Which 'Scale' A Song is In












6















A month or two ago, I participated in a school music programme, where I was playing guitar. The chord progression I was playing was in the key of C. Then our music teacher comes, and asks in which SCALE we are playing the song. I - without thinking much - told her that it's in C Major.



But now that I think of it, I had used the terms 'scale' and 'key' interchangeably, which obviously isn't very correct.



A scale is a collection of notes, with specific intervals (for example, the Major Scale is made from the intervals R, Major 2nd, Major 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, Major 6th, Major 7th, Octave).
But a KEY, is basically every note in the corresponding scale, counting notes that span MORE than a single octave. For example, the key of G Major contains the notes G, A, B, C, D, E, F#, but in every octave.



Then what should I have said to the teacher? Were the teacher's wordings inaccurate? Because it really seems like she was using the terms 'scale' and 'key' interchangeably.



(By the way, I have another such programme coming up, and we have rehearsals from tomorrow. Wish me luck :)



(EDIT: I don't know a lot of music theory, and I live in India, if either is relevant)










share|improve this question



























    6















    A month or two ago, I participated in a school music programme, where I was playing guitar. The chord progression I was playing was in the key of C. Then our music teacher comes, and asks in which SCALE we are playing the song. I - without thinking much - told her that it's in C Major.



    But now that I think of it, I had used the terms 'scale' and 'key' interchangeably, which obviously isn't very correct.



    A scale is a collection of notes, with specific intervals (for example, the Major Scale is made from the intervals R, Major 2nd, Major 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, Major 6th, Major 7th, Octave).
    But a KEY, is basically every note in the corresponding scale, counting notes that span MORE than a single octave. For example, the key of G Major contains the notes G, A, B, C, D, E, F#, but in every octave.



    Then what should I have said to the teacher? Were the teacher's wordings inaccurate? Because it really seems like she was using the terms 'scale' and 'key' interchangeably.



    (By the way, I have another such programme coming up, and we have rehearsals from tomorrow. Wish me luck :)



    (EDIT: I don't know a lot of music theory, and I live in India, if either is relevant)










    share|improve this question

























      6












      6








      6


      1






      A month or two ago, I participated in a school music programme, where I was playing guitar. The chord progression I was playing was in the key of C. Then our music teacher comes, and asks in which SCALE we are playing the song. I - without thinking much - told her that it's in C Major.



      But now that I think of it, I had used the terms 'scale' and 'key' interchangeably, which obviously isn't very correct.



      A scale is a collection of notes, with specific intervals (for example, the Major Scale is made from the intervals R, Major 2nd, Major 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, Major 6th, Major 7th, Octave).
      But a KEY, is basically every note in the corresponding scale, counting notes that span MORE than a single octave. For example, the key of G Major contains the notes G, A, B, C, D, E, F#, but in every octave.



      Then what should I have said to the teacher? Were the teacher's wordings inaccurate? Because it really seems like she was using the terms 'scale' and 'key' interchangeably.



      (By the way, I have another such programme coming up, and we have rehearsals from tomorrow. Wish me luck :)



      (EDIT: I don't know a lot of music theory, and I live in India, if either is relevant)










      share|improve this question














      A month or two ago, I participated in a school music programme, where I was playing guitar. The chord progression I was playing was in the key of C. Then our music teacher comes, and asks in which SCALE we are playing the song. I - without thinking much - told her that it's in C Major.



      But now that I think of it, I had used the terms 'scale' and 'key' interchangeably, which obviously isn't very correct.



      A scale is a collection of notes, with specific intervals (for example, the Major Scale is made from the intervals R, Major 2nd, Major 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, Major 6th, Major 7th, Octave).
      But a KEY, is basically every note in the corresponding scale, counting notes that span MORE than a single octave. For example, the key of G Major contains the notes G, A, B, C, D, E, F#, but in every octave.



      Then what should I have said to the teacher? Were the teacher's wordings inaccurate? Because it really seems like she was using the terms 'scale' and 'key' interchangeably.



      (By the way, I have another such programme coming up, and we have rehearsals from tomorrow. Wish me luck :)



      (EDIT: I don't know a lot of music theory, and I live in India, if either is relevant)







      theory scales terminology key






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 7 at 8:47









      lil' mathematicianlil' mathematician

      807




      807






















          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7















          Then our music teacher comes, and asks in which SCALE we are playing the song.




          That's not usually the way people use the vocabulary. People talk about a song being 'in' a key, not 'in' a scale. Maybe she just made a brief slip of the tongue, or maybe she was assuming that what you were playing would be restricted to a particular scale for some reason, and was focusing the question towards that.




          Is there a different definition of scales in Indian classical music? (from your comment)




          There are definitely scales in Indian music that wouldn't relate strongly to the Western key system - so if she thought you might be using one of those, yes, that could be a reason for her phrasing.




          But now that I think of it, I had used the terms 'scale' and 'key' interchangeably, which obviously isn't very correct. A scale is a collection of notes, with specific intervals (for example, the Major Scale is made from the intervals R, Major 2nd, Major 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, Major 6th, Major 7th, Octave). But a KEY, is basically every note in the corresponding scale, counting notes that span MORE than a single octave. For example, the key of G Major contains the notes G, A, B, C, D, E, F#, but in every octave




          I don't think that's quite right. You could talk about a scale that spans more than one octave - it's just that Major scales are octave repeating, so we don't usually need to.



          I would say that the difference between a scale and a key is that a scale is a collection of notes, while a key is a more general description of the tonality of a piece. So you can have a piece in the key of C major that uses notes that are not in the scale of C major.



          Nevertheless, the two concepts are very closely related, at least when it comes to the major/minor system.




          Then what should I have said to the teacher?




          Nothing confrontational, of course - just smile and be polite :).






          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks for the info, I didn't know that a scale can span more than an octave :P

            – lil' mathematician
            Jan 7 at 9:36











          • Also, "There are definitely scales in Indian music that wouldn't relate strongly to the Western key system - so if she thought you might be using one of those, yes, that could be a reason for her phrasing." Can you elaborate with an example that does not go too much into Indian classical music theory?

            – lil' mathematician
            Jan 7 at 9:37








          • 1





            @lil'mathematician I'm afraid I'm only basing that statement on Indian music I've heard - I don't have any theoretical knowledge of Indian music. It might be a great question to ask your teacher!

            – topo morto
            Jan 7 at 11:39





















          3














          I suspect that this is a question of translation, probably more between musical systems than between languages. In Indian music, pieces are analyzed in terms of raga and thaat. These concepts are similar to European melodic modes, which nowadays are largely confined to two: major and minor, with some notable exceptions. (Formerly there were eight: Dorian, Phrygian, Lydian, and Mixolydian, plus the Hypo- variants of those four.)



          Because Indian music is analyzed according to concepts that can be (approximately) translated as scale, it seems natural for an Indian musician to ask about a piece's "scale" rather than its "key." For a native English speaker trained in European music, it's a bit odd to speak of a piece's scale instead of its key, but no more than a bit odd. There's no reason to think that "scale" in this sense means anything particularly different from "key."





          Additional discussion



          Two factors have led to the development of key from the melodic modes. One is the development of harmony, whereby the mode affects not only the pitches used in a melody, but also the pitches and therefore the chords available for harmonic use. Along with this came the development of tonality, whereby the eight modes more or less merged into the major and minor tonalities. (This led to the invention of the Ionian and Aeolean modes, along with their Hypo- variants, in the middle of the sixteenth century, but that theory didn't stick particularly well. The major/minor dichotomy prevailed instead.)



          The other element in the concept of key is the development of standardized pitches, whereby the pitch a is around 400 or 450 cycles per second (more recently around 440), and of the twelve-tone system, which allows pieces in any mode to be played on any starting pitch. It is no longer sufficient to say that a piece is "in the minor mode"; we must say that it is "in D minor" or "in F-sharp minor" or whatever else.



          So it seems that the Indian concept might be better translated as "(melodic) mode" rather than "scale," but mode in the medieval sense is no longer a particularly common concept in European music, whereas everyone trained in European music knows what a scale is.






          share|improve this answer

































            2














            Just a thought -
            It's common to use a different scale for a lead part then a key which the song is in.
            For example, take a blues progression in A major (A, D, E). When soloing over this, you would be typically using A minor scale to sound "bluesy".



            You can also be using a pentatonic scale to play over a progression, for example, playing C major pentatonic over a progression in C major key - which would be common in rock.






            share|improve this answer


























            • Thanks, Didn't know about that! (Probably because I have not done a lot of soloing yet :P)

              – lil' mathematician
              Jan 7 at 9:40



















            1














            Should have asked 'Which SCALE NOTES were you using?'



            Each major key has one 'set of notes' that constitutes it. A pool of notes, if you like. When put in order, low to high and vice versa, that's a scale. French word echelle sums it up - also meaning ladder. And, after all, we say 'scale a ladder'.



            But we never (rarely?) use the words key and scale as synonyms. It might work for majors, as it's the same pool for both, but with minors, it's impossible! And a scale presumes notes which are consecutive in the same octave. Ever heard of a scale using C2, D3, E5, F3, G4 etc..?






            share|improve this answer
























            • Music based on a minor scale is in fact said to be in a minor key (insert copious examples from classical music). The key signature is that of the relative major key, with accidentals for the melodic/harmonic minor alterations. C major music containing features like starting and ending on A, or containing G# accidentals is likely described as being in the key of A minor.

              – Kaz
              Jan 9 at 1:01



















            1














            Your teacher probably just made a mistake. I don't recall hearing talk about "playing a song in a scale", as if you could decide to play it in another scale. Doesn't make sense. It's "in a key".



            Edit: India mentioned. Nevermind this answer. What I said only applies to the narrow field of Western music I've been exposed to.






            share|improve this answer


























            • I thought so too, but the teacher seems too good to make a mistake; she has even aired live on television. Is there a different definition of scales in Indian classical music?

              – lil' mathematician
              Jan 7 at 8:58



















            1














            Music which uses the C major key signature (empty: no sharps or flats) can use a note other than C as the root of its tonality, thereby being based on a scale that is a mode of C major. It is then effectively in the key of that root note, not in the key of C.



            For example, music in the key of A which uses the Aeolian scale will use the C major key signature. Chords used in that music will be ones you see in C major music. Similar reasoning applies to music in G using the G Mixolydian scale, or music in D using the Dorian scale.



            Therefore, we can't assume that just because it superficially looks like C major, that it really is music "in C".



            If the chord progression goes like this: G F C G and the melody emphasizes the G note, such as by starting and ending on it, I would tend to say that the music is in the key of G, using the G Mixolydian scale (which, being a mode of C major can be written with an empty key signature).



            You have to analyze the musical structure of the song; how is it using the notes taken from C major? What notes are emphasized? Does the ending resolve to a particular note?



            The most important note to which the music gravitates likely gives us the key, and the scale is then the notes of that music arranged in order, starting from that note.






            share|improve this answer


























            • That A minor, G Mixolydian and D Dorian have the same key signature as C major does not mean that they have the same scale as C major. These are not "modes of C major" but relative modes of it. A minor is the relative minor of C major; D Dorian is the relative Dorian mode of C major. But they don't use the same scale as C major, even though they use the same set of pitch classes, because they have a different final note.

              – phoog
              Jan 8 at 16:26











            • @phoog I cannot find where I wrote that these modes are the same scale as C major; only that they are written in the C major key signature. I'm not aware that modes can be other than relative, so "relative mode" seems redundant; relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes. "Mode" (in the modern sense) means "same notes, but at an altered starting offset". C major can have a "relative minor" (unsurprisingly, based on a mode) or "parallel minor" (C minor) which is not a mode of C major. Similarly, C Mixolydian is a mode, but not of C major.

              – Kaz
              Jan 9 at 0:54













            • It's just as accurate to say that a piece in C major is written in the A-minor key signature. By "relative mode" I mean for example that F Dorian is the relative Dorian of E-flat major. There's nothing redundant in that statement. To say that "relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes" does not mean anything unless you explain what the mode is relative to. Saying that D Dorian is a mode "of C major" is bizarre. Can you point to any theorist who uses that terminology? Why not say that C major is a mode of D Dorian or of A minor?

              – phoog
              Jan 9 at 6:42








            • 1





              'Music 'in the key of C major' is fairly and squarely in the key of C major.. True, key sig of no # or b. But if it's rooted anywhere else but C, it's not in C major, even though the key sig. says C. The 1st para. is ambiguous. 2nd para - music in D Dorian isn't written in C major - it just happens to have the same key sig., as it's actually written in D Dorian - proof being home is D. 3rd para. 'in Mixolydian scale' - we don't write in scales, but in keys.

              – Tim
              Jan 9 at 7:59











            • @Tim: True; the paragraph should say "music apparently in the key of C major" (could be something else, just using that key signature). Re: " don't write in scales, but in keys." Also true; and music in a given key, like G, can in fact use various parallel scales rooted in G (not to mention chromatics, microtones, ...).

              – Kaz
              Jan 9 at 21:23













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "240"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78385%2fwhich-scale-a-song-is-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes








            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            7















            Then our music teacher comes, and asks in which SCALE we are playing the song.




            That's not usually the way people use the vocabulary. People talk about a song being 'in' a key, not 'in' a scale. Maybe she just made a brief slip of the tongue, or maybe she was assuming that what you were playing would be restricted to a particular scale for some reason, and was focusing the question towards that.




            Is there a different definition of scales in Indian classical music? (from your comment)




            There are definitely scales in Indian music that wouldn't relate strongly to the Western key system - so if she thought you might be using one of those, yes, that could be a reason for her phrasing.




            But now that I think of it, I had used the terms 'scale' and 'key' interchangeably, which obviously isn't very correct. A scale is a collection of notes, with specific intervals (for example, the Major Scale is made from the intervals R, Major 2nd, Major 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, Major 6th, Major 7th, Octave). But a KEY, is basically every note in the corresponding scale, counting notes that span MORE than a single octave. For example, the key of G Major contains the notes G, A, B, C, D, E, F#, but in every octave




            I don't think that's quite right. You could talk about a scale that spans more than one octave - it's just that Major scales are octave repeating, so we don't usually need to.



            I would say that the difference between a scale and a key is that a scale is a collection of notes, while a key is a more general description of the tonality of a piece. So you can have a piece in the key of C major that uses notes that are not in the scale of C major.



            Nevertheless, the two concepts are very closely related, at least when it comes to the major/minor system.




            Then what should I have said to the teacher?




            Nothing confrontational, of course - just smile and be polite :).






            share|improve this answer


























            • Thanks for the info, I didn't know that a scale can span more than an octave :P

              – lil' mathematician
              Jan 7 at 9:36











            • Also, "There are definitely scales in Indian music that wouldn't relate strongly to the Western key system - so if she thought you might be using one of those, yes, that could be a reason for her phrasing." Can you elaborate with an example that does not go too much into Indian classical music theory?

              – lil' mathematician
              Jan 7 at 9:37








            • 1





              @lil'mathematician I'm afraid I'm only basing that statement on Indian music I've heard - I don't have any theoretical knowledge of Indian music. It might be a great question to ask your teacher!

              – topo morto
              Jan 7 at 11:39


















            7















            Then our music teacher comes, and asks in which SCALE we are playing the song.




            That's not usually the way people use the vocabulary. People talk about a song being 'in' a key, not 'in' a scale. Maybe she just made a brief slip of the tongue, or maybe she was assuming that what you were playing would be restricted to a particular scale for some reason, and was focusing the question towards that.




            Is there a different definition of scales in Indian classical music? (from your comment)




            There are definitely scales in Indian music that wouldn't relate strongly to the Western key system - so if she thought you might be using one of those, yes, that could be a reason for her phrasing.




            But now that I think of it, I had used the terms 'scale' and 'key' interchangeably, which obviously isn't very correct. A scale is a collection of notes, with specific intervals (for example, the Major Scale is made from the intervals R, Major 2nd, Major 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, Major 6th, Major 7th, Octave). But a KEY, is basically every note in the corresponding scale, counting notes that span MORE than a single octave. For example, the key of G Major contains the notes G, A, B, C, D, E, F#, but in every octave




            I don't think that's quite right. You could talk about a scale that spans more than one octave - it's just that Major scales are octave repeating, so we don't usually need to.



            I would say that the difference between a scale and a key is that a scale is a collection of notes, while a key is a more general description of the tonality of a piece. So you can have a piece in the key of C major that uses notes that are not in the scale of C major.



            Nevertheless, the two concepts are very closely related, at least when it comes to the major/minor system.




            Then what should I have said to the teacher?




            Nothing confrontational, of course - just smile and be polite :).






            share|improve this answer


























            • Thanks for the info, I didn't know that a scale can span more than an octave :P

              – lil' mathematician
              Jan 7 at 9:36











            • Also, "There are definitely scales in Indian music that wouldn't relate strongly to the Western key system - so if she thought you might be using one of those, yes, that could be a reason for her phrasing." Can you elaborate with an example that does not go too much into Indian classical music theory?

              – lil' mathematician
              Jan 7 at 9:37








            • 1





              @lil'mathematician I'm afraid I'm only basing that statement on Indian music I've heard - I don't have any theoretical knowledge of Indian music. It might be a great question to ask your teacher!

              – topo morto
              Jan 7 at 11:39
















            7












            7








            7








            Then our music teacher comes, and asks in which SCALE we are playing the song.




            That's not usually the way people use the vocabulary. People talk about a song being 'in' a key, not 'in' a scale. Maybe she just made a brief slip of the tongue, or maybe she was assuming that what you were playing would be restricted to a particular scale for some reason, and was focusing the question towards that.




            Is there a different definition of scales in Indian classical music? (from your comment)




            There are definitely scales in Indian music that wouldn't relate strongly to the Western key system - so if she thought you might be using one of those, yes, that could be a reason for her phrasing.




            But now that I think of it, I had used the terms 'scale' and 'key' interchangeably, which obviously isn't very correct. A scale is a collection of notes, with specific intervals (for example, the Major Scale is made from the intervals R, Major 2nd, Major 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, Major 6th, Major 7th, Octave). But a KEY, is basically every note in the corresponding scale, counting notes that span MORE than a single octave. For example, the key of G Major contains the notes G, A, B, C, D, E, F#, but in every octave




            I don't think that's quite right. You could talk about a scale that spans more than one octave - it's just that Major scales are octave repeating, so we don't usually need to.



            I would say that the difference between a scale and a key is that a scale is a collection of notes, while a key is a more general description of the tonality of a piece. So you can have a piece in the key of C major that uses notes that are not in the scale of C major.



            Nevertheless, the two concepts are very closely related, at least when it comes to the major/minor system.




            Then what should I have said to the teacher?




            Nothing confrontational, of course - just smile and be polite :).






            share|improve this answer
















            Then our music teacher comes, and asks in which SCALE we are playing the song.




            That's not usually the way people use the vocabulary. People talk about a song being 'in' a key, not 'in' a scale. Maybe she just made a brief slip of the tongue, or maybe she was assuming that what you were playing would be restricted to a particular scale for some reason, and was focusing the question towards that.




            Is there a different definition of scales in Indian classical music? (from your comment)




            There are definitely scales in Indian music that wouldn't relate strongly to the Western key system - so if she thought you might be using one of those, yes, that could be a reason for her phrasing.




            But now that I think of it, I had used the terms 'scale' and 'key' interchangeably, which obviously isn't very correct. A scale is a collection of notes, with specific intervals (for example, the Major Scale is made from the intervals R, Major 2nd, Major 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, Major 6th, Major 7th, Octave). But a KEY, is basically every note in the corresponding scale, counting notes that span MORE than a single octave. For example, the key of G Major contains the notes G, A, B, C, D, E, F#, but in every octave




            I don't think that's quite right. You could talk about a scale that spans more than one octave - it's just that Major scales are octave repeating, so we don't usually need to.



            I would say that the difference between a scale and a key is that a scale is a collection of notes, while a key is a more general description of the tonality of a piece. So you can have a piece in the key of C major that uses notes that are not in the scale of C major.



            Nevertheless, the two concepts are very closely related, at least when it comes to the major/minor system.




            Then what should I have said to the teacher?




            Nothing confrontational, of course - just smile and be polite :).







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jan 7 at 9:28

























            answered Jan 7 at 9:11









            topo mortotopo morto

            23.9k24099




            23.9k24099













            • Thanks for the info, I didn't know that a scale can span more than an octave :P

              – lil' mathematician
              Jan 7 at 9:36











            • Also, "There are definitely scales in Indian music that wouldn't relate strongly to the Western key system - so if she thought you might be using one of those, yes, that could be a reason for her phrasing." Can you elaborate with an example that does not go too much into Indian classical music theory?

              – lil' mathematician
              Jan 7 at 9:37








            • 1





              @lil'mathematician I'm afraid I'm only basing that statement on Indian music I've heard - I don't have any theoretical knowledge of Indian music. It might be a great question to ask your teacher!

              – topo morto
              Jan 7 at 11:39





















            • Thanks for the info, I didn't know that a scale can span more than an octave :P

              – lil' mathematician
              Jan 7 at 9:36











            • Also, "There are definitely scales in Indian music that wouldn't relate strongly to the Western key system - so if she thought you might be using one of those, yes, that could be a reason for her phrasing." Can you elaborate with an example that does not go too much into Indian classical music theory?

              – lil' mathematician
              Jan 7 at 9:37








            • 1





              @lil'mathematician I'm afraid I'm only basing that statement on Indian music I've heard - I don't have any theoretical knowledge of Indian music. It might be a great question to ask your teacher!

              – topo morto
              Jan 7 at 11:39



















            Thanks for the info, I didn't know that a scale can span more than an octave :P

            – lil' mathematician
            Jan 7 at 9:36





            Thanks for the info, I didn't know that a scale can span more than an octave :P

            – lil' mathematician
            Jan 7 at 9:36













            Also, "There are definitely scales in Indian music that wouldn't relate strongly to the Western key system - so if she thought you might be using one of those, yes, that could be a reason for her phrasing." Can you elaborate with an example that does not go too much into Indian classical music theory?

            – lil' mathematician
            Jan 7 at 9:37







            Also, "There are definitely scales in Indian music that wouldn't relate strongly to the Western key system - so if she thought you might be using one of those, yes, that could be a reason for her phrasing." Can you elaborate with an example that does not go too much into Indian classical music theory?

            – lil' mathematician
            Jan 7 at 9:37






            1




            1





            @lil'mathematician I'm afraid I'm only basing that statement on Indian music I've heard - I don't have any theoretical knowledge of Indian music. It might be a great question to ask your teacher!

            – topo morto
            Jan 7 at 11:39







            @lil'mathematician I'm afraid I'm only basing that statement on Indian music I've heard - I don't have any theoretical knowledge of Indian music. It might be a great question to ask your teacher!

            – topo morto
            Jan 7 at 11:39













            3














            I suspect that this is a question of translation, probably more between musical systems than between languages. In Indian music, pieces are analyzed in terms of raga and thaat. These concepts are similar to European melodic modes, which nowadays are largely confined to two: major and minor, with some notable exceptions. (Formerly there were eight: Dorian, Phrygian, Lydian, and Mixolydian, plus the Hypo- variants of those four.)



            Because Indian music is analyzed according to concepts that can be (approximately) translated as scale, it seems natural for an Indian musician to ask about a piece's "scale" rather than its "key." For a native English speaker trained in European music, it's a bit odd to speak of a piece's scale instead of its key, but no more than a bit odd. There's no reason to think that "scale" in this sense means anything particularly different from "key."





            Additional discussion



            Two factors have led to the development of key from the melodic modes. One is the development of harmony, whereby the mode affects not only the pitches used in a melody, but also the pitches and therefore the chords available for harmonic use. Along with this came the development of tonality, whereby the eight modes more or less merged into the major and minor tonalities. (This led to the invention of the Ionian and Aeolean modes, along with their Hypo- variants, in the middle of the sixteenth century, but that theory didn't stick particularly well. The major/minor dichotomy prevailed instead.)



            The other element in the concept of key is the development of standardized pitches, whereby the pitch a is around 400 or 450 cycles per second (more recently around 440), and of the twelve-tone system, which allows pieces in any mode to be played on any starting pitch. It is no longer sufficient to say that a piece is "in the minor mode"; we must say that it is "in D minor" or "in F-sharp minor" or whatever else.



            So it seems that the Indian concept might be better translated as "(melodic) mode" rather than "scale," but mode in the medieval sense is no longer a particularly common concept in European music, whereas everyone trained in European music knows what a scale is.






            share|improve this answer






























              3














              I suspect that this is a question of translation, probably more between musical systems than between languages. In Indian music, pieces are analyzed in terms of raga and thaat. These concepts are similar to European melodic modes, which nowadays are largely confined to two: major and minor, with some notable exceptions. (Formerly there were eight: Dorian, Phrygian, Lydian, and Mixolydian, plus the Hypo- variants of those four.)



              Because Indian music is analyzed according to concepts that can be (approximately) translated as scale, it seems natural for an Indian musician to ask about a piece's "scale" rather than its "key." For a native English speaker trained in European music, it's a bit odd to speak of a piece's scale instead of its key, but no more than a bit odd. There's no reason to think that "scale" in this sense means anything particularly different from "key."





              Additional discussion



              Two factors have led to the development of key from the melodic modes. One is the development of harmony, whereby the mode affects not only the pitches used in a melody, but also the pitches and therefore the chords available for harmonic use. Along with this came the development of tonality, whereby the eight modes more or less merged into the major and minor tonalities. (This led to the invention of the Ionian and Aeolean modes, along with their Hypo- variants, in the middle of the sixteenth century, but that theory didn't stick particularly well. The major/minor dichotomy prevailed instead.)



              The other element in the concept of key is the development of standardized pitches, whereby the pitch a is around 400 or 450 cycles per second (more recently around 440), and of the twelve-tone system, which allows pieces in any mode to be played on any starting pitch. It is no longer sufficient to say that a piece is "in the minor mode"; we must say that it is "in D minor" or "in F-sharp minor" or whatever else.



              So it seems that the Indian concept might be better translated as "(melodic) mode" rather than "scale," but mode in the medieval sense is no longer a particularly common concept in European music, whereas everyone trained in European music knows what a scale is.






              share|improve this answer




























                3












                3








                3







                I suspect that this is a question of translation, probably more between musical systems than between languages. In Indian music, pieces are analyzed in terms of raga and thaat. These concepts are similar to European melodic modes, which nowadays are largely confined to two: major and minor, with some notable exceptions. (Formerly there were eight: Dorian, Phrygian, Lydian, and Mixolydian, plus the Hypo- variants of those four.)



                Because Indian music is analyzed according to concepts that can be (approximately) translated as scale, it seems natural for an Indian musician to ask about a piece's "scale" rather than its "key." For a native English speaker trained in European music, it's a bit odd to speak of a piece's scale instead of its key, but no more than a bit odd. There's no reason to think that "scale" in this sense means anything particularly different from "key."





                Additional discussion



                Two factors have led to the development of key from the melodic modes. One is the development of harmony, whereby the mode affects not only the pitches used in a melody, but also the pitches and therefore the chords available for harmonic use. Along with this came the development of tonality, whereby the eight modes more or less merged into the major and minor tonalities. (This led to the invention of the Ionian and Aeolean modes, along with their Hypo- variants, in the middle of the sixteenth century, but that theory didn't stick particularly well. The major/minor dichotomy prevailed instead.)



                The other element in the concept of key is the development of standardized pitches, whereby the pitch a is around 400 or 450 cycles per second (more recently around 440), and of the twelve-tone system, which allows pieces in any mode to be played on any starting pitch. It is no longer sufficient to say that a piece is "in the minor mode"; we must say that it is "in D minor" or "in F-sharp minor" or whatever else.



                So it seems that the Indian concept might be better translated as "(melodic) mode" rather than "scale," but mode in the medieval sense is no longer a particularly common concept in European music, whereas everyone trained in European music knows what a scale is.






                share|improve this answer















                I suspect that this is a question of translation, probably more between musical systems than between languages. In Indian music, pieces are analyzed in terms of raga and thaat. These concepts are similar to European melodic modes, which nowadays are largely confined to two: major and minor, with some notable exceptions. (Formerly there were eight: Dorian, Phrygian, Lydian, and Mixolydian, plus the Hypo- variants of those four.)



                Because Indian music is analyzed according to concepts that can be (approximately) translated as scale, it seems natural for an Indian musician to ask about a piece's "scale" rather than its "key." For a native English speaker trained in European music, it's a bit odd to speak of a piece's scale instead of its key, but no more than a bit odd. There's no reason to think that "scale" in this sense means anything particularly different from "key."





                Additional discussion



                Two factors have led to the development of key from the melodic modes. One is the development of harmony, whereby the mode affects not only the pitches used in a melody, but also the pitches and therefore the chords available for harmonic use. Along with this came the development of tonality, whereby the eight modes more or less merged into the major and minor tonalities. (This led to the invention of the Ionian and Aeolean modes, along with their Hypo- variants, in the middle of the sixteenth century, but that theory didn't stick particularly well. The major/minor dichotomy prevailed instead.)



                The other element in the concept of key is the development of standardized pitches, whereby the pitch a is around 400 or 450 cycles per second (more recently around 440), and of the twelve-tone system, which allows pieces in any mode to be played on any starting pitch. It is no longer sufficient to say that a piece is "in the minor mode"; we must say that it is "in D minor" or "in F-sharp minor" or whatever else.



                So it seems that the Indian concept might be better translated as "(melodic) mode" rather than "scale," but mode in the medieval sense is no longer a particularly common concept in European music, whereas everyone trained in European music knows what a scale is.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Jan 7 at 20:35

























                answered Jan 7 at 17:26









                phoogphoog

                52827




                52827























                    2














                    Just a thought -
                    It's common to use a different scale for a lead part then a key which the song is in.
                    For example, take a blues progression in A major (A, D, E). When soloing over this, you would be typically using A minor scale to sound "bluesy".



                    You can also be using a pentatonic scale to play over a progression, for example, playing C major pentatonic over a progression in C major key - which would be common in rock.






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • Thanks, Didn't know about that! (Probably because I have not done a lot of soloing yet :P)

                      – lil' mathematician
                      Jan 7 at 9:40
















                    2














                    Just a thought -
                    It's common to use a different scale for a lead part then a key which the song is in.
                    For example, take a blues progression in A major (A, D, E). When soloing over this, you would be typically using A minor scale to sound "bluesy".



                    You can also be using a pentatonic scale to play over a progression, for example, playing C major pentatonic over a progression in C major key - which would be common in rock.






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • Thanks, Didn't know about that! (Probably because I have not done a lot of soloing yet :P)

                      – lil' mathematician
                      Jan 7 at 9:40














                    2












                    2








                    2







                    Just a thought -
                    It's common to use a different scale for a lead part then a key which the song is in.
                    For example, take a blues progression in A major (A, D, E). When soloing over this, you would be typically using A minor scale to sound "bluesy".



                    You can also be using a pentatonic scale to play over a progression, for example, playing C major pentatonic over a progression in C major key - which would be common in rock.






                    share|improve this answer















                    Just a thought -
                    It's common to use a different scale for a lead part then a key which the song is in.
                    For example, take a blues progression in A major (A, D, E). When soloing over this, you would be typically using A minor scale to sound "bluesy".



                    You can also be using a pentatonic scale to play over a progression, for example, playing C major pentatonic over a progression in C major key - which would be common in rock.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Jan 8 at 12:09

























                    answered Jan 7 at 9:08









                    Vojtěch ŠalbabaVojtěch Šalbaba

                    194




                    194













                    • Thanks, Didn't know about that! (Probably because I have not done a lot of soloing yet :P)

                      – lil' mathematician
                      Jan 7 at 9:40



















                    • Thanks, Didn't know about that! (Probably because I have not done a lot of soloing yet :P)

                      – lil' mathematician
                      Jan 7 at 9:40

















                    Thanks, Didn't know about that! (Probably because I have not done a lot of soloing yet :P)

                    – lil' mathematician
                    Jan 7 at 9:40





                    Thanks, Didn't know about that! (Probably because I have not done a lot of soloing yet :P)

                    – lil' mathematician
                    Jan 7 at 9:40











                    1














                    Should have asked 'Which SCALE NOTES were you using?'



                    Each major key has one 'set of notes' that constitutes it. A pool of notes, if you like. When put in order, low to high and vice versa, that's a scale. French word echelle sums it up - also meaning ladder. And, after all, we say 'scale a ladder'.



                    But we never (rarely?) use the words key and scale as synonyms. It might work for majors, as it's the same pool for both, but with minors, it's impossible! And a scale presumes notes which are consecutive in the same octave. Ever heard of a scale using C2, D3, E5, F3, G4 etc..?






                    share|improve this answer
























                    • Music based on a minor scale is in fact said to be in a minor key (insert copious examples from classical music). The key signature is that of the relative major key, with accidentals for the melodic/harmonic minor alterations. C major music containing features like starting and ending on A, or containing G# accidentals is likely described as being in the key of A minor.

                      – Kaz
                      Jan 9 at 1:01
















                    1














                    Should have asked 'Which SCALE NOTES were you using?'



                    Each major key has one 'set of notes' that constitutes it. A pool of notes, if you like. When put in order, low to high and vice versa, that's a scale. French word echelle sums it up - also meaning ladder. And, after all, we say 'scale a ladder'.



                    But we never (rarely?) use the words key and scale as synonyms. It might work for majors, as it's the same pool for both, but with minors, it's impossible! And a scale presumes notes which are consecutive in the same octave. Ever heard of a scale using C2, D3, E5, F3, G4 etc..?






                    share|improve this answer
























                    • Music based on a minor scale is in fact said to be in a minor key (insert copious examples from classical music). The key signature is that of the relative major key, with accidentals for the melodic/harmonic minor alterations. C major music containing features like starting and ending on A, or containing G# accidentals is likely described as being in the key of A minor.

                      – Kaz
                      Jan 9 at 1:01














                    1












                    1








                    1







                    Should have asked 'Which SCALE NOTES were you using?'



                    Each major key has one 'set of notes' that constitutes it. A pool of notes, if you like. When put in order, low to high and vice versa, that's a scale. French word echelle sums it up - also meaning ladder. And, after all, we say 'scale a ladder'.



                    But we never (rarely?) use the words key and scale as synonyms. It might work for majors, as it's the same pool for both, but with minors, it's impossible! And a scale presumes notes which are consecutive in the same octave. Ever heard of a scale using C2, D3, E5, F3, G4 etc..?






                    share|improve this answer













                    Should have asked 'Which SCALE NOTES were you using?'



                    Each major key has one 'set of notes' that constitutes it. A pool of notes, if you like. When put in order, low to high and vice versa, that's a scale. French word echelle sums it up - also meaning ladder. And, after all, we say 'scale a ladder'.



                    But we never (rarely?) use the words key and scale as synonyms. It might work for majors, as it's the same pool for both, but with minors, it's impossible! And a scale presumes notes which are consecutive in the same octave. Ever heard of a scale using C2, D3, E5, F3, G4 etc..?







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 7 at 9:03









                    TimTim

                    98.1k10100252




                    98.1k10100252













                    • Music based on a minor scale is in fact said to be in a minor key (insert copious examples from classical music). The key signature is that of the relative major key, with accidentals for the melodic/harmonic minor alterations. C major music containing features like starting and ending on A, or containing G# accidentals is likely described as being in the key of A minor.

                      – Kaz
                      Jan 9 at 1:01



















                    • Music based on a minor scale is in fact said to be in a minor key (insert copious examples from classical music). The key signature is that of the relative major key, with accidentals for the melodic/harmonic minor alterations. C major music containing features like starting and ending on A, or containing G# accidentals is likely described as being in the key of A minor.

                      – Kaz
                      Jan 9 at 1:01

















                    Music based on a minor scale is in fact said to be in a minor key (insert copious examples from classical music). The key signature is that of the relative major key, with accidentals for the melodic/harmonic minor alterations. C major music containing features like starting and ending on A, or containing G# accidentals is likely described as being in the key of A minor.

                    – Kaz
                    Jan 9 at 1:01





                    Music based on a minor scale is in fact said to be in a minor key (insert copious examples from classical music). The key signature is that of the relative major key, with accidentals for the melodic/harmonic minor alterations. C major music containing features like starting and ending on A, or containing G# accidentals is likely described as being in the key of A minor.

                    – Kaz
                    Jan 9 at 1:01











                    1














                    Your teacher probably just made a mistake. I don't recall hearing talk about "playing a song in a scale", as if you could decide to play it in another scale. Doesn't make sense. It's "in a key".



                    Edit: India mentioned. Nevermind this answer. What I said only applies to the narrow field of Western music I've been exposed to.






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • I thought so too, but the teacher seems too good to make a mistake; she has even aired live on television. Is there a different definition of scales in Indian classical music?

                      – lil' mathematician
                      Jan 7 at 8:58
















                    1














                    Your teacher probably just made a mistake. I don't recall hearing talk about "playing a song in a scale", as if you could decide to play it in another scale. Doesn't make sense. It's "in a key".



                    Edit: India mentioned. Nevermind this answer. What I said only applies to the narrow field of Western music I've been exposed to.






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • I thought so too, but the teacher seems too good to make a mistake; she has even aired live on television. Is there a different definition of scales in Indian classical music?

                      – lil' mathematician
                      Jan 7 at 8:58














                    1












                    1








                    1







                    Your teacher probably just made a mistake. I don't recall hearing talk about "playing a song in a scale", as if you could decide to play it in another scale. Doesn't make sense. It's "in a key".



                    Edit: India mentioned. Nevermind this answer. What I said only applies to the narrow field of Western music I've been exposed to.






                    share|improve this answer















                    Your teacher probably just made a mistake. I don't recall hearing talk about "playing a song in a scale", as if you could decide to play it in another scale. Doesn't make sense. It's "in a key".



                    Edit: India mentioned. Nevermind this answer. What I said only applies to the narrow field of Western music I've been exposed to.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Jan 7 at 9:19

























                    answered Jan 7 at 8:53









                    piiperipiiperi

                    7637




                    7637













                    • I thought so too, but the teacher seems too good to make a mistake; she has even aired live on television. Is there a different definition of scales in Indian classical music?

                      – lil' mathematician
                      Jan 7 at 8:58



















                    • I thought so too, but the teacher seems too good to make a mistake; she has even aired live on television. Is there a different definition of scales in Indian classical music?

                      – lil' mathematician
                      Jan 7 at 8:58

















                    I thought so too, but the teacher seems too good to make a mistake; she has even aired live on television. Is there a different definition of scales in Indian classical music?

                    – lil' mathematician
                    Jan 7 at 8:58





                    I thought so too, but the teacher seems too good to make a mistake; she has even aired live on television. Is there a different definition of scales in Indian classical music?

                    – lil' mathematician
                    Jan 7 at 8:58











                    1














                    Music which uses the C major key signature (empty: no sharps or flats) can use a note other than C as the root of its tonality, thereby being based on a scale that is a mode of C major. It is then effectively in the key of that root note, not in the key of C.



                    For example, music in the key of A which uses the Aeolian scale will use the C major key signature. Chords used in that music will be ones you see in C major music. Similar reasoning applies to music in G using the G Mixolydian scale, or music in D using the Dorian scale.



                    Therefore, we can't assume that just because it superficially looks like C major, that it really is music "in C".



                    If the chord progression goes like this: G F C G and the melody emphasizes the G note, such as by starting and ending on it, I would tend to say that the music is in the key of G, using the G Mixolydian scale (which, being a mode of C major can be written with an empty key signature).



                    You have to analyze the musical structure of the song; how is it using the notes taken from C major? What notes are emphasized? Does the ending resolve to a particular note?



                    The most important note to which the music gravitates likely gives us the key, and the scale is then the notes of that music arranged in order, starting from that note.






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • That A minor, G Mixolydian and D Dorian have the same key signature as C major does not mean that they have the same scale as C major. These are not "modes of C major" but relative modes of it. A minor is the relative minor of C major; D Dorian is the relative Dorian mode of C major. But they don't use the same scale as C major, even though they use the same set of pitch classes, because they have a different final note.

                      – phoog
                      Jan 8 at 16:26











                    • @phoog I cannot find where I wrote that these modes are the same scale as C major; only that they are written in the C major key signature. I'm not aware that modes can be other than relative, so "relative mode" seems redundant; relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes. "Mode" (in the modern sense) means "same notes, but at an altered starting offset". C major can have a "relative minor" (unsurprisingly, based on a mode) or "parallel minor" (C minor) which is not a mode of C major. Similarly, C Mixolydian is a mode, but not of C major.

                      – Kaz
                      Jan 9 at 0:54













                    • It's just as accurate to say that a piece in C major is written in the A-minor key signature. By "relative mode" I mean for example that F Dorian is the relative Dorian of E-flat major. There's nothing redundant in that statement. To say that "relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes" does not mean anything unless you explain what the mode is relative to. Saying that D Dorian is a mode "of C major" is bizarre. Can you point to any theorist who uses that terminology? Why not say that C major is a mode of D Dorian or of A minor?

                      – phoog
                      Jan 9 at 6:42








                    • 1





                      'Music 'in the key of C major' is fairly and squarely in the key of C major.. True, key sig of no # or b. But if it's rooted anywhere else but C, it's not in C major, even though the key sig. says C. The 1st para. is ambiguous. 2nd para - music in D Dorian isn't written in C major - it just happens to have the same key sig., as it's actually written in D Dorian - proof being home is D. 3rd para. 'in Mixolydian scale' - we don't write in scales, but in keys.

                      – Tim
                      Jan 9 at 7:59











                    • @Tim: True; the paragraph should say "music apparently in the key of C major" (could be something else, just using that key signature). Re: " don't write in scales, but in keys." Also true; and music in a given key, like G, can in fact use various parallel scales rooted in G (not to mention chromatics, microtones, ...).

                      – Kaz
                      Jan 9 at 21:23


















                    1














                    Music which uses the C major key signature (empty: no sharps or flats) can use a note other than C as the root of its tonality, thereby being based on a scale that is a mode of C major. It is then effectively in the key of that root note, not in the key of C.



                    For example, music in the key of A which uses the Aeolian scale will use the C major key signature. Chords used in that music will be ones you see in C major music. Similar reasoning applies to music in G using the G Mixolydian scale, or music in D using the Dorian scale.



                    Therefore, we can't assume that just because it superficially looks like C major, that it really is music "in C".



                    If the chord progression goes like this: G F C G and the melody emphasizes the G note, such as by starting and ending on it, I would tend to say that the music is in the key of G, using the G Mixolydian scale (which, being a mode of C major can be written with an empty key signature).



                    You have to analyze the musical structure of the song; how is it using the notes taken from C major? What notes are emphasized? Does the ending resolve to a particular note?



                    The most important note to which the music gravitates likely gives us the key, and the scale is then the notes of that music arranged in order, starting from that note.






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • That A minor, G Mixolydian and D Dorian have the same key signature as C major does not mean that they have the same scale as C major. These are not "modes of C major" but relative modes of it. A minor is the relative minor of C major; D Dorian is the relative Dorian mode of C major. But they don't use the same scale as C major, even though they use the same set of pitch classes, because they have a different final note.

                      – phoog
                      Jan 8 at 16:26











                    • @phoog I cannot find where I wrote that these modes are the same scale as C major; only that they are written in the C major key signature. I'm not aware that modes can be other than relative, so "relative mode" seems redundant; relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes. "Mode" (in the modern sense) means "same notes, but at an altered starting offset". C major can have a "relative minor" (unsurprisingly, based on a mode) or "parallel minor" (C minor) which is not a mode of C major. Similarly, C Mixolydian is a mode, but not of C major.

                      – Kaz
                      Jan 9 at 0:54













                    • It's just as accurate to say that a piece in C major is written in the A-minor key signature. By "relative mode" I mean for example that F Dorian is the relative Dorian of E-flat major. There's nothing redundant in that statement. To say that "relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes" does not mean anything unless you explain what the mode is relative to. Saying that D Dorian is a mode "of C major" is bizarre. Can you point to any theorist who uses that terminology? Why not say that C major is a mode of D Dorian or of A minor?

                      – phoog
                      Jan 9 at 6:42








                    • 1





                      'Music 'in the key of C major' is fairly and squarely in the key of C major.. True, key sig of no # or b. But if it's rooted anywhere else but C, it's not in C major, even though the key sig. says C. The 1st para. is ambiguous. 2nd para - music in D Dorian isn't written in C major - it just happens to have the same key sig., as it's actually written in D Dorian - proof being home is D. 3rd para. 'in Mixolydian scale' - we don't write in scales, but in keys.

                      – Tim
                      Jan 9 at 7:59











                    • @Tim: True; the paragraph should say "music apparently in the key of C major" (could be something else, just using that key signature). Re: " don't write in scales, but in keys." Also true; and music in a given key, like G, can in fact use various parallel scales rooted in G (not to mention chromatics, microtones, ...).

                      – Kaz
                      Jan 9 at 21:23
















                    1












                    1








                    1







                    Music which uses the C major key signature (empty: no sharps or flats) can use a note other than C as the root of its tonality, thereby being based on a scale that is a mode of C major. It is then effectively in the key of that root note, not in the key of C.



                    For example, music in the key of A which uses the Aeolian scale will use the C major key signature. Chords used in that music will be ones you see in C major music. Similar reasoning applies to music in G using the G Mixolydian scale, or music in D using the Dorian scale.



                    Therefore, we can't assume that just because it superficially looks like C major, that it really is music "in C".



                    If the chord progression goes like this: G F C G and the melody emphasizes the G note, such as by starting and ending on it, I would tend to say that the music is in the key of G, using the G Mixolydian scale (which, being a mode of C major can be written with an empty key signature).



                    You have to analyze the musical structure of the song; how is it using the notes taken from C major? What notes are emphasized? Does the ending resolve to a particular note?



                    The most important note to which the music gravitates likely gives us the key, and the scale is then the notes of that music arranged in order, starting from that note.






                    share|improve this answer















                    Music which uses the C major key signature (empty: no sharps or flats) can use a note other than C as the root of its tonality, thereby being based on a scale that is a mode of C major. It is then effectively in the key of that root note, not in the key of C.



                    For example, music in the key of A which uses the Aeolian scale will use the C major key signature. Chords used in that music will be ones you see in C major music. Similar reasoning applies to music in G using the G Mixolydian scale, or music in D using the Dorian scale.



                    Therefore, we can't assume that just because it superficially looks like C major, that it really is music "in C".



                    If the chord progression goes like this: G F C G and the melody emphasizes the G note, such as by starting and ending on it, I would tend to say that the music is in the key of G, using the G Mixolydian scale (which, being a mode of C major can be written with an empty key signature).



                    You have to analyze the musical structure of the song; how is it using the notes taken from C major? What notes are emphasized? Does the ending resolve to a particular note?



                    The most important note to which the music gravitates likely gives us the key, and the scale is then the notes of that music arranged in order, starting from that note.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Jan 9 at 21:36

























                    answered Jan 8 at 14:41









                    KazKaz

                    2,439119




                    2,439119













                    • That A minor, G Mixolydian and D Dorian have the same key signature as C major does not mean that they have the same scale as C major. These are not "modes of C major" but relative modes of it. A minor is the relative minor of C major; D Dorian is the relative Dorian mode of C major. But they don't use the same scale as C major, even though they use the same set of pitch classes, because they have a different final note.

                      – phoog
                      Jan 8 at 16:26











                    • @phoog I cannot find where I wrote that these modes are the same scale as C major; only that they are written in the C major key signature. I'm not aware that modes can be other than relative, so "relative mode" seems redundant; relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes. "Mode" (in the modern sense) means "same notes, but at an altered starting offset". C major can have a "relative minor" (unsurprisingly, based on a mode) or "parallel minor" (C minor) which is not a mode of C major. Similarly, C Mixolydian is a mode, but not of C major.

                      – Kaz
                      Jan 9 at 0:54













                    • It's just as accurate to say that a piece in C major is written in the A-minor key signature. By "relative mode" I mean for example that F Dorian is the relative Dorian of E-flat major. There's nothing redundant in that statement. To say that "relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes" does not mean anything unless you explain what the mode is relative to. Saying that D Dorian is a mode "of C major" is bizarre. Can you point to any theorist who uses that terminology? Why not say that C major is a mode of D Dorian or of A minor?

                      – phoog
                      Jan 9 at 6:42








                    • 1





                      'Music 'in the key of C major' is fairly and squarely in the key of C major.. True, key sig of no # or b. But if it's rooted anywhere else but C, it's not in C major, even though the key sig. says C. The 1st para. is ambiguous. 2nd para - music in D Dorian isn't written in C major - it just happens to have the same key sig., as it's actually written in D Dorian - proof being home is D. 3rd para. 'in Mixolydian scale' - we don't write in scales, but in keys.

                      – Tim
                      Jan 9 at 7:59











                    • @Tim: True; the paragraph should say "music apparently in the key of C major" (could be something else, just using that key signature). Re: " don't write in scales, but in keys." Also true; and music in a given key, like G, can in fact use various parallel scales rooted in G (not to mention chromatics, microtones, ...).

                      – Kaz
                      Jan 9 at 21:23





















                    • That A minor, G Mixolydian and D Dorian have the same key signature as C major does not mean that they have the same scale as C major. These are not "modes of C major" but relative modes of it. A minor is the relative minor of C major; D Dorian is the relative Dorian mode of C major. But they don't use the same scale as C major, even though they use the same set of pitch classes, because they have a different final note.

                      – phoog
                      Jan 8 at 16:26











                    • @phoog I cannot find where I wrote that these modes are the same scale as C major; only that they are written in the C major key signature. I'm not aware that modes can be other than relative, so "relative mode" seems redundant; relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes. "Mode" (in the modern sense) means "same notes, but at an altered starting offset". C major can have a "relative minor" (unsurprisingly, based on a mode) or "parallel minor" (C minor) which is not a mode of C major. Similarly, C Mixolydian is a mode, but not of C major.

                      – Kaz
                      Jan 9 at 0:54













                    • It's just as accurate to say that a piece in C major is written in the A-minor key signature. By "relative mode" I mean for example that F Dorian is the relative Dorian of E-flat major. There's nothing redundant in that statement. To say that "relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes" does not mean anything unless you explain what the mode is relative to. Saying that D Dorian is a mode "of C major" is bizarre. Can you point to any theorist who uses that terminology? Why not say that C major is a mode of D Dorian or of A minor?

                      – phoog
                      Jan 9 at 6:42








                    • 1





                      'Music 'in the key of C major' is fairly and squarely in the key of C major.. True, key sig of no # or b. But if it's rooted anywhere else but C, it's not in C major, even though the key sig. says C. The 1st para. is ambiguous. 2nd para - music in D Dorian isn't written in C major - it just happens to have the same key sig., as it's actually written in D Dorian - proof being home is D. 3rd para. 'in Mixolydian scale' - we don't write in scales, but in keys.

                      – Tim
                      Jan 9 at 7:59











                    • @Tim: True; the paragraph should say "music apparently in the key of C major" (could be something else, just using that key signature). Re: " don't write in scales, but in keys." Also true; and music in a given key, like G, can in fact use various parallel scales rooted in G (not to mention chromatics, microtones, ...).

                      – Kaz
                      Jan 9 at 21:23



















                    That A minor, G Mixolydian and D Dorian have the same key signature as C major does not mean that they have the same scale as C major. These are not "modes of C major" but relative modes of it. A minor is the relative minor of C major; D Dorian is the relative Dorian mode of C major. But they don't use the same scale as C major, even though they use the same set of pitch classes, because they have a different final note.

                    – phoog
                    Jan 8 at 16:26





                    That A minor, G Mixolydian and D Dorian have the same key signature as C major does not mean that they have the same scale as C major. These are not "modes of C major" but relative modes of it. A minor is the relative minor of C major; D Dorian is the relative Dorian mode of C major. But they don't use the same scale as C major, even though they use the same set of pitch classes, because they have a different final note.

                    – phoog
                    Jan 8 at 16:26













                    @phoog I cannot find where I wrote that these modes are the same scale as C major; only that they are written in the C major key signature. I'm not aware that modes can be other than relative, so "relative mode" seems redundant; relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes. "Mode" (in the modern sense) means "same notes, but at an altered starting offset". C major can have a "relative minor" (unsurprisingly, based on a mode) or "parallel minor" (C minor) which is not a mode of C major. Similarly, C Mixolydian is a mode, but not of C major.

                    – Kaz
                    Jan 9 at 0:54







                    @phoog I cannot find where I wrote that these modes are the same scale as C major; only that they are written in the C major key signature. I'm not aware that modes can be other than relative, so "relative mode" seems redundant; relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes. "Mode" (in the modern sense) means "same notes, but at an altered starting offset". C major can have a "relative minor" (unsurprisingly, based on a mode) or "parallel minor" (C minor) which is not a mode of C major. Similarly, C Mixolydian is a mode, but not of C major.

                    – Kaz
                    Jan 9 at 0:54















                    It's just as accurate to say that a piece in C major is written in the A-minor key signature. By "relative mode" I mean for example that F Dorian is the relative Dorian of E-flat major. There's nothing redundant in that statement. To say that "relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes" does not mean anything unless you explain what the mode is relative to. Saying that D Dorian is a mode "of C major" is bizarre. Can you point to any theorist who uses that terminology? Why not say that C major is a mode of D Dorian or of A minor?

                    – phoog
                    Jan 9 at 6:42







                    It's just as accurate to say that a piece in C major is written in the A-minor key signature. By "relative mode" I mean for example that F Dorian is the relative Dorian of E-flat major. There's nothing redundant in that statement. To say that "relativeness is the defining characteristic of modes" does not mean anything unless you explain what the mode is relative to. Saying that D Dorian is a mode "of C major" is bizarre. Can you point to any theorist who uses that terminology? Why not say that C major is a mode of D Dorian or of A minor?

                    – phoog
                    Jan 9 at 6:42






                    1




                    1





                    'Music 'in the key of C major' is fairly and squarely in the key of C major.. True, key sig of no # or b. But if it's rooted anywhere else but C, it's not in C major, even though the key sig. says C. The 1st para. is ambiguous. 2nd para - music in D Dorian isn't written in C major - it just happens to have the same key sig., as it's actually written in D Dorian - proof being home is D. 3rd para. 'in Mixolydian scale' - we don't write in scales, but in keys.

                    – Tim
                    Jan 9 at 7:59





                    'Music 'in the key of C major' is fairly and squarely in the key of C major.. True, key sig of no # or b. But if it's rooted anywhere else but C, it's not in C major, even though the key sig. says C. The 1st para. is ambiguous. 2nd para - music in D Dorian isn't written in C major - it just happens to have the same key sig., as it's actually written in D Dorian - proof being home is D. 3rd para. 'in Mixolydian scale' - we don't write in scales, but in keys.

                    – Tim
                    Jan 9 at 7:59













                    @Tim: True; the paragraph should say "music apparently in the key of C major" (could be something else, just using that key signature). Re: " don't write in scales, but in keys." Also true; and music in a given key, like G, can in fact use various parallel scales rooted in G (not to mention chromatics, microtones, ...).

                    – Kaz
                    Jan 9 at 21:23







                    @Tim: True; the paragraph should say "music apparently in the key of C major" (could be something else, just using that key signature). Re: " don't write in scales, but in keys." Also true; and music in a given key, like G, can in fact use various parallel scales rooted in G (not to mention chromatics, microtones, ...).

                    – Kaz
                    Jan 9 at 21:23




















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78385%2fwhich-scale-a-song-is-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Human spaceflight

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                    張江高科駅