Generalizing from a transformation of known eigenvalues to one of unknown eigenvalues

Multi tool use
I’m working through Axler’s Linear Algebra Done Right, 3rd edition. Problem 30 in chapter 5.A asks to prove there exists $xin R^3$, satisfying $Tx-9x=(-4,5,sqrt 7)$, if it’s known that -4,5, and $sqrt 7$ are the eigenvalues of linear transformation T.
My initial reaction to this problem is that each of the three eigenvectors will be sent to scalar multiples of themselves, but my understanding breaks down a little after that. I don’t believe I’m allowed to assume x=c(-4,5,$sqrt 7$) is an eigenvector, c some constant. Though if that were true, then clearly Tx would be sent to some scalar multiple of x, and the task simply becomes finding what scalar to plug in for c to get back x.
I’m uncertain how to make additional progress and rereading the chapter hasn’t proved fruitful. Am I overlooking some obvious theorem?
Also, I’m new here. Please let me know if I’m violating any rules, and point me toward that list, so that I can avoid breaking any in the future.
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors linear-transformations
New contributor
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I’m working through Axler’s Linear Algebra Done Right, 3rd edition. Problem 30 in chapter 5.A asks to prove there exists $xin R^3$, satisfying $Tx-9x=(-4,5,sqrt 7)$, if it’s known that -4,5, and $sqrt 7$ are the eigenvalues of linear transformation T.
My initial reaction to this problem is that each of the three eigenvectors will be sent to scalar multiples of themselves, but my understanding breaks down a little after that. I don’t believe I’m allowed to assume x=c(-4,5,$sqrt 7$) is an eigenvector, c some constant. Though if that were true, then clearly Tx would be sent to some scalar multiple of x, and the task simply becomes finding what scalar to plug in for c to get back x.
I’m uncertain how to make additional progress and rereading the chapter hasn’t proved fruitful. Am I overlooking some obvious theorem?
Also, I’m new here. Please let me know if I’m violating any rules, and point me toward that list, so that I can avoid breaking any in the future.
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors linear-transformations
New contributor
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Hint: What are the eigenvalues of $T-9I$? Can it be singular?
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 20:45
2
(Hint 2: The fact that the components of that vector are exactly the eigenvalues of $T$ is a red herring).
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 20:45
Since 9 is not an eigenvector, T-9I has to be non-singular yeah? Would the eigenvalues of that transformation just be the eigenvalues of T shifted down by 9?
– Thor Kamphefner
Dec 26 '18 at 20:54
If that’s the case, then I could say something like, since T-9I is non-degenerate, there exists a vector x in R^3 such that T-9I sends x to (-4,5,root7)
– Thor Kamphefner
Dec 26 '18 at 20:56
1
x @Thor: Yes, exactly.
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 21:03
add a comment |
I’m working through Axler’s Linear Algebra Done Right, 3rd edition. Problem 30 in chapter 5.A asks to prove there exists $xin R^3$, satisfying $Tx-9x=(-4,5,sqrt 7)$, if it’s known that -4,5, and $sqrt 7$ are the eigenvalues of linear transformation T.
My initial reaction to this problem is that each of the three eigenvectors will be sent to scalar multiples of themselves, but my understanding breaks down a little after that. I don’t believe I’m allowed to assume x=c(-4,5,$sqrt 7$) is an eigenvector, c some constant. Though if that were true, then clearly Tx would be sent to some scalar multiple of x, and the task simply becomes finding what scalar to plug in for c to get back x.
I’m uncertain how to make additional progress and rereading the chapter hasn’t proved fruitful. Am I overlooking some obvious theorem?
Also, I’m new here. Please let me know if I’m violating any rules, and point me toward that list, so that I can avoid breaking any in the future.
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors linear-transformations
New contributor
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I’m working through Axler’s Linear Algebra Done Right, 3rd edition. Problem 30 in chapter 5.A asks to prove there exists $xin R^3$, satisfying $Tx-9x=(-4,5,sqrt 7)$, if it’s known that -4,5, and $sqrt 7$ are the eigenvalues of linear transformation T.
My initial reaction to this problem is that each of the three eigenvectors will be sent to scalar multiples of themselves, but my understanding breaks down a little after that. I don’t believe I’m allowed to assume x=c(-4,5,$sqrt 7$) is an eigenvector, c some constant. Though if that were true, then clearly Tx would be sent to some scalar multiple of x, and the task simply becomes finding what scalar to plug in for c to get back x.
I’m uncertain how to make additional progress and rereading the chapter hasn’t proved fruitful. Am I overlooking some obvious theorem?
Also, I’m new here. Please let me know if I’m violating any rules, and point me toward that list, so that I can avoid breaking any in the future.
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors linear-transformations
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors linear-transformations
New contributor
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Dec 26 '18 at 20:43
New contributor
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Dec 26 '18 at 20:35
Thor Kamphefner
445
445
New contributor
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Hint: What are the eigenvalues of $T-9I$? Can it be singular?
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 20:45
2
(Hint 2: The fact that the components of that vector are exactly the eigenvalues of $T$ is a red herring).
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 20:45
Since 9 is not an eigenvector, T-9I has to be non-singular yeah? Would the eigenvalues of that transformation just be the eigenvalues of T shifted down by 9?
– Thor Kamphefner
Dec 26 '18 at 20:54
If that’s the case, then I could say something like, since T-9I is non-degenerate, there exists a vector x in R^3 such that T-9I sends x to (-4,5,root7)
– Thor Kamphefner
Dec 26 '18 at 20:56
1
x @Thor: Yes, exactly.
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 21:03
add a comment |
1
Hint: What are the eigenvalues of $T-9I$? Can it be singular?
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 20:45
2
(Hint 2: The fact that the components of that vector are exactly the eigenvalues of $T$ is a red herring).
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 20:45
Since 9 is not an eigenvector, T-9I has to be non-singular yeah? Would the eigenvalues of that transformation just be the eigenvalues of T shifted down by 9?
– Thor Kamphefner
Dec 26 '18 at 20:54
If that’s the case, then I could say something like, since T-9I is non-degenerate, there exists a vector x in R^3 such that T-9I sends x to (-4,5,root7)
– Thor Kamphefner
Dec 26 '18 at 20:56
1
x @Thor: Yes, exactly.
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 21:03
1
1
Hint: What are the eigenvalues of $T-9I$? Can it be singular?
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 20:45
Hint: What are the eigenvalues of $T-9I$? Can it be singular?
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 20:45
2
2
(Hint 2: The fact that the components of that vector are exactly the eigenvalues of $T$ is a red herring).
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 20:45
(Hint 2: The fact that the components of that vector are exactly the eigenvalues of $T$ is a red herring).
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 20:45
Since 9 is not an eigenvector, T-9I has to be non-singular yeah? Would the eigenvalues of that transformation just be the eigenvalues of T shifted down by 9?
– Thor Kamphefner
Dec 26 '18 at 20:54
Since 9 is not an eigenvector, T-9I has to be non-singular yeah? Would the eigenvalues of that transformation just be the eigenvalues of T shifted down by 9?
– Thor Kamphefner
Dec 26 '18 at 20:54
If that’s the case, then I could say something like, since T-9I is non-degenerate, there exists a vector x in R^3 such that T-9I sends x to (-4,5,root7)
– Thor Kamphefner
Dec 26 '18 at 20:56
If that’s the case, then I could say something like, since T-9I is non-degenerate, there exists a vector x in R^3 such that T-9I sends x to (-4,5,root7)
– Thor Kamphefner
Dec 26 '18 at 20:56
1
1
x @Thor: Yes, exactly.
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 21:03
x @Thor: Yes, exactly.
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 21:03
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053295%2fgeneralizing-from-a-transformation-of-known-eigenvalues-to-one-of-unknown-eigenv%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thor Kamphefner is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053295%2fgeneralizing-from-a-transformation-of-known-eigenvalues-to-one-of-unknown-eigenv%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
T74YWX0fw7lkU ZGqNnEojpKi,TuJsXTlBcM,p,msuNJa4zAaO G,JDHAemEorEv4RFAA3FSOHs RQzk MveWF8mpn5J6WmS
1
Hint: What are the eigenvalues of $T-9I$? Can it be singular?
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 20:45
2
(Hint 2: The fact that the components of that vector are exactly the eigenvalues of $T$ is a red herring).
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 20:45
Since 9 is not an eigenvector, T-9I has to be non-singular yeah? Would the eigenvalues of that transformation just be the eigenvalues of T shifted down by 9?
– Thor Kamphefner
Dec 26 '18 at 20:54
If that’s the case, then I could say something like, since T-9I is non-degenerate, there exists a vector x in R^3 such that T-9I sends x to (-4,5,root7)
– Thor Kamphefner
Dec 26 '18 at 20:56
1
x @Thor: Yes, exactly.
– Henning Makholm
Dec 26 '18 at 21:03