Why $mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$ does not hold?












6












$begingroup$


Let $lambda(n) = lambda(mathbb{Z}_n^*)$ be the Carmichael function and $phi(n) = | mathbb{Z}_{n}^{*} |$ be the Euler function. I need to show:



$$mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$$



But why should $mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$ one be a subgroup of the other? This was stated in one course on cryptography but I cannot find a good justification for it.



The claim was wrong



In general this only holds for the subset relation. Still it would be great to find a counterexample. In return, I leave here an argument why the subset relation holds.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $G$ is abelian then $f_k(x) = x^k$ is an homomorphism $G to G$. If $G = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ with $n$ odd (having $phi(n) =prod_{p^r | n} (p-1)p^{r-1}$ elements) then $ker(f_k)$ has $prod_{p^r | n} frac{(p-1)p^{r-1}}{gcd((p-1)p^{r-1},k)}$ elements. $lambda(n)$ is the exponent of $(mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. the least integer such that $ker(f_k) = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. $lambda(n) = lcm( ((p-1)p^{r-1})_{p^r |n})$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 6 at 23:05








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    We rather have an embedding from the cyclic group $Bbb Z_{lambda(n)}$ (of additive notation) to the multiplicative group $Bbb Z_{mathbb n}^*$ of the ring $Bbb Z_n$ which has $varphi(n)$ elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 6 at 23:07










  • $begingroup$
    I am confused because you introduced a group $G$, but the question that you ask does not appear to involve $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 9:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DerekHolt Thank you, I reformulated my question. $G$ is not relevant for the question itself
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:17










  • $begingroup$
    @Berci yes, you're right that is what follows from the facts i listed , my interest is to prove the other fact though
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:22
















6












$begingroup$


Let $lambda(n) = lambda(mathbb{Z}_n^*)$ be the Carmichael function and $phi(n) = | mathbb{Z}_{n}^{*} |$ be the Euler function. I need to show:



$$mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$$



But why should $mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$ one be a subgroup of the other? This was stated in one course on cryptography but I cannot find a good justification for it.



The claim was wrong



In general this only holds for the subset relation. Still it would be great to find a counterexample. In return, I leave here an argument why the subset relation holds.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $G$ is abelian then $f_k(x) = x^k$ is an homomorphism $G to G$. If $G = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ with $n$ odd (having $phi(n) =prod_{p^r | n} (p-1)p^{r-1}$ elements) then $ker(f_k)$ has $prod_{p^r | n} frac{(p-1)p^{r-1}}{gcd((p-1)p^{r-1},k)}$ elements. $lambda(n)$ is the exponent of $(mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. the least integer such that $ker(f_k) = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. $lambda(n) = lcm( ((p-1)p^{r-1})_{p^r |n})$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 6 at 23:05








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    We rather have an embedding from the cyclic group $Bbb Z_{lambda(n)}$ (of additive notation) to the multiplicative group $Bbb Z_{mathbb n}^*$ of the ring $Bbb Z_n$ which has $varphi(n)$ elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 6 at 23:07










  • $begingroup$
    I am confused because you introduced a group $G$, but the question that you ask does not appear to involve $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 9:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DerekHolt Thank you, I reformulated my question. $G$ is not relevant for the question itself
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:17










  • $begingroup$
    @Berci yes, you're right that is what follows from the facts i listed , my interest is to prove the other fact though
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:22














6












6








6





$begingroup$


Let $lambda(n) = lambda(mathbb{Z}_n^*)$ be the Carmichael function and $phi(n) = | mathbb{Z}_{n}^{*} |$ be the Euler function. I need to show:



$$mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$$



But why should $mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$ one be a subgroup of the other? This was stated in one course on cryptography but I cannot find a good justification for it.



The claim was wrong



In general this only holds for the subset relation. Still it would be great to find a counterexample. In return, I leave here an argument why the subset relation holds.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $lambda(n) = lambda(mathbb{Z}_n^*)$ be the Carmichael function and $phi(n) = | mathbb{Z}_{n}^{*} |$ be the Euler function. I need to show:



$$mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$$



But why should $mathbb{Z}_{lambda(n)}^* le mathbb{Z}_{phi(n)}^*$ one be a subgroup of the other? This was stated in one course on cryptography but I cannot find a good justification for it.



The claim was wrong



In general this only holds for the subset relation. Still it would be great to find a counterexample. In return, I leave here an argument why the subset relation holds.



enter image description here







abstract-algebra group-theory number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 28 at 22:39







Javier

















asked Jan 6 at 22:55









JavierJavier

2,02321133




2,02321133












  • $begingroup$
    If $G$ is abelian then $f_k(x) = x^k$ is an homomorphism $G to G$. If $G = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ with $n$ odd (having $phi(n) =prod_{p^r | n} (p-1)p^{r-1}$ elements) then $ker(f_k)$ has $prod_{p^r | n} frac{(p-1)p^{r-1}}{gcd((p-1)p^{r-1},k)}$ elements. $lambda(n)$ is the exponent of $(mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. the least integer such that $ker(f_k) = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. $lambda(n) = lcm( ((p-1)p^{r-1})_{p^r |n})$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 6 at 23:05








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    We rather have an embedding from the cyclic group $Bbb Z_{lambda(n)}$ (of additive notation) to the multiplicative group $Bbb Z_{mathbb n}^*$ of the ring $Bbb Z_n$ which has $varphi(n)$ elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 6 at 23:07










  • $begingroup$
    I am confused because you introduced a group $G$, but the question that you ask does not appear to involve $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 9:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DerekHolt Thank you, I reformulated my question. $G$ is not relevant for the question itself
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:17










  • $begingroup$
    @Berci yes, you're right that is what follows from the facts i listed , my interest is to prove the other fact though
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:22


















  • $begingroup$
    If $G$ is abelian then $f_k(x) = x^k$ is an homomorphism $G to G$. If $G = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ with $n$ odd (having $phi(n) =prod_{p^r | n} (p-1)p^{r-1}$ elements) then $ker(f_k)$ has $prod_{p^r | n} frac{(p-1)p^{r-1}}{gcd((p-1)p^{r-1},k)}$ elements. $lambda(n)$ is the exponent of $(mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. the least integer such that $ker(f_k) = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. $lambda(n) = lcm( ((p-1)p^{r-1})_{p^r |n})$.
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 6 at 23:05








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    We rather have an embedding from the cyclic group $Bbb Z_{lambda(n)}$ (of additive notation) to the multiplicative group $Bbb Z_{mathbb n}^*$ of the ring $Bbb Z_n$ which has $varphi(n)$ elements.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 6 at 23:07










  • $begingroup$
    I am confused because you introduced a group $G$, but the question that you ask does not appear to involve $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 9:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DerekHolt Thank you, I reformulated my question. $G$ is not relevant for the question itself
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:17










  • $begingroup$
    @Berci yes, you're right that is what follows from the facts i listed , my interest is to prove the other fact though
    $endgroup$
    – Javier
    Jan 7 at 23:22
















$begingroup$
If $G$ is abelian then $f_k(x) = x^k$ is an homomorphism $G to G$. If $G = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ with $n$ odd (having $phi(n) =prod_{p^r | n} (p-1)p^{r-1}$ elements) then $ker(f_k)$ has $prod_{p^r | n} frac{(p-1)p^{r-1}}{gcd((p-1)p^{r-1},k)}$ elements. $lambda(n)$ is the exponent of $(mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. the least integer such that $ker(f_k) = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. $lambda(n) = lcm( ((p-1)p^{r-1})_{p^r |n})$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 6 at 23:05






$begingroup$
If $G$ is abelian then $f_k(x) = x^k$ is an homomorphism $G to G$. If $G = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ with $n$ odd (having $phi(n) =prod_{p^r | n} (p-1)p^{r-1}$ elements) then $ker(f_k)$ has $prod_{p^r | n} frac{(p-1)p^{r-1}}{gcd((p-1)p^{r-1},k)}$ elements. $lambda(n)$ is the exponent of $(mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. the least integer such that $ker(f_k) = (mathbb{Z}/n mathbb{Z})^times$ ie. $lambda(n) = lcm( ((p-1)p^{r-1})_{p^r |n})$.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 6 at 23:05






3




3




$begingroup$
We rather have an embedding from the cyclic group $Bbb Z_{lambda(n)}$ (of additive notation) to the multiplicative group $Bbb Z_{mathbb n}^*$ of the ring $Bbb Z_n$ which has $varphi(n)$ elements.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 6 at 23:07




$begingroup$
We rather have an embedding from the cyclic group $Bbb Z_{lambda(n)}$ (of additive notation) to the multiplicative group $Bbb Z_{mathbb n}^*$ of the ring $Bbb Z_n$ which has $varphi(n)$ elements.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 6 at 23:07












$begingroup$
I am confused because you introduced a group $G$, but the question that you ask does not appear to involve $G$.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 7 at 9:03




$begingroup$
I am confused because you introduced a group $G$, but the question that you ask does not appear to involve $G$.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 7 at 9:03












$begingroup$
@DerekHolt Thank you, I reformulated my question. $G$ is not relevant for the question itself
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 7 at 23:17




$begingroup$
@DerekHolt Thank you, I reformulated my question. $G$ is not relevant for the question itself
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 7 at 23:17












$begingroup$
@Berci yes, you're right that is what follows from the facts i listed , my interest is to prove the other fact though
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 7 at 23:22




$begingroup$
@Berci yes, you're right that is what follows from the facts i listed , my interest is to prove the other fact though
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 7 at 23:22










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064491%2fwhy-mathbbz-lambdan-le-mathbbz-phin-does-not-hold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064491%2fwhy-mathbbz-lambdan-le-mathbbz-phin-does-not-hold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

張江高科駅