      |[text width=15mm]| 1 & |[text
      width=11mm]|
      {pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
      |[text width=15mm]| 2
      & |[text width=11mm]|
      {pgfmathparse{f(2)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
      |[text width=15mm]| 4
      & |[text width=11mm]|
      {pgfmathparse{f(4)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
      |[text width=15mm]| 8
      & |[text width=11mm]|
      {pgfmathparse{f(8)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
      |[text width=15mm]| frac{1}{2}
      & |[text width=11mm]|
      {pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
      |[text width=15mm]| frac{1}{4}
      & |[text width=11mm]|
      {pgfmathparse{f(.25)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
      };
      node at ([yshift=-.8cm,xshift=2cm]mat1.south)
      [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt] (1){$1$};
      node at (1) [right=5pt,text=red] {Select $y$};
      node at ([yshift=-1.5cm,xshift=.7cm]mat1.south)
      [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt] (2){$2$};
      node at (2) [right=5pt,text=red] {Compute $x$};
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}


      This outputs:



      enter image description here



      The arrows I am trying to draw :



      enter image description here







      tikz-pgf tikzmark






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Feb 6 at 15:06









      MathScholarMathScholar

      1,09529




      1,09529






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          You do not need tikzmark here because tikzmark is needed to make a non-node a node, but everything you are playing with here are nodes. EDIT: Fixed the directions of the arrows (big thanks to manoooh) and borrowed column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} from Zarkos answer. (However, I disagree with replacing pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} by something using pgfmathtruncatemacro because this won't work once you have non-integer results.)



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{matrix}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);}]
          matrix[matrix of math nodes,nodes={align=center,inner sep=3pt,
          text height=1.5ex,text depth=.25ex,draw=gray!40,ultra thin},
          draw,inner sep=0pt,ampersand replacement=&,
          column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},
          column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} ] (mat1)
          at (-5,0){
          |[fill=green!40!gray]| x~text{or}~2^{y} & |
          [fill=green!40!gray]| y \
          1 & {pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          2 & {pgfmathparse{f(2)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          4 & {pgfmathparse{f(4)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          8 & {pgfmathparse{f(8)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          frac{1}{2} & {pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          frac{1}{4} & {pgfmathparse{f(.25)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          };
          node at ([yshift=-.8cm,xshift=2cm]mat1.south)
          [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt,label={[red]right:Select $y$}] (1){$1$};
          node at ([yshift=-1.5cm,xshift=.7cm]mat1.south)
          [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt,label={[red]right:Compute
          $x$}] (2){$2$};
          draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1|-mat1.south) |- (2);
          draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2|-mat1.south) |- (1);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • with the same names I sensed something was not right, but it was the only way I knew how to get that specific output.

            – MathScholar
            Feb 6 at 16:01













          • @MathScholar My bad! I thought you overwrote nodes but you didn't.

            – marmot
            Feb 6 at 16:05











          • alright then I sensed there was a more "advanced" way to write it! ;)

            – MathScholar
            Feb 6 at 16:09






          • 1





            Nice answer marmot! I think the arrows should go in the other direction.

            – manooooh
            Feb 6 at 18:21











          • I'm in chat - and yes, let's clean up these comments.

            – Loop Space
            Feb 6 at 21:01



















          4














          off-topic (since topic is solved by @marmot answer), but it may be handy at writing of your matrices ...




          • with use of column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm} (and similarly for column 2) you can remove |[text width=11mm]| from all cells

          • with use of pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(<value>)}L instead pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} gives slightly shorter code

          • for nodes below matrix i would define common style


          • use of ampersand replacement=& is not necessary



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            usepackage{tikz}
            usetikzlibrary{matrix}

            begin{document}
            begin{tikzpicture}[
            declare function = {f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);},
            circ/.style = {circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt, % <---
            label={[red]right:#1}} % <---
            ]
            matrix[matrix of math nodes,
            nodes = {align=center,inner sep=3pt,
            text height=2ex, text depth=1ex, % <---
            draw=gray!40,very thin},
            draw, inner sep=0pt,
            column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}}, % <---
            column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} % <---
            ] (mat1)
            {
            |[fill=green!40!gray]| xtext{, or }2^{y} % <---
            & |[fill=green!40!gray]| y \ % <---
            1 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(1)}L} \ % <---
            2 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(2)}L} \
            4 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(4)}L} \
            8 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(8)}L} \
            frac{1}{2} & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(0.5)}L} \
            frac{1}{4} & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(0.25)}L} \
            };
            node at ([yshift=- 8mm] mat1.south east) [circ=Select $y$] (c1) {1}; % <---
            node at ([yshift=-18mm] mat1-7-2) [circ=Compute $x$] (c2) {2}; % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2) |- (c1); % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1) |- (c2); % <---
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}



          enter image description here



          edit:




          • corrected direction of arrows


          • added version with use of original way of calculation of values in the second column, i.e. with pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} (as noted marmot in his answer, it enable calculation of real values), for which is defined new command calculation :



            documentclass[tikz, margin=3mm]{standalone}
            usetikzlibrary{matrix}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            begin{tikzpicture}[
            declare function = {f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);},
            circ/.style = {circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt, % <---
            label={[red]right:#1}} % <---
            ]
            newcommandcalculation[1]{pgfmathparse{f(#1)}%
            pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}} % <---
            matrix[matrix of math nodes,
            nodes = {text height=1.5ex, text depth=0.5ex, % <---
            align=center, inner ysep=4pt,
            draw=gray!40,very thin},
            draw, inner sep=0pt,
            column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},
            column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=11mm}},
            row 1/.style = {nodes={fill=green!40!gray}} % <---
            ] (mat1)
            {
            xtext{, or }2^{y} % <---
            & y \ % <---
            1 & {calculation{1}} \ % <---
            2 & {calculation{2}} \
            4 & {calculation{4}} \
            8 & {calculation{8}} \
            frac{1}{2} & {calculation{0.5}} \
            frac{1}{4} & {calculation{0.25}} \
            };
            node at ([yshift=- 8mm] mat1.south east) [circ=Select $y$] (c1) {1}; % <---
            node at ([yshift=-18mm] mat1-7-2) [circ=Compute $x$] (c2) {2}; % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2) |- (c1); % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1) |- (c2); % <---
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}



          the result is the same as above.






          share|improve this answer


























          • I appreciate these posts. This morning I used the code: draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]2.west) |- (mat1-7-1|-2)--(mat1-7-1|-mat1.south); draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]1.west) |- (mat1-7-2|-1)--(mat1-7-2|-mat1.south); to get the arrows to go the other

            – MathScholar
            Feb 7 at 1:31











          • I need these sort of posts to become better at the programming

            – MathScholar
            Feb 7 at 1:33












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473633%2fis-using-tikzmarknode-within-tikz-matrix-possible%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7














          You do not need tikzmark here because tikzmark is needed to make a non-node a node, but everything you are playing with here are nodes. EDIT: Fixed the directions of the arrows (big thanks to manoooh) and borrowed column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} from Zarkos answer. (However, I disagree with replacing pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} by something using pgfmathtruncatemacro because this won't work once you have non-integer results.)



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{matrix}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);}]
          matrix[matrix of math nodes,nodes={align=center,inner sep=3pt,
          text height=1.5ex,text depth=.25ex,draw=gray!40,ultra thin},
          draw,inner sep=0pt,ampersand replacement=&,
          column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},
          column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} ] (mat1)
          at (-5,0){
          |[fill=green!40!gray]| x~text{or}~2^{y} & |
          [fill=green!40!gray]| y \
          1 & {pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          2 & {pgfmathparse{f(2)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          4 & {pgfmathparse{f(4)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          8 & {pgfmathparse{f(8)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          frac{1}{2} & {pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          frac{1}{4} & {pgfmathparse{f(.25)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          };
          node at ([yshift=-.8cm,xshift=2cm]mat1.south)
          [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt,label={[red]right:Select $y$}] (1){$1$};
          node at ([yshift=-1.5cm,xshift=.7cm]mat1.south)
          [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt,label={[red]right:Compute
          $x$}] (2){$2$};
          draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1|-mat1.south) |- (2);
          draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2|-mat1.south) |- (1);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • with the same names I sensed something was not right, but it was the only way I knew how to get that specific output.

            – MathScholar
            Feb 6 at 16:01













          • @MathScholar My bad! I thought you overwrote nodes but you didn't.

            – marmot
            Feb 6 at 16:05











          • alright then I sensed there was a more "advanced" way to write it! ;)

            – MathScholar
            Feb 6 at 16:09






          • 1





            Nice answer marmot! I think the arrows should go in the other direction.

            – manooooh
            Feb 6 at 18:21











          • I'm in chat - and yes, let's clean up these comments.

            – Loop Space
            Feb 6 at 21:01
















          7














          You do not need tikzmark here because tikzmark is needed to make a non-node a node, but everything you are playing with here are nodes. EDIT: Fixed the directions of the arrows (big thanks to manoooh) and borrowed column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} from Zarkos answer. (However, I disagree with replacing pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} by something using pgfmathtruncatemacro because this won't work once you have non-integer results.)



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{matrix}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);}]
          matrix[matrix of math nodes,nodes={align=center,inner sep=3pt,
          text height=1.5ex,text depth=.25ex,draw=gray!40,ultra thin},
          draw,inner sep=0pt,ampersand replacement=&,
          column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},
          column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} ] (mat1)
          at (-5,0){
          |[fill=green!40!gray]| x~text{or}~2^{y} & |
          [fill=green!40!gray]| y \
          1 & {pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          2 & {pgfmathparse{f(2)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          4 & {pgfmathparse{f(4)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          8 & {pgfmathparse{f(8)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          frac{1}{2} & {pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          frac{1}{4} & {pgfmathparse{f(.25)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          };
          node at ([yshift=-.8cm,xshift=2cm]mat1.south)
          [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt,label={[red]right:Select $y$}] (1){$1$};
          node at ([yshift=-1.5cm,xshift=.7cm]mat1.south)
          [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt,label={[red]right:Compute
          $x$}] (2){$2$};
          draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1|-mat1.south) |- (2);
          draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2|-mat1.south) |- (1);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • with the same names I sensed something was not right, but it was the only way I knew how to get that specific output.

            – MathScholar
            Feb 6 at 16:01













          • @MathScholar My bad! I thought you overwrote nodes but you didn't.

            – marmot
            Feb 6 at 16:05











          • alright then I sensed there was a more "advanced" way to write it! ;)

            – MathScholar
            Feb 6 at 16:09






          • 1





            Nice answer marmot! I think the arrows should go in the other direction.

            – manooooh
            Feb 6 at 18:21











          • I'm in chat - and yes, let's clean up these comments.

            – Loop Space
            Feb 6 at 21:01














          7












          7








          7







          You do not need tikzmark here because tikzmark is needed to make a non-node a node, but everything you are playing with here are nodes. EDIT: Fixed the directions of the arrows (big thanks to manoooh) and borrowed column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} from Zarkos answer. (However, I disagree with replacing pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} by something using pgfmathtruncatemacro because this won't work once you have non-integer results.)



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{matrix}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);}]
          matrix[matrix of math nodes,nodes={align=center,inner sep=3pt,
          text height=1.5ex,text depth=.25ex,draw=gray!40,ultra thin},
          draw,inner sep=0pt,ampersand replacement=&,
          column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},
          column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} ] (mat1)
          at (-5,0){
          |[fill=green!40!gray]| x~text{or}~2^{y} & |
          [fill=green!40!gray]| y \
          1 & {pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          2 & {pgfmathparse{f(2)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          4 & {pgfmathparse{f(4)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          8 & {pgfmathparse{f(8)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          frac{1}{2} & {pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          frac{1}{4} & {pgfmathparse{f(.25)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          };
          node at ([yshift=-.8cm,xshift=2cm]mat1.south)
          [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt,label={[red]right:Select $y$}] (1){$1$};
          node at ([yshift=-1.5cm,xshift=.7cm]mat1.south)
          [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt,label={[red]right:Compute
          $x$}] (2){$2$};
          draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1|-mat1.south) |- (2);
          draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2|-mat1.south) |- (1);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          You do not need tikzmark here because tikzmark is needed to make a non-node a node, but everything you are playing with here are nodes. EDIT: Fixed the directions of the arrows (big thanks to manoooh) and borrowed column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} from Zarkos answer. (However, I disagree with replacing pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} by something using pgfmathtruncatemacro because this won't work once you have non-integer results.)



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{matrix}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);}]
          matrix[matrix of math nodes,nodes={align=center,inner sep=3pt,
          text height=1.5ex,text depth=.25ex,draw=gray!40,ultra thin},
          draw,inner sep=0pt,ampersand replacement=&,
          column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},
          column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} ] (mat1)
          at (-5,0){
          |[fill=green!40!gray]| x~text{or}~2^{y} & |
          [fill=green!40!gray]| y \
          1 & {pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          2 & {pgfmathparse{f(2)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          4 & {pgfmathparse{f(4)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          8 & {pgfmathparse{f(8)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          frac{1}{2} & {pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          frac{1}{4} & {pgfmathparse{f(.25)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}}\
          };
          node at ([yshift=-.8cm,xshift=2cm]mat1.south)
          [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt,label={[red]right:Select $y$}] (1){$1$};
          node at ([yshift=-1.5cm,xshift=.7cm]mat1.south)
          [circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt,label={[red]right:Compute
          $x$}] (2){$2$};
          draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1|-mat1.south) |- (2);
          draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2|-mat1.south) |- (1);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Feb 6 at 23:10

























          answered Feb 6 at 15:41









          marmotmarmot

          113k5144273




          113k5144273













          • with the same names I sensed something was not right, but it was the only way I knew how to get that specific output.

            – MathScholar
            Feb 6 at 16:01













          • @MathScholar My bad! I thought you overwrote nodes but you didn't.

            – marmot
            Feb 6 at 16:05











          • alright then I sensed there was a more "advanced" way to write it! ;)

            – MathScholar
            Feb 6 at 16:09






          • 1





            Nice answer marmot! I think the arrows should go in the other direction.

            – manooooh
            Feb 6 at 18:21











          • I'm in chat - and yes, let's clean up these comments.

            – Loop Space
            Feb 6 at 21:01



















          • with the same names I sensed something was not right, but it was the only way I knew how to get that specific output.

            – MathScholar
            Feb 6 at 16:01













          • @MathScholar My bad! I thought you overwrote nodes but you didn't.

            – marmot
            Feb 6 at 16:05











          • alright then I sensed there was a more "advanced" way to write it! ;)

            – MathScholar
            Feb 6 at 16:09






          • 1





            Nice answer marmot! I think the arrows should go in the other direction.

            – manooooh
            Feb 6 at 18:21











          • I'm in chat - and yes, let's clean up these comments.

            – Loop Space
            Feb 6 at 21:01

















          with the same names I sensed something was not right, but it was the only way I knew how to get that specific output.

          – MathScholar
          Feb 6 at 16:01







          with the same names I sensed something was not right, but it was the only way I knew how to get that specific output.

          – MathScholar
          Feb 6 at 16:01















          @MathScholar My bad! I thought you overwrote nodes but you didn't.

          – marmot
          Feb 6 at 16:05





          @MathScholar My bad! I thought you overwrote nodes but you didn't.

          – marmot
          Feb 6 at 16:05













          alright then I sensed there was a more "advanced" way to write it! ;)

          – MathScholar
          Feb 6 at 16:09





          alright then I sensed there was a more "advanced" way to write it! ;)

          – MathScholar
          Feb 6 at 16:09




          1




          1





          Nice answer marmot! I think the arrows should go in the other direction.

          – manooooh
          Feb 6 at 18:21





          Nice answer marmot! I think the arrows should go in the other direction.

          – manooooh
          Feb 6 at 18:21













          I'm in chat - and yes, let's clean up these comments.

          – Loop Space
          Feb 6 at 21:01





          I'm in chat - and yes, let's clean up these comments.

          – Loop Space
          Feb 6 at 21:01











          4














          off-topic (since topic is solved by @marmot answer), but it may be handy at writing of your matrices ...




          • with use of column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm} (and similarly for column 2) you can remove |[text width=11mm]| from all cells

          • with use of pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(<value>)}L instead pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} gives slightly shorter code

          • for nodes below matrix i would define common style


          • use of ampersand replacement=& is not necessary



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            usepackage{tikz}
            usetikzlibrary{matrix}

            begin{document}
            begin{tikzpicture}[
            declare function = {f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);},
            circ/.style = {circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt, % <---
            label={[red]right:#1}} % <---
            ]
            matrix[matrix of math nodes,
            nodes = {align=center,inner sep=3pt,
            text height=2ex, text depth=1ex, % <---
            draw=gray!40,very thin},
            draw, inner sep=0pt,
            column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}}, % <---
            column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} % <---
            ] (mat1)
            {
            |[fill=green!40!gray]| xtext{, or }2^{y} % <---
            & |[fill=green!40!gray]| y \ % <---
            1 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(1)}L} \ % <---
            2 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(2)}L} \
            4 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(4)}L} \
            8 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(8)}L} \
            frac{1}{2} & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(0.5)}L} \
            frac{1}{4} & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(0.25)}L} \
            };
            node at ([yshift=- 8mm] mat1.south east) [circ=Select $y$] (c1) {1}; % <---
            node at ([yshift=-18mm] mat1-7-2) [circ=Compute $x$] (c2) {2}; % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2) |- (c1); % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1) |- (c2); % <---
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}



          enter image description here



          edit:




          • corrected direction of arrows


          • added version with use of original way of calculation of values in the second column, i.e. with pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} (as noted marmot in his answer, it enable calculation of real values), for which is defined new command calculation :



            documentclass[tikz, margin=3mm]{standalone}
            usetikzlibrary{matrix}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            begin{tikzpicture}[
            declare function = {f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);},
            circ/.style = {circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt, % <---
            label={[red]right:#1}} % <---
            ]
            newcommandcalculation[1]{pgfmathparse{f(#1)}%
            pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}} % <---
            matrix[matrix of math nodes,
            nodes = {text height=1.5ex, text depth=0.5ex, % <---
            align=center, inner ysep=4pt,
            draw=gray!40,very thin},
            draw, inner sep=0pt,
            column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},
            column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=11mm}},
            row 1/.style = {nodes={fill=green!40!gray}} % <---
            ] (mat1)
            {
            xtext{, or }2^{y} % <---
            & y \ % <---
            1 & {calculation{1}} \ % <---
            2 & {calculation{2}} \
            4 & {calculation{4}} \
            8 & {calculation{8}} \
            frac{1}{2} & {calculation{0.5}} \
            frac{1}{4} & {calculation{0.25}} \
            };
            node at ([yshift=- 8mm] mat1.south east) [circ=Select $y$] (c1) {1}; % <---
            node at ([yshift=-18mm] mat1-7-2) [circ=Compute $x$] (c2) {2}; % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2) |- (c1); % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1) |- (c2); % <---
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}



          the result is the same as above.






          share|improve this answer


























          • I appreciate these posts. This morning I used the code: draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]2.west) |- (mat1-7-1|-2)--(mat1-7-1|-mat1.south); draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]1.west) |- (mat1-7-2|-1)--(mat1-7-2|-mat1.south); to get the arrows to go the other

            – MathScholar
            Feb 7 at 1:31











          • I need these sort of posts to become better at the programming

            – MathScholar
            Feb 7 at 1:33
















          4














          off-topic (since topic is solved by @marmot answer), but it may be handy at writing of your matrices ...




          • with use of column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm} (and similarly for column 2) you can remove |[text width=11mm]| from all cells

          • with use of pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(<value>)}L instead pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} gives slightly shorter code

          • for nodes below matrix i would define common style


          • use of ampersand replacement=& is not necessary



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            usepackage{tikz}
            usetikzlibrary{matrix}

            begin{document}
            begin{tikzpicture}[
            declare function = {f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);},
            circ/.style = {circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt, % <---
            label={[red]right:#1}} % <---
            ]
            matrix[matrix of math nodes,
            nodes = {align=center,inner sep=3pt,
            text height=2ex, text depth=1ex, % <---
            draw=gray!40,very thin},
            draw, inner sep=0pt,
            column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}}, % <---
            column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} % <---
            ] (mat1)
            {
            |[fill=green!40!gray]| xtext{, or }2^{y} % <---
            & |[fill=green!40!gray]| y \ % <---
            1 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(1)}L} \ % <---
            2 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(2)}L} \
            4 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(4)}L} \
            8 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(8)}L} \
            frac{1}{2} & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(0.5)}L} \
            frac{1}{4} & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(0.25)}L} \
            };
            node at ([yshift=- 8mm] mat1.south east) [circ=Select $y$] (c1) {1}; % <---
            node at ([yshift=-18mm] mat1-7-2) [circ=Compute $x$] (c2) {2}; % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2) |- (c1); % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1) |- (c2); % <---
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}



          enter image description here



          edit:




          • corrected direction of arrows


          • added version with use of original way of calculation of values in the second column, i.e. with pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} (as noted marmot in his answer, it enable calculation of real values), for which is defined new command calculation :



            documentclass[tikz, margin=3mm]{standalone}
            usetikzlibrary{matrix}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            begin{tikzpicture}[
            declare function = {f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);},
            circ/.style = {circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt, % <---
            label={[red]right:#1}} % <---
            ]
            newcommandcalculation[1]{pgfmathparse{f(#1)}%
            pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}} % <---
            matrix[matrix of math nodes,
            nodes = {text height=1.5ex, text depth=0.5ex, % <---
            align=center, inner ysep=4pt,
            draw=gray!40,very thin},
            draw, inner sep=0pt,
            column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},
            column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=11mm}},
            row 1/.style = {nodes={fill=green!40!gray}} % <---
            ] (mat1)
            {
            xtext{, or }2^{y} % <---
            & y \ % <---
            1 & {calculation{1}} \ % <---
            2 & {calculation{2}} \
            4 & {calculation{4}} \
            8 & {calculation{8}} \
            frac{1}{2} & {calculation{0.5}} \
            frac{1}{4} & {calculation{0.25}} \
            };
            node at ([yshift=- 8mm] mat1.south east) [circ=Select $y$] (c1) {1}; % <---
            node at ([yshift=-18mm] mat1-7-2) [circ=Compute $x$] (c2) {2}; % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2) |- (c1); % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1) |- (c2); % <---
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}



          the result is the same as above.






          share|improve this answer


























          • I appreciate these posts. This morning I used the code: draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]2.west) |- (mat1-7-1|-2)--(mat1-7-1|-mat1.south); draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]1.west) |- (mat1-7-2|-1)--(mat1-7-2|-mat1.south); to get the arrows to go the other

            – MathScholar
            Feb 7 at 1:31











          • I need these sort of posts to become better at the programming

            – MathScholar
            Feb 7 at 1:33














          4












          4








          4







          off-topic (since topic is solved by @marmot answer), but it may be handy at writing of your matrices ...




          • with use of column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm} (and similarly for column 2) you can remove |[text width=11mm]| from all cells

          • with use of pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(<value>)}L instead pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} gives slightly shorter code

          • for nodes below matrix i would define common style


          • use of ampersand replacement=& is not necessary



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            usepackage{tikz}
            usetikzlibrary{matrix}

            begin{document}
            begin{tikzpicture}[
            declare function = {f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);},
            circ/.style = {circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt, % <---
            label={[red]right:#1}} % <---
            ]
            matrix[matrix of math nodes,
            nodes = {align=center,inner sep=3pt,
            text height=2ex, text depth=1ex, % <---
            draw=gray!40,very thin},
            draw, inner sep=0pt,
            column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}}, % <---
            column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} % <---
            ] (mat1)
            {
            |[fill=green!40!gray]| xtext{, or }2^{y} % <---
            & |[fill=green!40!gray]| y \ % <---
            1 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(1)}L} \ % <---
            2 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(2)}L} \
            4 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(4)}L} \
            8 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(8)}L} \
            frac{1}{2} & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(0.5)}L} \
            frac{1}{4} & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(0.25)}L} \
            };
            node at ([yshift=- 8mm] mat1.south east) [circ=Select $y$] (c1) {1}; % <---
            node at ([yshift=-18mm] mat1-7-2) [circ=Compute $x$] (c2) {2}; % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2) |- (c1); % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1) |- (c2); % <---
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}



          enter image description here



          edit:




          • corrected direction of arrows


          • added version with use of original way of calculation of values in the second column, i.e. with pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} (as noted marmot in his answer, it enable calculation of real values), for which is defined new command calculation :



            documentclass[tikz, margin=3mm]{standalone}
            usetikzlibrary{matrix}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            begin{tikzpicture}[
            declare function = {f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);},
            circ/.style = {circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt, % <---
            label={[red]right:#1}} % <---
            ]
            newcommandcalculation[1]{pgfmathparse{f(#1)}%
            pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}} % <---
            matrix[matrix of math nodes,
            nodes = {text height=1.5ex, text depth=0.5ex, % <---
            align=center, inner ysep=4pt,
            draw=gray!40,very thin},
            draw, inner sep=0pt,
            column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},
            column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=11mm}},
            row 1/.style = {nodes={fill=green!40!gray}} % <---
            ] (mat1)
            {
            xtext{, or }2^{y} % <---
            & y \ % <---
            1 & {calculation{1}} \ % <---
            2 & {calculation{2}} \
            4 & {calculation{4}} \
            8 & {calculation{8}} \
            frac{1}{2} & {calculation{0.5}} \
            frac{1}{4} & {calculation{0.25}} \
            };
            node at ([yshift=- 8mm] mat1.south east) [circ=Select $y$] (c1) {1}; % <---
            node at ([yshift=-18mm] mat1-7-2) [circ=Compute $x$] (c2) {2}; % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2) |- (c1); % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1) |- (c2); % <---
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}



          the result is the same as above.






          share|improve this answer















          off-topic (since topic is solved by @marmot answer), but it may be handy at writing of your matrices ...




          • with use of column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm} (and similarly for column 2) you can remove |[text width=11mm]| from all cells

          • with use of pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(<value>)}L instead pgfmathparse{f(.5)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} gives slightly shorter code

          • for nodes below matrix i would define common style


          • use of ampersand replacement=& is not necessary



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            usepackage{tikz}
            usetikzlibrary{matrix}

            begin{document}
            begin{tikzpicture}[
            declare function = {f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);},
            circ/.style = {circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt, % <---
            label={[red]right:#1}} % <---
            ]
            matrix[matrix of math nodes,
            nodes = {align=center,inner sep=3pt,
            text height=2ex, text depth=1ex, % <---
            draw=gray!40,very thin},
            draw, inner sep=0pt,
            column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}}, % <---
            column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=9mm}} % <---
            ] (mat1)
            {
            |[fill=green!40!gray]| xtext{, or }2^{y} % <---
            & |[fill=green!40!gray]| y \ % <---
            1 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(1)}L} \ % <---
            2 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(2)}L} \
            4 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(4)}L} \
            8 & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(8)}L} \
            frac{1}{2} & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(0.5)}L} \
            frac{1}{4} & {pgfmathtruncatemacro{L}{f(0.25)}L} \
            };
            node at ([yshift=- 8mm] mat1.south east) [circ=Select $y$] (c1) {1}; % <---
            node at ([yshift=-18mm] mat1-7-2) [circ=Compute $x$] (c2) {2}; % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2) |- (c1); % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1) |- (c2); % <---
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}



          enter image description here



          edit:




          • corrected direction of arrows


          • added version with use of original way of calculation of values in the second column, i.e. with pgfmathparse{f(1)}pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult} (as noted marmot in his answer, it enable calculation of real values), for which is defined new command calculation :



            documentclass[tikz, margin=3mm]{standalone}
            usetikzlibrary{matrix}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            begin{tikzpicture}[
            declare function = {f(x)=1/ln(2)*ln(x);},
            circ/.style = {circle,draw,font=small,inner sep=1pt, % <---
            label={[red]right:#1}} % <---
            ]
            newcommandcalculation[1]{pgfmathparse{f(#1)}%
            pgfmathprintnumber{pgfmathresult}} % <---
            matrix[matrix of math nodes,
            nodes = {text height=1.5ex, text depth=0.5ex, % <---
            align=center, inner ysep=4pt,
            draw=gray!40,very thin},
            draw, inner sep=0pt,
            column 1/.append style={nodes={text width=15mm}},
            column 2/.append style={nodes={text width=11mm}},
            row 1/.style = {nodes={fill=green!40!gray}} % <---
            ] (mat1)
            {
            xtext{, or }2^{y} % <---
            & y \ % <---
            1 & {calculation{1}} \ % <---
            2 & {calculation{2}} \
            4 & {calculation{4}} \
            8 & {calculation{8}} \
            frac{1}{2} & {calculation{0.5}} \
            frac{1}{4} & {calculation{0.25}} \
            };
            node at ([yshift=- 8mm] mat1.south east) [circ=Select $y$] (c1) {1}; % <---
            node at ([yshift=-18mm] mat1-7-2) [circ=Compute $x$] (c2) {2}; % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-2) |- (c1); % <---
            draw[latex-] (mat1-7-1) |- (c2); % <---
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}



          the result is the same as above.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Feb 7 at 1:08

























          answered Feb 6 at 18:08









          ZarkoZarko

          128k868167




          128k868167













          • I appreciate these posts. This morning I used the code: draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]2.west) |- (mat1-7-1|-2)--(mat1-7-1|-mat1.south); draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]1.west) |- (mat1-7-2|-1)--(mat1-7-2|-mat1.south); to get the arrows to go the other

            – MathScholar
            Feb 7 at 1:31











          • I need these sort of posts to become better at the programming

            – MathScholar
            Feb 7 at 1:33



















          • I appreciate these posts. This morning I used the code: draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]2.west) |- (mat1-7-1|-2)--(mat1-7-1|-mat1.south); draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]1.west) |- (mat1-7-2|-1)--(mat1-7-2|-mat1.south); to get the arrows to go the other

            – MathScholar
            Feb 7 at 1:31











          • I need these sort of posts to become better at the programming

            – MathScholar
            Feb 7 at 1:33

















          I appreciate these posts. This morning I used the code: draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]2.west) |- (mat1-7-1|-2)--(mat1-7-1|-mat1.south); draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]1.west) |- (mat1-7-2|-1)--(mat1-7-2|-mat1.south); to get the arrows to go the other

          – MathScholar
          Feb 7 at 1:31





          I appreciate these posts. This morning I used the code: draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]2.west) |- (mat1-7-1|-2)--(mat1-7-1|-mat1.south); draw[-latex,red] ([xshift=-2pt]1.west) |- (mat1-7-2|-1)--(mat1-7-2|-mat1.south); to get the arrows to go the other

          – MathScholar
          Feb 7 at 1:31













          I need these sort of posts to become better at the programming

          – MathScholar
          Feb 7 at 1:33





          I need these sort of posts to become better at the programming

          – MathScholar
          Feb 7 at 1:33


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473633%2fis-using-tikzmarknode-within-tikz-matrix-possible%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Human spaceflight

          Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

          張江高科駅